Infidel Dog

Yes on handguns. In Texas. The article I posted tells us Federal background check laws can be adjusted by the state. Texas did that. New York and California didn't. They still have mass shootings. Don't you want to save them too? Go ahead then. You've saved Texas . Now save New York and California. Tell us how you're going to do that.

But I did find this in your link talking about the ease of background checks for handguns: Perhaps you should have read that.

So you link me to your article and tell me to read mine? That's a little confusing. But yeah in my article where I told you there were some ideas on how you could fix the existing background checks it said this: So is that it then? Have you saved America now by fixing that problem with existing background checks?

BTW Aristides, can we put you on record as saying you're fine with gun ownership now as long as there are background checks? If not, why not?

Here ya go. This is what they've already got for background checks in America. But go ahead then Aristides, save America. Tell them what they need to add to make background checks that can be 'Aristides approved.' Then we can discuss. There are some ideas at the site. https://usafacts.org/articles/firearm-background-checks-explained/

Because you and yours are so much brainier believing repeating failed policies will save the world. New York state has red flag gun laws. And like I said above. The 2 mass shootings hyped in the media before this last one happened in New York. I'm told California has an average of 44 mass shootings a year. California has both red flag gun laws and requires gun registration.

So you cackling gaggle of the gun grabbers' chicken littles have been convinced you can save America with stricter gun laws... This last mass shooting happened in Texas so the instigators of gun grabbing hysterics jumped on it, screed and pointed fingers at the 2nd amendment: And because gun laws in Texas are lax you cheerfully bought in. Let's ignore the fact the kid was nuts - cutting his face up with knives, offering cryptic social media warnings and the 2 mass shootings before this one were in New York which has strict gun laws. And speaking of strict gun laws would you like to talk about the American shootings capital of Chicago which has among the strictest gun laws in North America. But I'm listening. Which gun laws precisely were you wanting to bring in federally that you believe will save America?

You were serious about those? I thought they were rhetorical. But something did come out of them I find interesting. You seem to think that certain facts are unmentionable if somebody draws a conclusion from them you don't like. And I could go into great length about why that's dumb but all it requires is one word. Tough.

But aren't you right now doing what you're accusing other of? Sure you are.

" A man affiliated with ISIS is under arrest for his participation in an alleged plot to assassinate former President George W. Bush. "An Iraqi citizen living in Columbus, Ohio, has been charged federally with an immigration crime and with aiding and abetting a plot to murder former United States President George W. Bush," the Justice Department said in a press release on Tuesday. The statement added that the suspect, identified as 52-year-old Shihab Ahmed Shihab Shihab, originally came to the United States in September 2020 on a visitor visa and filed for asylum in March 2021 which is pending review. Shihab, according to the Department of Justice, exchanged money with other individuals in an attempt to illegally smuggle foreign nationals into the United States and specifically planned to help four Iraqi nationals come into the United States across the southern border to help kill Bush. https://www.foxnews.com/us/isis-suspect-arrested-for-plot-to-kill-former-president-bush

Nut up Mike. Take a stand. Do you want the Government to offer full statistical information on dangerous offenders or don't you. "Well, sometimes, maybe, it might be misused" is not an answer. Does that mean you want the information hidden to the general public or do you want it released?

That's so much BS, Mike. You're baffle gabbing a posture of put-on rationality while you make it clear you think asking for more data can be and probably "is" just an excuse to be racist.

Have you noticed how Progs always misuse terms like "whataboutery?" And when they can't misuse an existing term they just pull some invented BS term right out their butts.

Here's one on stats though. Statistics in Sweden and other countries that had opened their borders showed undeniable proof the perpetrators of an explosion of violent crime (in particular crimes against women) were males from predominantly Muslim countries. Rather than ask why that might be Swedish leftists simply made it against the law to collect the statistics. Apparently those numbers would have been racist. And so the violent gang rapes that had never existed before the arrival of the followers Mohammed continue. But gang raping white Swedish girls because your culture and religion views them as 'lesser than," that's not racist. Only the numbers are that would create the possibility of a knowledge-based solution.

It isn't just numbers. It's information in general. You and this mainstream media you love so much don't just hide statistics you don't like. If something doesn't produce the kind of hate you support by giving conflicting information you want that is swept away too. The result is more racism than what you pretend to be protecting us from. I'll give you an example. Your 5 0'clock liars were falling all over themselves telling us about the violence against Asians (oriental Asians). The undeniable inference was these horrible white guys were at it again with their racism. Then all the photographic and video evidence started turning up of black men cold-clocking little old Chinese ladies and such and the media went silent on the issue. But we're not allowed to ask why Black guys would all of a sudden want to be attacking Chinese ladies. And you will no doubt call me a racist for noticing. I point the finger right back at you. The creators of the narrative you support are the racists. Race-baiting is racist. When you deny information about racist violence because it doesn't bait the right race it perpetuates that violence by ignoring it. Also baiting hate against whites is still racism. There are many more examples. We could look at how churches were burned over unproven and unlikely claims of mass graves in reservation schools. Show us the bones before you start pointing your racist hateful fingers at the Euro migration to North America.

What? You mean like they're neo-marxist claptrap? Explain how that's racist. If I notice CRT and BLM are racist, is that racist?

Hang on... So Bill offers up a request of government to release data so we can make reasoned responses to racial questions. This angers you. Apparently you want to call people racists if reason might interfere with your unthinking race-baiting. And what's even nuttier is you seem to think this posturing unearned claim to non-existing virtue entitles you tell other users to leave the forum. I have a better idea. Why don't you take your own advice. Hit the road Jack.

I don't know if you can still get Reacher on Amazon but that rocks.

Maybe you're like Bill Maher, Mikey. He says he hasn't changed. The wokeys are just moving the left too far away from him. He has to notice. Personally, I just think if you're reasonably sane there's a point where you can no longer ignore the obviously nutty. Not even for your ideology. Whatever. Here's Bill Maher today...standing with us. Wouldn't that first joke make a good spoof of great replacement theory?

I'm not looking for an argument on morality but I deny any inference by you that you might have any kind of superior insight on that issue.

How about this one. The priorities are changing in the corporate west. So woke is on its way out because lack of support for the wokeys is the beginning of the end for them.

I think not just the corporates but their stockholders are starting to clue into the thing that's been hitting them in the head trying to get them to clue in for awhile now. Wokism is not good for their bottom line. Whatever they thought they were getting from it is not working. Better to cut bait and walk away.

You mean, Neftflix? I think the layoff of the wokeys there has more to do with this: Netflix was hiring activists. The activists activated integrating woke into Netflix shows. Netflix didn't mind until the woke activists attacked their employer by trying to cancel the streamers most popular shows. At that point Netflix decided "Get Woke, Go Broke" had gone far enough and now the freak in the pic in the OP above is looking for another job. As it should be. Don't mess with the bottom line. Netflix just remembered it was a company that needed to make money to continue to exist. Disney is starting to figure that one out too.

How so? Here's Disney's President of content on video saying she wants more woke. For example she wants 50% of characters in cartoons to be gay. https://rumble.com/vz1ft6-woke-disney-exec-shows-why-you-need-to-cancel-disney-immediately.html It's a clip from a larger video where Disney execs are discussing how they have hyped the woke to change Disney so far and their plans for the future. YouTube didn't censor this one where a different exec brags about disallowing words like "ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls, or prince and princess" from its theme parks. Are you saying those execs have gone, have seen the light and are smartening up, or are you just talking about how Disney at least listened to share holders enough to back off from trying to change the Florida law against trying to sexualize kindergartners and 1st graders?

Of course it's part of a woke purge of corporate wokeness. And hopefully this is just the beginning. You're next Disney.