Goddess

The good thing about all this is that people are talking about the scandal again. And some are looking into it more, since it was swept under the carpet initially. It's exposing the Liberal party and its supporters as having no moral compass.

A Rebuttal: Via Vesper on "X" "Your take on what Pierre said needs an update from a fellow Montreal Conservative. Your post is a touching eulogy, Dimitris, for a Conservative Party that exists more in nostalgia than in reality. You speak of history, principle, and purpose, while scolding Pierre Poilievre for having the temerity to apply those very principles to a Prime Minister who treats the law as a suggestion box. Let’s be clear: your argument isn’t that Poilievre is wrong on the facts. It’s that his tone is impolite. How very Canadian to suggest that pointing out a Prime Minister’s alleged criminality is a greater offence than the criminality itself. You claim that in a “rule-of-law democracy, no opposition leader should ever call for a Prime Minister to be jailed.” What breathtakingly selective principle. A rule-of-law democracy ceases to be one when its highest official is seen to be above the law. The real recklessness isn't in calling it out; it's in the silent acquiescence to a two-tiered justice system. You accuse Poilievre of “grievance” for stating a grievance that is, according to the evidence, entirely valid. Let’s consult the very source you provided from Democracy Watch. Their request for an independent prosecutor lays out a case that is anything but the fever dream you dismiss it as. To summarize for those who won’t click the link: • 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐄𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞: The Ethics Commissioner found Trudeau guilty of violating the Conflict of Interest Act in the Aga Khan affair. In the SNC-Lavalin scandal, the Ethics Commissioner found he used his authority to "circumvent, undermine and attempt to undermine" the rule of law. • 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐂𝐫𝐢𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐂𝐨𝐝𝐞: Democracy Watch points to Section 139 of the Criminal Code, which defines "Obstructing Justice." The evidence of a sustained, coordinated pressure campaign on the Attorney General to stop a criminal prosecution fits this definition to a T. • 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐑𝐂𝐌𝐏'𝐬 𝐈𝐧𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧: As Democracy Watch details, the RCMP never even interviewed Justin Trudeau about SNC-Lavalin, despite a mountain of public evidence. Your post defends this as protecting “confidence in our justice system,” but to any objective observer, it looks an awful lot like the “despicable” shielding Poilievre described. If the RCMP won't investigate a sitting Prime Minister with this much evidence, who exactly will they investigate? You say Poilievre “has not learned the lessons of his electoral defeat.” Perhaps the lesson he learned is that a segment of the electorate is tired of Conservatives who bring a PowerPoint presentation to a knife fight. Canadians saw a Prime Minister who, according to multiple, independent watchdogs, repeatedly violated ethical and potentially criminal standards. What they “needed” was an opposition leader with the courage to name that corruption, not one who wrings his hands over parliamentary decorum while the foundations of accountability are eroded. The legacy of Macdonald, Diefenbaker, and Harper wasn’t built on politely ignoring brazen abuses of power, Dimitris. It was built on conviction. Poilievre’s rhetoric isn’t a distortion of that legacy; it’s a revival of its fighting spirit. The only thing being “rewritten” is the Liberal narrative that their former leader is untouchable."

Do you prefer......"Horseshit"? I wasn't.

Baloney. 🙄 You're here every day either actively supporting or making excuses for Liberal ideologies. Did you just assume my gender?

Not us. You. Tampons in men's bathrooms, dude. You guys went too far. Most people just want to be left alone. But you had to call them racists, bigots, Nazi's, fascists. It wasn't good enough that most people don't care about sexual or gender orientation, you had to force people to actively participate in and loudly voice approval for increasingly far-left ideologies. People just wanted to be left alone.

I think, in general, it's good that Canada has 3 main political parties, unlike the US's 2. Yes, about the see-saw. But it can also bring balance to a party that's going off the rails and taking the country down with it. The NDP should be the party that balances out both the other ones, whichever one is in power. They didn't do that with Trudeau. They cheered him on and helped him steer us off the cliff. I had an NDP guy come to my door before the last election and he asked if they could count on my support and I couldn't help it but I laughed and said, "Fuque, NO!" He didn't say anything, just walked away. I did feel a little bad, but my reaction was totally gut instinct.

I saw an interview with Conservative MP Garnet Genuis just before the last election and he said they already had legislation drafted for this, but you guys all voted for more of the same unaccountability from the Liberals, because orangemanbad.

It's been far-left governments running the show for at least 10 years. Some countries are getting rid of them - the US, Italy, etc. I think Canada and the UK have nearly have enough of far-left fire setting, starting to fight back. We'll see......

Eby has recently come out and admitted the "safe supply" experiment was a mistake. The devastation and deaths to Canadian families from that decision alone.....there needs to be accountability. But the Canadian public has always been apathetic to holding our very-highly-paid politicians accountable for policies that everyone knew were going to have bad, or even horrific, outcomes. Look at the extreme case of the vapors all the Liberals have right now because Polievre dared to say that Trudeau should be in jail for some of his scandals and that the RCMP helped cover them up. He's not wrong. He's absolutely correct. Democracy Watch is still fighting to bring the SNC Lavalin case to justice. In fact, they were successful in getting the documentation released that Trudeau tried to prevent and the RCMP could have gotten, but refused to try. Most Canadians don't know that the RCMP Commissioner is appointed by the Prime Minister and serves at his pleasure. Their job security is dependent on pleasing the PM. In this case, Duheme had only been appointed as INTERIM commissioner, so his job security was doubly in jeopardy if he chose to charge Trudeau. Democracy Watch forwarded all the documents to media outlets and offered interviews and they were roundly ignored by MSM. Only APTN has done stories on it.

I agree with you to an extent. But these people have power and they are paid handsomely to, in many cases, make life and death decisions for Canadians. Canada's politicians are the second highest paid on the planet, second only to Singapore. Malice does not have to imply intent. It can also be inferred by willful negligence and disregard for others' rights and safety. In law, when negligence is so egregious that it shows a conscious indifference to consequences, courts may infer a malicious mindset. You are more generous in your assessment of them than I am. I do agree that they have no intentions to govern Canada to success and are only in it to line their own pockets. Everything they do is nothing but virtue-signaling. Like holding a press conference to announce they are fixing a sewer line.

The biggest fail point I see is orchestrating mass immigration with little to no vetting of who is coming in. India warned Canada that we were letting in massive amounts of criminals. Just fixing this problem would go a long way to getting a handle on every other problem - healthcare, housing, the economy, skyrocketing crime. I believe this was done deliberately. I have my theories on WHY it was done. We all do. It CANNOT be incompetence. Nobody who owns a 3-bedroom house would invite 200 people to live in it with your family, for free. Your house would be destroyed, your finances even worse. Your neighborhood would suffer. That's common sense and we all have it. Except Liberal voters. They've applauded this and voted for it, every step of the way and show zero signs of coming to their senses. Carney is still on a spending spree, actually even worse that Trudeau was. Where is that money going to come from? The middle class in Canada has been devastated. They will come next for upper middle class and lower wealthy - anyone who still has assets or money in a savings account. Remember Freeland musing in a press conference about how Canadians had too much money in savings and the gov't had to find a way to unlock it? They did it with Capital Gains and the Liberal party commissioned studies in the last few years on how much money they could get from Canadian's home equity. Next, they will be coming after the ones who voted for them because they had enough assets to not be affected by the economic and housing upheavals. Mark my words.

I watched the Liberal press conference the other day about forking over $283 million to fix a Toronto sewer line. Feds announce $283M for Toronto sewer upgrades in Black Creek | CBC News This is how low the Liberals are setting the bar for government competence and most Canadians will clap like seals for this. They want applause and accolades FOR DOING THEIR DAMN JOBS! Your job is literally maintaining Canada's infrastructure by using OUR tax dollars. That money doesn't come from the Liberal gov't. The gov't has no money. It's YOUR money.

This is the point that I'm at, too. There's been sooooo much damage done to our country at every level - healthcare, immigration, the justice system, housing, the economy, the covid over-reaction, scandal after scandal after scandal - it's too much to be just chalked up to simple incompetence. It has to be deliberate. And the gaslighting - MSM relays the Liberal government's mantra that "Everything is great!" "Canada is doing better than ever!" If I heard "Triple A credit rating!" one more time, I'm gonna stab myself in the throat. All that tells the Liberals is that they can continue borrowing and printing money. For the last 5+ years, I feel like I'm living in bizarro world. Like they say, a country falls in the same way a person goes bankrupt - slowly and then all at once.

He's here every day supporting Liberals. 🤣

Not gonna look at any of the information I gave you to check out, just gonna go with the Wiki entry, eh? Not surprised. Sorry, my dude, you don't get to refuse to look at information and then whine that it doesn't exist. That weasel play is getting reeeeeal old with me.

I'm ill-informed? You're the one who thinks China is our friend and that the Liberals have done a great job 🤣

How about listening to the guy who was detained by China for over 1000 days? You got a problem with his opinion, too, @eyeball? Michael Kovrig: Don't buy the gaslighting, China's intentions towards Canada are hostile

Like I said, any Liberal could r@pe a 9 year old right in front of eyeball and he'd cheer them on.

We're not the only ones having issues with Chinese corruption: Chinese CEO Fired European Executives and Transferred Banking Powers to Suspicious Individuals: Inside Europe’s First National Security Seizure of a Chinese-Owned Chip-Maker Not sure why eyeball thinks the Chinese are so virtuous.😏

Here is Sam Cooper, an award winning journalist, testifying in Committee regarding the Chinese Capture of Canada and how it's affecting Canada's relationship with our Five Eyes partners. You'll notice he refers to RCMP surveillance of Chinese crime lords and their horror when Trudeau meets up with one of them while under surveillance. Or you can be like eyeball and bury your head in the sand and deny it's happening. Because eyeball is clearly smarter than all these guys. After all, he knows how to Wiki. 🙄

At least Fake Flyer, the 12-year-old fart joke loving boy in mommy's basement, loves your posts. 🤣 You got that going for you.

I keep responding to you, thinking maybe you really do want to know the truth about things, but no. You wallow in your stupidity like a fly in cow 💩.

@eyeball You are truly one of the stupidest people I've ever come across in my life. I just have to say that.

I'm not even going to look at your feeble "Wiki" information or investigate it, just like you didn't investigate it. I've read Willful Blindness, I've read and subscribe to the Bureau's substack, I've watched Sam Cooper's testimony in front of both the US and Canadian governments. You have a Wiki entry that you quickly googled to make a rebuttal. You can fuque all the way off. You're intellectually lazy and just plain STUPID.