Hal 9000

Only a complete nitwit would believe that Donald Trump would, or would even attempt to ban all muslims and deport all 11 million illegals hispanics. It would take asking yourself about 3-5 honest questions to know that he wouldn't even try such things. All the hysterical liberals have no idea of what game is being played.

Ever notice that people keep talking about how dangerous it would be to ban Muslims, but no one ever says it would be dangerous to deport Mexicans?

Clearly a troll thread, but as long as we stick to slagging Trump and leave Justin alone, s'all good.

These women all claimed to be victims, but their ideas change when they're forced to look into a mirror and face their own accountability.

Yeah, cyber is pretty close. I see these liberals (and pundits) who believe that Ryan and such don't support him because of his radical views, they couldn't be more wrong. They laugh because the Kochs don't want to support Trump. Trump is a republican, although not as conservative as some would like him to be - he is still a republican. Trump, like many people is fiscal conservative and socially liberal (at least more than most republicans). Big business might be turning to Hillary, not because she's less radical than Trump, but because, as we all know she has become a shill for wall street. The old school republicans and democrats are on the same side and they know that Trump is the only one who'll hold business accountable to the country and to the people. If big business and people like the Koch brothers support Hillary, then a Hillary win will be a disaster for the working people. The high level politicians know that Trump will reduce the federal government, and this scares all of them - so much that many are willing to sabotage an entire election. The fact that many business people are turning democrat and some in the republican party will sabotage Trump should be very worrying to democrats.

There was no way prosecutors were going to embarrass themselves or waste more taxpayer money on this. It was far fetched to believe there would be another trial. This is the equivalent of a behaviour contract.

The funny thing is; Hillary didn't go after these women for having an affair with Bill, she went after them because they did or were going to go public about it.

But now he's their only chance. And, i'm sure that tanking or sabotaging their own leader is gonna cause more harm, so...why the lack of support?

Have you thought about why they're not supporting him...yet?

I don't care what Hillary does to female "victims" if women don't. If these chicks want to sleep with someone's husband, maybe they deserve to have their lives threatened...or ruined. I just get the idea that you're not really sure what this is about, and thought maybe I should clear it up for you.

I think that it's about what Hillary did 20 years ago.

The president having an affair is nothing new, however to sit at your desk on the phone with other world while you're getting a BJ adds a certain douchieness to the ordeal. Then there was the lies (to the american people) and discrediting the accuser - But that was Bill. Hillary, OTOH was tasked with silencing all these women in whatever ways necessary - this is what should hurt her...If people have any common sense at all.

Of course she did, her political career was in jeopardy too. I loving and forgiving wife is politically better than a divorcee. When the truth comes out, I'm sure we'll discover that she knew about all his affairs and did her best to cover them up - even going as far as quieting (in whatever ways possible) the women.

In any Clinton scandal, Hillary is just as guilty as Bill is...and vice versa. And, If Trump was a Clinton supporter at one time, who knows what dirt he may have.

Trump knows what he's doing. He knows the difference between how to speak at a rally versus speaking at a debate or one-on-one interview. The common people have always complained about politicians speaking down to them, Trump speaks on their level - for now.

It wasn't a personal attack, it was recognition of your posting style...and this is a perfect example; Insults, attacks and name calling. This is why I say you can't be enlightened. P.S - Trudeau also scores pretty high on the narcissistic chart.

It's funny the amount of scrutiny people pay to Trump's experience level and potential policies, when both Obama and Trudeau were voted in with little to no actual experience...in anything at all.

Sure, I do. I also think an Aussie named Lydia has a pretty good shot. But, In going with the numbers, I'd bet on US for men, Korea for women. Tell you what, You take McIlroy and Day, I'll take the Americans (Spieth, Fowler, Watson and Johnson)

Brooke is our best hope for a medal, but If I had to make a wager, I'd say that the american men will prevail and on the women's side, it'll be Korea.

The Repubs don't like him because although he's fiscally conservative, he's actually socially liberal. This does not sit well with the social conservatives of the party. I think that it's gonna be a good thing if he can drag the republicans a little more left. I should think that given some thought, many on the left will realize this.

Here is a quick but easy guide to sociopaths and narcissists. 1. Sociopaths (Hillary) will deliver an insincere but convincing apology if it benefits their agenda, a narcissist (Trump) will not. 2. Sociopaths (Hillary) will appear more humble and less of a braggart. Narcissists (Trump) are more oblivious to how they appear to others and will often boast about their achievements ad nauseum. 3. Sociopaths (Hillary) upon meeting you, will try to pick your brain and ask you a lot of questions. Narcissists (Trump) will focus the conversation on themselves and their interests. 4. Sociopaths (Hillary) have no real personality. They are chameleons and will change their identity (interests, likes, beliefs) in order to manipulate others. Narcissists (Trump) are more concerned with always being perceived as the BEST. 5. Sociopaths are manipulative and calculating and will exploit others to their benefit and to further their agenda. Narcissists aren’t as calculating. They are self-centered and will step on others or throw others under the bus if they feel someone is hindering their agenda. 6. Sociopaths (Hillary) ignore social norms and boundaries not only out of a sense of entitlement, but to manipulate situations to further their interests. Narcissists (Trump) also feel a sense of entitlement, but will ignore rules and social norms more from a place of self-importance. 7. Sociopaths (Hillary) are more interested in winning and in being right at all costs. Narcissists (Trump) are more interested in feeling admired and special. 8. Sociopaths are more prone to boredom and more likely to be an adrenaline junkies. Narcissists may or may not need excess stimulation. 9. Sociopaths (Hillary) will set a trap months in advance if they perceive you are obstructing their plans, and patiently wait to take you down. Narcissists (Trump) are less calculating but will lie, intimidate or destroy you if they perceive you as hindering their plans. 10. Sociopaths (Hillary) will manipulate others so they can gain financially by doing as little work as possible with the least amount of effort. Narcissists (Trump) don’t mind putting in effort and working hard if it leads to admiration and accolades. 11. Sociopaths (Hillary) are more likely to abruptly abandon you if their cover is blown and their manipulation tactics are no longer effective. Narcissists (Trump) will have a pattern of overlapping relationships that end very poorly. You see, Trump is a narcissist in almost every sense of the word but as I said, isn't almost every celebrity to an extent. What's really disturbing is that Hillary is the one who is actually a full blown sociopath.

She doesn't play internet psychologist, she just hurls out insults without even knowing what they mean. Anyway, This article is about narcissism and the people writing the small blurbs have labelled Trump a narcissist - well, of course they will. Sure Trump has some narcissistic traits - Arrogance is a narcissistic trait, but don't all rich people, celebrities, politicians, rock stars, athletes etc etc. have an amount of narcissism in their personality? Narcissism, however is not sociopathy. An argument can be made that Hillary exhibits way way more sociopathic traits than does Trump.

Trump is also unswayed by lobbyists and stands by his convictions. In fact, unlike Hillary, he has stayed away from corporate money and publicly given notice to the very people he has done business with that there will be big changes that they will not like. He has also stood by his convictions to the point of losing business and giving up tens of millions of dollars. He has in every sense of the words; put his money where his mouth is. I'll agree that Trump is brash, maybe egotistical, but he is not self serving - at least not anymore than any other politician. As a socialist, Sanders is swayed by special interest groups. Special interest groups go hand in hand with socialism. It's not actually remarkable at all how they fill a void. Both political sides are sick of the status quo - which involves Hillary. The difference is, you like Sanders and hate Trump.

Yeah, make fun of someone who has personal experiences - real smart. Anyway, I do know some legitimate sociopaths and I could give you some idea of what one actually is, but as far as enlightening Jacee, that's just not possible. You see, Jacee doesn't ever engage in discussion, she hurls angry insults and accusations with the occasional wikipedia reference thrown in for reassurance. There is no poster on this board who is as angry, as confident and so wrong as Jacee is. What's the saying "you can sometimes win an argument with someone smarter, but you can never win an argument with someone stupid". I'm sure that you want to consider everyone who says "no", draws a line or recognizes boundries as a sociopath, but that's just not how it works. If you or Jacee hate Trump - fair enough, but it's really grasping to try and use every derogatory trait and paint him as that - it simply shows your amount of ignorance. There is not one shred of evidence that Donald Trump is a sociopath, arrogant maybe, but not a sociopath.