CdnFox

He had nothing to do with it. He was told this is what we want to do and what we're doing, he said sure Again no matter who was prime minister the same thing would have happened at the same moment. Nice try kiddo

LOL ahh yes your usual freak out when you realize the left is doing something stupid They're banning religion outdoors, no mention of berets

OOOooopse - i broke him again. He's stuck in repeat mode That's his OTHER way of admitting he lost So what's the plan big guy, just spam the channel looking like a tard with some cheezy gifs you spent a half hour finding and then insisting you just don't care about how people feel about you? ROFLMAO!!!!!!! Amusingly that commercial was for Life cereal, and just like Exflyer's life that bowl's gone soggy But he'll never get the joke, that commercial came out 4 decades before he did (he's probably desperately trying to google it now )

Stop licking your mirror! (gross!)

Pedophilia is inappropriate sexual acts with children under the age of puberty (usually 12). The only reason you're using that term is because it sounds worse than the actual truth. And that means you are the one that's claiming what he actually did isn't that bad. You're so okay with it that you had to create a fake crime that he never did in order to make it sound as bad as you'd like it to be. Once again three beard is a hypocrite. I'm sure we're all shocked. We can pretty much hear you foaming at the mouth from here Well it's the weekend, I guess you've earned your NyQuil

THat mirror was the best thing we ever bought you LOLOL

No, you would agree with that, but in reality i don't see it as being any worse than actually doing it and trying ot hide it. If anything it's worse that they did the same thing and covered it up. At least voters can hold trump accountable if they want, he's not pretending it didn't happen. Essentially what you're saying is that the crime isn't the doing of the thing, the crime is that he's admitting to doing the thing whereas others tried to hide the fact that they were doing the thing unsuccessfully It reminds me of the Spartans who used to teach their kids that it wasn't wrong to steal, it was wrong to get caught. Davis again because it is so critical and hopefully those of you on the left you still have some reasonable nature's to you will understand, once you decide it's ok for YOUR side to cross a line and go beyond what is acceptable, you give permission for the next guy to decide how and where HE"S going to cross the line, and HE will decide what is or isn't acceptable. And nobody is going to be interested in YOUR opinion at that point because you were the ones who decided to abandon the line in the first place (that would be the collective 'you' of course not you personally per se ) Democrats stood idly by while obama and Hillary conspired to create fake intelligence reports to go after their political rival with absolutely no real evidence and that was obvious from the beginning. Democrats stood idly by while their leaders arranged for what can only be called "designer" charges that had never ever been laid before to be brought against trump. The democrats cheered when prosecutors went after trump and his money for civil fraud where there was not a single person complaining and no actual fraud had taken place. The democrats were ecstatic about the idea of having a judge keep trump's name from the ballots in violation of the constitution. Now you don't get a say. If the democrats ever form power again then if their supporters are smart they will make sure the party understands That they need to reset things and they need to be the ones to say "WE will stop doing this, we will break the cycle and we are going to establish the rules again", and then live with it. But they can't expect to break the rules and then demand that the other side plays by them when it's their turn

Once you say it's acceptable at all, then you lose the ability to say to others where THEY should draw the line. And that's the problem. And i do remember the prosecutor in trump's case RUNNING on the idea that he would go after trump and saying so directly. So how is that different? And i remember kamala suggesting SHE would go after trump and would be good because 'she's used to dealing with criminals" etc. So nope. At this stage if you didn't raise a ruckas back then about those politicians doing it then you can't say boo now.

Yes yes, I've already accepted your admission of defeat.

I accept your admission of defeat But seriously keep me out of your weird sex fantasies, you're pretty gross

That dog don't hunt. Either it's wrong or it's not. And if you are willing to turn a blind eye to it when it's convenient under the excuse that it's only a LITTLE evil and corrupt, then you lose the right to complain if someone else sets the bar differently. The brazenness doesn't play into it. Either this kind of thing is okay or this kind of thing is wrong. The democrats established that this kind of thing is okay. The republicans are now taking that and running with it. If the democrats ever get back into power they can choose at that time to say what we did was wrong and we're going to change how things are done in the future and then get by in for that. But we're seeing again and again democrats trying to sell this idea where they're saying " All right maybe it was a little wrong when we did it, but don't you think we should stop now before you do it?" And everyone knows full well the democrats are going to do it again the moment they get back into power So a better choice is to just do the same things to them as they've been doing in spades. Perhaps they will come to the realization that there is a price for them doing these things and that if you want to live without these things then they have to give them up too

Absolute bulllcrap. Politics has played a role in the judicial system for ages in the us. It didn't "become corrupted" with trump. Remember when bill clinton ran across the tarmac to lynch's plane as she was deciding about charges to hillary clinton to 'talk about their grandchildren'? Bill Clinton, AG Loretta Lynch meet on tarmac in Phoenix - CBS News Once again the left likes to pretend that this is all terrible stuff that's never happened before but that's not the truth. There is ample evidence of democrat interference with the doj and the case of clinton, obama ordered the intelligence agencies to provide a false report about trump, etc etc. And once again when all that was happening the left was told "If you let this go and don't speak up it'll be used against you some day." Well today is someday it would seem.

Probably. but once you open the door to restrictions on religion like that it'll wind up getting used and abused against christians as well. I'm not terribly religious but i do think it's important to protect the rights of those who are. If you want to restrict large gatherings and such because they're disruptive that's one thing but then do that, don't tell people where they can and cannot pray

No he didn't. I doubt he'd even heard of it. Staffers would have said "this is what we're doing btw' and he'd have said 'er ok'. THis is right up there with him creating an office to announce a bunch of major projects which were already happening regardless then trying to take credit for it He did nothing

Ugh. I'm not sure which body part of yours you're talking to right now, but i've asked you many times to leave me out of your weirdo fantasies

If you posted that as an example of how the left has better mental health, I have some terrible news for you

Exactly as i said. You excuse it when it's "your side". it's the same thing. You just don't mind when it's your guys and you hate it when it's someone else. So you "buying it" is the problem - you 'buy in' when you feel like and not when you don't. Sure, and it's pretty wild some of the things he says But it's not like hitler. He was jewish. Did you think jews had any rights before? it's the same thing. The difference is how you look at the one group doing it vs the others. And others do the same thing in return saying biden and obama and hillary were worse. You don't get to play the "mine was a 3 yours was a 7' game.. It's either ok or it's not. To what? CNN and your echo chamber? That's not a thing. They did. They supported the "mostly peaceful but fiery' protests. They raised money to bail out some of the people arrested. OAC said that riots like this were SUPPOSED to make people uncomfortable. Sorry, but they sure as hell weren't against it. They frequently will pay a little lip service but then it's right back to supporting it ..... "well of course i don't condone violence but THEY TOTALLY HAD IT COMING AND I FULLY UNDERSTAND WHY THE KIDS WOULD DO THAT AND THEY SHOULD ALLLL BUUUUUUUURRRRRNNNN" LOL Great. Still not hitler and still not different than the dems. Unless they're things that hitler said but no dem ever did don't bother. He never did. Because they're democrats who you feel ARENThilter but did the same things trump does. So ... why weren't you calling them hilter? Simple answer is that you just like calling trump hitler and trump's actions aren't really 'hitler's playbook'. Did you forget what we were talking about? Yeah, hitler didn't do any of that. If anything he brought in MORE institutions, brought in universal health care, opened a bunch of new gov't beurocracies... so how is that 'hitler's playbook'? And sorry but cutting gov't departments has been done millions of times by gov'ts around the world, that's not 'hitler'/ Sure, he stopped getting sued or having fake lawsuits Hate to break it to you but all president's have their net worth go up. If he did something illegal impeach him. Sounds like they're doing great.... got any proof of corruption or illegal behavior? No? Biden did exactly the same thing with hunter. Sorry swing and a miss there Dude they physically invaded our lands once, and we formed canada because it was almost certain they were going to again. And they've eyeballed us a FEW times since, trump is NOT the first. Well that was a lot of words to get to "yeah you're right all along" Trump is trump. He's not hilter, he's not stalin, he's not darth vader. But the left doesn't want to actually break down his issues, they want to call him 'hilter' because they want to dehumanize him. You don't have to listen to what hitler has to say, you just have to hate him. That's their thinking. So again it comes back to what I was saying. The left has already taken dehumanization to an extreme level so complaining at this point that the democrats are the victims at this point in time because the republicans are doing it isn't going to fly.

You should try to be honest with me whether you're going to europe or not You mean like biden did with anti vaxxers. Or "minsinformation spreaders' like people who said hunter's laptop was real Like nancy pelosi and hillary clinton did? Or kamala with her whole "trump is hitler his voters are nazis' thing? Hilter didn't actually do that Swing and a miss. Like hillary who is TO THIS DAY claiming trump was not the legit president? Sorry but that's just stupid. That's not even a thing. Germany didn't have a constitution. And trump has never repudiated the constitution. You mean like the dem support of the massive BLM riots? Or did you mean arrests? If you're counting arrests as violence, then they did have trump arrested on 'trumped up' charges a few times Hilter never did that, and courts do that in the usa, not trump. Oh you mean like constantly repeating fake statements trump never said? Like "there will be blood in the streets'?Or that trump was hilter and should be opposed? Or that his supporters were human garbage? Hilter never did that. Yeash. And hillary said she was going to capture the courts for the dems, so..... Oh you mean like taking money through your son for selling influence? Or did you mean selling influence while she was in charge of the state depertment for 'donations' to the charity that pays her hubby? (hilary). Or perhaps you mean using the nations security forces to produce a fake security assessment of a political opponent? That's almost ALL the us presidents. Cuba and jfk? grenada? iraq? i could go on for quite a while here. It's literally the truth that americans coined the term 'gunboat diplomacy'. Trying to claim that was unique to hitler is silly. As I said going into this, the only way it's true is if you generalize so badly that I could apply to almost any politician. I'm worse a number of those things aren't even things Hitler did. And that tells me you didn't actually think about any of it you're just rattling off stuff that you think Hitler might have done Trump is no more Hitler than Biden was

It actually came pretty close. In fact to be honest I think carney thought there was no chance and then suddenly realized there was a very real chance. So I made concessions that would make lizzy happy and such. And when it's as close as it was there's always the chance of a math error or miscommunication leading to a consequence. But I think the odds were slim. That's no surprise, obviously eveyone knew that from the beginning. But i wouldn't say zero.

Well if you want to get technical I never said you said it. I just said it was no more true than that statement So if you want to get technical you're still wrong. But we both know that that was the sentiment you were expressing. And trump isn't following Hitler's Playbook anymore than any other politician And no it hasn't been well documented in the slightest, a number of extreme left anti-trump websites make these comparisons and they always wind up being completely bogus. They'll be on the lines of trump chews gum, Hitler chews gum, my god they might as well have been separated at birth. I tell you what, let's have some fun. Go find three things that you feel represent examples of trump following Hitler's Playbook that wouldn't also apply to other politicians that are democrats and we'll see what you come up with Spoiler, I doubt this ends well for you

I accept your admission of defeat

Utter lie. There's no comparison unless you get so vague and general that honestly it could apply to any politician. Sorry. It's not even close. It's not even the same general circumstances. "D It's exactly the same level of truth as 'trump is the party of hitler" So there you go. It doesn't match up to your echo chamber self crafted reality but it's just fine with actual reality And once again you can't even refute the points or defend your position, you just make a statement and stomp your feet and cry about how unfair the world is rather than offer any logic reason or fact that might back you up.

Course it's about you. Who did you think I'm replying to? Is there somebody else with you right now that we don't know about? Can anyone else in the room with you see them? LOL If your words mirror the crazies out there then you get to share a seat with them. Sorry, but you don't get to say kill the Jews and not be compared to the Nazis So in other words when you call people a Nazi it's perfectly justified but if anybody else calls a left Winger something then it's dehumanizing. You're just digging yourself deeper here kiddo Sure they do. In fact more than one does. Which is kind of a scary thing for the Americans but honest to god biden the light is ass off. So did Obama although he was at least a lot more focused on trying to hide that fact from Americans for as long as possible. The difference is you're prepared to give anybody who's not trump or at the very least republican a complete free wash.. And you emphasize at highlight things that trump does or says. So in your mind it's an imbalance but in reality objectively it's the same thing.

LOL is that what you mom askes you after breastfeeding? I'm pretty sure you still do

Triggered leftie loser who can't refute a single thing being said and resorts to grade 3 insults like 'wrong wingers' in a desperate attempt to soothe his broken and shattered ego is triggered