Hal 9000

I think the obvious notable point he's making is that there are ISIS flags on some, maybe many of those phones.

The only real solution is to make all bathrooms and change areas open to any gender.

Uhmmm errrr uhmmmm, I completely agree with you.

I hear ya! It was harder that I thought, and it looks like I have to go even further for Waldo. Anyway, Good to see you back!

This is hard for you eh? I didn't say that Trump and Sanders would align, did I? What I said is that Trump would side with Bernie's plight and use some of what Bernie is saying in order to bring some Bernie people over to his side.

It's been known for years that Hillary knew all about the affairs - in fact everybody on the inside apparently knew, the issues aren't about the affairs, it's about how Hillary destroyed the women who slept with Bill and later came forward...or wanted to come forward. It's you people who chose to constantly turn this from Hillary's actions and make it about the affairs themselves.

If you don't get it, you don't get it! It's a pretty simple really, as long as you look at what he's doing from a business perspective rather than a political perspective. As far as opponents, he's crushed all his opponents. He (at this time) doesn't have an opponent. He's waiting for Hillary, and in the meantime taking some shots at her, but really he's secured a great number of supporters and his next move is to soften up and secure more support (mainly from the GOP) before attacking Hillary. He and Bernie have been using the same strategy "It's a movement" "a revolution", "the establishment is corrupt and against me". Trumps next move - and it's not a stretch because it's already begun, is to side with Bernie's plights and say some of the same things as Bernie and convince Bernie people that they should side with him. But, as I said, you won't get it - and fair enough. OT - I hope the mods are noticing that i'm trying to generate conversation and taking the high road while being constantly trolled.

If you wondering if the Chinese have worse human rights violations than Donald Trump, I'd say...yes. Do the liberals protest them? Hell No! Look at you, I point out the obvious and you swoop in to protect their honour, try to make it my issue. Sorry, if you hypocrites want to protest human rights in Vancouver, there are lots of businesses to choose from.

I almost thought you were getting it, until the emoticon. So, who are his supposed opponents?

Ok, for Jacee, cyber and Waldo, I'll explain just a little - and I'll dumb it down somewhat too. So, Trump says "Ban all muslims", "deport all the illegals" etc. Now, what if he said "hey, lets sort out this terrorism thing" and "lets finally deal with illegal immigration", what would happen? Nothing, he would be cast into the same category of every politician Repub or Democrat from the last 24 years. So, he goes over the to - shakes everyone a little. What he wants from illegals, and he has made implications about it in this election year, is to remove all the ones with criminal records and career welfare cases, legalize many of the ones already working in america, and have them pay into the system. Many people are against this because it means their labour costs will go up. And, of course stem the flow and get everyone who goes to US to be legal - that doesn't sound so radical. Banning all muslims? This can never work and he knows full well it can't. He knows that the DOJ or State department (whatever) has pretty good info on terror cells yet refuses to use it - he'll root out those people. He'll also properly assess those that come into the country. As we've seen in europe, an open border to every wayward muslim is not good for the safety of the general population - despite what liberals tell us. There will be no "banning of all muslims" in the US. Now, how do I know this? I pay attention to the details! Trump has said a number of times that he is flexible, a negotiator, he has referred to his book "Art of the deal" many times - what that is telling us, is that his positions that we see as radical - are simply starting points for negotiation. Why doesn't he just tell us what he really wants, you say? Well, have you ever seen the teacher's union go into a negotiation saying "hey, just give us a modest cost of living increase"? No! What they do is say "we want a 40% increase and we're striking until we get it". Trump is simply using similar tactics. It's not flip flopping or back peddling - it's a negotiation tactic. Bernie is playing the same game - That's why he is also doing better than expected "I will give you everything for free"...sure Bernie! With all the business leaving the country already and people needing work, he is gonna tax employers even more! No chance! At best, he could put in some tax breaks for college, tax a little more on gas, alcohol and smokes to bring down medical expenses etc.. People are buying into it though. Hillary (and pretty much all the repubs) is giving the old standard "I will work across the isle and fight to give you what you need the most" - she does this the give herself the "out". This crap doesn't work anymore - people are on to it. Trump and Sanders know the "game" and are playing it to a "T" As for the wall, that actually is right up Trump's ally, it would be a great job creator.

First off, i'm never outraged - I find the term all too hyperbolic in nature. And, most of the other things you can't or shouldn't be able to ask if you were an employer. Could you imagine the "outrage" if you asked any liberal about their sexual orientaion?

I would more concerned with the idea that a politician is paid extreme amounts of money for speaking engagements, yet she won't release the transcripts of what she spoke on.

They should maybe be reviewed by an independent non-bias source, but the public shouldn't claim the right to know anybody's financial standing.

Maybe these people should protest all the Chinese money and investments in Vancouver.

You're not even trying to make sense anymore, I see. Are you hitting the wine tonight?

It brings us back to the thought, we can't even think of anybody, let alone agree on someone - so why bother?

You guys are aware that every US election culminates in people threatening to move to Canada. Both sides do this, it's beginning to be a running joke. And, in every election, the republican nominee is painted as a racist and warmonger who will begin WW3. There is nothing new here.

I don't really care that much about the issue, but lets not pretend that it's a requirement of her position or anything more than her (them) wanting to be fabulous - they reckon themselves the new Kennedy's. It's embarrassing to me.

All of these things seem pretty far fetched.

That's the thing, I wouldn't be bothered too much about all the Trump hate except for the fact that all those people who do it are quite comfortable voting for Hillary - how totally hypocritical.

So, If what you say is true - and I believe it could be, then people or corporations that donate money to a candidate actually expect political favours in return? Are you the only one who knows about this? Does Hilary know about this?

I didn't say now...did I? As I said, and you for some reason couldn't comprehend, is that every country has started out with many guidelines on assisted suicide, only to see the law stretched into something quite different from the intended purpose. It's really just a matter of time.

Once the door is open, it can only open wider. Check out the path of assisted suicide in other countries around the world. Lawyers will stretch the semantics so much that eventually a bad haircut on a bipolar person will be acceptable grounds for suicide.

The wall is very doable. Why don't people criticize Bernie for some of his crazy pie in the sky ideas that are way less likely.

Actually, the wall will happen.