Infidel Dog

Ha, that was mild. I like my favourite right wing archive site. This one. Whenever they get a Shifty Schiff story they don't use his name. They say the 'Bug-eyed, Burbank, Bolshevik.' I think every time we catch the left, or liars that are but say they aren't, in a lie we should tell them they're 'Talking Schiff." Because I don't think I've ever heard anything come out of the bug-eyed, Burbank, Bolshevik's mouth that wasn't a lie.

You forgot the word 'Proud' between million and unvaccinated.

I don't watch any of that CSI, FBI crap. If I want to watch far out fantasy I'll watch far out fantasy that isn't BS-ing me they represent reality. Reality forensics lacks the magical, all-covering infallibility I see on those shows. Start there. FBI shows, especially. I haven't seen one but I bet there aren't episodes about monitoring and harassing parents for not wanting their daughters to share a change room with a guy with a dingle dangle. That sort of thing would be the reality of the new FBI.

The Oakland based radio station released a phone call. They say they got from David Depape. He's only sorry he didn't do more damage to more targets.

Feel free to use those. You're going to do it anyway so I might as well give you my permission.

That's a good one if I do say so myself. But wait...I've got an even better one. Lately you're like Wile E Coyote on the Bugs Bunny cartoons. And what can I say but Meep Meep...whoosh.

Look. Your gotcha didn't get anybody. Stop whining and try to do better next time. That would be my advice. Stop Black Knighting me.

I'd expect you to be used to that by now when all you've got to start a conversation with are insults. Don't want to be topped? Stop laying claim to the bottom.

So why wouldn't that apply to this one? Tyre Nichols live updates: Video of confrontation released I watched a clip of it on Canadian news tonight, Robo.

Oddly enough that's the way I feel about some of the nutty things you obsess over. But we already know yours turned out to be false. Still think the unvaccinated need to be mandated out of polite society but think the clot shot protects you from infection? Actually you should have pegged that one as illogical if not nutty when you were pushing it.

As I understand it the difference between the stock act and Josh Hawley's act is the Stock act pretty much just told congress insider trading was naughty and they shouldn't do that. Josh Hawley's act says flat out they can't trade stocks.

No. My claim was precisely what I quoted. The video noting an NBC report which turned out to be almost all true had been disappeared by NBC and was trickling out anyway was reason to make one suspicious. I claimed that sort of thing was going to happen after the midterms. That was correct. I'm a frickin' Nostradamus. And I'd still like to know why they held up the body cam footage with the Pelosi attack. Did you hear they released the body cam footage on the Tyre Nichols assault by police today?

Where's the evidence saying it's just a coincidence that Paul knows precisely when to buy and sell and it always coincidentally lines up with something like a coming cancellation of subsidies or an upcoming investigation? You're always asking for evidence, Evidence boy? You're never offering any.

Guess who's children are NOT "dying suddenly"? We can all learn something from these people.

First of all, what are you talking about? My claim was "the midterms are over and those of us who suspected the truth wouldn't start to trickle out until after they were over were correct" What about that is false? Why didn't they just release the body cam footage right away like they do for other media event crimes? If people started jumping to conclusions based on only available snippets of information how is that a surprise? Apparently that disappeared NBC report that had people guessing was correct about everything except Pelosi stepping back towards DePape. They could have stopped that confusion by releasing the footage. But they didn't. I'd still like to know why not.

I could give you a better answer than the silly one you gave me to where did Nancy's money come from. "She made it before the 2012 stock act" did she? Don't be ridiculous. So what do they want from this new bill that they didn't get from the stock act of 2012. Actionable results preventing stuff like this: https://freebeacon.com/democrats/convenient-timing-pelosi-sold-3-million-of-google-stock-weeks-before-doj-launched-antitrust-probe/

Yeah? Where did all Paul and Nancy's money come from then?

True, but even if you're prone to believe it all it says is the committee believes there was no cause to believe on Jan. 5 that Antifa would be there en masse the next day causing conflict with Trump supporters. No problem. Nobody is contending that. The contention is antifa and other bad actors were on the capitol grounds well before the Trump ralliers arrived preparing the ground for an attack on the capitol. And if R&R's heroes on Liz and Nancy's Kangaroo court even considered that I've yet to hear it. Ok, maybe a little bit. Something like "Mr. Epps are you a bad guy?" Epps: "Who me? Hell no. I'm sweetness and light." "Fine. You can go now."

Is anybody up on this ESG thing? If so explain it to me. Near as I can figure it stands for an Environmental, Social and Governance agenda amongst the big investment companies. Currently 30% of such companies have bought in. At the present time it seems more voluntary but there's a push to make reporting mandatory. That seems to be the current trend. So who gets the big money for investments will be decided somewhere by somebody or some thing and all seeking investment opportunities will submit to mandatory monitoring. Have too many lights on? Getting sued by a tranny? Not submitting to authority with acceptable vigor? No cash for you. Or at least that's the direction it's going. My big question on it is how long before it filters down to the rest of us? How long before the money and other managers of your life such as banks and electric companies are managing your money and activities based on something like your ESG score? Apparently if you ask the question you're a tin foiler requiring pariah status from great tolerant thinkers like herb and Mikey. So what? These sorts of question need to be asked by the open minded.

He had them for six years. If he didn't know they were there, he's had Alzheimer's even longer than we thought. And if that's the case, for god's sake clean your house, Jill. Get Hunter to clean the garage. He was in and out of there more than anybody even knows. No doubt collecting info so he can collect his '10% for the big guy.'

No. You're incorrect. At Biden's home they're reported as "items" not documents. Could be boxes of documents.

I don't remember saying that. Most likely because I didn't. Take something like Newsom down in California saying he's going to make gas driven vehicles illegal by 2030 or whenever it is. The problem with that is it isn't feasible. The grid wouldn't handle it. The money necessary to make it feasible isn't there and never will be. And it's not just in California they're talking about banning gas driven vehicles. So if there's a push to do this but it can't actually be done what do they really want? Cars they will have enough of a grid to keep in the city while the road trip class is out enjoying the highways as they spin past the plebs they've kept to alive to service the roads.

This all sounds very '2030 Agenda-ish' to me. The bit they left out is how the Global Resetter investment class like Black Rock and Vanguard have been buying up the suburbs while Gates and others by up farm and ranch land. My personal suspicion is this is what the push to go electric with cars is about. Electric and driverless - that's what cars in the 15 minute cities will look like. While Gates and his buddies zip about the vacant countryside, choking down porter house steaks, cuddling city girls all too willing to do anything to get out. They all joke about how they've got the plebs in the cities eating bugs. There's the conspiracy theory for you in its complete form. And I don't care who doesn't like it. Every day it gets a little more real. Drip, drip, drip.

Here's another interesting little factoid the left doesn't seem to want people to notice. " During its thirteen-hour search, the DOJ found “six items” containing classified documents at Biden’s home. This does not mean that they found six classified documents, as some reporters have claimed. We do not know exactly how many documents were recovered — which a White House aide confirmed during an interview — because we do not know what the “six items” are. They could be cardboard boxes, plastic tote containers, filing cabinets, woven baskets, any other receptacle capable of holding papers. Any accounting of who had more documents between Trump or Biden is unknowable at this point — and shouldn’t factor into any analysis of the severity of each respective case."