-
Posts
41,356 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
351
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by CdnFox
-
I know and 40 angles got their wings and for that shining brief moment there was world peace and no hunger But in a month people won't be able to afford food or shelter. The problem is that the majority of liberal voters are actually retired and or older gov't workers right now and they're not impacted by the change in economy the same way younger people are. So they think everything is fine.
-
Those are legitimate risks. Make no mistake, I am against quantitative easing generally speaking. And there are many legitimate things to criticize about the current economic policy, but what you said before was inaccurate. Which is great but the effect of those markets are controled through quantitative easing, And as I pointed out those people are still buying lots of bonds or the bond interest rates would be going up. Well that's always the million dollar question. It's one a fair number of countries are asking themselves right now The US is an anchor economy. That's going to let the Americans get away with a lot more than other countries would be able to in that regard. But the obvious answer is not forever. The theory that trump seems to be operating under is that he will somehow supercharge the economy to the point where tax revenues will shoot up and there will be no need to worry about the deficit because the budget will balance itself. We had a guy like that running Canada for the last 10 years and it caused problems 😁 Time will tell if trump is correct or not. The economy is doing fairly well under him but not well enough to justify the amount of money he's borrowing currently, Eventually something will have to be done about that No I just know what I'm talking about and I know what you were talking about is nonsense. As I have said there are significant issues that are legitimately worth criticizing about trump's current policies but the ones you brought up were not real I would point out that if you were to go back and look at my comments in February and March I was the one suggesting that by this time I expected to see the economy actually and slightly worse condition and inflation slightly higher than it is right now because I felt his policies would be a drag on the economy more than they have been. So it's not like I've been cheering him on.
-
You're the one that called your mother unprivileged and with a mental disorder. That wasn't me kiddo Maybe don't say your mom has a mental disorder if you don't want people to talk about her mental disorder. I mean it must be pretty bad if even you are talking about it Talking about your mom again? I know you've said previously that she let your father do inappropriate things with you but this weird passive aggressive attacks on her while attempting to defend her are just odd Although it does explain why you're so messed up
-
Carney, Ford discussed idea of an early federal election to secure majority, sources say - The Globe and Mail So that lying sack of crap Carney indeed was thinking about going to the polls and getting his majority and Doug Ford was supporting him. And l love the whole "i totally think carney should go to the polls and get a majority but please don't think that means i'm endorsing him" routine. The liberals are going to do whatever it takes to try and lock in 4 years where they don't have to be accountable.
-
Canada needs to diversify trade but isn't going to.
CdnFox replied to I am Groot's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
BTW with regards to those trips: Mark Carney billed taxpayers $94K for in-flight catering on one single trip -
That's actually amazing. It's not surprising considering that democrats also believe that black people can't get iD and they're too stupid to use the internet but to see it ingrained at that level is actually a little startling to me. Everyday new evidence comes out that the most racist group in the world is the left
-
And failed there too As I have explained to you that's not how quantitative easing works . The FED winds up buying its own bonds. While foreign investment helps the reality is is it's not required for quantitative easing Here's a short blurb from AI Yes, the Federal Reserve frequently buys U.S. Treasury bonds and other government securities through "open market operations" to manage monetary policy, stabilize markets, and influence interest rates. It does not buy them directly from the Treasury Department, but rather from authorized financial institutions in the secondary market. So no America does not rely heavily on global Capital markets to fund its large and growing budget deficits Further, bond interest rates are extremely low right now. They're even lower than they were under Biden which means the countries are buying them. If the US doesn't have the ability to sell them then the interest rate goes up and that hasn't happened So once again you are 100% wrong and you do not understand how any of this works There are issues with the economy right now and with the quantitative easing that's happening but you haven't actually touched on any of the real problems Read a book before you wind up sounding like a twat
-
The problem is that thanks to the left it now requires two incomes to get by This started at the end of the '60s beginning of the '70s when liberal women demanded that their incomes be included in their husband's calculations for how much of a mortgage you could get. At the time all banks assumed that a woman who was married would become pregnant shortly and leave the workforce so her income was not calculated in the couples mortgage eligibility calculations No fair enough, I can understand women saying that they should have their income included and they shouldn't be considered to just be baby factories. Quite understandable . But the upside was that suddenly people could afford much larger mortgages. And guess what happened to housing price is throughout the seventies. That trend continued and pretty soon it wasn't just that you could get a bigger house with two incomes, in order to get any decent house you need it to incomes and nowadays to get literally anything bigger than an outhouse you need to incomes. Add to that massive taxation, massive increases in the cost of compliance with local building codes, massive reduction in investment in business which has seriously repressed the job market and the value of the job market and insane taxes like the carbon tax and pretty soon you need to people earning as much as they can just to get by. No time for children And here's the latest example, you know what would really help women get back into the workplace but still have children? Being able to work flexible hours from home. No need for daycare, they can take care of the kids and get them to school and be there afterwards if they can work from home and have some flexibility in their hours Covid prove this. But what's the federal government doing? Doing everything it can to force people back to the workplace where women with children cannot afford to go.
-
That's what happened the last six times so I got to say you got history on your side
-
Canada needs to diversify trade but isn't going to.
CdnFox replied to I am Groot's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
Obviously you know it's correct or you would have some sort of counter argument. Instead of worrying about the next let's talk about the last prime ministers. Harper flew all around the world too, but you know what he came back with? Actual trade arrangements that benefited Canada substantially. You know who didn't despite flying all over the world? Trudeau. In fact we lost trade arrangements when he flew around the world. And you know who isn't delivering any trade arrangements now? Carney despite having flown around the world two or three times Hey when we get the next government in office if it's conservative I'm pretty sure they'll fly around the world and actually come back with trade arrangements again. It's what they do But if you make five or six trade related trips where your stated purpose is to get new trade agreements which is exactly what carney has done and you come back with nothing other than you gave away our car market to the Chinese, That's not impressive regardless whether it's liberal or conservative -
LOL he got about 1 percent less than Carney did in the election so if he's not very good carney isn't either And voting intentions remain about the same. Carney just had a major PR victory, so sure he's a little ahead right now. The CBC sees to that. Occasionally you get a little bump. But people still can't afford food or homes and they can't eat speeches from Davos. Sooooo.... we'll see.
-
And I keep telling you that i'm not responsible for YOUR actions. You keep insisting that i control you and that you can only stop acting like an ass if I do something. Kid, for the last time, you're responsible for your actions. Nobody else. As much as you wish it, i'm not your father nor your 'master', i don't control you, YOU are supposed to do that. Yeah this is his whole stick. It's not HIM you see, I FORCE him to do his behavior and YOU force him to this behavior and he has NO CONTROL!!! He's not mentally well, and i do honestly believe he's a teen.
-
Yes, YOU were the one who insulted your dead parents. I pointed out how weird that was, but i wasn't going to argue with you. Now you're mad that YOU said your mother, and i quote, your mother was "underprivileged and mentally impaired" Now you want to be mad at me because of what YOU said? LOL sure kiddo
-
When I Read This, I Remember Renee Good
CdnFox replied to robosmith's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
INSANE DELUSION of MASS COLUSION New name of my punk rock band. -
If you mean federally empowered law enforcement agents then you're right Or do you support vigilante justice and violence? Are you suggesting that perhaps bands of armed citizens should be going around and shooting Mexicans rather than allowing ice to address them for example? You seem to be advocating citizen violence. You understand that's how people get shot right? Why is it that people on the left always go to the most violent solution they can think of when they don't like what's happening
-
Canada needs to diversify trade but isn't going to.
CdnFox replied to I am Groot's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
This echoes what I've been saying. Carney is out there promoting his own brand and making his own contacts, this will not result in any substantial trade deals. Further he is going out of his way to prevent things like pipeline deals. Meanwhile food inflation is going through the roof and realistically for all practical purposes we're in a recession, it's just a shallow one. Which means things slowly and slowly get worse economically. He's basically boiling the Frog by turning up the water slowly Honestly I think he doesn't really want to be prime minister for much more than 4 years or 5 years, by then he'll help secured enough fortune that he can retire at around 65 or so with a 100 million to 1 billion dollars a year in income and invitations to all the cool parties around Europe and the rest of the world In other words you were too stupid to figure it out and now you want it to be someone else's fault Yet you supported a government it was done everything you can to avoid infrastructure spending on things like ports or Pipelines. And Carney isn't going to be any better. So how can you say that you can clearly see the problem and then support a government that's specifically ignores the problem -
But I just can't tell you how to vote or even check how you did vote. The only people that ice would scare away are illegals that might get arrested. I mean it might be a good day to bring your papers with you just in case I suppose if you happen to have been born outside of the US but if you're legally in the country and legally a citizen how would the presence of ice affect you? Just go vote
-
When I Read This, I Remember Renee Good
CdnFox replied to robosmith's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
So you admit all of the other lies he mentioned were true, the left-wing media did lie about that Well I think you proved his point for him
