WestCanMan

I have no disagreement with what you said there TBH, I just don't agree with the farcical belief that islam doesn't churn out violent religious bigots at a much higher rate than any other religion or culture.

Maybe we're becoming commies, but the commies don't like us: https://nationalpost.com/opinion/tasha-kheiriddin-the-worlds-love-affair-with-justin-trudeau-ends-on-a-sour-note?fbclid=IwAR0RLBPE4YysKH-L_pVgZHw78LLljsmGI2yvLCK_HKeGfJSQuJWM1Jw873M I love that China treats our idiot PM like trash lol. Their own propaganda outlet also roasted him when he tried to pretend that "Our government here doesn't interfere in matters of the court" by pointing out his SNC/JWR scandal.

The stammering dolt.... painful to watch. https://www.news.com.au/world/north-america/us-politics/joe-biden-answers-awkwardly-when-asked-about-calling-vladimir-putin-a-killer-ahead-of-their-summit/news-story/21f0c7e65942f72f6c98dce25e24a078

And it is the opposite now. Islam hasn't changed at all. Wow, your ignorance has turned to delusion. I honestly didn't see that coming. No, I didn't really explain what any of it means, I left it there for you to mull over but it's all apparently beyond your reckoning. You've never explained anything, when you get backed into a corner and you have no answers to give you just cower behind your ignorance. I backtracked lol. I said that their religion is everything, and I was correct. If 999 Jewish kids are killed by a rocket tomorrow all will be fine in the world of islam because they're just Jews. If a woman takes her hijab off in Iran tomorrow it's a serious crime. That's islam. I get that you don't see a problem with that, and that's why there's something seriously wrong with you.

1) I'm looking at centuries of data on a massive scale and pointing out the most largest and most relevant causes for concern while you choose to pretend that there's nothing to be gleaned from such things. 2) Let's recap: the religion IS the geo-politics. It's their everything. Stop ignoring the elephant in the room. There's a reason why 99% of muslims think that Israel's history and existence is an abomination, while those same people have no qualms about Pakistan's history or existence. I don't have to explain all of this to you. The information is here for you to look at and if you choose to stick your head in the sand that's your prerogative.

Those weren't even his worst moments. When he tried to talk about Putin the other day he completely lost his words and went silent. He's done. He couldn't even be a used car salesman in the state that he's in.

Your test is, look at the world in 2021 and ask yourself if Christian countries are extremely violent and bigoted towards religious minorities. Ask yourself how many Christian countries sentence people to death for blasphemy. Ask yourself how many women have been sent to jail for not wearing the proper religious symbols in Christian countries. This country should not be allowing schools or courts to uphold the rights of muslims to inflict their religion on other people, period. Not one single child should be subjected to reading or listening to muslim prayers in public school, period. Religion can not be forced upon people in public places, period. We used to have the Lord's Prayer in the morning up until I was in Grade 2 or 3 in public school, then it went away, as it should have. It was a holdover from back in the day when almost all of the schools in the country were financed by the Catholics, and the fact that it is gone is a blessing.

1) Does what you say really matter when you're pushing the limits of human ignorance with every new sentence? 2) You just glossed over the fact that most of the muslim countries on earth in 2021 share laws which are so extremely bigoted that they seem harsh by dark ages standards. I'm not interested in answering your stupid questions until you acknowledge what it means for so many countries have so many violent & oppressive religiously bigoted laws. You're down 1,000 - nothing now MH. You're making zero headway. You have the reasoning and logic of an ayatollah.

If we were talking about things that happened once every ten years in the US, based on the small muslim population there, or once or twice a year in muslim countries, then you would have a point MH. But, as usual, you do not. 2016: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents_in_2016 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents_in_2017 If we were talking about laws at the tribal level in a few remote areas of the mountains then you would have a point, but I'm talking about laws that are on the books in 13 modern countries with populations in the tens of millions. It takes a lot of people, sharing the same f'd up beliefs, to end up with entire countries which are like the Lord of the Flies on steroids. You think that your astonishing ignorance is proving something. It's not.

You just accused me of being emotionally unstable for using caps MH. It's right here in this thread. Stop crying. I didn't say "This country does thing". I said "Several countries do these things that other countries don't do, which are abhorrent by Canadian standards." 13 countries are religitarded, and they all share a religion: https://www.seeker.com/where-blasphemy-can-get-you-a-death-sentence-2041523454.html Iran is religitarded: https://womensagenda.com.au/latest/yasaman-aryani-took-off-her-headscarf-was-sentenced-to-16-years-in-prison/ Pakistan is religitarded: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/1/8/pakistan-court-sentences-three-to-death-for-blasphemy Keep in mind that article was written by Al Jazeera, which is the opposite of anti-islam. How is it that whole countries can be religitarded in the year 2021 if not because of their religion? How can this violence, oppression and violent bigotry have nothing to do with religion? How can you support such things and yet claim to be a liberal? Which one are you: a psychotic religious fanatic or a bleeding heart liberal? How can you have such a strong opinion on this topic and yet be so completely ignorant about it? Your contribution to this thread is like the argument of a kindergarten student who's criticizing Bill Gates because their iPad [made by Apple fyi] froze. FYI apostasy, mentioned in the uppermost quote about the 13 countries, is simply the act of disavowing the islamic faith. If you leave the religion, you can be sentenced to death by the highest court in the land. 13 whole countries have that law on the books. It's not a fringe thing from a few small sects here and there.

They even yell the name of their god while they do it but CNN says that doesn't mean anything. Case closed!

There are no comparables at all MH, you're deranged. There's not a country in the western world that metes out the death penalty for saying bad things about Christ, or Buddha. There's not a country in the western world where you're allowed to verbally assault women for their choice of religious garb, let alone assault them, or rape them. There's not a country in the western world where women have been whipped and put in jail for removing their religious headdress. Do you think that these things have nothing to do with their religion? Because that would be retarded MH. 2) There were 3 terrorist attacks against Canadians by muslims in less than 3 years before that one MH. You asked me for proof of something so I "cherry picked" facts which proved that I was correct. So weird, hey? I challenged you to find something equally disturbing in human history and you failed to do so. Your inability to consider information that disproves your irrational and childish beliefs is duly noted, as is your woefully lacking knowledge of religion on the whole. Waah, I put the word billions in caps, to emphasize the contrast against your use of the word 'millions' and you're gonna make some kind of childish generalization about that now? And fwiw, why did you capitalize YOU in this sentence? Have you lost it MH? Are you emotionally unstable now?

If that's not 100% accurate it's just because it's the understatement of the century. One could make a solid argument for the case that behaviour is vastly more dependent on religion than socio-economic status or any other factor short of starvation.

1) Are you kidding me? You're comparing two attacks by Canadians to the genocides and the entire countries full of religiously bigoted laws and state-sanctioned violence that I mentioned? Are you completely demented? Do you know how many attacks there were against Canadians by muslims before those two events took place? How can those two isolated events compare to all the things that I talked about MH? What parallel events MH? Where is your example of a group of Christians or Canadians putting out propaganda about how they were beheading journalists and burning people alive, and who then had millions of people sign up to help commit genocide? Find that for me MH. How many BILLIONS of non-muslims are there on earth and why do they commit just a fraction of the terrorist attacks that the muslims do? Answer that for me MH.... Or just dodge it like everything else that doesn't fit your narrative. Whatever. Muslims are about 1% of the population of Canada and the US but the vast majority of murders from terrorists attacks were committed by muslims here. DO THE MATH FFS! No, that's not a fact. That's just an opinion that you belched out here and nothing more. People who emulate Christ act a certain way. People who emulate Buddha act similarly. Ditto for Sikhs and Hindus. Non-religious people who adhere to the Canadian way of life also act in a similar way. Socio-geo-political conditions don't force Christians, Sikhs or Hindus to strap explosives to themselves and then kill children after an Arianna Grande concert. FYI people of the islamic faith emulate mohammed, and when you finally learn about the things that mohammed did then you can begin to understand islam. You stopped learning about people and cultures in kindergarten ffs so don't try to lecture me on 'cause and effect' lol. You're the last person on earth who should be teaching anyone anything.

1) Maybe context-free if you live on Mars, but FYI recent and distant history on earth both show a pattern of extreme bigotry, discrimination, violence and murder from islam. Just a few years ago, islamic state was broadcasting the fact that they were beheading journalists and burning people alive and it helped them to recruit enough muslims to capture an area the size of a large country while fighting off the armies of Syria, Turkey, Russia, the US, Canada (lol) etc. If a Buddhist was bragging about beheadings and burning people alive, what % of Buddhists do you think would rally to the cause? Hindus? Sikhs? Christians? Canadians? Mexicans? Go ahead an name me one other group on this planet who would be drawn to such a thing MH..... Aside from islamic state there are still many countries to this day where extreme religious bigotry and violence is sanctioned/ignored by the state. This entire planet, it's current events and it's history is 'context'. Try to get on a plane without subjecting yourself to a security screening and tell me there's no context MH. You are immersed in it. 2) Rational people spend more time staring at the sun than you spend looking at evidence that contradicts your favourite propaganda. When people bring up actual facts you completely ignore them if they don't fit your narrative. Again, why did so many people join islamic state MH? There are several countries in the ME and further out where religious bigotry is encouraged. Why did islam need an even more bigoted state than Iran or Pakistan? How is that possible? How could so many people feel that way? 3) You are intentionally ignorant of context, you refuse to observe things and consider what they mean, and then you say that blackbird's point is a non-sequitur lol. You're confusing non-sequitur with logic dude. They aren't synonyms.

Well, you're wrong. Don't believe everything you see on CNN. Anyone dumb enough to go along with the Dems' version of "how atrocious that one brief, non-violent event was compared to all the racial violence, burnings and murders of the previous 4 years." Jan 6th alone caused PTSD, the rest of it was just really cool, and those rioters need to be bailed out.

You're trying to say that what BLM did in Seattle wasn't on the same level as insurrection? It wasn't a big deal to AOC because she wasn't personally affected by it, but for the people who lived and worked in the area where BLM chased out the authorities, declared sovereignty, and killed a kid, it was the exact definition of insurrection. Your inability to reason and to feel empathy for other people is duly noted, but you're still wrong.

It doesn't matter wether you think that overrunning the authorities in an area and then declaring sovereignty over it is somehow less than treason/rebellion, but it isn't. Your support for the stammering moron and his BLM/Antifa militias is not something to be proud of. LMAO!!!!!!! Are you claiming to be above trafficking in completely bullshit conspiracy theories now? Since when godzilla? I can guarantee you that you have hundreds if not 1000's of posts in support of Russian collusion, Dr Ford, Ukrainian collusion and other completely bogus narratives here. An average 5th grader couldn't have been sucked in by half of those things if they looked into them. You're like the go-to source for batshit crazy conspiracy theories. A true blue-anon warrior.

That's a lie. BLMers armed with guns stormed a police precinct in Seattle, which is obviously a government building, and then declared sovereignty over a patch of land there, denying the businesses & residents in that area access to police and other services. The dems praised those highly illegal, insurrectionist actions and a young man and a child lost their lives as a result. No, it was a very reasonable protest that went too far. Wrong. Taking over a police station at gunpoint and declaring sovereignty over American soil was not just a 'riot', but at least you tried on this front. You still haven't talked about the appearance of illegitimacy in the 2020 election though, when millions of ballots were sent out unsolicited, and were allowed to be collected without any form of signature matching whatsoever. If there was a book called "Election Fraud Made Easy 101", that would be chapter 1, and chapter 2 would be called "Managing The MSM, Social Media and Useful Idiots to Create The Illusion of Legitimacy".

If you can't acknowledge that what I said was accurate, that's just pathetic. What part of what I said did you think was inaccurate? I'd love to see you try to explain your answer instead of just regurgitating CNN's pat answer.

One thing that we're also not doing is trying to pretend that the 215 kids at that school were murdered, just so that we can join in the PM's virtue-signalling campaign, when we know that they died of the same diseases that white folk in the cities were dying from. It's because we're not liars and dipshits.

When you go to a place where there are lots of sikhs you find a lot of restaurants with sikh cuisine. When you go to a place with a lot of kids you see a lot of elementary schools. When you go to places with a lot of gangs you see a lot of violence and drug usage. Why wouldn't you expect to see traces of the 3rd world in areas where people from the 3rd world are living myata? What would you expect to see there?

You saw how millions of mail-in ballots that no one asked for favoured Biden. Votes that didn't have signatures that matched any signatures anywhere on earth. You also saw how Biden campaigned about fifteen times in 2020 and had a grand total of about 3,000 people attend those rallies. What exactly did you see for real, sapper? Do you think that President Xi or Vladimir Putin could win an election that way? Do you think that Xi or Putin could ever lose an election that way? What we saw was the end of democracy.

How did you miss the 3 years worth of riots and racial violence that the Dems endorsed and just notice the 2 hrs of demonstration at the capitol that the Republicans condemned?? Have you seen the footage from inside the building? It's quite a lot more peaceful than the Dem-sanctioned violence of 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2020. That's why the Dems don't want you to see it. There are actually thousands of hours of video covering those minutes in the capitol. You don't get to see it though. You just get to hear Nancy's opinion of it, and you get to hear about that idiot AOC's "PTSD" lol. Funny that AOC was quite happy about the riots that killed twenty people, saw thousands of assaults, where thousands of businesses were burned to the ground. Did no one else get PTSD from rioting aside from that retard, or does their PTSD just not matter to her?

I should actually thank you for that post Yz, I might not have found that link which confirms the likelihood of all my theories from posts in the Kamloops thread otherwise.