CdnFox

So you admit you said it then. Sorry but you were for a specifically to the incidents and deaths of October 7th. And no this isn't another flare up. This was a war deliberately started by Hamas without justification. So now you claim that the attack was simply an act of resistance. It's resistance when you slaughter children and women civilians, that's your claim? Nope Nope. It means the British. That's it. And only blame them for starting them off bad, he didn't blame them for the fact that the Palestinians decided to choose violence instead of peace There isn't. He thought Israel was great, he thought Britain handled it poorly and he hopes that both sides would someday choose peace. Palestine didn't No I really don't lose at all. Einstein's words just make it clear two things can be true, praise for Israel and condemnation for Zionist terrorism. Not at all. And you were the one that literally demanded, demanded! That I post them The problem is you are the one playing games and when you post his works in their entirety it becomes clear that what you were saying was bullshit and now you're angry Nope Nope. The Israelis have tried many times to bring peace to the region and the Palestinians have deliberately refused. They are the scum, they are the aggressors, they are the terrorists, and now they are dying in large numbers as well they should. There's a price to be paid for that kind of attack and the deliberate targeting and slaughter of civilians. ???? Da fuk? The only difference between you and me is that you think that it's okay and in fact a human right for terrorists to slaughter civilians without warning during a time of peace. I do not. All your ignorant little games and bullshit lies about 80 years of war are simply to justify the violence that you approve of now. But there is no justification for what happened. It's not a flare up, it's not a human right, it was an act of terrorism perpetrated against women and children without warning by a group of evil people who have now brought war upon them their own land. Which makes them criminals twice, once for killing Israeli civilians and the second time for engineering the death of so many of their own

There's truth in that but tariffs are actually more than a tax. If they were just a tax, we'd call them a tax and there are such things as import taxes which are different from tariffs. Tariffs are designed to specifically restrict the flow of trade. It's not just about wanting customers to pay more for a product it's about wanting people to buy less of a product. There are several reasons why a country might consider this. Personally I agree with Reagan that tariffs wind up doing more harm than good in the long run. But trump obviously believes that he will create more jobs and more economy at home by restricting trade with other countries. He's betting that wages and opportunity goes up more than the cost increase due to tariffs. We'll have to see if that's true.

Grippen is swedish for griffin big guy The name Gripen comes from the word Griffin in English and represents a mythical creature that has the face, beak, claws and wings of an eagle and the body o LOL what was that again about being familiar with what you're talking about?

Can't recuse yourself at that point. She already would have given instructions and everybody would have known how the way of the land was. We're using yourself to that point is just a show. Everybody knows that. You're being a 100% dishonest

Awww, do you need your diaper changed again little guy? You're sounding a bit like you're getting a rash He learned it from biden and hillary of course. They've said all of those things. In fact biden called trump's supporters garbage people during the campaign. Didn't notice you asking "why" then. Sorry kid but you've been told, the rule is you cannot criticize others for doing the things you refused to criticize your own side for when they did it. That's just how it works

Specifically directly in reference to the October attack. Repetitively. You weren't vague. They're irrelevant. There is no excuse for the attack on civilians like that. Nope. You're trying to twist what he said again. The quote i posted was the last of his letters on the subject. He was proud of isreal, he was proud of the isrealis and what they had done. In his perfect world palestians and jews would have been one country who respected each other but he didn't blame israel at all for the fact it didn't work out that way. You lose that one hard kid. No. The british are not us. That's not how it works. Sorry kiddo. Further, he blamed the british for starting things off poorly. But he did not blame them for the ongoing issues, that was the choice of the israelis and the palestinians. The israelis offered peace many times. The Palestinians offered 'from the river to the sea' constantly. Your whole premise falls apart entirely when you look at what he actually said. You want to take snippets out of context and ignore the rest but that's not how it works, that's just more lies. He was proud of israel, he HOPED that one day the palestinians and the jews could live in harmony. But he did not anticipate the rampant barbarian hatred and fundimentally violent nature of the Palestinians. Their attack was 100 percent unjustified, there is no possible excuse for it, they COULD have chosen peace and prosperity decades ago and instead chose war and death, and that didn't work out for them.

Whataboutism is your way of trying to dodge the role the dems have played in the current situation. Sorry kid, that isn't whataboutism. If you punch someone in the face, and they punch you back, and you try to pretend that the fact you punched first isn't relevant, you're simply being dishonest. Not to mention wildly stupid Trump has accomplished quite a bit. It may not be things you approve of but you can't say he hasn't done anything. And the hatred was started by the democrats. They're the ones who let the rhetoric get out of control early on. When you grow up and learn to face the truth and address the points that are raised to you like a man instead of running like a child behind trite buzzwords and dismissive pap, then we can talk about change.

Don't kid yourself. It'll be everybody. The 1% is always want to know what the other 1% are doing

Of course there was, and I am extremely comfortable with the truth. It tends to serve me well and allows me to crush little twats like you You're just bitter because you realize you put your foot in it and now you look stupid having done the very thing you were denying democrats and left Wingers like yourself do LOL it was pretty funny

If we're being 100% honest I don't see a big difference between that and trump 20 years ago other than he didn't have the ability to text at the time It really doesn't speak to a mental illness. He might be slightly narcissistic and possibly borderline sociopath but those are normal states for people to exist in as part of the spectrum of mental states. Arguably almost all of the presidents that have ever been fall into those categories to one degree or another. You simply cannot get to the very top of the food chain without being very driven, very convinced that you're the most important thing in the universe, and extremely competitive. As to whether or not he should be presidents, the people have said so and may I remind you that you back to guy who was actually suffering mental health issues long after it should have been apparent that he wasn't cognitively functioning at a reasonable level

That's not necessarily true. Well I generally agree with the sentiment the fact is people who are considering made are often doing so had a. Of extreme emotional distress in their life. They can be highly susceptible to the influence or persuasion of others at that time. If you take a veteran who has bad ptds And you can't sleep and is emotionally distressed and physically injured or ailing due to wounds he received years ago and you are telling him that you can't treat him and the government won't pay for it, And as he sits there emotionally crippled and unable to decide what to do in an unable to cope with his emotional state and the prospect of continued suffering and you say to him "By the way there is an option, have you considered maid? it might be for the best..." At that point you have significantly colored that person's thinking and they may not be necessarily making that decision on their own. I still believe in maid, but I do have concerns

oh don't think i don't empathize LOL Damn near missed one this morning. I remember a joke: Dr: " You appear to have gout" Patient: "What? I thought gout was only a rich man's disease!" Dr: " that used to be true, but credit cards solved that" I grew up with a shag carpet And i eat a lot of PBJ. and i AM a hunka hunka burning love... heyyyyyy wait a minute....

Arguably true, but I think we would both agree that there are some serious problems with that. There may be an opportunity the next time the democrats get in. Although to be honest with you the amount of work that would be required for both sides to make that happen is substantial and I think both sides would be resistant. Even if the leaders of the day realize that this is basically an exercise in mutually assured destruction and that the only way forward is for both sides to agree to changes that would disarm everybody, there will always be members on both sides who feel that they need to keep that weapon in their back pocket. The problem is that mentality tends to lead to a Downward spiral. Sooner or later one side uses it again and then the other feels justified in reciprocating and the other side reciprocates the next time and so on and so on. This kind of decline has been the death of many societies and empires over the years and I'm not sure I ever recall reading about one that managed to correct the problems once it had started seriously

In other words you're angry at the truth and can't refute it so you'll attack me instead kid, everything I said was completely true and easily observed. Want proof? Instead of actually addressing what I said you chose to try and dehumanize me by calling me a troll so that you didn't have to actually address the points I raised. Game set and match kid

LOL, sometimes you just gotta lean into it

You did and I wasn't the only person to call you on it. And I certainly wasn't the only time you suggested but that attack was justified. Ohh noooooeess, triggered leftie liar is triggered Sure, there are many, but here's one that was wrtten ONE YEAR AFTER what you quoted The Jews of Israel (1949) There is no problem of such overwhelming importance to us Jews as consolidating that which has been accomplished in Israel with amazing energy and an unequalled willingness for sacrifice. May the joy and admiration that fill us when we think of all that this small group of energetic and thoughtful people has achieved give us the strength to accept the great responsibility which the present situation has placed upon us. -Albert Einstein The fact is you took one small note and took it entirely out of context. Both before the creation of isreal and after he praised isreal and it's creation and the actions and the people involved. He regretted that the jews and arabs couldn't find a way to live in peace and he blamed the british for creating a hostile environment that put one against the other but he was pro isreal and did NOT believe that they had done anything wrong. You lose kid. You should learn to read more than just your echo chamber. Exactly. anyone who denies what einstein REALLY said instead of taking him out of context is exactly that person. And that would be you. You are, as always, a liar and a terrorist supporter. You should feel disgusted.

5% of all deaths in Canada, and I mean all deaths, we're from maid last year We've heard the stories of veterans being told to consider made rather than other treatments. I firmly believe people should have the right to die with dignity at their decision. But I do have to wonder sometimes if there isn't a problem

So you Freely admit you're trying to get people killed

It is 100% what you said. We were discussing the specific event and you said they were exercising their human rights to resist oppression with that attack. Those were literally your words, and not just once but few times when I came back and challenged you on that. We've been through that and we know that that's a lie. Fact of the matter is the only people that use that defense are people that are excited and happy about the idea of killing women and children in terrorist attacks to promote the group that they prefer. It's not real

The fact that you have nothing intelligent to say doesn't mean that others don't And I love that you're still too much of a coward to address me directly, as I said in another post I can at least respect moon box in that respect compared to you

Honestly I think he said it because he's not afraid to lie and he though it would help him get elected. There are ways that the government could massively stimulate huge increases in construction but unfortunately loaning money to developers is not one of them. That has not been their problem. That's true. Although if we're being fair part of the problem has been that municipalities and cities have become a little drunk on the money they make from Developers in the forms of fees and charges and those have grown substantially if not exponentially in some areas. But the feds could have done a lot more in recent years and matching immigration to housing starts should have been a no-brainer

You are horrifically mistaken. Currently as things stand in British Columbia about 55 to 60% of the cost of building a new home development for a contractor is in red tape and compliance issues No municipality has the right to red tape. Municipalities and cities do not exist in the constitution, only provinces and federal governments do. All lower forms of government derive their power from the provincial government itself and the provincial government can dictate whatever it likes. They absolutely do. I absolutely gave you a link to a story about the government building things I know reading isn't your forte but for god's sake it was an easy link And yes, Poilievre did quite a bit when he was minister under harper. And they built more homes then then are being built in Canada right now. And that was 15 years ago when we had a lower population. The government absolutely has the ability to impact how many homes are built and in fact that's something cardi has just set up a department to do but unfortunately it's failing. And anybody familiar with the industry could have told you that's what was going to happen. He's not addressing the right problems

It's not complicated. Control population growth to match growth in medical capacity. Introduce Private/public blended solutions such as those which have been wildly succcessful in france Restore full federal funding OR restore the collection of taxes for that purpose to the provinces. Done. Other places do this right. we do it wrong and it shows.

They didn't. That's just a lie that those who support the terrorist killing of innocent civilians and babies like to spout in order to justify they're completely immoral stance. There's no Tit for Tat. These guys are terrorist scum and you support them because you believe it's okay to kill women and children without warning in an act of terrorism. You have said so many times. It was their human right to do so you claimed.

Well first off that's absolutely false. Governments of all levels build housing all the time. One of many examples: BC Gov News In addition government set the stage for whether or not it is Affordable to build. Governments have a direct impact on whether or not developers are interested in building within an area or not. So governments do have the ability to directly influence where homes are built and how many homes are built. They don't just sit back and hope.