Hal 9000

Of course I can, so can Argus...and so can you. So why the weird post saying he missed the point? Big guy wasn't too veiled in his posting.

What is the point then?

I feel the same way about the promo poster for "9 to 5", where Dabney Coleman is shown tied up by three women.

After one month,13 pages and 188 posts, Charles shut down the "Trump is a man baby" thread because it devolved into name calling of politicians.

I don't know man, I've gotta "gulp" side with Bubber here. The spoiler was posted where it could not not be avoided. If I can't come here without seeing spoilers, I just won't bother coming here. I suspect I'm not alone, therefore I think the mods have a responsibility to their site to remove such posts. If there is a GoT thread, spoil away!

Exactly, then get to it and argue his points. Unless, you can't argue his points and instead are looking to rip on the source of any cite you believe he shoulda posted.

Well, I guess you'd have to use your mind and give an opinion based on...you know, your thoughts. I think that although he spoke in opinion, the ideas that he shared can't really be argued. What can be argued is whether one likes or dislikes the country we've created.

Honestly, I don't care one way or another. As I said, my first thought was "another horrible man that needs killing" - nothing new here. Ho hum! There seems to be a glut of movies that celebrate women killing men. I know what I'd see in this movie, so I'll never bother with it.

Of course it was gonna get pulled. The question is; did they pull it because they made a mistake or because they fear the wrath of the left?

I'm trying to ban 1980's heavy metal music.

Of course! But, can we also do something about the domestic violence shown in videos by singers like Carrie Underwood, Beyonce, Lady Gaga and Taylor Swift...just to name a few.

Certainly underrated. Mads Mikkelson and Stellen Skarsgaard were great in that too.

Are you suggesting that the article is false?

I agree it's not a wise ad, but I do believe that if people have issue with it, they should protest with their pocket book instead of making big deal and going to the movie anyway. Maybe, what they want is to show this and show the odds that Mystique (representing the woman) is up against and how men are evil - but a strong woman can overcome anything. By looking at this poster, I know he is a bad guy and that she will prevail over him. I don't see it as promoting violence against women, I see it as an anti-men promotion. The proof will be shown in the movie.

Here's an interesting twist to the debate. http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/06/02/transgender-aclu-operative-quits-daughters-intimidated/

Exactly, and look where it has led us!

So yeah, we are reaching a point with trigger warnings and safe spaces that fictitious fights between Good and Evil are unacceptable if the Evil actually does anything . . . Evil?

Seriously? Do you and Jacee even read the posts that you're so offended by? I've said at least twice now (in the last 2 pages) that there are up to 65 different genders.

Post 329, if you're following along, I stated that there was anywhere between 50 and 65 recognizable genders. Maybe you should do some research. Or, better yet, let cybercoma know that there are more than 2 genders, because he's the one suggesting two genders...not me. If cyber would shelve the outrage for just a minute, he'd realize that the very fact that they themselves use the word "trans", proves my point.

Why, do you believe that transgenders are 100% of the gender they claim? Really?

It's hardly a secret agenda, Google Ontario Human rights, google the bill that Trudeau is pushing...connect some dots or use some sense, it's all there .

Well, you can google UofT Transgenders, New York transgender, Washington transgender or many others to find the info.

Hence the idea of a third facility. But, this is what's problematic; we used to be able to define transsexuals and transvestites. In the effort to not discriminate, we've grouped everyone together and essentially lost all definition. We use examples of people like Buck Angel and Laverne Cox, but the more realistic thing to see is some dude who throws on a dress and wig and when he is in the shower looks like any other dude. IMO, someone like Buck Angel has more chance of being attacked in a mens room than Laverne Cox.

Well, I think they should be provided their own shower. A single occupancy bathroom/change room/shower would be easy to institute at any public pool, college, school, gym or other public area. P.S- There are radical examples of any group of people. People like Buck Angel who are male, but claim to be trans woman are far more common. Lets not pretend that all trans women are like Laverne Cox.

You guys still talk about bathrooms, my issues are primarily focussed on change rooms and showers.