CdnFox

No, it isn't. The goal isn't mentioned in the constitution in the slightest. For god's sake, at least PRETEND you're following the conversation. Ok, fine ... show me where it says in the constitution that the goal of removing people who are in the country illegally should not be approved of by the pubilc. FFS. Apperently you can amend it just with the power of your imagination, and stick in all sorts of things about the goals of the public Well at the end of the day it depends on the nature of the ruling and what's involved with "working around" it. Which might include no changes but perhaps appointing special 'justicies' or people with such powers to blow through the backlogs. The devil will be in the details. At the end of the day as i noted the goal of removing illegal residents is supported by people and why not. (no, not the constitution), and the gov't wants to pursue that aggressively. So it's going to boil down to what's the quickest and easiest way to get there. If the court says that there's a requirement for notification and a chance to appeal they may set up an expidited process for that which meets the bare minimum and hire on a bunch of 'special adjudicators' or the like and accept the one month delay or so.

Oh dear. I see we're having yet another math problem again. Calm down, don't bother taking off your mittens, i'll do the counting for you. The information you posted originally is from 2022. The second information you posted was from over 1 year ago. This is 2025. That is THREE years more than your original data year, and a YEAR more than your last. So, it turns out when you do the math that 2025 is actually MORE recent than 2022 for example. And the data i posted was from 2025. So you're posting old data, VERY old in one case, and trying to claim it's somehow MORE relevant than NEW data. Here's some more. youth unemployment canada 2025: Once a haven for job seekers, Canada has now one of the worst job markets for graduates; what went wrong, and it could get worse? - The Economic Times Here's a chart Canada's unemployment is RADICALLY higher than it was this time last year. You quoted the first quarter, but ignored the last quarter where things got bad, Once again you've entirely embarrassed yourself. You've got the brains and research skills of road kill. You should be deeply ashamed.

LOL oh i've missed the full on hissy fit freak outs Are you extra mad because everyone seems to be laughing at you around the forum today? You seem extra mad 🍿🍿🍿 [munch munch] 🍿🍿🍿

That's no way to talk about your dead mother for god's sake. Show some class! 🍿🍿🍿 [munch munch] 🍿🍿🍿

If nobody says they were then they weren't They took dr seuss off the shelves. In any case, whether they feel there are issues with regards to the author or not the books either are right or they are wrong. If you can't address the actual content to explain why you disagree with it or why others have said they disagree with it or the like and all you can do is criticize the possible authorship then you are in essence conceding that the content is fine you just don't like the source He/she presumably wouldn't be so daft is to claim there were errors unless they could demonstrate them. Again if all he/she was complaining about was the authorship and not the accuracy of the information that's fine but otherwise there's no particular reason to believe that the contents are substantially inaccurate. One error for three books worth of material hardly condemns the whole thing

Will you stop it please? He's going to start posting ass porn again at this rate!

LOL you were literally the one who brought it up We missed you while you were away, it's way funnier when you're here working so hard to keep us entertained 🍿🍿🍿 [munch munch] 🍿🍿🍿

So you couldn't find any other mistakes Most books have at least one mistake despite numerous proofreading's. They address it in the next edition. A reasonable and thoughtful person would expect that if there were more mistakes they would have been found.

Talking to that mirror again are you Kid, you had no problem with doing it, doing get emotionally devastated when people do it back. But i love that you were so upset and take it so seriously... that you took the time to go find a little pig picture to go with it LOLOL Yeah, nothing says "i'm really serious" like taking the time to find a cartoon for your complaint Or was that a self portrait?

Exactly Awwwww, poor little Eyeball butthurt about making himself look stupid again maybe try rubbing some omnibus on that? or just learn to NOT be completely full of bullshit

Oh spare me. you've posted insults about my mother a number of times. This is like when you brought up your kids and when i replied you screamed how dare i bring up your kids 🙄 You've also brought up other people's as i recall. And at least we can be thankful yours can't see what kind of person you've turned out to be. That must give you some solace. Dude you act like an ignorant childish pig, then you get mad if anyone says anything to you. And honestly i'm still half convinced you're a pre teen living in your mommy's basement.

But apparently you will not get over drinking or your mother's drug use while she was pregnant 🍿🍿🍿 [munch munch] 🍿🍿🍿

Let me sum up this entire thread for you It's great that you like Ev's. For a handful of people it's an option that makes a lot of sense and that they will prefer. And they should absolutely have access to those options as consumers. But for the vast majority of people EVS are a poor option or no option. The technology just isn't there. Amusingly some of the Chinese hybrids look like they would give us about 90% 95% of what EVs do in the way of pollution reduction and would be adaptable in a much wider scale. But Evie's just aren't a practical solution for the vast majority of Canadians at this time given the current technology. But I'm glad you enjoy yours and absolutely support your right to buy a vehicle that's right for you

Canada’s electric vehicle strategy has failed, and there are lessons to learn - The Globe and Mail

Yeah, it was pretty obvious you had no clue what you were talking about and once again you want it to be my fault. At least you're done lying about how the libs shouldn't produce a budget because "ominbus"

Well, it's true that if they learned that they might not have voted libeal in the past and they wouldnt' be in this mess

That's some precision ejaculation right there, making sure the timing lines up perfect. "you've got no cards Mr Christian!"

LOL awwww i've upset little @ExFlyer again, he's left a little passive aggressive "i'm too afraid to talk but i'm big mad" down arrow .... still crying in your basement, too afraid to try to make a reasoned counter argument? Just mad that your echo chamber was wrong? Poor fella. You have a cookie and a nap, you'll be fine

I'm sure he does. i mean he needs a laugh same as we do right?

That's from 2023, reporting on 2022. Welcome to 2025 kiddo. Move over housing: Canada’s young are facing a new crisis Youth unemployment is upwards of 15 percent and getting worse. And our overall unemployment is going up. Our labour force participation is going down which is very bad news and means people are giving up on even looking for work. The rest of your statements are also wrong. But when you start off being wrong to begin with people tend to stop reading. Read a book for god's sake.

Complete and absolutely not true. Utterly false. He had nothing to do with it. He did what he was told to do, which is great, but he had NO leadership. The person who got us through that was Jim Flaherty, and of course Stephen Harper as well. Carney had zero to do with getting us through that. And literally everyone who's commented about his time at the BoE has said bad things about him. He was definitely involved with scandals about serious overspending on his expense accounts. If that's why you voted for him, you voted for a lie i'm afraid.

ROFLMAO!!! Remember our talk about not drinking during the week? I'm loving the "zero" meltdown tho LOLOL 🍿🍿🍿 [munch munch] 🍿🍿🍿 Are you STILL crying about that? For gods sake, go change your diapers and get over it! You should be HAPPY, not weeping like a toddler who had his soother taken.

Are you being deliberately stupid? Is this like your "kryptonite" routine? There's no majority, razor thin or otherwise. It's a minority. You make yourself look like a tard when you insist things are true when you know they're not.

You support him a lot for someone who's not a supporter.

America has military parades every year, many of them extremely lavish. They are considered the third largest after Russia and China and always have been But when trump does it of course nobody's ever done it before in America and it's proof that he's a dictator 🙄