CdnFox

So if somebody says something it doesn't mean they said something You're a tard kid As has been shown to you what he said is substantially what goddess claimed and you're trying to "Law and order" your way out of that simple truth Nope, it's what he's said and now he's saying something else.

So did Hitler. What's your point

Posted the whole story so of course I did mention it. In fact you pulled it from my source. So once again you have to resort to lies to try and make a point. I was very clear in my original post, nobody said that the house had passed it or parliament or anything like that from minute one everything I said was absolutely true and complete. But you lied about it and now that I pointed out you lied about it you want to somehow make it be my fault. This is what the left wing is today. They want to put people in jail for saying things they don't like. That's the kind of person you are that's the kind of person they are here's the proof Your entire post is above. Your entire argument was "BUT BUT BUT BUT IT WAS DEFEATED SO THIS DOESN"T COUNT". Let's not pretend it wasn't. So I can. And I won't be STFU. Instead I'll be pointing out what a dishonest liar you are and how dishonest the left is and how badly they want to defend the idea of locking people up for saying things they don't like. All you've done is hammer hold the point that I was right from the beginning. This is what the left is. You want to lie, you want to silence people that don't lie the same way, you don't believe in human rights, you believe that whatever you think is right should be the ONLY thing people can do . Or they can stfu. But they won't .

That was the case you could refute it in a second. But you can And it's not just my opinion a number of people have pointed out you were the one who brought up trump and are trying to suggest that this gentleman's actions are trump's fault Trump has nothing to do with this. This guy's actions are the fault of this guy and the left wing ideology that he's bought into Look above. Both I and others have pointed out you've done it in this very threat. It's not like you have to search Not you they don't. You can say whatever words you want and then 5 minutes later pretend that you didn't. Those guys actions have nothing to do with trump. Trump isn't involved with this. Yet you keep bringing trump up and then pretending you're not the one bringing trump up. Oh look, more whining and crying from the little boy who can't actually refute the truth You want this to be trump's fault, you suggested it's trump's fault, you constantly bring up trump every post even though nobody else was discussing it and then when people reply to you and your comments about trump you accuse them i've been fixated on trump. You don't shift at all. Your brain has been stuck in stupid gear since minute one and absolutely everybody can see it.

"I DON"T LIKE WHAT YOU SAY SO I HOPE THE GOV"T CENSORS YOU AND TAKES AWAY YOUR RIGHT TO SPEAK!" -Linksoul Yeah Very left wing of you big guy I guess given your failures to be able to make coherent arguments that's all you can hope for

STILL crying and butthurt because you can't refute the points huh Kid You literally said that trump is to blame for this. It was your first comment. The words. But in context of the discussion nobody was talking about trump. So your comments indicate that trump is to blame for what's happening because of 'political divisiveness' not the person who did the act. Don't pee in your own pants more by pretending otherwise. You brought up trump, you kept bringing up trump and you kept saying that it's his wrongdoing that's the issue here Kiddo the fact that EVERYBODY sees through your shit doesn't have anything to do with me. This is a "you" problem. You look like a dumb twat and are surprised when people call you a dumb twat.

It was a 3,5 inch semi serrated locking blade. That's not just a 'multitool' , that's a serious blade Trying to downplay that just makes YOU look like a tool.

LOL wow you can't even say more than one letter of my nickname? Have i scared you that badly? ROFLMAO!! sorry to make you wet your pants Lxx ! BWAAHAHAHA!!!!

You mean you brought it up exactly the way I said you did. And then freaked out when I answered that yeah he does have magical answers. I assumed you were being somewhat rhetorical and didn't actually think that magic existed but now I realize that you're just that self delusional As to the rest yes he does have absolutely solid ideas how to resolve the issues and turn the economy around. He's not vague about it. I listed a bunch of really good ones . He's produced many results in his life and has had a successful career in the government. Which mark carney cannot claim And I can absolutely prove that Mark Carney's promises and platform were built largely on promises and ideas that poilievre had already made and everybody has commented on this. Is beyond childish that you are attempting to claim otherwise And I'm happy to provide evidence and proof Did Carney steal conservative ideas for his election - Google Search While the Liberals argue that Carney is simply steering the party back to a pragmatist, "political centre", critics point out several major conservative policy planks that Carney adopted or adapted: [1, 2] 1. Housing and GST Cuts Poilievre pledged to eliminate the GST on new home builds under $1 million. Carney subsequently introduced an identical platform policy to cut the GST for first-time homebuyers on new or heavily renovated homes under $1 million, drawing direct accusations of platform theft. [1] 2. Immigration Restraints Under Justin Trudeau, the Liberals oversaw historic peaks in immigration. Poilievre repeatedly criticized these targets as unsustainable. During his leadership bid and subsequent election push, Carney broke from his predecessor by publicly conceding that immigration levels had gotten out of control, later introducing the Safe Borders Act to scale them back. [1, 2] 3. Capital Gains and Middle-Class Taxation [1] Following aggressive Conservative pushback against Trudeau-era capital gains tax hikes, Carney's Liberals moved to scrap those very increases. Carney also admitted the federal government had overtaxed the middle class, adjusting his economic platform toward middle-class tax relief—a narrative long dominated by Poilievre. [1, 2] 4. Natural Resources and Pipelines Carney shifted the Liberal approach on resource development closer to the Conservative stance. When former Greenpeace activist and Liberal minister Steven Guilbeault spoke out against constructing new pipelines, Carney publicly overruled him, explicitly stating his administration would support pipeline creation. [1, 2] 5. Fiscal Deficits and Spending [1] Carney openly criticized the "lost decade" of his own party's past rule, agreeing with Tory talking points that runaway federal spending, bloated civil servant hiring, and heavy deficits had severely weakened the domestic economy. [1, 2] OOOOPSIE!!!! YOU WERE WRONG AGAIN YOU LYING FREAK LOL I always provide proof, you always lie, and then always accuse me of lying. Pathetic And yeah trudeau takes the platforms from the conservatives and simply says the same thing but more. For example he waited till Erin put out his platform and then took the housing numbers and added 200 million to it, took the other spending and just added some money to it, it was very blatant. The media called it 'overlap' As to the recession, you don't understand at all. We are in a recession and that's just the way it is. It's like a technical pregnancy or a technical break and enter. Putting the word technical in front of it doesn't change it Some economists having to gated that they believe it's probably going to be shallow and short and that's great but they follow up by saying even if we recover from a recession we're going to be at miserably low growth rates far below other countries and far below what we should be So your entire argument is that we shouldn't say that we're doing terrible we should just say that we're doing really bad. There is nobody who isn't partisan who is suggesting we're doing well. At best they might say there are a few positive indicators that suggest things aren't completely crashing You've embarrassed yourself again.

So you don't have a problem with carney being involved with slavery, your problem is that it was a conservative that brought it up If you didn't have bad morals you'd have no morals

Sure kid. Kid it's what you do. You constantly accuse others of what you do. When i say you're a liar i can prove it with facts the majority of the time, but you NEVER can. Simply not true and you know it. I constantly post facts, and you left wing twinkies constantly demand i repost them again and again. Your problem is you can't cope with reality so you just prefer to lie about it. Morality and logic are both real, sorry for reality butting into your echo chamber like that. And here you are lying proving my point 100%. I very specifically said above that it would be perfectly normal for you to criticize republicans, or even be angry at them. I used those words only a few posts ago And here you are claiming that I have said that you couldn't criticize them. A 100% contradiction to what I actually said. You couldn't have proven you were the liar here more effectively than that. Criticism, fine. Anger fine. Commentary about failed policy or the like, fine. Being happy and excited that people are hurt and dying because it lets you win points on the net? Not fine. I can't believe this needed to be explained to you. No that's still your side. THRILLED when kirk was killed, OVERJOYED when a medical exec was shot, ELATED when trup was shot but disappointed the guy's aim wasn't better... Conservatives see it necessary to kill people who slaughter innocent women and children without cause. Conservatives don't' have a problem enforcing laws and understand that when someone drives a car at a cop and hits him the cop is right to defend himself. They're not gleeful, they just recognize sometimes that has to happen. You on the other hand were excited as HELL that people were getting killed!!!! Yaaaayy!! Makes trump look bad so war is great!

Obama Says If He Had A Son Who Stabbed Someone In The Heart With A Knife, He Would Look Just Like Karmelo Anthony | Babylon Bee Obama Says If He Had A Son Who Stabbed Someone In The Heart With A Knife, He Would Look Just Like Karmelo Anthony

I've already addressed that. So do you mean do i want to know the thing i already proved? No, i already proved it He said the same thing. Which you know And you're desperately trying to dodge the simple truth by pretending you're a lawyer. "YOUR HONOUR, TECHNICALLY MY CLIENT SAID WE DON'T "HAVE" NEED SO THEY"RE COMPLETELY LYING!!!! It's quite clear he's said that we can't trust the us, that relationship is ruptured and trading with them is a weakness we have to correct, he's saying we don't need them.

Yeah, your mom's paying us all 20 bucks an hour to babysit you I hope you appreciate it, she's got to take on 3 more 'special friend' clients just to make you feel like people give a crap about you

Yes, but his incomprehension is due to your incoherence. You didn't think that one through, did you

I agree. There are no times you can correct him on the facts.

I literally proved it. You know, For what its worth you could try fact checking yourself before posting crap

Sorry kid, i get that you think it's tough talk asking that when the search engine is down but you did. You simply scream 'liar' when you disagree with someone. When i call someone a liar in can usually prove it or it's well known. Actually i spotted you a few You're taking glee in people being hurt and dying in a war. Sorry kid but that's what you're enjoying. That's the kind of person you are. I'm sure you'll claim you never said what you said 2 posts from now tho.

I accept your admission of defeat

He has made statements close enough to that. He's said that our relationship and the previous order is 'ruptured' and we have to look elsewhere to 'middle' countries to fight back and that we need to diversify away from the us trade. CTV News has quoted him: Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has stated that the United States is "no longer a reliable partner" and that the old Canada-U.S. relationship—built on ever-closer economic integration and military collaboration—is over. This declaration followed the imposition of significant U.S. tariffs on Canadian goods, prompting a major shift in Canada's trade strategy. So the relationship is over. We don't need to deal with them. They're unreliable Ai notes: Canada's Strategic Pivot In response, the Canadian government has initiated a fundamental pivot to protect its economy: [1, 2] Mid-Level Alliances: Carney has actively championed alliances of mid-level economic powers to operate beyond U.S. protectionist policies. [1] New Trade Missions: The government has led a series of international trade missions (including to Asia and Japan) to diversify its markets, attract foreign investment, and reduce over-reliance on the American economy. [1] Addressing Vulnerabilities: Carney has publicly stated that Canada's heavy reliance on U.S. ties has become a "weakness" that must be corrected. Trade with the us has become a weakness that must be corrected. So he absolutely has expressed the idea that we have to move forward without the USA. That is a very reasonable paraphrase of what he's said. BWAAHHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHA!!!!!! Holy shit kid, the fact you didn't blow up typing that is proof how deep your hypocrisy goes

well seeing as they only exist in your mind, i guess what you're saying is YOU wanted me to post again Very kind of you kiddo LOLOL Does your mommy know you're on the internet?

Me stating simple facts about BIDEN that are easily verified that prove what you said was incorrect = trump fan LOLOL do you even hear yourself? We weren't even mentioning trump, this was about biden and his inflation! YOU are the only one who keeps bringing up trump. "this person was wrong to do what he did to ms kirk" You - TRUMP!!!!! "biden had high inflation during his presidency" you 'TRUMP!!!" Kinda rainy today you "TRUUUUUUMPPPP!!!!!" You're freaking obsessed. This thread wouldn't have the word 'trump' in it if it wasn't for you bringing it up all the time You are the only one bringing up trump.

And here's the democrats asking the essential question: "It's not that he stabbed him, did he stab him ENOUGH?" Failed dem senator says she'd have stabbed him too Jasmine Crockett suggests she also would have stabbed Austin Metcalf in stunning defense of Karmelo Anthony

Nope. Overall it was still a higher rate. If you start at 9 and go to 4 then the 4 is charged on top of the 9 If you are at 5 and you stay at 5 the five is on the original 5, it's lower. The us still had vastly higher rates overall and for two years was up to twice as much as other countries, certainly much more than any other. So your claim that they did better than anyone is completely and utterly false. They did vastly worse than anyone else and then did very slightly better than some of the others Here's 2024 for example, long after covid. And a list of some countries that had LOWER inflation than the us Inflation Rate: A Global Comparison - Global Finance Magazine I cut out the small fry countries. The us was behind most of europe and Canada. United States 1.249 4.682 7.992 4.128 2.907 Greece -1.262 0.574 9.3 4.155 2.749 Spain -0.337 3.008 8.323 3.4 2.674 Netherlands 1.106 2.819 11.617 4.117 2.66 Canada 0.717 3.395 6.803 3.879 2.606 Georgia 5.202 9.567 11.898 2.488 2.58 Sweden 0.658 2.651 8.055 5.91 2.574 United Kingdom 0.851 2.588 9.067 7.306 2.453 Israel -0.587 1.492 4.395 4.208 2.448 France 0.527 2.068 5.903 5.662 2.417 Germany 0.371 3.212 8.666 6.03 2.406 Ireland -0.443 2.413 8.049 5.209 2.38 Japan -0.027 -0.235 2.497 3.268 2.237 Italy -0.145 1.941 8.736 5.903 1.673 Switzerland -0.725 0.582 2.834 2.134 1.537 Denmark 0.333 1.944 8.534 3.353 1.459 Bahrain -2.325 -0.611 3.635 0.075 1.4 China 2.492 0.918 1.975 0.228 0.97 No I didn't leave anything out. Biden's record is horrible. He had the worst inflation in the industrial world for 2 years and then it dropped down to middle of the road but by then prices were already radically high and any new inflation was on top of that That's why people were so furious about it and why he was doing so poorly in the polls

Says the guy crying is eyes out because he can't think of a rebuttal to what i said originally the shooting when it happened and the attack on her here. "Oh the attack is justified because trump! It wouldn't have happened because Trump! The attacker isn't to blame, he was innocent because trump!" That's your whole angle. So there you go. It's in black and white kiddo. You didn't say the attack was wrong or bad or that the guy is guilty or shouldn't have, you just defend his actions because "trump"