CdnFox

As @WestCanMan said he's never been divisive. He can be abrasive attacking his enemies but if anything he's extremely inclusive and if you've seen one of his ralleys it's all about bringing people together, letting them partake in the promise of canada, and building a future. Divisive people don't attract as many people as he did, and from as many different groups as he did. The CBC et al like to portray him as another trump and claim he's divisive but that's just simply not the case.

Well he looked pretty uncomfortable Here's a body language expert commenting on the situation

Our immigration in general needs to be reworked. We need to get back to a more rigid point system and we need to limit dependents as much as reasonably possible. Canada benefits from immigration done right, with modest levels that are appropriate to our infrastructure growth and focusing on people likely to be strong that contributors in short order. We do not benefit from excessive amounts of integration and excessive dependents

Because the alternative is war. That's how it is in history It will be bloody and I don't know that it would ever stop. You would get armed groups going to Ontario to commit terrorist attacks and they would be largely Unstoppable. Guaranteed that the rail lines would be disrupted and billions of dollars a day would go out the window. Our military couldn't handle trying to seize territory as large as Alberta, it just doesn't have the gear. Not to mention a reasonable portion of the may very well side with the province. As an alternative redrawing the borders might look very tempting

I don't really think of you as an affliction. But I could certainly see why you would think others would think of you that way. Like a rash or something

It doesn't matter Robo. @User and @Nationalist both pointed out nobody was denied life, liberty or property. They had no legal right to be in country. And nothing at all prevents them from trying to enter using legal means moving forward. But they'll have to apply from their home countries. There's no violation there The same way that you determine without due process whether or not someone is licensed to drive a car. Or whether someone owns a piece of property. There is documentation and if the documentation indicates that the person is not from this country and has not applied for the legal permissions or rights to stay in the country then that is sufficient. They are absolutely free once they leave the country to apply to the court system if they feel something has been done unjustly and they will absolutely be given due process. But if they cannot demonstrate a right to stay in the country then they absolutely can be removed without having a court involved. If an error has occurred that has harmed them then they will have recourse through the courts. It's pretty simple

Don't be silly, if I felt that way I would have voted for the guy At the end of the day we've got who we've got, but his whole stick was that he was super mega hyper talented that negotiating deals I could handle trump. That was his entire sales pitch. Now we expect results. And results is not what we're getting. If he did not anticipate the visit producing something positive he should not have gone. He's meeting with trump at the G 7 Summit shortly, appreciators working to at least put something on the table before he went down there even if all it was was a date that negotiations would begin

He was fine before the election, and the guy who won mentioned that until trump and carney for the two years before he got absolutely nowhere with his efforts. But once the election got called people were worried about trump and things changed quickly. They should have noticed, they know he's busy with the campaign. But according to the guy lawnsigns didn't even start going out till a week before the election. Whomever PP left in charge missed the signs and dropped the ball. But i really wonder in the face of trump if anything would have saved it.

That is absolutely untrue. The constitution does not make the federal government higher than the provincial governments at all. In no way shape or form is the federal government sovereign to the provinces. The constitution treats them as equals and does not give one precedent over the other It is true to say that the Canadian Constitution does not have an exit clause. There is nothing in there that would allow a province to break that commitment. However as you know the UN absolutely does and I doubt very much that ontario would be interested in a civil war over the matter. I'm more interesting question is what about the first nations? If it is fair to say that Alberta has the power to leave confederation because the will of the people, then it must also be true that the first nations have the right to leave alberta. But that kind of gets messy.

I don't even know how this is a thing that he can't understand. Many Canadian citizens are immigrants but they don't stop being immigrants the moment they become Canadian citizens. They are still people who moved here from somewhere else and immigrated Honestly it's comments like this that make you look at the left and shake your head and they can't understand why we don't take them seriously on these subjects. At any rate, I have posted some significant research studies in the past that showed that immigrant votes actually don't amount to much and they don't vote as a block. They are also the least likely of the citizens to vote. But it would seem that that's kind of changing a little bit and many of the immigrants are extremely unhappy with how the system worked under Trudeau and they prefer the conservative stance. Obviously that something we should probably encourage and double down on if we can, it's unlikely that carney is going to stop bringing in excessive amounts of immigrants

LOL says the guy who was mad that an extra thread got started.... then kickstarted the thread with his reply Kid, the only one with a funny face and people laughing at them around here is you I don't think that many people hate immigrants. I think there's a fair number of people who are extremely concerned with the level of immigration. Those are two very different things And if the polling and other sources are to be believed, one of the largest blocks that hate excessive immigration are immigrants. And you are immigrant for your whole life you dumbass Whether you're a citizen or not you're still an immigrant. Being an immigrant just means you moved here from somewhere else, and that's still true whether you are a citizen or not. I'm absolutely shocked that I had to explain this to you for a third time

You're not listening. What he wanted was for trump to come visit the king. Rather than the king coming to visit him. He got that. Handed him an invite and got the commitment. Then the king got a chance to set trump straight in private and now he's getting the trade deal under pretty favorable conditions. Do we even have a date for when we're going to start negotiating? Britain and France both did, but we've been told that our tariffs are going to stay on forever. He got what he wanted. I know you're absolutely desperate to try and justify your argument the carney is some sort of ultimate negotiator and statesman. But so far he's falling flat. Trump patted him on the head and said what a good little boy he is, and then went about his business completely ignoring him. We didn't build any relationships, we haven't won trump's respect, we haven't secured a date for our negotiations, we haven't got any concessions until then, and trump just slapped a 100% tariff on our movie Industries if he can figure out how to make that work and that will be crippling to two of our provinces, one of which is already in real trouble This isn't good. And nothing you can say is going to spin it as being good.

ROFMAO!!!! OH right i forgot about your 30 second attention span. Here's a rule Ex - Ok Remember the rule? Ex - What rule? Goldfish look at you and think you've got Alzheimer's LOLOL it actually explains a lot about why you're wrong so often, no wonder you can't remember the facts

They're welcome to apply for one once they're out of the country.

Typical loser response from someone who can't actually refute the points Britain just got their tariffs reduced by the way What I said was absolutely true, and it's easy to verify. They both had specific reasons to go, they both had specific things they wanted to achieve, and in both cases they were successful Why did carney go? What was his purpose? What did he hope to achieve? Because it doesn't appear that there was any success that came out of that. Trudeau patted him on the head, blew him off when he said that Canada is not for sale, told him there's nothing you can say that would reduce tariffs and then made him sit there like a school boy while he held his presser as if he was a Dad taking his kid to work or something So what did we achieve? What did we want to achieve? I'm not seeing anything and if you have some sort of bright idea then great let's hear it. To me it was a mistake to go. Your first diplomatic trip as a prime minister is important. Trump commented before he even got there that he didn't know why Carney was coming and poked fun at the fact he's running to see him (not as bad as he made fun of justin for doing the same thing but still). Now do you have anything intelligent to add or is your little pouting fit there your admission that you were wrong?

You're violating the first rule already!

Canadian gun owners would like to have a word with you.

New rule: You have to wait at least one post before having a meltdown and no, there isn't, these are the same sheriffs we've always had. It's the same ministers it's the same party was a part of this for the last 5 years, it's like those people who are afraid someone's going to trash their Tesla so they put honda on it instead and think people will believe it's a completely different car It's the same car. Or perhaps I should say, it's the same short bus ROFLMAO!!!! Awww muffin! LOL that was really terrible. You seem to be losing your shit pretty early today, didn't you get much sleep?

LOL how? we already know you don't know which way is up

Awww, is the little liberal voter upset that the conservatives made gains in ontario and that immigrants sided with the CPC? LOL! Sorry it hurts your feelings bud. The conservatives did great and made great gains, And in fact I believe they made games just about every province except maybe some of the Atlantics. And immigrants largely supported the conservatives based on the available information. So the liberals have lost the immigrant vote, the youth vote, the middle class vote, and even the working vote if the number of unions backing PP is to be believed. The only thing the libs got was the left wing ndp vote. But they're never going to be able to hold on to that for long. The conservatives are building a foundation that will be pretty hard to shake. No wonder you're complaining about people talking about it

But his people aren't. His legacy of a destroyed economy isn't. The divisions he created aren't. And all the people in power right now supported his ideas and voted for him and approved of him. Including carney. He's "gone" in name only So that the man who advised him how to fail can take over and continue the fail. How is that a good thing.

So you f'd up and you wanted to be my fault, And to prove it you accuse me of needing to use insults while at the same time using insults by claiming I have a low intelligence Kid. I am not the one who embarrassed himself here. Not only are you a retarded twit who can't make a cohesion point, but you lack the self-awareness necessary to realize you started off a complaint about people using insults by using insults. Which means you're not just dumb, you're a hypocrite. Feel free to get your head out of your ass at any time Which is fine, everybody's got their own preferences and at least I appreciate you being honest unlike most liberals who claim that they're giving us advice because they really like us to do well next time Not everybody's going to vote conservative.And that's okay

Trump, Xi, Man so many world leaders out there who are just desperate for Canada to have the very best representation so that they can have an intelligent conversation with them and work out a deal that's fair for Canada as well. None of these guys want what's best for their country after all