Goddess

Well, this is quite astounding: McGill University and Moderna to expand collaborations with new projects in Lipid Nanoparticle research | Newsroom - McGill University It describes two research projects. Take a look at project #2. It is “a study to characterize LNPs so that their specific size and payload distribution may be better understood“. The announcement also admits that “Standard techniques cannot simultaneously quantify the size and payload of individual LNPs, and thus often only averages are measured that mask individual variation and mask the relationship between size and payload.“. In other words, the real dose of mRNAs being delivered in each shot is NOT KNOWN, particularly across different batches. This is an open admission that one person can potentially receive a very different dose than another, regardless of the ‘average’ dose stated on the vial. Never before has there been a global rollout of a drug where physicians are unable to accurately administer defined doses. ("Trust your doctor!!") Finally, “The results [of the study] will guide the optimization of LNP manufacturing and could be used for quality control for the manufacture of mRNA-based vaccines“. Should there not have been an adequate understanding of the biodistribution of these LNPs PRIOR to a global rollout? Should this optimization and development of a proper quality control system not have been done PRIOR to a global rollout? Bottom line: Basic things like understanding where a drug goes in the body and how to optimize quality control oversight of its manufacturing and standardize its dosing - should have been done extensively and satisfactorily more than two years ago. And anyways, independent scientists and researchers have already answered these questions - the LNPs collect in major organs like the heart and lungs, the ovaries and testes. They cross the blood-brain barrier. And we already know that the shots can give one person zero dosage and another person 7,000 times the dosage.

2023 is proving to be more deadly worldwide than 2020. Yet, no outcry. No panic. No response. Alberta: (pop. 4.3 million) 625 excess deaths in the first 18 weeks of 2020 2,090 excess deaths in same period of 2023 That's 3 and half times as many. BC: (pop. 5.3 million) 315 excess deaths in the first 18 weeks of 2020 1,895 excess deaths in same period of 2023 That's 6 times as many. Saskatchewan: (pop. 1.17 million) 50 excess deaths in the first 13 weeks of 2020 460 excess deaths in same period of 2023 That's 9 times as many.

CBC headline ? ?

https://resistancepress.com/article/ten-lessons-covid-19-pandemic?fbclid=IwAR0AxZGpaRH--Fh--4bcqYM-B0esn67fgcqrgqWNroRk4XbkAt060CpskFQ #3, #5 and #9 Are my top 3.

England & Wales (UK ONS Data) Week 27 - Excess deaths 14,163 in 2019 63,825 in 2022 41,757 in 2023 (So far....) Media - silent. Politicians - silent. Everyone here who screeched covid deaths every 15 minutes for the last 3 yrs - silent.

Another one for the Museum of Pandemic Absurdities:

Guillain Barré Syndrome: Explained: Peru declares health emergency after rise in Guillain-Barré Syndrome cases; here are the signs of this neurological disorder | The Times of India (indiatimes.com) A run-away "neurological" disorder..... Huh. And the #2 adverse event after vaccination (cardiac issues being #1) is........neurological disorders. Huh. On July 8th, the Peruvian government declared a nationwide health emergency after an explosion in cases of Guillain-Barré Syndrome. The state of emergency will last for 90 days as officials tackle the “unusual increase” in cases. Good luck, Peru! Pfizer thanks you for your patronage!

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm?fbclid=lwAR2PcFrRYmWibcz886GrQnZPmjqSswsIV9mXkhTkip14YaTRC-8qSfGLxpw Only 5% of deaths were actually "from covid". The other 95%, had on average, 4 other comorbidities.

Peanut Gallery here rarely has anything scientific to share. I think because they get their "science" from MSM headlines. ??

Apparently I know more than you because, BASED ON SCIENCE STUDIES, I've said from the beginning that the jabs would not prevent transmission or infection, that lockdowns would be far more harmful than covid, etc. Feel free to share the scientific studies you've found that say lockdowns were great and the jabs prevent transmission and infection. Good luck. You're going to need it. And you're 67 pages of science BEHIND.

Covid Censorship Proved to Be Deadly - WSJ The author sensibly pointed out that forbidding doctors from recommending effective alternative treatments and hiding the fact of recovered immunity is not only unethical and droolingly moronic but led to countless preventable deaths: The article quoted Nobel Prize-winning physicist Richard Feynman, who in 1969 famously said “Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts.” Truer words were never spoken. So I guess all us of contrarians were doing science all along.

Lockdowns: the Self-Inflicted Disaster | City Journal (city-journal.org) The article described two substantial new analyses of near-universal lockdown policies enacted in every country but one (Sweden, the control group). Both reports concluded lockdown policy made little or no difference in saving lives, but had massive destructive effects. The first analysis was published in book form, after researchers reviewed over twenty thousand separate studies. Think about that number, twenty thousand. That is a LOT of lockdown studies. The book, authored by three respected economists and published last month, was simply titled, “Did Lockdowns Work?” The answer is no. Sadly, mainstream media, having sold its soul for twenty pieces of silver during the pandemic, largely remains silent. For now. And the CDC is suicidally sticking to its lockdown guidance, along with the W.H.O., which is still pushing them, hard, in its odious new “pandemic treaty.” Which means the next time they try this - and they will - we must not comply.

A Systematic Review of Autopsy Findings in Deaths after COVID-19 Vaccination by Nicolas Hulscher, Paul E. Alexander, Richard Amerling, Heather Gessling, Roger Hodkinson, William Makis, Harvey A. Risch, Mark Trozzi, Peter A. McCullough :: SSRN The dam holding back vaccine injury data was broken open yesterday when the world’s premier medical journal dipped a toe into the vaccine injury pool. Yesterday — the 5th of July — the Lancet published a preprint titled “A Systematic Review of Autopsy Findings in Deaths after COVID-19 Vaccination.” The review’s nine authors included Harvey Risch of the Yale School of Public Health, Paul Alexander, who worked at the Department of Health and Human Services during the pandemic, and top-published cardiac researcher Peter McCullough. Researchers reviewed 678 individual studies — all of the published autopsy reports they could find — collapsing those into 44 papers describing 325 autopsy cases and one tissue study. To make the final cut, three physicians independently reviewed each death to determine whether it would have been the safe and effective covid vaccination that killed the patient. Of those 325 cases, 73.9% were determined by a majority of the three reviewing doctors to have been caused by the shots in full or in part. Timing was critical to the diagnosis: folks in the study group killed by the jabs died on average two weeks following the first shot, three weeks after the second shot, and one week after the third shot. Unsurprisingly, the two largest groups of organs injured by the shots were the heart (the cardiac organ) and the blood (hematological systems), which includes strokes, clotting, and so forth. They concluded that the evidence strongly suggested a causal link between the jabs and the deaths: By necessity, this paper only looked at acute (sudden) deaths that occurred soon enough after vaccination to provoke an autopsy. Because of the authors’ desire to firmly link jabs to deaths by “temporal proximity” (closeness in time), their review excluded longer-term causes like turbo cancers or delayed strokes and heart attacks. That may be why, at the end of their paper, the authors brought up the large, unexplained numbers of baffling excess deaths, as additional evidence shoring up their conclusions: Between shrinking estimates of covid deaths (because of over-diagnosis many countries are now deleting supposed "covid" deaths), and increasing evidence of jab-caused mortality, we are now well on the way to proving that the jabs killed more people than covid. I’d like to remind you of what Eric Rubin said in 2021, just before voting to approve the shots for kids. Rubin is the editor of the New England Journal of Medicine, a professor at Harvard, and sits on the FDA’s Vaccine Advisory committee. In October of 2021, to persuade his committee colleagues to vote in favor of shots for kids, Rubin infamously said: Dr. McCullough explained, “That statement will go down as the most reckless, as the most reprehensible scientific statement in the history of medical bioethics."

For anyone who is emerging from the brainfog of 3 uesrs of induced fear and paranoia, do you ever wonder why the "conspiracy theorists" have been consistently right through all this and the "experts" consistently wrong? It's because we follow science and you follow "The Science".

Here's 4 from June 2023 for you: Imagine how many "unfamous" deaths there are. 1. Katarina Pavelek, a 41-year-old actress who decided to take her own life after suffering from vaccine side effects. She chose to end her life in Switzerland on the 2nd of June after being diagnosed with an untreatable chronic neurological illness caused by the booster jab. Her last message on Instagram: 2. The Gold Coast Marathon just concluded yesterday, and reports are that two marathon runners collapsed, and one has died in the hospital. Gold Coast Marathon runners who collapsed - one fatally - aged in 20s and 30s (goldcoastbulletin.com.au) Let's examine the data from a study conducted by the American Heart Association that examines the number of cardiac arrests experienced by marathon runners. The study analyzed long-distance race records in the United States from January 1, 2001, to May 31, 2010. According to the findings, there was an incidence of 0.54 cardiac arrests per 100,000 runners, meaning approximately 1 in 180,000 marathon runners experienced cardiac arrest: Marathon-related cardiac arrest - PubMed (nih.gov) In yesterday's Gold Coast Marathon, which had approximately 6,500 participants, two incidents of cardiac arrest were reported. This translates to a ratio of 1 in 3,250. The disparity between 1 in 3,250 and 1 in 180,000 is significant. 3. So, did Oscar Cabrera die because of the vaccines? Let the man speak for himself: This was his post on Facebook, translated into English: (I had to adjust the swears so this would post.) “I got a d**m Myocarditis from putting a fuquing vaccine. (I got 2 doses of Pfizer) And I knew it! Many people warned me. But guess that? It was compulsory or I couldn't work. I am an international professional athlete and I am playing in Spain. I have no health problem, nothing, not hereditary, no asthma, NOTHING! I suddenly collapsed to the ground in the middle of a match and almost died. I'm still recovering and I've had 11 different cardiology tests done and guess? They find nothing. I have no cholesterol, no fat, nothing! 7% body fat 93% muscle. When they give me the diagnosis, they tell me that I won't be able to play for at least 5 months until my heart goes down again and they can't give me that medicine" 4. The death of Joesthetics, also known as Jo Linder, sent shockwaves through the bodybuilding and fitness community yesterday. He was only 30 years old. However, the main point wasn't about steroids at all. Joe conducted an interview 2-3 weeks prior to his sudden death, in which he described his personal health anomalies after receiving the vaccines. This included discussing his blood work and other related details. Essentially, he has all the evidence to support the presence of blood anomalies after vaccination. What more could you ask for? You can watch the interview here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aly-7QpL5NQ&start=76s&utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email According to the National Cancer Institute, plasmapheresis is commonly performed to eliminate excessive antibodies, abnormal proteins, or other harmful substances from the blood. Today on MSM, there was a photo gallery of almost 200 famous people who have died recently. I noted many heart attacks in 20-30 year olds and many "died suddenly at homes". The excess mortality is not slowing down.

And this is why people like Eyeball keep falling back to "But I don't know anyone who had an adverse reaction, so therefore adverse reactions don't exist." Privy Council advocated downplaying COVID vaccine injuries or deaths | Toronto Sun The memo also suggested skewing stats to minimize the impact of vaccine-related deaths or injuries, such as stating the “chance of it happening to me is one in a million” rather than “it has happened five times.”

I posted this paper before when it first came out, and it still has not been challenged: Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in randomized trials in adults - ScienceDirect Shows COVID vaccine has 1/800 severe adverse event rate. Rotavirus vaccine was pulled from market for 1/10,000 adverse events Swine flu vaccine was pulled for 1/100,000 - after only 50 deaths. As far as vaccines go, the COVID vaccine adverse event rate is historically extremely, extremely high. The egregious part was the government knew the AE rate was high (they had the most comprehensive and current data), and they mandated it for populations they knew weren’t at risk of severe outcomes. The original risk analysis held true. Healthy young people were NEVER at serious risk. Generally speaking, healthy people were never at risk. That was true at the beginning, and it is still true today.

"It is the responsibility of scientists never to suppress knowledge, no matter how awkward that knowledge is, no matter how it may bother those in power; we are not smart enough to decide which pieces of knowledge are permissible and which are not." - Carl Sagan, a scientist that probably would not be afraid to debate someone

The lab leak was real. Of course it was. As John Stewart attempted to explain to full-on pharma-stooge Stephen Colbert in the midst of all the silliness, “there was an explosion of chocolatey goodness in Hershey, Pennsylvania.” But he forgot to account for the cardinal sin from those horrid two years where progressives took leave of their senses: Stewart was right too early. That makes you a conspiracy theorist. The right-too-early crowd lost friends and family members to that dreaded scarlet letter. The powers that be were wrong on: Covid origins Community masking Closed schools Closed businesses The usefulness of vaccine passports Infection-acquired immunity The efficacy of the vaccines The safety profile for the young and healthy But we were the crazy ones. In the eyes of many, we still are. “A perfect record of anti-science failure,” says Stanford professor Jay Bhattacharya, who was perhaps more castigated than any for asking the right questions at the wrong time.

ESC 365 - Myocardial Inflammation/Myocarditis After COVID-19 mRNA Booster Vaccination. (escardio.org) Professor Christian Eugen Mueller, based in University Hospital Basel in Basel, Switzerland presented study results from the prospective investigation titled “Myocardial Inflammation/Myocarditis After COVID-19 mRNA Booster Vaccination.” The study results reveal the actual incidence of post-vaccination myocardial lesions is 2.8% vs 0.0035% of myocarditis in retrospective studies. Impacting women more in this research, this data is contrary to what has been described by the retrospective research and what has been captured by regulatory agencies such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in mRNA vaccine package inserts. Why didn't the media in the West nor the medical trade press pick up this study result? The data, according to the principal investigator, the first such prospective data to be generated concerning mRNA vaccines and myocardial lesions, raises significant concern about the safety of the mRNA vaccines. The risk for myocardial lesions is far higher in women than men, running counter to data derived from retrospective data. This prospective data suggests females face higher risk for myocardial lesions associated with mRNA COVID-19 booster doses. The incidence of myocardial lesions is 2.8% or 800x higher than the usual incidence of myocarditis, and this afflicts more women than men, unlike viral myocarditis. This evidence, suppressed in mainstream media and even trade press, raises the specter that repeated doses of mRNA vaccine in order to maintain protective coverage against SARS-CoV-2, especially with the predominance of Omicron (less severe generally; lower death rate), should be done so using great caution regarding the prospect of repeated myocardial lesions and their impact on possible cardiovascular complications. Put another way, this data would likely impact risk-benefit analysis for COVID-19 vaccination. Why wouldn’t this research result be more easily available?

The real conspiracy theory is believing that you can replace your immune system with hand sanitizers, masks, and gene therapies.

View of Annual All-Cause Mortality Rate in Germany and Japan (2005 to 2022) With Focus on The Covid-19 Pandemic: Hypotheses And Trend Analyses (sciencexcel.com) A new peer-reviewed study confirms that the drastic spike in deaths since 2020 have a direct link to the COVID-19 vaccine rollout. Worrying Conclusion: ‘From this point of view, it seems possible that a high vaccination rate has contributed to an increased all-cause mortality in some countries.’

Critic of congressional probe into gain-of-function research helped fund Wuhan gain-of-function study - U.S. Right to Know (usrtk.org) First Fauci and now Hotez - both involved in the gain of function research that started the covid pandemic. Hotez in that bow tie looks like a serial killer.

New emails show COVID vaccine mandates were based on a lie | Washington Examiner Emails obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request show that CDC Director Rochelle Walensky and former NIH Director Francis Collins were aware of, and discussed, “breakthrough cases” of COVID in January 2021 — right when the vaccines became widely available. In her email, Walensky says that “clearly,” it is an “important area of study,” links to a study raising the issue, and assures the person she is sending it to that Dr. Anthony Fauci is looped into these conversations. However, in public, Walensky was saying something quite different. Two months after discussing this data, she said vaccinated people “don’t carry the virus” and “don’t get sick.” We now know that was not true and that Walensky herself knew it was not true.