Jump to content

Hal 9000

Member
  • Posts

    4,333
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    10

Everything posted by Hal 9000

  1. Cruz and Kaisich teaming up is/was a bad idea. These guys heads are spinning because they just don't know the game that they're playing.
  2. The law has to release her - it's the law, however, that's not what i asked. Are you saying that because she's been released from prison, that she is not a homicidal pedophile rapist?
  3. And what's the reason that gays are being hacked to death (the fashionable thing these days).
  4. Just to satisfy my confusion, are you saying that because she's been released from prison, that she is not a homicidal pedophile rapist?
  5. I think what Bubber is saying is that rewarding bad behaviour just leads to more bad behaviour and I concur. However, that doesn't mean we should sit back and do nothing. I think we should unleash hell (to use a cliche) on these people. If it means grabbing a few ISIS dudes (or gals) and publicly executing them - so be it. The high road doesn't work with these people.
  6. Sure, they deserve the right to grow up normally, but they won't! Not now anyway. And it was her who is dragging them through this, it was her who brought all this on, not the parents who are against it. She is not a victim, her kids are in fact victims of her actions - no one else's...hers. If she had an ounce of decency, she would've stayed far far away from Quebec...and Canada. P.S - An anecdote; I have a friend who has always wanted to have sex with her (and he's serious), he thinks she's repulsive, but it's kind of a bucket list thing for him.
  7. So! I can opine whatever I want. I've said nothing offensive, if Squid (or you) wants to disagree he's welcome to do that. I've joined the discussion and If he can't or won't put forth a counter argument, then he should not respond.
  8. Were clearly dealing with different questions here. I think that there should be some type of "violent offender" registry. We have one for sex offenders, why not for purely violent people. Manslaughter doesn't always equate to violent behaviour, sometimes that is just negligent behaviour. I don't think you can mark every negligent incident as violent, and you can't/shouldn't report every crime of assault or threatening behaviour, but surely crimes involving weapons should be notable to the public. Any crime where a person uses a knife to sexually assault someone is considered for the sex offender registry, but someone who uses a knife to rob or physically assault someone is not on a registry. Although the crimes have different elements, fundamentally, you still have someone walking around and potentially harming people with a weapon. Where to draw the line: I think any offences that include willful violence while using a weapon should be reportable to a registry and therefore to the public. Any offences for first or second degree murder as well as some cases of manslaughter depending on circumstance should be notable as well. Manslaughter, in many cases (certainly for Homalka) is a charge that is plead down to from a more serious crime. And the down plea (again for Homalka) is clearly not meant to be simply a way of getting less jail time, but also helps the criminal in their life after prison (if there is even any prison time). This is where the system fails. A predator who lures children, rapes them and murders them gets the same treatment as someone who was reckless with their car. * I think Homalka served her entire sentence because she knew that the justice system couldn't keep tabs on her after her release, but I could be wrong. Now, as far as Homalka goes, she clearly got out before any registry was formed for any offenders, but does that make her less violent? Does the fact that she she served her allotted time mean that Canadians should forgive and forget? Hell No! She is what she is, and no time served will wash her clean of that. What she is; is a psychopath, a sociopath, a predator, a rapist and a murderer. That's the fact! Are her children in danger? We don't know that, but are they in more danger than typical kids? - Of course they are! You'd have to think that Karla Homalka is just the same as any regular soccer mom to believe different. This woman is more vile than OJ Simpson for heavens sake. Being released hasn't changed that - and never will. P.S - As an edit: What she did to those girls before they murdered them is worthy of a life sentence.
  9. If one takes DNA, it comes up with male or female - simple as that. Surgery and hormones don't change that. It doesn't matter what a person claims they are when they are walking around a girls changer with their dick swinging out. Pubescent girls don't want that in their change rooms. And of course...another troll post from Jacee - Don't worry, MH will let it go and hammer me for pointing it out
  10. You clearly don't know much about the psychology of children or the way they view their own bodies. Jacee - you've clearly been allowed to get away with too many insults lately. That's all you seem to do nowadays.
  11. Knowing that Ghomeshi has actually kept all his emails has surely made some complainants reconsider just how abused they really were.
  12. How would you like your daughter seeing some 40 year old dude's junk? I guess you're Ok with it, many people are not. My wife and I will teach our kids about our bodies and sexuality - if you don't mind.
  13. I have no issues against people being gay...tranny or whatever sexual designation they choose - even though the reality is; people are what their genetics say they are. Anyway, remember when it was asked "why should you care what people do in their own bedrooms"? Now we have to accept them taking off their clothes and showing their dicks to our daughters? Sorry, I'm not on board with that, and I feel very comfortable drawing that line.
  14. The law can't seem to do anything about the douchebag in the article.
  15. Look, you're being disingenuous. And, you're fishing from a slow moving boat.
  16. ...and I did! If you don't care for my opinion, please provide your own.
  17. Haven't we been down this road before - recently?
  18. No, there is one reason...The Chinese. They're buying up all the property, sometimes leaving it empty, sometimes leaving anchor people usually women to sit on the land. Vancouver people get offered staggering money and see that as their lottery ticket - and sell. The same thing is happening to our fisheries, but we're too politically correct to openly acknowledge the situation.
  19. So, why do you think house prices are so high in Vancouver? MMMM....I love animal carcass.
  20. So, I guess that solves the racism issue.
  21. Just because there is a handful of mixed marriages, does not for a minute show any evidence that the world could ever consist of one race. It's simply a dream of western world white folks and bears no resemblance to how the majority of the world thinks.
  22. Well, I had first quoted you before you provided a link. Then, To be honest, i have no interest reading anything from Coulter, nor do I have any interest in what the coulter detractors say. Labelling something as motormouth doesn't intrigue me to read it. You "hope" that all races amalgamate into one race, I said it would be nice but.... - it can't and won't ever happen and i've told you why - what more do you want.
  23. Well, I guess it depends on what you mean as "browning". If you mean that brown, black or yellow people will over run white people, then I'd agree. If you think, as the way you worded your other post, that all races (including white) would amalgamate into one singular race, then I gotta think that you're not seeing the numbers or the trends.
×
×
  • Create New...