ironstone

Steve Bannon got arrested for ignoring a subpoena. Trump's family members got subpoenas too...they showed up and testified. But then none of these people have the kind of protection that Hunter clearly has.

Ummm..yes it clearly is just that.

Is the law different for Democrats? They can refuse subpoenas and dictate where and when they they testify, or not? You missed the part where Hunter scurried off without taking questions. The narrative went from 'Joe was never involved with any of Hunter's business dealings' to 'my father was never FINANCIALLY involved in my business deals'. Did you catch that...

It will probably be more successful than CNN+

The grievance industry is extremely lucrative. And we always end up caving in to those demands. It will never end either.

I was of the opinion that mail-in ballots were used much more by the Democrats than the Republicans. Democrats took a risk to push mail-in voting. It paid off | US elections 2020 | The Guardian So is it not logical to assume that most of these people admitting to and knowing about others committing fraud would be Democrats?

I'm sure Trump will be talking about this particular poll from Rasmussen. Quite interesting. Heartland/Rasmussen Poll: One-in-Five Mail-In Voters Admit to Committing at Least One Kind of Voter Fraud During 2020 Election (yahoo.com) A new poll by The Heartland Institute and Rasmussen Reports found one-in-five voters who cast mail-in ballots during the 2020 presidential election admit to participating in at least one kind of voter fraud. When asked, “During the 2020 election, did you fill out a ballot, in part or in full, on behalf of a friend or family member, such as a spouse or child?”, 21% of respondents who said they voted by mail answered “yes.” (Filling out a ballot for someone else is illegal in all states, although many states allow people to assist others with voting.)

Hunter ignores the congressional subpoena and makes a show with a brief press conference(but refuses to take questions). Will he face the same consequences as Steve Bannon or Peter Navarro? Navarro was arrested by the FBI and placed in shackles. If I had to bet, I would say Hunter won't be subjected to the same thing. But what did dad Joe have to say on the subject of someone defying a government subpoena? "I hope that the committee goes after them and holds them accountable criminally," President Biden said. Biden says DOJ should prosecute those who defy January 6 committee subpoenas | CNN Politics

I was going to say that the whole world has gone mad, but it's more accurate to say that is mostly due to the progressives.

No, the media is that bad. And they have failed to adapt with the times. Giving them more money is no guarantee that they will attract more readers/viewers either.

So you allegedly went there for the purpose of taking a verbal shot at Elon Musk? You do realize that he'll never hear of this groundbreaking moment do you?

Translation: You categorically reject any and all evidence that doesn't fit the established media narrative in this case. A huge issue in this case was the restraint of Floyd by Chauvin. The defense team said the technique was taught to all officers. The police chief at the time said under oath, that he knew absolutely nothing about this procedure. In the film, various former Minneapolis police officers all stated that that particular technique was indeed part of their training. Chauvin's mother pulled out her son's actual training manuals, and right there is a photo of that exact restraint technique. This alone is a pretty significant fact and a hole in the prosecutions case. Not to mention the false racism angle. Chauvin did not get a fair trial.

So did you watch the entire trial?

The film came out after the appeal. And I hope you're not implying that the courts are incapable of getting things wrong.

New film provides truth in the face of George Floyd lies (nypost.com) The original autopsy report, the day after Floyd died: The original autopsy report by Hennepin County Medical Examiner Dr. Andrew Baker the day after Floyd died found there was “no physical evidence suggesting that Mr. Floyd died of asphyxiation. “Mr. Floyd did not exhibit signs of petechiae, damage to his airways or thyroid, brain bleeding, bone injuries, or internal bruising.” Sweasy claims that Baker also told her that day that “there were no medical findings that showed any injury to the vital structures of Mr. Floyd’s neck. There were no medical indications of asphyxia or strangulation.” In sworn testimony, prosecutors told of the “insane … extreme premium pressure” they were under to throw the book at Chauvin and charge the other cops because “the city was burning down.” Floyd also had COVID and severe “arteriosclerotic heart disease,” with one artery 75% obstructed, and “hypertensive heart disease.” But Ben Crump, the ambulance-chasing attorney who represented the Floyd family and secured them a $27 million payout from the Minneapolis City Council, told the media: “George Floyd was a healthy young man.” The private forensic pathologist he hired, Dr. Michael Baden, declared, without seeing Floyd’s body or slides of the autopsy, that “there was no underlying medical problem that caused or contributed to his death.” The documentary says the FBI met with Baker after Baden’s review and soon after the official autopsy report was changed to find Chauvin was to blame. Floyd’s cause of death had become “cardiopulmonary arrest complicating law enforcement subdual, restraint, and neck compression.”

There is more to it than that. You've totally bought into the media narrative. The race angle is total bs. Some video was allowed, other videos were not. I saw a lot more on this documentary than was ever reported by the msn. The jury verdict was a forgone conclusion. It was either a guilty verdict, or the riled up mob threatening outside the courtroom would "do their thing". What kind of justice is that?

Are you afraid you'll see things that either shoot down or at the very least cause reasonable doubt about the narrative that politicians and the media put out about the Chauvin case? The knee on the neck. It was a maneuver that apparently was in the police training manual, but was disallowed by the judge. The involvement of the FBI with the coroner and his autopsy. People saying George Floyd was a healthy young man with no pre-existing health issues. Who knew that George was quite an accomplished actor? Too many lies about the whole case. And it's not entirely about the Floyd case itself, but also how far down the toilet Minneapolis is spiraling, primarily because of foolish left wing government policies.

After watching a documentary called, The Fall of Minneapolis, I think Chauvin did not get justice. In fact, the trial looked like a sham. The documentary showed evidence that was withheld from the jury and the public.

I wonder if this is Ben Shapiro and...Gaetan?

Here's a bit more context to your argument. High Red State Homicide Rate Mostly Blue County Homicide Rate (dailysignal.com)

Deflecting, as opposed to this other politician?

PP responding by simply asking who are the people saying these things is certainly a valid question. Why couldn't this reporter give at least a couple of names? Admit it, this reporter got owned.

Reporter Tries & FAILS to Bait Pierre Poilievre #canada #trudeau #pierrepoilievre | Watch (msn.com) My apologies if this one has already been posted. This one is almost identical to PP taking down some small time male reporter who tried to use the old "people say" routine without being able to name which people are saying what.

The part about the Hyundai dealer quoting 50 grand seems to be correct. That would be enough to really shock most people. It sure would knock the hell out of me if I were in his shoes. How would Hyundai react of the story didn't go public?

Here's a scary story about battery replacement. Ontario man’s EV battery replacement cost $50,000 | True North (tnc.news) Kind of pricey isn't it?