CdnFox

We addressed this in another thread. Turns out it was a false report. They based it on a "leaked" document from a pollster who has now said that he never did any polling at all like that. Sorry kiddo

As i understand it , it was radio canada that broke the story. You know, the guys the cpc are NOT threatening to cut I think once cbc knew it was getting out they figured better not look too bias.

So you voted him into power you're saying. And then you didn't vote into elections and now you'll be voting for the same liberals that were under Trudeau now and pretend it's different. I love that you try to win on some sort of weird technicality but it's pretty obvious that you support the liberals under Trudeau or not

I have never said that about anybody before. And as usual faced with the truth all You can you can do is lie Yawn indeed

I'm talking to you and I'm answering because god knows you can't Oh look, no link yet again And no, that formula is partially filled in. You did not correctly calculate the MOE(p1 -p2) if that's the equasion you used, It looks like you took a picture from somewhere, so you saw the formula and then ran the internal calculations without recalculating the variable. You've calculated the outcome based on two polls with a 95 percent accuracy MOE. The correct number in this case would be 97.5. SO you calculated the z score wrong if that's the formula you used. So you effed up the calculation LOLOLL I told ya you couldn't answer it. you just never pass up another chance to look stupid do you

Kind of. Except it's not one guy. The sealed boxes are openedone election person and then one person from each of the parties review the ballots one by one and do a tally. They agree on whether or not a valid is spoiled and they agree on the final count. This number is accorded officially and they can keep a copy of what each of the writing ballots came in at. That information will be forwarded but can be reviewed in the event of any discrepancy and any of the scrutineers can report any Shenanigans or differences that they feel may exist. Further the ballot numbers are recorded and even though we don't have the names associated with the ballot we do have whether or not it was a, a process which is also subject to the scrutineers and verification. So every party is watching over this to the point where the record is finalized and that can be double checked later if necessary. And as you know each riding has several ballot areas, so if conservative scruitineers come back to their riding And they all agreed that the candidate won in each of their ballot areas or even most of the valid areas and suddenly it's posted as a loss for that candidate they will be very aware of the fact that something is wrong. It is theoretically possible that some of the advanced poles could be tampered with. But that would involve duplicating an official elections Canada sealed box along with all of the seals, duplicated all of the correct ballots with their numbers in it, and then falsely marking them. You have to count all the ballots, then decide how many you would need to alter in order to change the outcome to your favor, and then either duplicate or modify those ones. And it is not really possible to take an eraser to them and erase the check mark without it being fairly obvious somebody did that which would be caught by the scrutineers when the ballots were counted. The effort would be insane, very likely you would be caught. And it would involve the cooperation of several levels of Elections Canada staff which is severely unlikely. The amount of work necessary Would be vast and you'd have to do it on a fairly large scale for it to make any real difference. Again, not technically impossible but so difficult and so easy to be caught has to be improbable to an extremely high degree. But they could always use more scrutineers for sure. There's never quite enough

??????????? Everyday I think you're as dumb as you could possibly get, and every day you prove that I just don't have enough faith in you

Actually he has no credibility for that a very reason. Everybody who's written about him that's had dealings with him has very little nice to say. The fact is not terribly well respected. It would be like Justin Trudeau claiming to be well respected on the world stage just because he had been there. It simply isn't true

LOL quite plausible, it's hard to find the spaces between lies to sneak another one in with him

It is! I consider laughter to be extremely therapeutic and that makes you and your posts a very important part of my day ! LOLOLOL Kid, we know you're suffering emotional damage from this what we see all of the little down arrows of despair that you leave the like little puddles of tears

I'm sorry. My sincere appologies to Jabba for the comparison.

I'm sure that's what the voices in your head tell you but that's not actually what a fact is But then you've never done well with trying to cope with the truth have you

He's the leader of opposition. Why the hell would he have standing with outer countries whatever the hell that means. His one job is to hold the current government to account which means you don't sign a gag order. Asking questions is his whole purpose right now and you are trying to pretend that it makes sense that he signs away his right to do that. You have to either have a concussion or be a die-hard liberal to think that that holds Any weight. Amusingly the effect on the brain is similar for both of them

They did, it seems you didn't like what they said and tried to reframe it

LOL denial. not just a river in egypt little guy And for heaven's sake stop saying the nazi's were right because it was the law and you follow the laws of the day. The nazis' were wrong and the law isn't always good law, and you're looking like a nazi tard instead of your usual regular tard.

I posted a pew research paper on the same thing and it says you're wrong. Pew, one of the most respected polling firms in the known universe. But hey, lets settle it : seeing as you feel you know the calculations, what ARE the proper calculations for the margin of error in that specific case? Hmmmm? Don't know? Cant' figure it out? Havne't got a clue about what you're talking about? Yeah. Thought so. Lets recap. You claimed that i had never posted any of the polling data, despite me telling you i had you kept insisting. I posted a snip of the post probing you wrong. FAIL ON YOUR PART #1 you then claimed that you can't apply the margin to both numbers and call it a tie because theoretically it could go the other way. I posted proof that you were wrong from pew research and others showing that if the margin overlaps AT ALL then it's a statistical tie. FAIL ON YOUR PART #2 You then claimed the other numbers must be adjusted and i referred you to the pew research paper that noted even with multiple entries that is not necessarily true. FAIL #3 Now you're desperately trying to recover from all that by relying on a small article from a newspaper that doesn't address the issue nearly as well as what i'd already posted. Sorry kid, that's FOUR strikes. Yer out LOLOLOL honestly it's getting to the point we're making you look stupid is just getting boring. You make it too easy See you next time!

Sure, although i think you know me well enough to know i'm going to say "well then volunteer to scruitineer" There's nothing wrong with a healthy level of distrust. As long as you don't let it cloudy judgment

You're saying harris was an illegal drug possessor?

You realize she has totally got you here right? You're kind of digging yourself in deeper. Perhaps you meant to say something like history may one day vindicate them but at the moment they have broken our laws which were passed by a legitimate elected government for what that's worth. As it is you're actually agreeing with the Nazis and that's bad Just so you know

Actually he's not far off there. And the numbers do back that. There's a reason why he spent even more money during his term even after covid than trump did during covid. That artificially inflates the economy and stocks but it's all a false economy. There's much we can say about trump at the moment but if you thought Biden's economy was actually good, it wasn't. I'm pretty sure i've posted the rather large body of proof on threads you were on before.

Jabba the Libb

I'm sure that your hatred and bigotry driven spite is reveling at the very thought But there will be no implication even if they lose. At the end of the day poilievre's numbers are better than almost any other conservative numbers or liberal numbers for that matter for quite a while. Harper won a majority with those numbers. So Poilievre will still have a job unless he's a complete ass about it And Carney will go back to stealing tax money and ripping people off for a living Sector instead of the prime minister seat if he loses

This is why YOU think we should Watching you guys is why we think we shouldn't It's not like we haven't had bad relations in the past and worked it out. Canada was formed because the brit colonies had a free trade deal with the states and they cancelled it and threatened invasion again. Britian said "think you better 'country' up to prevent an invasion and that's when Canada was formed. And we all got over that eventually. In the end, the benefits of a peaceful relationship where we've got each other's backs when the occasional war breaks out is simply too valuable not to get back to it sooner or later. Might be a little later this time We're pretty pissed. And trump is still going on about being the 51'st state. Jezuz, he's got QUEBEC feeling patriotic. When the french start sticking up for Canada you KNOW it's serious.

But you don't believe in enforcing the law. There have been many times when people have acted illegally and you have supported them. In fact you supported the idea that trump should be shot. That pretty much throws your little temper tantrum there in the garbage bin. You hypocrisy is unbelievable