Infidel Dog

I'm halfway through. I like it. He just said something that resonates with me because sometimes I think I'm the only one who notices. Progressives can be right or left. They're most blatant on the left so that's where you direct your fire is all. But that's not what he's really talking about. The topic is much larger. I just wanted to stop halfway in to go "Yay you, for noticing that bit, guy."

And what exactly do you have? Cowardly or corrupt justices refused to put existing evidence on trial or give the plaintiff time or ability to gather the whole truth. Much evidence has been gathered since. Go ahead tell me 2000 mules is just a popcorn flick. I'll show why it isn't. Then you can try to produce something more than a slur to show me why it is. We'll see who's got "nothing." I'll show you what "Zuckerbucks" are. Then you can give me some evidence telling me why only Democrat donators are able to slip an illegal amount of funding into how the election is run. Except you can't. We both know it. And I've had about enough of the king of wrong standing on his soap box bragging BS about how he's shown only Republicans have ever been found guilty of election fraud when all he's really proved is election fraud exists. Would you like to see what the Democrats have been up to since you've been busy ignoring that side of the question? Go ahead then, your majesty. Show me what you've got and I'll show you what I've got. We'll see who's got "nothin'." Lets' do this then. Do you two really just want to posture then smear n slur or do you actually want to get into the nitty gritty of what the evidence actually shows. Very well. Show me what you've got. I'm your Huckleberry.

There was no "Big Lie." Pardon me there is, kind of. The big lie is there was no rigging of media, judicial tampering, tampering of the electoral process and yes, fraud. There was good reason to be suspicious of that election. And what was done the perpetrators want to do again. They're calling it "protecting democracy." There's another big lie for you. Oh...and here's another one. There was no "insurrection." That's a media driven lie. There was a minor riot organized by a small group of agitators and possibly government agents. Oh and Beave, all these smears and slurs you're slinging should be addressed to a mirror.

Shifty is always the man with the 'smoking gun' evidence. He was on CNN every other night telling America he had the evidence that was going to put Trump away for Russiagate. He was going to produce it any day...except he never did. Same thing with both failed impeachments. Remember his secret investigative panels in the basement of the Capitol building. Achieved what's become his customary nothing. And now he's the man with the plan to finally get Trump for what he and the rest of the Democrat clown show are calling "the insurrection." The insurrection erection. Just another failed production from Shifty Schiff and crew.

As part of my morning scroll I hit this American archive site for Conservative media: https://thelibertydaily.com/ They have fun with titles. They call Shifty the "Bug-eyed, Burbank, Bolshevik."

BTW seems awful important to a "good conservative" like yourself not to consider the evidence of possible electoral malfeasance by the regressive left. Why is that?

Linda Parker is an Obama judge. She was writing an opinion for a lawsuit. Dinesh D'Souza is documentary film maker. If your point is the opinion of one is sacrosanct, or at least credible and the other is a partisan hack, yeah maybe, maybe both but you don't make one's lies born out of partisan corruption credible by disparaging the other. Meanwhile...

Of course there is. The only question is "how much was there in the 2020 American election?" I would answer, a lot more than you seem able to recognize. I'll give you a pass as a gullible easily swayed by the Regressive left's secretarial pool in the MSM and the post modern narrative though. BTW, you're no part of a conservative. The reason why not is in the title. "Conserve." The Prog God that pulls the gullibles' strings is for bringing things down around all our ears. They sold you poor saps on the lie they can or even want to "build back better" once they've ripped it all down. Whatever they actually have planned though, it's not "conserving."

What? We can't call him "Uncle Joe" anymore?

Well if you don't want to grab the guns what do you want? Be sure to be as cryptic or diversionary as possible if you finally dare to answer that one. Because, of course, that's going to impress us. Now as to which countries lead the US (or at least did by records up 2015) in mass shootings there's tons of links to that but try this one from the New York Post: America doesn’t actually lead the world in mass shootings or this one from Crime Prevention Research Center: How a Botched Study Fooled the World About the U.S. Share of Mass Public Shootings: U.S. Rate is Lower than Global Average where you'll find comment like: "Of the 86 countries where we have identified mass public shootings, the US ranks 56th per capita in its rate of attacks and 61st in mass public shooting murder rate. Norway, Finland, Switzerland and Russia all have at least 45 percent higher rates of murder from mass public shootings than the United States."

That's how you authorize voter fraud is it? By mocking outrage at Trump wanting the RINOs and Neo-con Republicans to support voter integrity and investigate an obviously rigged election. As far as suspicion goes I notice you have none as to how a guy who couldn't fill an auditorium during his campaign could get a historical record number of votes in the actual election. Not to mention a metaphorical, tropical rainstorm of suspicious activity and outright contradictions to historical precedent in elections and just plain common sense.

Which makes it even more amazing that America is not even close to having the most mass shootings per capita world wide, but does make it pretty much impossible that you could grab all the guns without going full-on totalitarian. Whether you know that or have just bought into the nonsense narrative that supporting more government control somehow makes you morally superior that's what it's really about. Scooping up control on the way to total political control. That's all control over guns, health care, the environment or whatever's next is ever really about.

That's a myth started around 2015 and based on one bad study. John Stossel explains: Now things may have changed since 2015. You'd have to ask why if that's your new claim. Bet ya the Biden years have moved stats more than a bit.

Great idea. Here's one that doesn't get enough ink. It's connected to the 2020 ballot box stuffing True the Vote pointed an unassailable finger at. The Zuckerbucks, big money through NGO 501c's scam: How Zuckerberg Used a Tax-Exempt Foundation to Help Biden Fix the 2020 Election This one in particular needs more consideration: "(b) dispatch CTCL agents to train poll workers; and (c) fund “Happy Faces,” a temporary staffing agency affiliated with the Georgia Democrat Stacey Abrams, to count the votes on election night in Fulton County." I don't believe it was limited to Georgia and it would explain so much. I saw videos of election staff being trained on how to push poll watchers out of the way and such. Basically counting operations could be financed by illegal Zuckerbucks. It would explain things like poll watchers and media being forced out of buildings. The windows to counting stations being blocked off by staff, the mysterious plumbing explosion that turned out to be a plugged toilet and allowed some very mysterious activity by a mother and daughter team of counters in Georgia and was never properly investigated. Swarms of ballot holders appearing early in the morning in Philadelphia after the polls had closed...stuff like that. If you run the counting stations you can pretty much do whatever you want. There should be a RICO investigation but don't expect that under a Biden administration. I worry they're going to do it again in the midterms. If they get away with that. Forget about it. There's no such thing as fair elections in America.

Nope. They're Progs, Dems, RINOs, Liberal neo-cons, or some other form of leftist infiltrator of the right like the faux conservative pervs of the Lincoln project. Libertarians and some phony Christians sneak in there from time to time too. But basically they've all been corrupted by the twisted, post-modern thought and narrative wrongly labelled as "Progressive" that has you and so many others unfortunately indoctrinated.

Your refusal to consider the evidence does not mean it doesn't exist. It only illustrates the "Progressive" tendency to present what they wish was true as reality. And isolated incidents do not damn all your hopeful targets of a targetted demographic everywhere. If they did, this one would paint all Democrats as election frauds and cheats. cheats: Buchanan County supervisor indicted on election fraud, embezzlement charges

What should I do. Hand you some more matches?

I started one, one time. On some other forum. I forget which one. I think I called it The Progtionary or something like that. I forget exactly how it went. Something like... BLM: An active grift making race traitor black Marxists rich since Trayvon Martin won his Darwin Award. Really pissed off the right people. I remember that. I've been thinking of doing a similar one here. I'll call it. Lie Labels: Liebels.

I'll agree with you there. Too many of us - the majority of us even - in the free west have gotten fat, lazy and apathetic. We ignore the commiefication from within. We let the mind engineers controlling your narrative call it "Progress" and pretend that isn't obvious BS so we delude ourselves into believing it can't harm us. We need to wake up.

Sure all that...for good reason. I also heard "slave mask." But Red Dawn? How is that supposed to happen out of the domestic, control freaks of the regressive left's obsessive need to mandate BS controls. I'd be interested to know. Did I miss something? Why would you guys need a foreign invasion when you're attacking from the inside?

No idea what you're talking about. Mask mandates? Red Dawn? I have to decline your invitation to adopt the Progressive 'up the butt' method for information though. My leather bound Webster's looks too cool up on the shelf where I put it. Thanks but no thanks.

Not really fair to limit it to police though, because of course, Blacks get murdered. Usually by other blacks, so it seems. BLM doesn't seem to care about them though.

Except he said "murdered," not killed. Back to the dictionary with you, little Proggy.

Don't you just love those 'Black is White/Up is Down' type guys they have over there on the far left side of the Progosphere.

And the point of mentioning the incident from 4 years ago even if it didn't involve Ramos was those two kids were grabbed and institutionalized for things they said. You claimed that couldn't be done even in that instance. (I can easily grab the quote from you again, if you like.) You were wrong. Live with it.