WestCanMan

They're gonna start rounding Canadians up and throwing them (us) in jail. I'm pretty sure that they arrested people in Britain for things that they said before internet fascism became law there. There are comments that we made here, which are true, but don't fit within the "res schools were built for the sole purpose of committing genocide" narrative that we are supposed to adhere to. The good news is that we can now accuse Pierre Elliot Trudeau of committing genocide, and no one can deny it, or they will go to jail.

He probably spent as much on snacks while travelling around the world as he drummed up in trade.

Not true. It's more like the Ricky Gervais quote: "The dead don't know that they're dead: the pain is only felt by others. The same is true for the stupid." IOW, you think you know your sht, but you're too dumb to know that you're way out in left field.

CBC and the LPoC's other MSM lackeys are sure earning their money lately.

I guess that there is a recession now, and two of his cabinet ministers are leaving, so they feel like they have to crank up the propaganda for the byelections, so that Carney doesn't lose the CBC's majority? I mean, the LPoC majority?

This seems like a really weird time to use fake polling to pretend that Carney's popularity is so high, because they can't possibly be keeping the polling this high on a consistent basis until 2028, which means that they will inevitably have to downgrade his popularity at some point to get back to a ballpark figure now. Of course the polling is fake. It's always fake. But this time it's outrageously fake, and there's gotta be a reason. We just don't know what it is yet.

Use green font if you see a shload of irony in that post.

The wealthiest person I know sent his kids to a boarding school. Apparently a high percentage of their grads get into Ox/Bridge. I've also heard that famous people in America send their kids to the Shawinigan school.

Oh crap. That's pathetic. I think Jordan should tuck in his junk and go dominate for 1 season. League revenue would explode.

Remember a month ago when the MSM narrative was "Poilievre is too negative, so 'Canadians' don't like him"? I was listening to that stunned tw4t's radio program this morning and it was all narratives, fake polling and lies. First she went on at length about how 'Canadians' feel like Carney's unfortunate economic performance is just because of the timing with Trump, as if she really speaks for all Canadians, then she said "I was talking to a person the other day who said [paraphrasing] Poilievre gives a lot of good answers and seems to know all the facts, but the other day when he was talking about the recession he seemed happy that our economy wasn't doing well." Next thing you know, her anecdote was actually a reflection of how "Canadians" in general feel. It's the new narrative. So now Poilievre is unpopular because he smiled at the wrong time 😂 Fake polling? Oh yeah... Kapelos cited "polling data" saying that Carney is the most popular PM since Chretien, when he was opposing the Iraq war 😂 I'm not saying that she made that up herself, she didn't, but let's be honest.. Even CBC talking heads were noting Carney's aversion to sunlight last week. There's no way that Kapelos actually believes Carney is that popular. It's more likely that 67% of Canadians hate him. Anyways, here's what that fake polling says now: Surveys from firms like Spark Insights and Angus Reid show Prime Minister Mark Carney's approval hovering between 58% and 67%, making him one of the most favorably viewed Canadian leaders since Jean Chrétien's early tenure I would guess that his actual support right now is closer to 25%. Just the diehard cultists plus someone who clicked a one when they thought they were clicking 3.

Of course you do: you're a fact-averse cultist. Fact: she gave a declarative answer that was the exact opposite of the truth, and she admitted to knowing the truth not long before she gave that false answer.

I thought Britney Griner was a woman. Isn't she in the WNBA? Is there a dude in the WNBA?

Just a moment ago you were saying that AI was programmed to just tell me what I want to hear, now you're telling me that it's programmed. What don't you care that CBC, NYT, BBC, FB, etc are involved in censorship of the truth and disinformation? What I perceive as disinformation is the same thing that AI perceives as disinformation. What I perceive as censorship of the truth is what AI perceives as censorship of the truth. What you perceive as conspiracy theories and fringe opinions are the things that AI considers to be true at the end of the day. AI didn't disgaree. I think you don't understand basic English. "TNI suppressed verified facts." How can I make that any more plain for you? I can only bring you the information, I can't understand it for you. Yes, sometimes I do. The first answer that AI gives is usually disingenuous, and tries to toe the party line. But the thing is, when AI does that, it makes the mistake of trying to twist facts to fit the narrative, and I extract the facts, put them in proper order, and eventually get AI to come to essential truth of the matter. You don't make the same mistake that AI makes: you don't try to reference any facts. Instead you appeal to authority (authorities like CNN, CBC, and Pfizer's own studies about their drugs). Eventually i can get AI to admit that the lack of vax efficacy plus its health risks made the mandates into a complete failure. You would never do that yourself. You would avoid the facts and stats of the matter and instead rely on insults alone to carry the debate for you. No, it just tries to stay on topic, and try to twist and dodge like a leftist, but seeing as it keeps on alluding to pertinent facts, it eventually gets painted into a corner. That never happens to you because you avoid facts like the plague. There's not a leftist here who will say what stage of back-pedalling vax efficacy is at. We're obviously somewhere between: it's safe, you won't get sick, you can't give it to granny, and ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... it doesn't help at all but it might kill you but no leftist will ever admit that there was a back-pedal. It just "woks like it's supposed to, and that's that." As long as you guys refuse to try and bring facts into your argument, you never have to admit to anything, right? Well AI search never learned how to dodge and weasel like a left4rd yet. Buddy, that's a 10-second call to the gov't of Canada. They're so quick and efficient that they've drawn comparisons to Germany, from the '30s, again. Why would you do that? It came out with that answer all by itself. I was not expecting to just see the truth pop out like that. Don't forget, this AI search is from Google, and Google is a big part of TNI's disinformation campaign.

OMG, here we go.... MH V2.0.

Spencer Pratt & Steve Hilton + Newsom & Bass's laundry list of failures and scandals = a red wave in November? Is the California cult dying? Just like the iron grip of islam actually squeezed the islam out of tens of millions of Persians, it seems like the left's sickening hold on the MSM, activist judges, etc, is actually driving people away from the Demonrats. While this is just a primary, and the Dems' votes won't be split in the Nov elections, it's still crazy that there's a possibility of California flipping at this late stage of the race. I don't personally like Hilton's chances. He's up against a new Demi gubernatorial candidate, and hope springs eternal. But Pratt is up against an incumbent who has been a dreadful failure. Also, with Spencer finishing top-2 in the primary, now Karen Bass has to face off against him in two more debates, and he's clearly her superior on the debate stage. Pratt seems like a force of nature, just taking up all the oxygen in the room, while bass is constantly on her back heel, trying to defend her litany of failures. Can Pratt really cure the homelessness problem? No way, because it's not a California problem, it's a "where do Americans go when they are out of food and money" problem, and the answer is never "Alaska". But can Pratt be a thousand times better than bass? Of course he can.

When the judge is banning the only known facts of the trial - evidence of the accuser's lying during the deposition - from the proceedings, of course the jury is gonna come out with a twisted view. The trial was a complete farce, and it's pathetic that you support such abuse of the courts.

That's a really pathetic thing to say. You're just admitting that the goal of your party is to thwart justice by weaponizing the DoJ. You said the quiet part out loud.

Still, Google AI search doesn't generate answers that go against leftist gov't narratives. I normally have to hector AI search for 5 minutes to squeeze the truth out of it. Are you still not aware of the disinformation mentioned above? Are you still not aware of the efforts of the TNI conspirators to stifle so many different facts that they didn't like?

Outside of a kangaroo court, that case was unwinable. When an accuser has no evidence, no witnesses, and can't name the year that an incident allegedly occurred, that's not a case that should even be allowed to go to court. The trial was held in a county where less than 6% of voters were registered as republicans, and the judge was a democrat. AND, the only piece of verified evidence in that whole trial was the fact that Carroll lied during her deposition, but that fact was withheld from the jury. Aside from that one fact, there is just a story that Carroll allegedly told some friends. FYI that doesn't count as "a bunch of witnesses", it counts as "a completely unverified story that was allegedly told by a known liar to some friends". If Trump tells some people that he did something, do they all count as witnesses in court? Is that what the word "witness" means to you, little boy?

TNI suppressed verified facts. The social media giants and MSM all got together to spread disinformation and suppress the truth, and all you can say is "Bless your heart"?

AI is not optimized to blow sunshine up people's arses. In most instances, AI will go with the left4rd flow. For example: Question: "Did Fauci lie from the very beginning about the likely origin of covid" Answer: Whether Dr. Fauci lied about the origin of COVID-19 remains a subject of intense political debate, with the U.S. intelligence community and scientific experts divided as to whether the virus spilled over from animals or accidentally leaked from a laboratory. [1, 2, 3] The accusations that he "lied from the very beginning" are primarily rooted in early 2020 communications and subsequent congressional testimony: [1, 2] FYI Ai was completely disingenuous with that answer, to the point of being incorrect. The correct answer is "Yes, Fauci lied, by presenting the pangolin theory as being almost a certainty when he knew that it was the less likely of the two main theories." Whether or not there's "debate" is neither here nor there. Beave will debate that Trump colluded with Russian 'til the day he dies, but that doesn't mean that it's still a possibility. AI said this, as a statement of fact: The Case for the "Disinformation Cabal" Label Critics, independent journalists, and legal challenges argue that the TNI fits this description because it systematically used its immense market power to suppress verified facts while actively magnifying narratives that later proved to be false or highly misleading. TNI suppressed verified facts. It's impossible to overstate the importance of the fact that BBC, CBC, NYT, FB, Google, Twitter, WashPo, Reuters, AP, the Euro Broadcasting Union, etc, BANDED TOGETHER TO KEEP THE TRUTH AWAY FROM PEOPLE. And it's not like they were all guilty of assuming the obvious or something... They suppressed VERIFIED facts. That's why people like me were so ecstatic when St Elon broke Twitter free from the disinformation cabal. That might seem like a minor detail to you, but if democracy survives, then Elon's bold move to break up TNI's stranglehold on the truth was one of the most consequential events in the history of mankind. TNI actively magnified narratives that later proved to be false or highly misleading That would be one thing if they were going with the most obvious answer, but just remember that they were going with the most unlikely options most of the time, and where they were wrong, I was right. How is is that I'm smarter than all of those media conglomerates put together? How did I know so many things that were so beyond their ken? And they weren't just wrong, they were actively censoring the truth. TNI is the BIGGEST story of the millennium, and almost no one knows about. How do you feel about being a NYT cultist, when NYT is part of a disinformation cabal?

A contingency case, from the lawyers' POV, means that they don't get paid unless they win. But they were getting paid by a Demonrat donor, who probably donated something to the judge as well.

The judge also blocked the defence from posting the one and only FACT of the entire case. Be honest: no real judge would let a case with absolutely NO evidence, from an unknown year, go to trial. Just think about all the violent crime that DAs didn't prosecute since 2020... Actual violent felons left to wander the streets. Yet a judge took on "I brought him into the changeroom to model lingerie for him, then he pushed me against the wall and kissed me and I giggled, then he put a bunch of fingers in my snatch and I giggled, then when he started to pull out his Biden I pushed him with one arm and left. That happened in about '95 or '96. One of my friends said it was probably a r4pe." The case was "unwinable", outside of a kangaroo court. Stick to your left4rd echo chambers, where you seem normal. You just look ret4rded here.

vocabulary

Wrong, stupid. Trump admitted to grabbing girls by the ****. That's not even close to the same thing. "30 or 31 years ago a guy grabbed my ****!" - lol Correct, but in this instance, it was... Her lawyers were already getting paid by someone else. If they weren't already getting paid by someone else then this wouldn't be a topic, would it? Are you trying to say that "No one was paying Carroll's lawyers anything, it was only a contingency case"? It means that "no one is paying the lawyers." Not "someone is secretly paying the lawyers but the client doesn't know about it". And Carroll admitted that she knew about it. Why do you want her to weasel out of her legal problems? She's a person who committed a serious crime, plain and simple. If Trump committed perjury you would be adamant that he was charged. You're being a disgusting little hypocrite here. Grow up.