WestCanMan

You laugh, but Psaki might be onto something - get Fox News to do the FBI and presidunce's job for them. This is the 5th month where Fox News has been the sole voice of reason in the US. The FBI has a full slate with lying to courts and whoring bogus investigations to the media and all, and the POTUS is already working an hour a day, sometimes two. He's maxed.

We all know that using racial epithets is bad, but it's really bizarre that the biggest virtue-signallers in NA come up with so many policies enacting the most serious form of racism possible - ie exclusion by skin colour, guilt by skin colour, reducing policing in minority neighbourhoods, encouraging riots in poor neighbourhoods, etc. Leftists would go apoplectic if they heard the word 'jap', and rightly so, but isn't it worse to deny a kid entry to Harvard because he's of Japanese descent? If I spent my whole childhood as a professional student so that I could get into an ivy league school I'd rather be called a jap that went to Harvard once in a while than be called a University of Washington grad for the rest of my life. Biden: "The biggest threat that America faces is from white supremacist terrorists!" lol. What a worthless piece of shit. Leftists scramble to throw murders into their favourite category and the best that they could do is attribute a grand total of 64 murders over 5 years to 'white supremacists'. There are almost 800 murders every year in Chicago. That's 4,000 over the same period, in just one city. The Demonrats encouraged rioting by tens of thousands people all over the inner cities (aka 'poor black America') every time they got in front of a mic for 4 years, and they did everything that they could to de-criminalize rioting from instituting zero-cash bail, telling the police to stand down, telling AGs not to prosecute, and even Kamala bragged about bailing rioters out of jail, and every single one of those things was done to keep the riots going. Just watch the video of Kamala getting all giddy when she talked about the prospect of rioting lasting for several months. All of those despicable pieces of shit changed their tune about rioting instantly the second that they personally experienced just two hours of semi-rioting. "OMG IT'S SO EVIL! WHO WOULD PROMOTE RIOTING! THAT'S A CRIME WHEN IT HAPPENS OUTSIDE OF THE INNER CITIES!" Those scumbags also promote defunding the police (in inner cities) while they all have personal escorts by........ the same dastardly police that everyone is supposed to be shit-scared of.

If there was a leftist version of Ted Talks their muppets could listen to: 3-house Bernie Sanders talk about socialism the 4-house BLM leader could lecture them about the greatness of communism, the evils capitalist greed and the lack of equity in America 4-house David Suzuki could lecture them about their carbon footprint (and Leo DiCaprio and John Kerry etc from their private jets) Hillary Clinton could cry about election cheating and Russian collusion (after she got caught cheating on the 2016 election 3 times while she was busy paying Russian agents for disinformation) AOC and Kamala can talk about how wonderful the rioting of 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2020 was, how insignificant all of the thousands of assaults were, how trivial the dozens of murders were, how the arson and looting were no big deal, and how rioting suddenly became horrible for 2 hours in 2021, when it affected them personally. AOC can talk about how big of a deal her PTSD is, and how meaningless everyone else's feeling are from when they were assaulted, lost businesses or loved ones in the previous 4 years of rioting. Trudeau could lecture them on morality, accountability and transparency, teach them how to balance a budget, etc... They could listen to Biden mumble incoherently for a while and call it a big verbal hug.... Honest to god I think liberals are the stupidest things to ever walk the earth. It's time to take the warning labels off of everything and cull the herd.

I'm pretty sick of all the baseless allegations of racism by leftists, and the overwhelming bombardment of lies, hypocrisy and stupidity. You'd think that eventually they'd get sick of having all of their hyperbolic narratives undermined by facts, but they seem to have an insatiable hunger for new baseless allegations which will eventually wind up in the exact same trash heap as the old ones. Lie, slander, get exposed, lie louder, switch the topic to new lies & slander, get exposed, lie louder, rinse, repeat.

Do you realize that your post was just bullshit though? I could accuse you of being racist too, that doesn't make it true, and it doesn't make it worth repeating. The fact of the matter is that nothing the GOP has done was racist, nor was it designed to disenfranchise minorities. The GOP has taken steps to ensure election integrity, period. When CNN says "THEY MADE IT ILLEGAL TO BRING WATER TO PEOPLE WHO ARE LINED UP TO VOTE! IT'S APOCALYPTIC!!!!!" The truth is, they made it illegal to suggest how people should vote while you bring them water. Cite an exact instance where the GOP made a law that actually disenfranchises people myata. I dare you. I can cite several laws that the Dems made which are voter-fraud-friendly. 1) no ID required to vote 2) mailing out ballots to people who haven't requested them 3) ballot harvesting 4) signatures on mail-in ballots don't have to match, etc. Every single one of those laws is a blatant green light for election fraudsters. They also don't care at all that big tech unethically influenced the last election by censoring factual reporting and allowing false news to be propagated unchecked. Biden actually welcomed big tech execs into key gov't positions. Do you care myata? No, you don't, because Dem election fraud is widespread and in your face. This is their pattern: they commit massive fraud and then raise a massive ruckus over non-existent fraud from the other side. Case in point - they cheated 3x on the 2016 election yet every single dem voter thinks that Trump was the election cheater although he didn't cheat at all. Case in point - the Dems supported/incited/lionized rioting for 3 years when civilians and cops were being assaulted and murdered, then they acted like the 2-hr mini-riot of 2021 was the most appalling thing to happen to America since 9/11. The list goes on. Grab some coffee.

Your sudden change of heart is reminiscent of the people who say "ALL WOMEN MUST BE BELIEVED, REGARDLESS OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE AND VAGUE, BASELESS ALLEGATIONS!" one day and "That woman and her witnesses are obviously lying, because the accused is a leftist. I won't even listen to the allegations, or consider their evidence" the next.

In addition to what you said, there was at least one instance where Democrats overstepped their appointed powers by unilaterally making changes that required approval from the legislature. I think it was an AG who changed the voting law from: signatures on ballots must match signatures on file to everything counts. What the thread is also neglecting is the fact that this election had the appearance of a huge Trump win, due to the fact that he was getting tens of thousands of people to come to multiple rallies a week while Biden was doing a few rallies a month and only getting 200 or less attendees. The fact that covid was kicking around had nothing to do with low attendance numbers for the bidet because Demmies showed up en masse for the rioting in the summer. The election was mailed-in, which is by far the easiest way to defraud the democratic process. CNN might just as well decide the president themselves based on their own polling.

You started this topic as a serious accusation against the GOP, you shouldn't be ignoring posts like the one above myata. There's a lot to address there.

Your whole post is just worthless BS and blather unless you have some kind of a cite with actual facts, and FYI someone on CNN talking doesn't count. Common sense is also more than just a word. 1) The Dems got caught cheating 3x in the 2016 election (the Dems schemed against Bernie, Hillary was given debate questions by CNN, Hillary colluded with Russians). Why are you all ears when they make accusations against other people? 2) Everyone in the US needs ID to drive, take out library books, etc. They need ID for things that aren't even important. Voting is important, and so is the integrity of elections. Can you make an intelligent case why people shouldn't need ID to vote? Can you explain to me how poor black people are too __________ to get ID but poor white people somehow manage? What word would you use to finish that sentence without sounding racist? 3) CNN and the Demmies blatantly lied about the Georgia voting bill, saying things like "It prevents people from even bringing water to voters while they're lined up to vote! They do that to discourage people from voting!" Actually, the bill doesn't prevent anyone from bringing you water if they're just being altruistic, they just can't do it while they're encouraging you to vote one way or another. FYI harassing people who are lined up to vote is actually a very serious form of voter fraud. There are laws against "campaigning" too close to polling booths, for very good reason.

One other thing about the wet market theory vs BSL4 lab - there are 44,000 wet markets in China and only 1 BSL4 lab. Not all wet markets sell exotic/wild animals, but if it's only 10% that still makes 4,400 wet markets in the country selling those types of animals. So of the ~ 4,000 wet markets in China selling wild animals, what are the chances that covid came from that one wet market in that 1 sq km of China that also just happens to have a BSL4 lab? C/mon FFS, the chances are 99.9% BSL4, 0.1% wet market. We've known that for a long time now. Even if the virus that seemed to be tailor-made to kill old, fat people (Americans) wasn't leaked intentionally, of course the Chinese government doesn't want to admit that the virus that killed millions of people leaked out of their lab. Even if they won't allow themselves to be sued, no one wants to look stupid.

No one forced you to copy and paste what you just wrote there, and it was extremely stupid. 1)The lab in question was conducting gain of function research on coronaviruses, 2) a new strain of coronavirus just happened to pop out in that exact square kilometre of the globe, 3) at least 3 people who work in that lab got sick with what appears to have been covid, and 4) at least one of the original carriers of covid had never been to the wet market and didn't live close to it. After reading through that list do you really think that "unlikely" was the right adjective to use there? Isn't it alarming that they're conducting an investigation into something that is almost a certainty, but calling it unlikely? From a scientific and investigatorial standpoint, wouldn't it be appropriate to just leave the adjectives out of that sentence? And if you even read the article you'd realize that it's so full of contradictions that it's just pure shit. 1) They admit right in your article that Biden's administration considered it a 'fringe theory' (now that it's 50/50, obviously Biden looks stupid) 2) They admit right in your article that "intelligence agencies do not believe that there is sufficient information to assess one to be more likely than the other" (IE - it's 50/50) 3) Then after admitting that it's 50/50 they call the lab theory "unlikely" below the title line. Do they not read their own articles? Dude your link was just PURE STUPIDITY. If you read it then you should know that. The Guardian just outed themselves as worthless propagandists with that one article and you'd have to be dull to miss it. I can't, for the life of me, understand why you're so eager to gobble up American propaganda but so reluctant to fall in love with Trudeau. Every other person that I know who blindly gobbles up CNN drivel also worships at the altar of St Turd.

Do you remember that Trump went so far as to completely cut funding to the WHO back when the wHO was wearing dark glasses and waving a white cane around in front of themselves as they walked through China "investigating"? And when the WHO were telling the world not to block travel from China, and not to wear masks? Biden still hasn't caught up to the wisdom of that yet. It will take libtards another few years to get there, I guess. Or maybe never.

Two old adages spring to mind when I think about covid: - 1) Avoid it like the plague, and - 2) A stitch in time saves nine. Regarding #1, there was never a requirement for "science" to help us figure this one out. Moms have known to avoid infectious diseases since the first herpes outbreak, back before Gronkstein invented the burny, smoky stuff. When we first figured out that covid had the potential to wipe out millions of people, our leader should have followed the example set by Trump and other world leaders - stop the plague from getting here. Social distancing and mask wearing were also obvious steps, which we failed miserably at. The second biggest failure regarding #1 was by people like Pelosi (the Chinatown hugathon that she did 1 month after Trump blocked travel from China was the exact opposite of covid-smart) and DeBlasio (get on the subway like it's no big D - the NYC subway was one of the biggest super-spreaders on the planet). Anyone who didn't see the abject stupidity in those kinds of behaviour just needs to stfu about this topic. Regarding #2, the failure to do the things mentioned in #1 let the cat outta the bag with a vengeance. Our country had every natural advantage imaginable to fight covid (low population density, lots of medical expertise and lots of PPE), we just completely dropped the ball and basically pumped covid in as fast as we could until March 16th. We've been paying ever since. Again, humans didn't need "science" to tel us to nip things like this in the bud. Our leader here was and remains an idiot.

From Ballotpedia: Joe's biggest knock is that he's an idiot who's not really capable of doing anything, but this list is chock full of elite-level losers who would strap rockets to the back of the US and shoot it down the face of El Capitan. They have the covid killer on their list, the Governor of California who closed restaurants to peons and then dined indoors with a party of 13, AOC - the mother of stoopiditee, Cory "manly tears of rage" booker, Kamala "suga daddy" Harris who was probably the worst DA in US history and then went on to bail actual violent criminals out of jail in 2020 (she also has a great grandmother who was a slave owner)...... You could easily mistake the 2024 DNC Primary as an episode of "America's Biggest Loser".

Ballotedia has these people listed as the top GOPers for 2024: https://ballotpedia.org/Presidential_candidates,_2024 I wonder why Jim Jordan isn't on that list... Nikki Haley? Lol, how old is this list? Josh Hawley is an interesting name for 2032 or beyond but I can't imagine a POTUS that looks like he doesn't shave yet. Interesting names of non-elected Americans noted below: I like Tucker but there's not a presidential bone in his body. Candace Owens should definitely be elected at some level but I don't think POTUS is a starter job as far as leadership roles go. The Trump kids don't really have a chance imo. Don Jr. is a wienie and Ivanka is married to a Jew. I think that there are way too many anti-Semites on both sides of the aisle to elect a Jew POTUS. I'd still like to see Ivanka run though, just to see all the massive anti-Semites in the US go apoplectic.

Maybe we were a bit too proud, but we definitely have way more shame going around than we should. Well, aside from the shame that we feel for having the second-dumbest leader on the planet (thank ya kindly for taking the #1 spot from us USA).

Oh bullshit. This isn't something that was predicted or climate alarmists would have a link to a document from back when they predicted it. I could just as easily predict Canada electing its most scandalous PM ever in 2015 using the same method. This isn't a result of 'man-made climate change' any more than it's the result of the SNC Lavalin scandal or lax/restrictive gun laws.

Ummmmmmm.....? Leftists make me laugh. Leftists: "The Chinese gov't is committing a civil rights massacre against their citizens by only allowing them to have 1 child!" Also leftists: -"The population of the world is too high!" Aaaaaand when leftist idols say: "I have 5 estates with huge mansions and no trees, a yacht, a private jet and I'm gonna preach to your stupid asses about your gargantuan and irresponsible carbon footprints" you all say: "Hooray for Al Gore! Hooray for David Suzuki! Hooray for Leo DiCaprio! You are so great!" I understand what "the tragedy of the commons" means, but I'm still not listening to hypocritical idiots.

TBH, "Timber Rush" has only done a fraction of the damage that the plague of mountain pine beetles has. At least that's the case here in BC. The mountains are a wasteland.

Toronto was actually the most hated team in Canada for a long time. Back in the '80s, when Edm & Cgy were elite teams and Wpg and Vcr were still decent, the CBC only had 1 HNIC game and 80% of the time all of Canada was forced to watch the cellar-dwelling Leafs. Det vs Toronto was like a mainstay on Sat night and it was no more than a draft derby. Nevertheless, that's what we'd be watching while the Oilers/Flames were playing the Flyers or Islanders. Local stations couldn't even carry games with the other Canadian teams because HNIC had a monopoly on Saturday night. It's funny that I used to hate the CBC for their awful sports coverage, and then when that problem went away I started hating them for their propaganda. #DefundCBC

My mother-in-law is a fawning sycophant of la turd. If any of us mention anything about him she does a pathetic double-arm flap and drops her head. I sweat to god that she is incapable of questioning anything that she sees on Global, CBC or CTV, even if it makes no sense at all.

And yet there are tens of millions of Canadians who see him as the flower of democracy. The Fleur Duh Lies.

Anyways, when we left off we were talking about how Trudeau has a long history of milking charities, from back before he was elected right up until after he was an MP. Then Trudeau got We making propaganda for him and paying his family huge gobs of money for basically nothing, and in exchange he threw them some small bones in the low millions of dollars. SOLICITING WE TO HOST EVENTS WHERE HIS MOM SPOKE: https://nationalpost.com/news/politics/trudeau-government-contributed-1-18-million-to-we-day-event-in-2017-during-which-pms-mother-was-likely-paid-to-speak 'We' CREATED A PROPAGANDA VIDEO FOR JUSTIN: If there was nothing more to add to this story, it would have been an scandal (ethics breach) at this very point. Not one more thing was needed.Any reasonable human would think that it's a breach of ethics for the PM to solicit a charity to host events, pay them $$$ MILLIONS in taxpayer money, when huge amounts of it are going straight to his family, and some is being used to create propaganda for the PM. The fact that Trudeau went to throw them a $900,000,000.00 bone is just a scandal on top of a scandal. It's important to note that when news of the scandal first broke, the We 'charity' declared that Trudeau's family didn't receive any money from them, but that was a lie. They got approximately $500,000.00 from We. WE CHARITY LIES, SAYS THAT THE TRUDEAUS NEVER RECEIVED MONEY: Was this even a case where there was an actual need to spend money, and Trudeau slipped it to his lac keys without giving anyone else a chance to bid on it, or is it a case of Trudeau's government finding a way to funnel almost $1B into We? SIDE NOTE: The We scandal and the SNC scandal are both extremely similar in nature: at the heart of both scandals is the attempt to get extremely lucrative government contracts into the hands of his pals, and in the We scandal for sure, some of that money was going back to his family. The fact that SNC has a court-documented history of bribing government officials to win bids: (SNC bribed Michel Fournier with $2.3M to get a $127M bridge contract in Mtl ) leads one to wonder whether or not SNC found a way to get money directly into Trudeau's pocket as well. (Googling "Michel Fournier accepted $2.3M bribe CBC" and a bunch of other combos of those words doesn't bring the story up anymore. These links are gold).

Lol. The Liberals didn't stop at screwing up this entire country, they had to screw up international law too.

Then they need to categorize genocide like murder, and have genocide 1,2,3, etc. It's ridiculous to use the same word to describe 1) what the Pakistanis have been doing to religious minorities since 1949 and 2) what happened to 1stN people in Canada. In the first instance 10-13M people were murdered, they used mass systemic rape (300,000 in a single year) and to this day people still get murdered by the Pakistani government for stating the religious beliefs. In the 2nd instance the minorities have several extra rights and privileges and they own almost all the lakefront.