-
Posts
5,868 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
28
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Infidel Dog
-
No and I'll keep pointing out the obvious to you until even you can get it. Toleration doesn't require pressure. If you're forcing somebody to use pronouns you invented that's not toleration. There are many other examples but I'll save them. You seem to need to be spoon fed the obvious so let's try that. One spoonful at a time then. See your buddy in the video below there? That's not toleration:
-
American Conservatives would fight for the right to conserve the right of an American baby to be born. Conservatives are willing to tolerate. They don't see why they should be forced to endorse what seems wrong or insane to them. For example if you want to call yourself zim or zer go for it just don't be thinking you have the right to pressure me or mine into using your nutty pronouns. You can try but you'll have as much luck as Commie Bonnie Henry did cancelling Christimas. Nobody forced Kaepernick to shut up and sit down. Many stopped going to the games though. You can do that and still love freedom.
-
1. Why who's a racist? Who's a homophobe - what even is that?\ 2. Then allow me to educate. Lawfare is running a grievance through the legal process just to do it. Because "the process is the punishment" and what that means should be obvious but just for you, I'll look it up because I don't want to you to get confused anymore than you are: The Process is the Punishment
-
Conservatives pretty much just want to be left alone to do what they do if it hasn't hurt anybody. If you try to force them to they'll fight back. That's not enough for the prog. You must bend the knee like a Kaepernick. You must kiss the feet of prog, or and submit to cancellation. Come to think of it, what's that "Cancelling Christmas" crap all about? I don't sing holiday songs. I sing Christmas Carols. And how did that Cancelling Christmas for Covid thing go for you last year, Commie Bonnie Henry?
-
Bitching? But it's you who's getting all upset that American Christians are allowed to pray as their 1st amendment allows? I'm for Kaepernick exercising his constitutional right to make an idiot of himself. Just as I recognize my right to point at him and say "What a jackass." Why are you complaining?
-
US Supreme Court strikes down Roe V. Wade
Infidel Dog replied to West's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Did you know Steve Jobs, John Lennon, Michael Oher, Marilyn Monroe, Jamie Foxx, Ingrid Bergman, Eric Clapton, Malcolm X, Bill Clinton, Nelson Mandella, Babe Ruth, Nancy Reagan, Edgar Allen Poe, Louis Armstrong, Richard Burton, Colin Kaepernick, Newt Gingrich, Eleanor Roosevelt, Leo Tolstoy, George Washington Carver and many, many others that made their mark in the world were all adopted. Again, what's your point? That the world would be better off if they'd all been sliced and diced and sold for body parts out of planned parenthood, or something? -
US Supreme Court strikes down Roe V. Wade
Infidel Dog replied to West's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
All kinds of reasons. Why? Have you never seen The Blind Side? Michael Oher's father was gone down the road. His mother was a druggy. A kindly lady found him sleeping in her son's school, living out of trash cans. She fostered then adopted him. True story. There's lots like that. Car accidents, Deadly disease takes the mom and no family wants to help, economic insolvency, murder suicide, taken by welfare. Lots of reasons kids become wards of the state. I don't understand. What's your point? -
US Supreme Court strikes down Roe V. Wade
Infidel Dog replied to West's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Belief of what, though? You were telling me earlier what I believe. I'm merely telling you, you were wrong then and if you still believe you have some special knowledge of what I believe without asking me you're as clueless now as you were then. -
US Supreme Court strikes down Roe V. Wade
Infidel Dog replied to West's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Just in case you're having trouble understanding what "conception" means in reference to pregnancy: "Conception is the time when sperm travels up through the vagina, into the uterus, and fertilizes an egg found in the fallopian tube." https://www.healthline.com/health/womens-health/what-does-conception-mean -
US Supreme Court strikes down Roe V. Wade
Infidel Dog replied to West's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
"Preconceived babies?" What's that? I saw what looks to be some Prog troll T shirt connecting the term to menstruation. Is that what you're talking about? Because that would be ridiculous. Menstruation and masturbation would have nothing to do with "Life begins at conception." -
US Supreme Court strikes down Roe V. Wade
Infidel Dog replied to West's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
No. Having trouble understanding what a "first source" reference is, are we? It's like this: If you start telling me what I believe I tell you, you don't have a clue what you're talking about. And I base that on first source knowledge (which would be me.) I am first source on what I believe. Get it? -
" A 42-year-old man has been arrested and charged with murder, attempted murder and terrorist acts after a shooting in the centre of Norway's capital, Oslo. Two people were killed and 21 injured, 10 of them seriously, in a busy nightlife district early on Saturday. Police said they consider the attack an act of extreme Islamist terrorism. The victims were shot in and outside the London Pub, a popular LGBTQ+ venue, and near the Herr Nilsen jazz club and another pub. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-61933817
-
US Supreme Court strikes down Roe V. Wade
Infidel Dog replied to West's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Of course not. You're comfortable in your own where what you would like to believe is the new reality. I prefer to believe what my eyes see. I see evidence of lineups to adopt so I believe they exist. And I've seen enough that I don't find this hard to believe: "While it is difficult to find an exact, accurate number to answer this question, Some sources estimate that there are about 2 million couples currently waiting to adopt in the United States — which means there are as many as 36 waiting families for every one child who is placed for adoption. Based on this couples waiting to adopt statistic, many couples are waiting to adopt." https://www.americanadoptions.com/pregnant/waiting_adoptive_families -
US Supreme Court strikes down Roe V. Wade
Infidel Dog replied to West's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
And I believe you were having trouble understanding how the internet creates a knew world of knowledge sharing that wasn't available in the days of your "back alley abortions." Start here for relevant examples: Finding Help in the 21st Century: Foster Parent Networks -
US Supreme Court strikes down Roe V. Wade
Infidel Dog replied to West's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
I said there were line-ups. There are. Some will go out country to adopt rather than sit in the line-ups. So in answer to your question "Why not adopt one of them." Bureaucratic incompetence slows the process. -
US Supreme Court strikes down Roe V. Wade
Infidel Dog replied to West's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
And trust a Prog to slip into slurs when his argument gets obliterated. What's left seems to be what you think about me and what I belief and how you believe it's connected to every wrong you believe can find in any sect or exception to the rule. In case you're interested you're wrong about all of it. And I say that as a first source to what I believe. -
US Supreme Court strikes down Roe V. Wade
Infidel Dog replied to West's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Really? And what shall we call your fantasy world of back alley abortions on every street corner? -
US Supreme Court strikes down Roe V. Wade
Infidel Dog replied to West's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
That's worth noticing too. I don't know how it was in back your "back alley abortion" days, but these days there are line-ups to adopt. -
US Supreme Court strikes down Roe V. Wade
Infidel Dog replied to West's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
We live in a different age - culturally, legally, and technologically. The kinds of pressure put on unwed mothers that used to exist no longer does. There will be opportunity in most states to travel for abortions. Birth control is available now in a way it wasn't during the era of infamous "back alley abortions". Including day-after pills. And I'll wager new abortion options will appear in the internet age. Any fat girl with a "my body, my choice" T shirt will be able to find safe abortion options if she can find a way to need one. There will be little need for "back alley abortions." -
US Supreme Court strikes down Roe V. Wade
Infidel Dog replied to West's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Man, that was a lot of blather to tell us humans develop. As to the argument potential implies value - at least it does under the law... Shapiro already explained that if you cared to listen and this is the third time I've mentioned it. Plus ironstone gave you the video. Here it is again:
