ironstone

To lighten the mood a bit. Here's a Democrat in a grocery store. 😉

Border Crossings 3 Times Higher Under Biden Than Trump (newsweek.com)

A reasonable person might think that there is a limit to how many people a country can absorb at any one time. Barrack Obama deported more people than Trump, but few people dare to mention that inconvenient fact. People have the right to apply and try to enter most countries legally. They shouldn't have the right to barge in.

It seems to me that Trump is opposed to illegal immigration, especially when it's happening on a massive scale. He is not opposed to immigration, when it is done through legal channels.

Those parties will certainly change things. Under no circumstances will I ever vote for the NDP or Greens. I've had a dislike for the NDP since the Bob Rae experiment in Ontario.

Dershowitz is also a classical liberal. Meaning he actually supports things like free speech and equal application of the law. You pointing out that Dershowitz 'took OJ's side' in that murder trial really sounds childish. Can you not comprehend that every defendant, no matter what you may think of them, is entitled to legal representation?

It is relevant when her decision to remove Trump was based on an extreme interpretation of the law. It's an abuse of power.

Are we reading minds now too? I merely wrote down what Trump actually said prior to the Jan 6 riot.

“I am asking for everyone at the U.S. Capitol to remain peaceful. No violence! Remember, WE are the Party of Law & Order – respect the Law and our great men and women in Blue. Thank you!” Donald Trump

I would agree with that generalization. Canada has a problem with the health care system being overloaded and of course the housing shortage. It's not unreasonable to think that we are currently taking in too many people.

Canada's high immigration is driving down per-capita GDP: report (msn.com) I'm not against immigration, but mass immigration is another story.

Don't insurrections always involve the use of weapons? I mean a LOT of weapons! Has there ever been a single insurrection that didn't have a lot of heavily armed people trying to overthrow another group?

What were the odds that a supposed 'insurrection' could have been successfully pulled off with spears, brass knuckles, bear spray and other implements? And a relatively small number of people at that? It was not Pearl Harbor or 911 all over again.

That is debatable. How many people at these protests are chanting ' from the river to the sea' and all that it implies?

So according to you, Hunter Biden can decide when, where, or even IF he will testify. To hell with a congressional subpoena right? Does everyone have that same right or is it just Hunter?

How do you reconcile that one in light of Trump's fraud case in New York?

Why then did Jack Smith not charge trump with insurrection? Everything in this latest court decision revolves around 'Trump the insurrectionist' yet he's not actually charged with it.

He should have had a brief press conference in front of the Capitol, refuse to take questions and then scurry off. We both know how that would have played out.

And one of the dissenting judges on the Colorado decision stated that there was no basis in the Constitution for the decision.

Thank you for proving the point of my post.

Director of a Gaza hospital says clinics were used by Hamas fighters (msn.com) Even with this admission, there are still those who refuse to admit the truth.

Jack Smith didn't charge Trump with insurrection.

You must own the most elaborate pair of rose coloured glasses on the planet.

I've already addressed this nonsensical point. Maybe Steve Bannon should have tried the Hunter strategy? Oh wait...he doesn't have the right surname.