impartialobserver

Well the assumptions put forth on here were all wrong. She was not trans nor was she a leftist. Also, not a social justice warrior of any kind. Just someone who was deeply disturbed and did not want to live any longer. The point of my posts yesterday was to say that maybe you should wait until you have actual information before blasting away and this affirms that point. About the shooters manifesto "The author also writes that they acquired weapons "by lies and manipulation, and my father's stupidity" and describes wanting to die by suicide, but feeling like carrying out a shooting was "better for evolution rather than just one stupid boring suicide." https://abcnews.go.com/US/abundant-life-christian-school-shooter-wisconsin/story?id=116847316

I believe them and do not at the same time. Do they sit on the sofa and watch cable news? probably not. So then how do they get their info? Simple.... facebook, X, instagram, TikTok feeds where the source is sometimes CNN. Person X shares this and so on down the rabbit hole. Liberals do not source their news in the same way. I know.. I am married to one of them. She does not listen to talk radio and we do not have live TV (not a single channel).

this is not about CNN... can you understand that simple phrase? Or am I asking too much? The point is that there is no information available about the shooter in order to validate one's opinion. You could be right or not.. no one knows YET.

as expected.. you dodge. CNN... what would you do if there was no CNN. Your life would lose all meaning. A more honest and forthright person would simply say, "I do not know" or "That information is not available yet". Thanks for proving my point for the second time. PS.. i know that you will go off into the weeds about COVID, CNN.. instead of answering the question.

Ok you know where but can you prove definitively what the motive was? Your opinions and predictions are meaningless.. Lets see some video, documentation that explicitly states the motive

How can you know if it is political in motivation when you have no information to draw upon? Can you answer that honestly and not give me a bunch of fluff about leftists? I do not care to read about your predictions. Predictions are not evidence.

Thank you for pointing that out. You do not care about the truth.. good to know. Nothing you say has any value then.

nice dodge. Anyways, you have proven my point over and over again how folks do not KNOW anything and yet make up their minds. I had a case last week where your p_isspoor reasoning would have put someone in prison. Well.. did some digging and come to find out.. they were right.

I do not know you outside of this and if I started making accusations about you (lack of evidence).. would you shrug it off?

You prove my point that you are too biased to ever have a rational discussion...

Point proven... The evidence be whatever it may will not change your predisposed opinion. You have no evidence which you have admitted to and still pretend to have this figured out.. Ok, well you are why I have such a low opinion of politics and the supporters.

I simply hold folks to a standard. Interesting that you do not..

You claim to have some insight on this.. insight based on what? Oh.. warm and fuzzy feelings.

Wow... how many shots have you had today? The point of my discussion with the other guy is that there is no actual information out there about the shooter.. not yet. Until that time, there is no evidence to really back up any theories about motive. When that information does come out then we shall see.

Name calling... hmm.. so grown up of you. You could simply say that I have no evidence and this is my guess which as good as anyone else's.

Maybe my expectations are too high but it would seem only right for someone to know what they are talking about.. actually have evidence. Its really that simple. But I know that you do not believe that.

And you expect to simply buy into this when you offer no actual evidence. Again.. good thing that you are not in law enforcement or such.

Yeah.. I know you expect folks to believe you biased assumptions. This also shows that you crave affirmation. Someone not unquestioningly buying into your lack of evidence really bothers you

I prefer to be correct and know what I am talking about. I know that you do not. Its ok. I am paid to be 100% correct. Folks livelihoods depend on it. If I was like you, a lot of folks would not appreciate it.

Your theory is not evidence.. good thing that you are not a lawyer.

In the absence of cheap labor, folks will either produce less crops (and therefore need less labor), increase their prices, or resort to automation.

long winded way of saying, "No, I have nothing but want to run my mouth"

do you have evidence? Evidence would include name, verifiable video, medical documentation, social media posts, interviews. Your beliefs and predictions are not evidence.. not even close.

Does the evidence get a say in it or do we just blindly trust your warm and fuzzy feelings? If you had been on the Stephen Paddock case... you would have failed so miserably.

And the prey took the bait. For all of your bravado and "knowledge", you never mentioned that the shooter was female. Good thing that you do not work in law enforcement in any way.