impartialobserver

I do not know. He seemed like an ok selection but maybe he resurfaces later on in some other capacity.

apparently, Gaetz viewed this distraction as being too "bad" of a thing and therefore disagrees with you.

the reason that I have read is that the confirmation hearing would be too much of a distraction. Taking that at face value (which I do not), that seems ok. There will be other options.

More covid.. you like talking to yourself. "You were pretending not to be interested in the posts that said "The jabs aren't stopping the spread of covid"." I challenge to quote myself saying this.. .the forum is searchable. You have me confused with someone probably. But this is what you get for putting passion/righteousness in front of getting it right. i am cold/clinical when I am brought into a fraud investigation. I have no idea about the race/politics of the accused. I only care about two things.. proving that the amount is correct (usually it is not) and proving that they did not follow established law. I go into it with zero assumptions. I have at the end of six months told the higher ups that they have the wrong person or have incorrect details.

other clues are that they give no exact details.. just vague platitudes or talking points. For most normal humans, it takes more than two minutes to research, digest, and sift out the inevitable BS that comes with reading internet articles. I have not had time to do a full deep dive on his cabinet picks and so have not complained nor praised them. I know that is not the norm. We should fire away whether we actually know anything or not.

Quite dense, it appears. It is a simple matter of having every fact in place before making accusations. The last one was a fictitious employer. I went to the address given and took pictures. The company listed in the claim was nowhere to be found. We had pictures, video, transcripts, exact times and places such as an IP address, make/model of computer used, no gaps of any kind. That is not a yes man.. that is proving a case thoroughly. I know that you can't comprehend this.

Yes, every decision of Trump's is going to draw complaints. Why? Because the opposing party lost. How do I know that it is really that simple? Easy.. how immediate it is. When you respond quickly, it tells one that you did not take any time to sift through details, do any research, ponder any context... However, that is the nature of our current political world.

You have my pity.. honestly. You affirm everyday why you hide in the shadows. If I operated like you at my job, I would not have lasted one day. If I bring a fraud case against someone.. I come armed with a bulletproof case that show every transaction, where it was done, who received what.. no gaps of any kind. No filling in the blanks.

And yet you respond of your volition... quite sad You obviously have no knowledge of human nature. When you have two groups opposed to another.. the other will complain because they did not win. If you are 1/10 as smart as you claim to be... you would know this already.

to quote user (look below). this is purely legal. The former prosecutor is to blame. They agreed to a deal with him and he held up that deal. Its a simple part of our justice system, you can't be prosecuted for the same crime twice like this.

yes, I am partial because I know the law far better than most. Had to become a paralegal of sorts when the dept was wrongfully sued. User (conservative poster) explains it pretty well. Are you going to come after him as well?

if you actually read the article.. you would know that the decision was overturned due to legal mishaps not woke politics.

First, it is primarily a discussion. Primarily does not mean 100%. Second, discussion infers that the content is editorial.. hence opinion. Hence, they are not held to the same standard.

did you notice that I have yet to mention COVID in this thread? Hmmm.. its very easily proven. Get my posts, put them in Word or Notepad ++, hit ctrl + F, and see what it comes up with. I know that you can't get out of your own way but I am referring to conspiracy theories in general.. lets repeat that.. in general. Do you know that means?

Discussion... key word. Think about it for a second.

The View is entertainment and that is what we are talking about.. If you need clarification, read the title of the thread

its rather simple.. TV shows live and breathe based on ratings.. not on their being factually correct or anything like that. If the show helps the network's bottom line.. they keep it.

the folks on here are showing a lack of reading comprehension and knowledge of the law.

Way, way too early. Most likely, she will find other pursuits (political or not). A lot can change in 4 years.

My comments are not about an administration being bad, good, indifferent. Any time that there is a democratic president, you will complain about everything that they do. Likewise, every time that there is a Republican president types like Robosmith will complain everything that they do. All it takes is a simple knowledge of human nature to see this. But your partisan, biased ways have and will always keep you from seeing this.

Off topic nonsense. My post is about conspiracy theories in general... so not specific topics. Conspiracy theories would not be theories if the evidence was there. Conspiracy theories live and breathe because there are gaps and omissions that demand you believe something. I am not a man of belief especially when it comes to hyper-partisan types like you.

interesting how you edit it once I call you out for being childish and juvenile. Every time I investigate a conspiracy theory.. there are so many holes/omissions as to make it pointless. I need more than articles where someone summarizes things for me. I like to look at the primary/raw data. Depending on the situation, this could be not possible (ie.. medical records)

A simple knowledge of human nature tells you that group x is going to appoint those that align with them. That automatically makes those who do not align with them complain. Its simply inevitable. Each cycle, the same story plays out and folks like you pretend that "this time is different" when you know it is not.

Project 2025... pretty benign stuff. Trump is not behind the creation of it nor does he contribute to it. Seems strange to be so concerned about it.

And you expect to be taken seriously? So childish and juvenile. Maybe that's why you stay in the shadows (anonymous online forums).