WestCanMan

So this is an instance where two wrongs actually do make a right. Hopefully for our sake, doing 1,000 things in a row wrong can make something awesome, because that's where our gov't is at right now.

They got cocky. They thought that they had it in the bag. Hillary was the 1st woman nominee, she had Obama's highest endorsement, there were Trump racism & harassment accusations and a tax 'scandal' being pushed hard in the news every night, Hillary had fake polling data to discourage GOP voters, the FBI let Hillary off the hook and played up theRussian collusion hoax, etc. On election night 2016 Trump theoretically had about a 10% chance of winning. Since then the Dems have done everything that they could to make elections less legitimate and the MSM has touted their fraud-friendly reforms as "ANTI-RACISM! To question these reforms is to admit that you're a bigot!". Hence their all-out, media-aided campaign to just blatantly stack the SC with 6 new SCJs in the most undemocratic fashion imaginable, using accusations of 'racism' against the filibuster. What the Dems tried to do was shameful and morally repugnant, but somehow the entire MSM was all for it. It was 'cool'. The overwhelming bias of America's MSM made Pravda and TASS look like bastions of journalistic integrity. Grow up.

They can save $0.16 on the food but the gas to go to the store and buy it will cost $1 more, and everyone who drives to your house will also pay more to get there. That's if you don't get shot during that process, on account of the fact that the police in your neighbourhood have been defunded and crime is up, and if the grocery store wasn't burned down or looted or shoplifted clean (by people who won't be prosecuted because Kamala is VP now).

Even if Trump won, the fact that the FBI, academia, MSM, and social media are 100% controlled by the Dems would only be a little bit less alarming. The fact is that with 1 party in complete control of all of those things it's just a matter of time until you have 1-party rule. A Trump win would have moved things back 4 years. Big deal. The last western nation to have 1 party with such complete control over the media, the police, and to have militias out attacking people with the blessing of the government and media was Germany in 1935.

America isn't as far away from NoKo as you think. Their MSM is controlled by 1 party, academia is controlled by 1 party, the federal police are controlled by 1 party, social media is controlled by 1 party, and that party even has 2 violent militias which operate with the full blessing of the MSM.

This is closer to the point, but in all honesty, anyone with a sense of decency should be offended by a dude whipping it out in front of girls. Even sensible LGBTQ people should be against that. Of course there is. There's the witness, her girls, and the other customer asking for a refund. Then there's the fact that the spa isn't denying that junkgate is real, they're just saying that it's sweet. Taking the position that "It probably didn't happen" is not within the realistic limits of the topic. In any social Environment there's what's considered reasonable and what's just ridiculous. Part of allowing trans people to share bathrooms is the understanding that they don't act like animals. I can change in the locker room and pull out my junk if I want, even with boys present, but would it be ok if stood with it 2 feet from some kid's face while they were changing? Isn't discretion a part of the social contract? At some point doesn't it just become lewd and indecent? Just remember that in civil suits the standard that has to be met is "a reasonable man's judgement". In this society it has always been considered inappropriate to show our junk to little girls. Man junk. Trans junk. Any other kind of phallic junk. It's just not right here, period. Once it becomes OK to put it out there where little girls can see it, that's a whole new ballgame. If that guy can do it, why not another guy who identifies as a child, or something else? I beg to differ. You're persuaded by about 10,000 people who want to show their junk to little girls. Are you saying that those people are actually right? I can want to do a whole lot of things based purely on my own sexuality, does that make any of it right?

Ummm, the message isn't that men are prone to rape and assault. The message is that a very small percentage of 'men' do get their kicks out of exposing themselves to children, and it shouldn't be sanctioned by the gov't. Is that honestly what passes for logic in liberal circles? Should we also say that liberals should never be allowed in colleges and universities because sometimes they assault people and start fires when someone says something that they don't like?

It's just pure bigotry to assume that religion or being conservative has anything to do with this. People protect their children, period. All mammals protect their offspring. FYI I don't have any imaginary friends and if a dude whipped out his junk in front of my girls when they were younger it wouldn't matter to me whether he considers himself to be a woman or trans or whatever... When you whip out a dick, you're a dude with his dick out by definition. A mother shouldn't have to worry that their child is going to have to look at a man's penis when she goes into a woman's changeroom. What's the point of even having a women's changeroom if non-women can go into them? Why not just have one changeroom for everyone? If I feel like I have a good enough reason to whip my junk out in front of your daughter is that sufficient? Should I just be allowed to do it? Should you have to just be ok with it? Does the opinion of 50 million mothers and 50 million fathers mean nothing? Can't people have a changeroom where people don't expose their male genitalia to little girls, or vice versa? Does that somehow not make sense to you?

What constitutes 'political suicide' in a democracy is a lot different from what constitutes political suicide under one-party rule. Do you think that you could blow sunshine up Kim-Jong Un's arse and then get flamed by the NoKo News for it? The Dems have full control over the mainstream media, social media and the FBI. As long as a sitting Senator or Congressman toes the party line they are celebrated as heroes, evidence to the contrary is verboten, and they are untouchable by law. The only democrats under fire from the MSM in the US are Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema. In Joe's case, he will be lucky to just get primaried because he's considered unbeatable. If I was him I wouldn't accept any invitations to chill with Hillary. https://www.politico.com/news/2021/02/02/manchin-sinema-challengers-464821 These are the same people who got AOC elected, they're not a fringe group with no jam.

So you agree now, but you weren't offended before. How is that a thing? Do you feel like you have to admit that what Maxine did was wrong now, in order to complain when other people did the same thing? Congratz - your level of hypocrisy is no longer set to "Liberal". Careful or the mob might come for you next.

You're lying dialamah. Where did Trump ever advocate for violence? Where did he advocate for people to take the presidency back by force?

Just because the GOP couldn't prove that there was widespread fraud in 2020 doesn't mean that it was non-existent. The Dems chose the easiest possible election reforms to get away with fraud, and then no one could find evidence of fraud. Shocker.

Get a grip MH. There's no "delusion" at all. Biden had a handful of rallies, most of which were small for a High School President election. That's a fact, not delusion. How is it possible that no one wanted to come see his rallies yet he got 15M more votes than Obama? Are you stupid enough to believe that mail-in ballots without signature verification of any sort is a secure way to hold a federal election? Are you aware of the history of election mail fraud? It's almost normal. Do you really believe that using ID for voting is racist? Why is it that the Dems, who got caught cheating 3x on the 2020 election (even if you don't count the use of the FBI as a political tool), have so many election reforms that all seem so voter-fraud-friendly and yet you are completely without suspicion? It's normal to be suspicious of people who are known cheaters. Why are they so adamant that groups, who are openly supporting one candidate or the other, should be allowed to approach voters in polling lineups to "give them water"? Don't you think that could be intimidating for some people? Do you want the Bloods, Crips, Hell's Angels or MS-13 coming up to you at the polling station and offering you water? The Dems are huge cheaters and all of their election ideas are so dumb it's laughable. Honestly, if Trump was the one who said that voter ID should be illegal and mass-mailed ballots are a great idea you'd see through it in an instant.

Good call on the end of the filibuster, I forgot that they were getting rid of that "RACIST" mechanism (that they use more than anyone) as well. You're correct in saying that their own Senators didn't 'unanimously' vote for it. They still wanted it though, they just couldn't sell packing the court with only 50/50 plus the VP. It's too extreme with such fierce and undivided opposition. If they get 55-45 Senate though, the court will be packed. The SCOTUS won't stand up to the Congress, the Senate, the POTUS, the MSM, and social media censorship. It's impossible. They'll get called 'racists' and people who argue against it will be censored. They SC will fold like a cheap tent.

Why wouldn't they have mail-in voting? They just convinced Americans that it's invulnerable to fraud - even without signature-matching, and even with ballot harvesting. Tens of millions of Americans just did it. To question the legitimacy of mail-in ballots now is to declare the 2020 election a fraud. You can stay at home and put your ballot in the hands of a political operative, just knowing that they will safely deliver your actual ballot to the polling station. What could be better than that? Elections are safe an easy now.

If the Demonrats get control of the Senate the US will be unrecognizable. There will be a 15-justice SC, fraud-only voting, socialism-level taxation on the disappearing middle class, an end to suburbia, and no border, just for a start. On the bright side, rioting will be gone, because it will no longer be necessary. You'll actually see a real police state.

Under the cover of covid fear, Biden's main campaign strategy was to let CNN and the rest of the MSM use their 'news programming' as 24/7 attack ads on Trump, backed by 'polling data', while he hid in his basement, mumbling pre-recorded elevator speeches every third day. The media sold his hiding as: "Biden is setting a good example by hiding from covid! He doesn't have to answer any questions from us because we love him no matter what!" At the same time Trump's fearlessness and dedication to his job in the face of a bit of danger was labelled "COVID RECKLESSNESS & A DANGEROUS EXAMPLE!!!!!" while somehow 24 yr old ER nurses with nothing to fear from C19 were branded as heroes by the media for just showing up to their jobs. The 2020 election differed greatly from other election in that Americans could normally get a sense of how much support each candidate had by the number of people showing up at their rallies, but in 2020 that was not the case at all. The only indications that Biden had any support at all came from polling sites and CNN's opinion desk. He averaged 100 or less people per 'rally', despite the fact that he only had 1/5th as many rallies as most presidential candidates have. A grand total of about 10,000 people in the whole country came out to see Biden - the silence was deafening. And despite the fact that he had so much time at home, he didn't even bother to do any social media. He just hid. "Heroically" Ironically, in an age where candidates have more opportunity than ever to show their face to the public (almost for free when you consider the cost of social media), Biden was a ghost. Americans saw less of Biden's incoherent, mumbling face than they saw of any candidate since the guys on their dollar bills, who ran before TV was invented. Honestly, all we have to indicate to us that Biden really won the election was some mass mail-in ballots, some polling 'data', and CNN's opinion. And just remember that CNN spent all 4 years from 2016 to 2020 saying that the 2016 election was completely fraudulent, and yet for some reason they were confidently certifying the 2020 election fraud-free by 10 pm on election night 2020. How did a company that was as deeply skeptical of elections as CNN for 4 years suddenly become believers well in advance of the 2020 results if they weren't told to say that in advance? Regardless of whether people believe that the 2020 election actually was stolen, it's a pretty dangerous precedent to set by allowing a candidate to be elected on nothing more than the strength of polling data, media opinions and mail-in ballots. Hollywood can just declare the next president every 4 years if that's the case.

The 2022 mid-term election is the most important election in US history. The 2024 election will just be a scripted reality TV show if the Demonrats get their way on all of their voter-fraud-friendly election reforms.

All that matters to leftists when they talk about Trump is their own emotions. Talking about facts to them is like talking about geometry with a snake.

The major concern from law enforcement is that the FBI has become every bit as much of a political entity as the KGB ever was. Leftists love it now because they're working for the Dems, they just don't realize that once you finally achieve one-party rule there's no turning back. The idea of Hillary Clinton, AOC, or Ilhan Omar with absolute power should scare the shit out of you but for some reason you're a cheerleader for it. Even scarier is a Joe Biden puppet government, run by god only knows who.

Lol. You're pretending that Trump lied to you while ignoring the blatantly obvious lies of the Dems. An 8 yr old could figure out the Dmes are lying if you gave them all the facts.

1. That would only make sense of the 'managers' were also the 'owners'. Was it a strata? If it was a strata, they wouldn't likely want the 'teardown and rebuild scenario'. That's something that would only benefit a corporation owned by people who don't live there. 2. Would they gamble with their lives though? They lived there, probably with their children. If someone told me that my house might collapse I wouldn't stay here with my kids, just hoping to get an insurance claim. 3. A low # of Covid deaths in your state, and a lack of strict regs don't necessarily stop individual businesses from closing, or ensure that their workers will show up. Getting things done during covid was hard. In BC we're having a heat wave and some schools are closed (portables don't have AC), some workers are not showing up to their jobs, etc.

"Urging managers to get it repaired" still isn't the same as "warning managers that the building was at risk to collapse". Keep in mind, this wasn't a case of people in one city letting people in another city take a grave risk, the managers also lived in the building. Apparently the person who said that they needed to get repairs done either underestimated or understated the severity of the issue. Also, just remember that repairs of that scale can't just get done by anyone within a week or so. There is a process involving engineering firms and city hall that isn't always quick - and 2020 was the covid year, aka a gongshow.

It's inflation. The currency is de-valued every time our government just miraculously creates more currency. Think of it this way - if the government just gives Canadians a trillion dollars next year, that doesn't mean that everyone can rush out and buy a Lamborghini because the number of Lamborghinis doesn't magically increase at the same time. The price of a Lambo would just up from $249,000 to $360,000 or whatever (just a wild guess - I'm not in the market for one). This is how Biden is going to achieve his $15/hr goal. The Biden administration is giving out so much money that it is devaluing their dollar. Soon people will be getting $15/hr, but those $15 will only have the same buying power that $12 (approximation) has today.

The biggest obstacle imo will come from the gas & oil sector. There was a very good documentary called "Who Killed the Electric Car" about the Saturn EV that was made over a decade ago, and why it didn't become popular. Among other things mentioned in that video, 1) Texaco bought the company that had the patent on the batteries they used in that car, and they sat on it, 2) for some strange reason, the person who invented that battery was stopped from writing in popular science magazines about the success of his batteries and what they meant for the automobile industry in the future, and 3) the ads that they made for the car were basically a list of reasons why not to buy them. It was like saying: "The 2021 Corvette - you can only fit two people in it, it hardly has any trunk space, and it burns 3x as much gas as a Nissan Altima while only getting up to hwy speeds 1 second faster."