Goddess

Although Canada is a highly vaccinated country, do you think the 4+ shot group is the largest? I suspect not. But they are the largest hospitalized and deaths group. First we needed 60% jabbed for herd immunity. Then 70%, then 80%, then 90%. If 90% won't do it, now what? And if the jabs aren't preventing hospitalization and death, what good are they? These are global questions that anybody who can think critically is asking. Well, everybody is asking, except the CDC.

Edmonton news tonight. Not sure how many times this has to happen on the air before some of you start putting the pieces together. A very young reporter from Regina "died suddenly" recently, as well.

This young lady had already had covid, so was immune. But media coverage convinced her that she needed the shot to do the things she wanted to do in the world. She did not tell her parents she was getting the jabs. They only found out after she died suddenly, days after getting it. Let me say it loud - YOUR LYING MISINFORMATION THAT THERE IS NO NATURAL IMMUNITY TO COVID IS KILLING PEOPLE.

That time, 2 years ago, when this chick almost blew the whole scam.

JCM | Free Full-Text | The Incidence of Myocarditis and Pericarditis in Post COVID-19 Unvaccinated Patients—A Large Population-Based Study (mdpi.com) I do see some flaws in this study, so make of it what you will. Co-morbidities and underlying health condition and socioeconomic determinants of health and socioeconomic inequalities are not taken into consideration. It didn't bother controlling for undiagnosed myocarditis. If you don't look for it, how can you know if it's there or not? It does agree with other, better studies.

Incidence of acute myocarditis and pericarditis during the c... : Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine (lww.com) The aim of this study is to explore the incidence and prevalence of acute inflammatory heart diseases analyzing the occurrence of these diseases prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Overall, the cases of myocarditis (including also cases of perimyocarditis with minimal signs of pericardial involvement) were 92 in PRECOVID and 67 in the COVID period. The annual incidence of myocarditis was significantly higher in PRECOVID than in the COVID period, respectively 8.1/100 000/year vs. 5.9/100 000 year (IRT 1.37, 95% CI 0.99–1.99, P = 0.047), consisting of a net reduction of 27% of cases. We have analyzed the impact of the pandemic on the incidence of acute inflammatory heart diseases in a definite area with a population of more than 1 million inhabitants. The main findings of our study show that: compared with the PRECOVID period, a 27% decrease in the annual incidence of myocarditis was found during the COVID pandemic; the greater decrease in the incidence of myocarditis was recorded in young patients and particularly in those under the age of 34 years; myocarditis observed in the COVID period showed greater severity of LV involvement with higher wall motion abnormalities, a greater number of LGE segments and higher ventricular mass index than those observed in PRECOVID period; finally, no difference regarding pericarditis was observed between the COVID and PRECOVID periods. This is the first study showing the incidence of acute inflammatory heart diseases during the COVID pandemic. The reduced incidence of non-COVID myocarditis during the COVID period is supported by a reduction the respiratory pathogens (i.e. adenovirus, influenza) with myocardial trophism. Furthermore, the use of sanitizing gel and/or medical gloves may have contributed also to the decrease in the incidence of some gastrointestinal viruses with some aptitude to myocarditis such, as coxsackie virus and echovirus. Indeed, during the COVID period, we have observed a greater reduction in myocarditis particularly in young patients, aged less than 34 years. The decrease in myocarditis incidence of such a group of young patients, representing the most involved class of age in PRECOVID, could be partially explained by the restriction on social life that were imposed during our COVID period of observation (closure of discotheques, disco-bars, pubs, etc.). In Fig. 1, the annual incidence per 100 000 inhabitants of myocarditis is shown for all the classes of age from 12 to greater than 74 years old. As is evident from the graph, most of the differences in the incidence of myocarditis are because of a significant decrease in cases of myocarditis in the ages between 17 and 34 years. Particularly, the incidence of myocarditis was significantly lower in COVID than in PRECOVID in the class of age 18–24 <th>years (P = 0.048). However, the finding of a decrease in the overall incidence of myocarditis during COVID could be considered as indirect proof of the absence of a substantial impact of SARS-CoV-2 on the risk of myocarditis.

John Ioannidis Warned COVID-19 Could Be a “Once-In-A-Century” Data Fiasco. He Was Right - Foundation for Economic Education (fee.org) COVID-19 has been far from the deadliest virus in modern history, but it has been the most divisive. The public, politicians, policy experts, and public health officials have disagreed on how deadly it is and how best to contain it. But the one thing everyone seems to agree on is the numbers we have—fatalities and cases—are way wrong. A new CDC report estimates COVID-19 rates about 10 times higher than reported. Ioannidis put the figure even higher, estimating weeks ago that as many 300 million people had already been infected globally. Deaths are more complicated. The New York Times says COVID-19 deaths have been massively undercounted. Dr. Ashish Jha, speaking to Lawrence O’Donnell on MSNBC, agreed, saying most experts agreed there is a “substantial undercount.” Others, including nearly one-third of Americans according to a recent survey, believe that the COVID-19 death toll is inflated. This includes physicians who say medical professionals are being pressured by hospital administrators to add coronavirus to death sheets. Writing at the American Mind, Angelo Codevilla recently argued if the CDC had used the same criterion for the SARS virus as COVID-19—primarily “severe acute respiratory distress syndrome”—total COVID fatalities in the US would have been 16,000 through June. Nobody knows the true count, of course. But the one thing left and right seem to agree on is the data we have are junk. And yet the lesson we keep hearing is “trust the experts.” But thinkers as diverse as Matthew Yglesias at Vox to author Matt Ridley have pointed out the dangers of blindly following “the experts,” especially when they’ve shown themselves to be spectacularly wrong from the very beginning on the COVID-19 pandemic. "It's dangerous to rely too much on models (which lead politicians to) lock down society and destroy people's livelihood,” Ridley recently told John Stossel. Ridley has a point. The experts can’t agree on their own numbers or even clearly answer if a man who died in a motorcycle accident while infected should be labeled as a COVID-19 death. In light of this, perhaps it’s time for the experts to exercise some humility and begin offering guidance to individuals instead of advocating collective blunt force.

Effectiveness of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Bivalent Vaccine | medRxiv Cohort for this study was 51,011 employees of the Cleveland Clinic and was a 3-month study from the date of the first bivalent booster dosages given on Sept. 12, 2022. Pertinents: Among 51,011 employees - 20,689 (41%) had had a previous documented episode of COVID-19, 42,064 (83%) had received at least two doses of a vaccine. 10,804 (21%) were bivalent vaccine boosted COVID-19 occurred in 2,452 (5%) during the study. (Pfizer 89%, Moderna 11%) NOTE: this study is based on large numbers: Doses, 0 = 6,419 (12.6%) Doses, 1 = 2,528 (5%) Doses, 2 = 14,810 (45.9%) Doses, 3 = 23,396 (45.9%) Doses 4 = 3,757 (7.4%) Doses 5 = 85 (<1%) Doses 6 = 16 (<1%) The risk of COVID-19 varied by the number of COVID-19 vaccine doses previously received. The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19. Vaccine doses versus risk of covid during the 3-month study period: One dose - 1.7 times more likely to test positive for covid Two doses - 2.63 times more likely to test positive for covid Three doses - 3.1 times more likely to test positive for covid More than three doses - 3.8 times more likely to test positive for covid Compared to the unvaccinated Leading to an estimated vaccine effectiveness (VE) of 30% - REMINDER that until these inoculations, a vaccine needed to show at least 50% efficacy to be used in humans. P = 0.001 means 999 out of 1,000 likely to be a genuine result That 99.9% likely to be a genuine result ALSO NOTE: Again, it is NOT the CDC, FDA, NIH or any other entity doing these studies. Why aren't they? So....... you can make decisions based on this study (and other studies that show the same) or you can go with Eyeball's highly intellectual and scientifically based analysis of the situation based on his 3-year long in-depth studies of CBC headlines, which is much easier to read and understand than actual medical studies and data - "Horseshit."

Pfizer has habitually engaged in illegal and corrupt marketing practices, bribed physicians, & suppressed adverse trial results. This is no secret, yet this fact continues to be brushed under the rug by politicians & the media: 1994 - Pfizer pays out $200 million to settle claims that the company lied to get federal approval for a heart valve and then covered up safety concerns as the device killed hundreds of patients. 1996 - Pfizer experiments on 200 Nigerian children without informing their parents that an approved cure existed or that their children were subjects of a medical experiment. Eleven children died. Others suffered brain damage, organ failure, or paralysis. 2001 - Pfizer is sued on behalf of 30 Nigerian families who alleged their "children were used as human guinea pigs." The families claimed Pfizer violated the Nuremberg Code and exposed their children to "cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment." The case was dismissed. 2002 - Pfizer agrees to pay $49 million to settle allegations that the drug company defrauded the federal government and 40 states by charging too much for its cholesterol treatment Lipitor. Pfizer's revenue for Lipitor in 2001 was $6.45 billion 2007 - The Nigerian government sued Pfizer for $7 billion and accused the company of "carrying out illegal trials" that "killed or disabled children." Nigeria claimed Pfizer did not inform local health authorities or parents that the children were part of an experiment. 2008 - The NYT published an article entitled, “Experts Conclude Pfizer Manipulated Studies.” Pfizer delayed the publication of negative studies, spun negative data more positively, and suppressed negative findings to promote Neurontin. Experts Conclude Pfizer Manipulated Studies - The New York Times (nytimes.com) 2009 - Pfizer paid $750M to settle 35,000 claims that its drug, Rezulin, was responsible for 63 deaths and dozens of liver failures. The FDA did not remove Rezulin from the market until three years after the UK had, despite a mounting death toll. 2009 - Pfizer was fined $2.3 billion, then the largest healthcare fraud settlement and the largest criminal fine ever imposed in the US. Pfizer pled guilty to paying kickbacks to doctors and illegally promoting — Bextra, Geodon, Zyvox, and Lyrica. CNN's Anderson Cooper: If Pfizer is too big to fail and even the biggest fine in history is just a few months' profits, then what's going to stop it from illegally promoting other drugs? Critics say nothing. They say it's the cost of doing business. 2010 - Leaked State Department cables alleged that Pfizer had hired investigators to blackmail Nigeria's Attorney General into dropping the $7 billion lawsuit against Pfizer. WikiLeaks cables: Pfizer 'used dirty tricks to avoid clinical trial payout' | Pfizer | The Guardian 2010 - Pfizer is ordered to pay $142 million in damages for violating federal anti-racketeering laws by its fraudulent sale and marketing of Neurontin. The jury found that Pfizer violated the RICO act. Neurontin Lawsuits - Pfizer Illegal Marketing, Injury Claims (yourlawyer.com) 2010 - Pfizer admits that it paid $20 million to 4,500 doctors and other medical professionals for consulting and speaking on its behalf during the last six months of 2009. The disclosure was required due to a settlement agreement for the illegal promotion of drugs. 2010 - Blue Cross filed a lawsuit against Pfizer, accusing the pharmaceutical giant of illegally bribing 5,000 doctors with lavish Caribbean vacations, golf games, cash payments, massages, and other recreational activities. 2012 - The SEC charged Pfizer with violating the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act for bribing foreign healthcare professionals in Bulgaria, China, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Italy, Kazakhstan, Russia, and Serbia. Pfizer settled for $60 million. 2012 - Pfizer paid $1.2 billion to settle claims by nearly 10,000 women that its drug, Prempro, caused breast cancer. This included punitive damages for the pharmaceutical giant withholding warnings about the risk of breast cancer. 2012 - In 2012, Pfizer paid $55 million to settle criminal charges for illegally promoting its proton pump inhibitor Protonix. 2013 - Pfizer paid $273 million to settle claims by over 2000 people that its drug, Chantix, caused suicidal thoughts and severe psychological disorders. Pfizer settles 2,000-plus Chantix suits, takes $273M charge | Fierce Pharma 2016 - Pfizer paid $784 million to settle a medicare fraud case for its promotion of Protonix. There are over 13,000 proton pump inhibitor lawsuits pending in federal court — which claim that Pfizer and other drug manufacturers — withheld warning signs of kidney disease, acute interstitial nephritis, and kidney failure. "Virtually every major drug company has either been convicted of fraud or reached a settlement. Is fraud the business model of the pharmaceutical industry?" ~~ Bernie Sanders ~~ ......but don't worry, they're telling you the truth this time.

I can already see what some are going to post about the Australian data:

Double WOW. They're also not going to be reporting by vax status any more. What a shocker. Every country, does this when the numbers start going the OTHER way. At the beginning of the vax rollout, when unvaccinated deaths exceeded vaccinated, it was publicized by MSM everywhere. Now the opposite is happening and nothing but crickets from them. The censorship by government, MSM & big pharma is still going on. Interesting that there were 6 deaths, but no hosp/ICU for unvaxxed. Are we supposed to believe that they were all too stubborn to seek medical help when they were getting close to death? Or were there contributing factors, like car crashes, falling off ladders, gunshot wounds...

Oh WOW. The weekly covid report in Australia, week ending Dec. 31 (pertinent chart is on page 4, vax status is near the bottom of the chart): NSW Respiratory Surveillance Report - week ending 31 December 2022 1,770 hospitalized: NO UNVAXXED 810 with 4 or more doses hospitalized. 140 in ICU: NO UNVAXXED 58 with 4 or more doses 95 deaths: 53 with 4 or more doses

I've mentioned before that I am in a control group study. I just filed my report for December. There is a section of the website for news and such - the control group study had this to report, representing the duration of the study so far: There is just shy of 19,000 people reporting each month (18,967, to be exact). Everyone is unvaccinated. Out of the 19,000 - 5,196 reported a suspected or known SARS-Cov2 infection, since the beginning of the study. Of the 5,196 cases, only 74 reported being hospitalized, either as inpatient or outpatient. That's 1.4% of the total cases that required some kind of hospitalization and it is 0.4% of the group cohort. As a rough comparison, data from New York as of August 2022 indicates that 0.52% of vaccinated individuals have been hospitalized. Vitamins C and D, zinc and quercetin are used regularly by the majority of the total cohort.

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/health-care-workers-cry-foul-fda-claiming-it-didnt-prohibit-ivermectin-covid-19 Now the FDA is claiming they did not forbid Ivermectin. Why this constant lying and attempts to re-write history?

Florida will be investigating the large number of sudden deaths at home. In a study of 35 of such deaths, 4 were definitely attributed to the vaccine, others were likely but not proven.

Yes, that seems to be the way it goes. I have 2 grandbabies - 8 yr old and 3 yr old.

Myata, is that you? ? Blink twice if Yes. Bark once if you're in Miwaukee.

aI feel like with the Damar Hamlin thing, there was brain death on the field. Tough choice for the family. As a death doula, I see how agonizing it is. Sad.

There are some studies coming out now regarding repeat infections - getting covid over and over. Basically very hard on your body organs. I need to go over them before I post. The problem is - it's mainly the vaxxed getting repeat infections. Healthy lifestyle is still the best prevention. Eat well, get some exercise, spend time outside, take supplements, look after your physical and mental health. Basically everything the lockdowns prevented people from doing for 2 years.

From the beginning, I read the studies and opinions of doctors and scientists who explained scientifically the mechanisms in the mRNA inoculations that could cause great harm. I was hoping they would be wrong, too. ? The adults are sad, but they got to choose, even if it was a shitty choice like "take the jabs or lose your job." What have we done to the children, though? Short term - myocarditis, sudden death after cardio activity, weakened immune systems. Long term - we don't know yet, but I suspect there are going to be a lot of fertility issues in the future. Child vax uptake is low right now. I think most parents instinctively know something is not right with how this all went down.

And now they're going after Jordan Peterson: Click on "Read the full conversation on Twitter"

He says what the government tells him to say.