Goddess

This is quite the conspiracy theory making the rounds amongst the usual half-baked Liberal supporters in their echo chamber. Somehow, those who skipped the covid jab "brainwashed" the entire country to ditch all vaccines altogether. Straight up lazy bull💩. Canada was "measles-free" since 1998, with 95% herd immunity. So where did it suddenly come from? SPOILER ALERT: Not some backyard BBQ of skeptics. Measles is raging globally, particularly in these 9 hotspots: India, Pakistan, Nigeria, Yemen, Afghanistan, Indonesia, Mexico, Kyrgystan and Russia. As someone else pointed out, Canada does not require this vaccination for immigrants, temp workers, foreign students, etc. We have brought literally millions of people in from these hotspot countries since 2020. Now zoom in to where the numbers are exploding in Canada - Ontario & Alberta. Ontario got 21% of PR's, including up to 200,000 Indians, 35,000 Pakistanis, 30,000 Nigerians, 50,000 Afghanis. Alberta is about 7% nationally, but mostly agricultural workers, including 40,000 Indians, 10,000 Nigerians, 150,000 Mexicans and 10,000 Afghanis. Public Health Canada reports that sequencing of the clusters are from Middle Eastern and South Asian strains - that means imported measles landing in dense, diverse neighborhoods. Raw numbers for 2025 are still pending, but you get the picture. Yes, hesitancy is up, but we are dipping well below herd immunity rates in pockets of Canada where many immigrants are landing. Immigrants who are not required by Canada to be vaccinated against measles. That's 30 years of herd immunity down the drain because of imports, not because of some domestic cult's brainwashing of the nation or backyard BBQ. Only m0r0ns believe that. I realize scientific epidemiology is inconvenient for Liberals, but I don't really f%#@king care anymore what a bunch of media-fed, uninformed cretins believe or say.

Fake Flyer, Queenie, eyeball....they are all examples of all that is wrong in this country. Low IQ, uninformed voters who look at one poll and see the Libs ahead and say, "That's who I'm gonna vote for." No looking at policies, no digging, spoon-fed their info from the CBC, shallow thinking if there's any thinking involved at all. An apathetic electorate is our biggest problem.

I've heard it said more than a few times - the Liberals are great at winning elections by manipulating weak-minded, uninformed people into voting for them and using the media to carry water for them. But they SUCK at actually leading the country.

I guess if you count success as getting elected, then yes. If you count success like most of us, meaning actually leading Canada to success, then no. How's Justin's butthole today? 🙄 Will you ever need to come up for air and take a look at the reality or you're just content smelling his farts?

If you look at his voting record, d'Entremont voted against many Liberal pet projects - censorship and ending the mandates being the main ones, he voted against their abortion stuff once - very strange that the Libs would want a guy like that. He also abstained from votes. A LOT. He's a dullard, for sure. No wonder he didn't get the Deputy Speaker appointment.

Obviously, they've done more than that, since the Libs have stolen many CPC policies. They implement them half-ways, but they have stolen a lot of the Cons policies.

We cannot win an election with or without him. I don't think the Conservatives will win another election in Canada - ever. Liberals are importing 2 million Liberal voters a year and Canadians love it. Liberal supporters do not want ANY KIND of opposition party. They will only allow another party to exist if it shuts up, never holds the Liberal party accountable for anything and green lights everything the Liberal party does. They only want another party to blame for anything that goes wrong. Canada is finished as a democracy.

Lib supporters, too. They don't want a true opposition party. They want the opposition to green light anything the Libs put forward.

I don't know if any of these ones want the job, but my top 3 picks are Larry Brock, Garnet Genuis and Michael Barrett. I wish Barrett was a bit more articulate, though. He stumbles a bit too much when speaking. And Genuis has a mitt load of kids, so may not be interested in the job. Larry Brock is very articulate, was a former Crown prosecutor and is very level-headed. Kelly Block rocks committee meetings, but she's a bit soft-spoken......maybe that's what we want, though, I dunno. Definitely what Libs want - they absolutely DO NOT want any Conservative with the balls to call them out, though.

This budget uses Carney's new "creative accounting". The CPP, which has always been a liability to the gov't because it's money owed, has now been moved over to the "Asset" column. We can kiss our pension goodbye. The Libs just claimed that money for themselves. It's a false asset, so we will never know exactly how bad we're in debt until it's too late.

I'm getting very worried about this country's economy and where we are headed. The Libs will not STOP spending on crap and sadly, a slim majority of Canadians don't seem to understand that THE GOVERNMENT HAS NO MONEY. IT'S ALL YOUR MONEY. IT'S YOUR TAX DOLLARS. I cannot believe that we cannot get rid of this albatross Liberal government from around our necks and that most Canadians still don't see what's going on.

I've been willing to sit back and watch Trump tariff away at every other country because I read quite a bit of what his strategy is and was hoping it would work out, albeit with some growing pains. But I'm kind of getting to the point of wondering how bankrupting other countries benefits US in the long run? It's like Trump is sitting at a Monopoly board with other countries and just sweeps all the properties, hotels and homes to himself and says "This all belongs to me now." It's a nice thought for the American citizens to get the biggest end of the stick every single time, but at some point, all the other players at the Monopoly board and going to say "F%#@K this guy" and start another game themselves. Like I say, bankrupting and short-shrifting every other country in favour of the US......who is going to buy your USA sh!t when we're all broke?

The Liberals have proven to be quite bad at gambling on investment. How many $$billions$$ have we lost on betting on green tech now? Cricket factories? All that money went into consultant's pockets - mostly McKinsey. It's the billions in consultants that makes zero sense to me. If you don't know how to do the job, then GTFO. I don't get to tell my boss "Hey, I actually don't know how to do any of this stuff, so you need to hire 2 other people also to do the work you hired me to do. And also, you have to pay me handsomely and give me exorbitant raises on a regular basis."

And every time we do, lefties like you, side with the government.......

Yay. We agree on this one.

I don't know why, but this is not letting me post the link for this article. You'll have to look it up, sorry. The report analyzed publicly available information on every approved carbon mitigation-focused project being financed by the world’s two major multilateral climate funds: the UN-backed Green Climate Fund, and World Bank's Climate Investment Funds. This is 100% grift. Project Analysis and Findings The report evaluated publicly accessible data on every approved carbon mitigation project funded by two of the world’s primary multilateral climate funds: 178 projects from the UN-backed Green Climate Fund and 466 from the Climate Investment Funds, initiated by the World Bank and regional development banks. The authors scrutinized nearly 650 projects against a comprehensive set of criteria, utilizing a computer program that was later verified manually. Reactions from Experts Bert De Wel, who serves as the global climate policy coordinator at the International Trade Union Confederation and was not involved in the report, expressed that the findings reflect the experiences of workers and their unions worldwide. He noted, "Climate finance is determined by the needs of the investors instead of the people affected by the emergency."

Carney is a CEO. He's not used to cooperating and compromising. He used to giving orders and having the peons jump around trying to make him happy. That's not how politics works, though.

That would be the Liberals. Check out what they did to Edison Motors in BC. MSM wouldn't touch that one with a ten-foot pole.

Ya, that's what we all keep saying. He's also not a vaccinologist, epidemiologist or any other kind of "...gist". Unfortunately, his vast wealth allows him to control both the climate and vaccine agendas.

Ooooh, you're one of those people that think Bill Gates is humanity's messiah! Hahahaha 🤣 A philanthropist, lol

You don't appear to understand that he is pivoting. Keep your hair on fire and shoveling money to billionaires for nothing if you want to. A lot of us are done with the grift and the climate death cult.

Exactly. Like all of us who don't live in the world of the climate death cult have said for years - No more taxpayer money to billionaires for climate shit. Make people's lives better. When they're not struggling just to subsist, then they care about the planet.

Canadians will vote the Libs in again - majority or minority gov't, it won't matter. A slim majority of Canadian voters will not learn until their children are in bread lines, dying in hospital hallways or too broke and jobless to survive on their own. We will be Venezuela. I'm kind of with you - if that's what it's going to take, so be it. But voting PPC or NDP is nothing but a vote for the Liberals. Especially if you vote NDP, they're just Libs in disguise. They will support anything and everything Libs do to us in exchange for scraps. They have no long-term vision for Canada other than turning it into a total welfare state. Too many Canadians think socialism, the little sister of communism, is totally gonna work this time. 🙄

In the wee hours of the morning, the New York Times ran an astonishing article: Memo From Bill Gates Warns Against Climate Alarmism - The New York Times He’s changed his mind. “Climate change will have serious consequences — particularly for people in the poorest countries — but it will not lead to humanity’s demise,” the pudgy software billionaire admitted. For lefties, the only group that deserves more hatred than MAGA fascists, is climate crisis deniers. Some of the comments: “It is very suspicious that Bill Gates has radically changed his views after just a few months of Trump’s presidency.” “Billionaires don’t have the solution because they are the problem.” Bill’s memo was not linked by the Times. It isn’t hard to find though. He has his own news site called GatesNotes, where he disgorges his various late-night theories and ruminations. This one was titled, “Three tough truths about climate. Subtitle: “What I want everyone at COP30 to know.” COP30 is the latest in a series of COPs, which is the world’s biggest climate conclave, organized by the United Nations. It's the can’t-miss event of the year. Especially if you earn your living on the Climate Express grift train. Bill Gates has been a permanent installation at previous COPs and is a beloved keynote speaker, a major address deliverer, a prominent panel participant, and of course, THE big money man. Bill Gates just announced that he isn’t going. Seeya. After several paragraphs of reassuring COP30 addicts that he still takes climate change very seriously, Gates continued in his “memo” to gently shred climate science into ribbons. The lengthy memo was packed with a long series of graphs, charts, arguments, and three “tough truths.” (They’re only ‘tough truths’ to climate junkies.) Here they are: “Truth #1. Climate change is a serious problem, but it will not be the end of civilization.” “Truth #2. Temperature is not the best way to measure our progress on climate.” “Truth #3. Health and prosperity are the best defense against climate change.” In short), Gates said the best way to measure progress on climate is through human flourishing. “It’s time to put human welfare at the center of our climate strategies,” Gates wrote, “which includes reducing the Green Premium to zero.” What Gates meant by “Green Premium” was the extra cost of green tech over things like coal plants and gas engines. In other words, Gates argued we shouldn’t use any climate solution that isn’t cheaper than the traditional alternative. If COP30 accepts this advice, it would wipe out 99% of the purpose for the stupid summit in the first place. Gates next suggested climate worshippers stop being such negative ninnies and look at the long term - like, maybe improving peoples’ lives —not with windmills and solar farms— but through genetically engineered food and vaccines and stuff. Until about ten minutes ago, Bill Gates was one of the biggest doomsayers on the planet. Now, apparently, he’s decided that he is out. To me, none of this redeems Gates. Like buying billions in Moderna stock right before the pandemic, (even though Moderna had yet to bring any product to market) then selling it all - just before admitting the shots don’t work. But why? We can only speculate. USAID money isn’t flowing to Gates’ foundations and climate companies anymore, so now he must fund them with his own money. That’s one. He also has a great big Epstein problem that he’d prefer stay buried along with the International Mystery Man. That’s two. Chemtrail experiments will soon be shuttered for good. That’s three. And Gates can easily see Republicans holding the White House for quite a while yet, so climate won’t be nearly as profitable as the old days, not if you count “profits” as free money extracted from taxpayers by lefty politicians and then laundered back to those same politicians through climate CEOs.

Ooooo, this meltdown is epic! 🤣