ironstone

Somebody is watching too much Rachel Maddow.

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/world/cars-set-ablaze-bibi-effigy-burnt-windows-smashed-in-montreal-pro-hamas-riots/ar-AA1uBGKJ (Thank you Justin 😒)

She will certainly be a huge improvement over Merrick Garland.

I think that list was probably very close to what she would have picked.😲 DEI on steroids.

Seems the bar is set much lower for the likes of those people.

You seriously think Penny intended to kill this person that was threatening people on the train? And what would your position be if that lunatic did end up injuring or killing another passenger while everyone stood by and did nothing?

You left out some important parts like the lunatic who was threatening other passengers and one hero that stepped up to protect them. If Daniel Penny was black, there would likely have been no charges brought against him.

At the end of the day, he chose to not do it. You conveniently left that part out.

Wouldn't these muslims in Michigan be the same one's that were chanting 'death to Israel' and 'death to America'?

Seems to me that when Democrats appoint people, they lean heavily on identity politics and which boxes they check off while the Republicans lean much more towards qualifications. Not to suggest that every Trump pick will turn out A+, but it's a better process than the Democrats.

Back when Stephen Harper was PM, remember how most of the chiefs fought tooth and nail against his Financial First Nations Transparency Act?

She is sort of a female version of Al Sharpton.

We all know that this case was brought forward because of race. If the roles had been reversed, it would be a different story.

Where is your proof that any or all of it is false?

"The 1980's are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back," Barrack Obama

When it comes to all of the legal cases against Trump since he entered politics, I defer to Alan Dershowitz. Hard to challenge this man's credentials. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/alan-dershowitz-trump-s-new-york-trial-is-a-stupendous-legal-catastrophe/ar-BB1m3EKX https://www.foxnews.com/media/dershowitz-slams-trump-conviction-worst-legal-verdict-ive-seen-60-years How is it not lawfare when people like AG Letitia James literally campaigns on a promise to 'get Trump'?

But it's Democrats that are blaming everyone else for the loss. Racism, misogyny etc etc

Four more years of rehashed 'Russian collusion' again??😴 I thought the Democrats and their allies had already used every imaginable nasty tactic against Trump(including assassination attempts) but clearly they are just going to double down even after a resounding ass kicking on election day.

You don't think what Trump has been going through is lawfare? New York Times columnist David Brooks said the quiet part out loud recently while on left-of-center “PBS Newshour”: “if you look at democracies in decline, then it is a pattern that people in office use their power to indict and criminalize and throw in jail the people who were in office before them of the opposing party. And so we are a nation, democracy in decline.” While he may have been trying to project such unethical and illegal behavior onto Trump and the Republicans, it perfectly defines what the Democrats are now trying to do to Trump.

Yes they are demented. Four more years of accusations and lawfare from the Dems.🙁

Saying that someone is 'known to be a white supremacist' is pretty vile when there is no evidence to support such a claim. But it's par for the course from the side that constantly throws out that accusation against Republicans.