Goddess

He likely doesn't even know that there were deaths and permanent disabilities in the trials. Or that almost half the participants dropped out after the first jab, so they weren't counted as part of the trials. Or that 1,223 people died within 24 hours of injection in the immediate rollout of the jabs. BTW, "within 24 hours" in VAERS means it could have been 10 mins after injection or 10 hours.

Yes. Which I supported in the Trickle thread. You don't even have to "figure out where you supported it" - I just told you where. 🤣 Everybody who's been on this board for the last few years knows where it is. You're clearly not interested or you would go right there. You do this all the time. "Where's the studies?" "Right here in *this* thread." "Meh..... I'm too lazy. Post it again for me now." When you are ready to look at what has been posted, let me know. Otherwise, have a great day. ☺️ P.S. I do realize it's a bit harder without a Search function here.

I watched a presentation by Dr. Nic Hulscher, an epidemiologist with a BS in Pre-Health Professional studies and a Masters in Public Health degree with a specialization in epidemiology, give a presentation to some public health authority ....Chelan-Douglas Health District Board of Health in Washington. Some notes from the presentation: A total of 450 peer-reviewed studies show that covid vaccines are net harmful to the human body. Vaccine components are now being detected in individuals over 3 years since last injection. Thousands of genes critical for immune function, mitochondrial function and cancer surveillance become severely disrupted. The vax spike has been found directly in affected tissues, including the heart, the brain and the adrenal glands at autopsy. The vax spike was being expressed in the cerebral arteries of hemorrhagic stroke patients for up to 17 months since last injection. Post-mortem analyses of 325 peer-reviewed autopsy reports indicate a high likelihood of causal links between covid jabs and deaths from multiple organ systems. The highest estimate of post-injection deaths is up to 17 million. 8 studies have documented negative efficacy once the antibodies wear off. When the efficacy wears off (which is about 6-8 months post-injection) you face increased infection risks. There is now documented direct evidence of genetic material from the vax integrating in the human genome. The jabs increase the risk of any cancer by 23%, breast cancer by 54%, bladder cancer by 62% and colorectal cancer by 35%

In the Trickle thread. All the studies are there. Don't be lazy. I've already done all the research for you. All you have to do is look at it. We've been down this road before - you and I. I put a LOT of effort and time and research into that thread. I'm not re-capping it again for you here just because you're too lazy. You refused to look at it last time, I suspect you will refuse again. Because in reality - you're not interested in it. You're interested in supporting the narrative that's been spoon-fed to you. The fact that you keep demanding a "best study" tells me you don't understand science. Science is not about "one best study". It's cumulative knowledge. It's looking at all the studies and thinking critically. The studies were showing myocarditis in children from 2021. You all denied those studies because it didn't fit your narrative. You were all wrong. Just that fact alone should humble you. But it won't. You're still here pushing a narrative and refusing to follow evidence.

The FDA recently put out a memo saying the covid shots killed at least 10 kids. We all know that's under-reporting. The report deserves more than just a knee-jerk dismissal by "experts" and narrative poseurs. The report is not an "anti-vaccine playbook" tactic, as critics suggest. It's a courageous step forward towards transparency and accountability in a public health system that has, for too long, prioritized narrative over evidence. The memo's reliance on VAERS is a feature. VAERS is designed as an early warning system. While it's true that reports are unverified, the FDA's internal analysis concluded that " no fewer than 10 deaths were related to vaccination, likely due to myocarditis, a risk signal identified as early as 2021. Dismissing this ignores the fact that VAERS has historically flagged serious issues, like the Johnson & Johnson covid vax clotting issue, which later prompted action, and the Astra Zeneca vax, which was completely pulled from the market. Remember - 2 out of the 4 covid vaccines that were forced on people were pulled for safety issues, and then Big Pharma immediately went into "lock down the data" mode to keep the other 2 on the market.

Did it? We went from "The jabs do not cause myocarditis in children" to a black box warning on the label now and the only countries jabbing kids are Canada and the US. How many dead and disabled kids are acceptable for a product that doesn't stop transmission and doesn't prevent death? We went from "If it just saves one life" to burning children to keep octogenarian adults warm.....while failing at its intended goal.

Studies show jabbed people get more covid than unjabbed people, due to their immune systems being destroyed by the jabs. (See all the studies on IGg4 switch, P53, antibody lowering, etc in the Trickle thread. It's happening, my dude. It's well-documented.) So if jabbed people get covid say......6-10 times (like many of the jabbed people I know) and unjabbed people (like me) get covid ZERO times or maybe once and now have natural immunity (which is better than vax immunity), which group has a better chance of experiencing hospitalization and death?

but how would you launder your money then?

How does bankrupting Canadian women and starving out Canadian children help anybody? You really think that Muslims in Morrocco who saw off heads and Iranians who kill and beat women and girls for a strand of loose hair share some sort of universal values system with us? You can throw all the money in the world at them - it's not going to change the lot of women and children in those kinds of countries. Foreign Aid is great. when we can afford it. Impoverishing Canadian women and children is wrong and I don't need to virtue signal like you. Because they can't argue with the facts. Low intelligence poster.

Peterson's group is called "Alliance for Responsible Citizenship". I'm sure you would be against this, because I'm pretty sure you hate Jordan Peterson with a passion. And would probably find reasons to hate everyone else on the panel. I'm not sure where it's at right now, I understand Peterson's health has been really bad lately.

Oh, okay. So only half of them would be people like you. Anyways, Peterson proposed having people with varied backgrounds, experience in economics, healthcare, business, education, etc. I'm not sure I would put much faith in just random Canadians. You all wanted your fellow citizens put to death, thrown in jail, have their kids taken away, fired, put in camps for refusing an experimental jab that didn't even protect you from anything. It would be like putting the religious zealots in charge of the Salem Witch Trials. That didn't work out too good for humanity.

You told us. All the time. You only vote NDP or Liberal, NEVER Conservative. Because you're totally non-partisan. *wink wink* And you refuse to vote for the only party that wants to tackle accountability. They may "suck at it", who knows? At least they want to try. Instead you vote for the parties that love corruption and want to keep it going. Because you love accountability. *wink wink*

This is a good idea. Unfortunately for you, Jordan Peterson already started the groundwork for the idea. The only problem I could see, is it would likely be people like you on there: *Gov't proposes something sketchy* Citizen's Assembly: "This seems sketchy." Eyeball: Let's just ask them if they are up to something sketchy. "Hey gov't, are you up to something sketchy here?" Gov't: Nooooooooooo. Eyeball: See, everyone? They say there's nothing sketchy going on. They would totally tell us if there was. Like I always say - Criminals always tell you when they're up to something sketchy. You don't have to investigate or find out - just ask them!

Ahhhhh, you believe the corruption is mostly imaginary. No wonder you don't want anything done about it.

I feel like we need an age requirement on this site. Pages and pages of 12-yr-old boy contributing nothing but LOLs and LOSERs and fart jokes. Isn't it naptime yet? The adults would like to discuss things.

Then why do you do it? And why do you oppose the only party that wants to even attempt to tackle accountability? It was an important enough issue that they campaigned on it and already had draft legislation. Instead, you vote for the parties who want to continue corruption. Your claim to want to bring about accountability, while voting for parties that have no interest in ending it....is quite bizarre.

I support anything that would bring about accountability in gov't. It's you that doesn't. Don't project your ignorance on me.

Canadians should be deeply embarrassed by the whole Ryan Weddings affair, too. A Canadian former Olympic athlete now running a drug cartel for the Sinaloa Mexican cartel using trucks going from Arizona to Canada. And the Americans had to crack the case. Because our gov't keeps telling us "There's no drug cartel problem in Canada! The Americans are just making it all up! Don't listen to Sam Cooper, he made a mistake one time!" I don't know if our MSM even covered the FBI press conference, but there was our head of the RCMP, standing like a doorknob while the Americans announce nabbing and shutting down the cartel. Independent journalists have delved deep into the case and Canada just does nothing about these cartels and refuses to cooperate with the US, doing as little as possible about it. We should be deeply ashamed. And it should give you some insight into why the Americans are so angry with us.

Fuque your cameras and microphones. As I told you, the Liberals just investigate themselves and find themselves innocent every time. We need legislation so the government can't investigate itself and keep finding itself innocent. And you dont' want it.

@Queenmandy85 The Bureau | Sam Cooper | Substack

You're wrong. Please, check things out. Things beyond what the CBC tells you on the 6 o'clock news. I know you have dismissed Sam Cooper as an independent journalist, without even so much as sniffing at his work, because you've been told to. The man has testified in both Canadian parliament and US Congress and Senate hearings. He has blown the whistle on Chinese drug lords in Canada and why the US is super angry at us for doing nothing about them. Why not have a look at his website or read some of his substacks on how the Chinese are taking over and have taken over major parts of Canada's infrastructure, banking, real estate, drug cartels, etc. Not to mention the election interference. Then decide if the Chinese are benign and our friends. EDIT: His website is The Bureau. I know it will feel like you're reading apostate literature when you're deep in a cult, but do it anyways. You might learn something more than what's on CBC every night.

Which is what Trump was doing, in his own ham-fisted way. He's brash and rude and doesn't give a 💩 what anybody thinks of it. I take him seriously, but not literally. You allowed the Liberal party to manipulate you into voting for them - again - by using fear of the Americans invading us. It's 100% you that are being naive.

Perhaps you haven't noticed, but they are not the ones who have been in power for the last 11 years, which have been the absolute worst years for full-scale government corruption. The Liberals have been in power and you keep voting for them. Or the NDP who props them up. You continually vote against any party that wants to put forth accountability legislation. The irony of you saying conservatives only vote along partisan lines while admitting you only vote along partisan lines..... Do you ever actually think about what you're saying? LOL

Yet you keep voting against anything that would put forth any real accountability measures. You say you want cameras, but what good are they when the Liberals just keep investigating themselves and SURPRISE! finding themselves innocent. We need actual legislation. And you voted against it.

There's a YouTube channel Moose on the Loose, he does a section on almost every video called Far Off Ripoff. It was on there, he shows the actual pages from the Gov't of Canada website, which all you have to do is look for yourself, as well. But yes, gender sensitive rice in Viet Nam was in there and so was gender sensitive beans in Africa. And a lot of other stuff. The Liberals, under Trudeau, spent $11 billion on gender sensitive crap all over the world. And it was all added to our national debt. Since it's the same Liberal gov't under Carney, this continues.