Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 10/16/2025 in Posts

  1. Politico Mixed into formal conversations about whipping votes, social media strategy and logistics, the members of the chat slung around an array of slurs — which POLITICO is republishing to show how they spoke. Epithets like “f----t,” “retarded” and “n--ga” appeared more than 251 times combined. In one instance, Walker — who at the time was a staffer for Ortt — talked about how a mutual friend of some in the chat “dated this very obese Indian woman for a period of time.” Giunta responded that the woman “was not Indian.” “She just didn’t bathe often,” Samuel Douglass, a state senator from northern Vermont and the head of the state’s Young Republicans, replied to Giunta. Clearly awful, awful people. Now we get to watch like-minded folks here line up to once again defend the indefensible.
    3 points
  2. We can see how Confederation (Canada as one country) is a losing proposition for western provinces. Alberta's energy industry gets hammered. No more pipeline laws. Tanker ban on the BC north coast. Now the agriculture industry on the prairies is being destroyed because Ottawa put 100% tariffs on EVs from China to protect the auto industry down in Ontario. Yet western Canada has been paying billions of dollars to Quebec in equalization payments. So what is the benefit of western Canada being in Confederation? It all seems to be a losing deal for the west. All take by central Canada and no give.
    2 points
  3. Dude you're a knowm liar, and it's painfully obvious that you're not attempting to mock anything. You can't get mad when people aren't believing you're telling the truth when you're operating with such an ,... er... honesty deficit to begin with You clearly support liberals. I"ve heard you speak out against china but you also think that the liberals benefitting from china is no big deal.
    2 points
  4. Maybe you could quote the section where I said that... Well, ya got that part right. Show me that quote too. And that... Starting to get the idea? We have laws about this stuff already. If you were advocating for stricter enforcement and a return to common sense bail conditions I'd be all for it. But, if you're looking to repair a system that has been deliberately rendered pi$$ weak by the very government you now trust to exercise judgement with capital punishment then forget it.
    2 points
  5. I'm ill-informed? You're the one who thinks China is our friend and that the Liberals have done a great job 🤣
    2 points
  6. I'm not going to indulge your desperate whataboutism. Nor will I entertain the premise that there is any circumstance in which blatant racism and misogyny are excusable. It's beneath the dignity of decent people everywhere. You can wallow in depravity with your brethren, but I won't be joining you.
    2 points
  7. I see that whataboutism is the first course. Pretty predictable. You could at least put in the effort to find a better whatabout though. Yes, indeed saying something hateful about one hated foe is VASTLY less offensive than blanket racism, misogyny and other such condemnable sentiment. Doesn't make it admirable, but the stark difference is pretty obvious, you know, if you're not working overtime to defend the indefensible.
    2 points
  8. Canada is the largest supplier of meth to New Zealand and it is costing lives. It is put in the beer and young men who drank it have died. One man who took one mouthful of the beer, had complete organ failure and died a week later. The sentences in Canada are very small for this crime. It should be capital punishment. It could be done with the assistance of MAID. Thousands of people every year in Canada are choosing to take MAID for various reasons. So what is problem with giving capital punishment to a relatively small number who are killing people with their drug dealing? This may be the only way that they will think twice and stop dealing in it. MAID seems like the best solution for these people. A significant number of people in Campbell River, BC are dying from illegal drugs. This also is another example of the failed justice system. People are dying unnecessarily. One reason is the relatively light sentences for drug dealing. There is no serious deterrent. We need to change the system and start saving lives. News report Campbell River has experienced a significant spike in suspected drug overdose deaths, with at least 11 fatalities reported in the past five weeks, raising serious public health concerns. Recent Statistics and Concerns The RCMP in Campbell River has issued a public safety warning following a sharp increase in suspected drug-overdose deaths. At least 11 people have died in just five weeks, prompting authorities to urge drug users and their families to take extra precautions. The Greater Campbell River Local Health Area has one of the highest rates of unregulated drug deaths in British Columbia, with a rate of 109 deaths per 100,000 population in 2024, more than double the overall rate for Island Health. Warning issued as suspected drug deaths jump in Campbell River - Victoria Times Colonist
    1 point
  9. So... Of course they would attack the guy for not being a despicable piece of shit. Oh, and he is voting to keep the government open. Being reasonable and having even the slightest hint of decorum is a problem for Democrats.
    1 point
  10. That’s a lot of words that completely avoided answering my simple question. Do you want to expand the state’s power to kill its citizens?
    1 point
  11. Libtard logic. Killing innocent people through MAID is ok, killing murderers is not.
    1 point
  12. No one is saying that challenging Trump makes you a despicable piece of shit. He was strictly saying he wouldn't call Republicans fascists or nazis. People that call Republicans and conservatives fascits/Nazis are despicable pieces of shit.
    1 point
  13. So then why do you want to give leftists the power to kill you?
    1 point
  14. Why do you hate psychiatrists? They were probably having a great day but now....
    1 point
  15. Don't get snarky when someone points out the obvious. Yes Trumps a problem but much of Canada's problems lie with the Liberal government. Why are you in denial? You sir seem to programmed with Liberal ideology, and badly at that. I quit responding to his puerile nonsense. A broken record plays a much better tune.
    1 point
  16. Minion - a survile follower... which is you to a tee Won't and/or can't answer questions, can't think for yourself... a waste of time
    1 point
  17. I honestly think they thought the entire world would come to their aid, presumably after a week or so as the world has always done. We've seen many times Hamas attacks Israel, Israel retaliates and because Hamas hides behind its population there are civilian casualties and then the rest of the world screams about how unfair that is and give Hamas a bunch of goodies. But this time they went too far and the rest of the world didn't show up when it was supposed to. They sided with Israel instead and suddenly Hamas realized it had a tiger by the tail but there was nothing it could do. So here we are. They effed around and found out
    1 point
  18. No it's not and the fact that you think it is bespeaks a problem with discretion and common sense. Until I trust you to fill the damn potholes you can expect no delegation of authority for any measure with life and death consequences that demands discretion, integrity and common sense. In other words, you don't get the keys to the airplane until I trust you. That said, I think you would make a fine Library Officer.
    1 point
  19. Failed policy, on top of failed policy, on top of failed policy. It’s what Liberals do best.
    1 point
  20. Trump is just acting on pure national interest. You can argue whether his policies are good in the long term for the U.S., but as citizens of Canada we have no ability to apply political pressure on him or any US political parties to any significant degree, except through counter tariffs and boycotts of U.S. products. These measures do influence politicians in places like Tennessee where bourbon sales are down, but on a national level these pressures are just a few more competing interests among many others for the US. Canada feels more impact from these trade barriers than the US. We need to think about what would make us better off and prevent us from being impacted by self-interested US policy, but we can only really influence Canadian politicians and policy. Trump’s moves just highlight that and he knows it. He said he would apply economic pressure for exactly this reason. What he may only now be realizing is that many Canadians are willing to take an economic hit for the sake of sovereignty, so unless these trade barriers are really helping the U.S., they may not make Canadians want to integrate into the U.S. In fact, the opposite may be the case, where Canadians seek less involvement with the U.S. That’s why we need a realistic plan that the citizens of both countries can support. USMCA is really the status quo and I don’t see any inspiring new proposals.
    1 point
  21. He is attacking us. Please, face reality. Of course, I’m not blaming Trump for every problem we have, merely for what he is doing to us which he is choosing to do out of a mixture of stupidity and malice.
    1 point
  22. Except, there is no what-about-ism. Just your hypocrisy. That isnt what I said, and you know it. I said that the words have meanings, but the words are either appropriate or inappropriate depending on the context of the conversation. I've used nigģa four times in this conversation. Not one use was racist. You don't want to acknowledge that it is possible to use the words, in context, appropriately. If you did, you wouldn't be able to maintain irrational hatred. I will acknowledge it is possible or even likely they inappropriately used those words. If they did, they should be condemned. We don't tolerate intolerance. I have a hard time believing anything the left comes up with because you guys lie so damn often. And isn't it just so convenient that they just happened to find this text chain days after their guy was caught fantasizing about killing a political opponent and his family? That is some next level coincidence right there.
    1 point
  23. Yeah, most of us call that 150 years of history, thanks for joining us
    1 point
  24. Well that's what a bot would say wouldn't it. And if you were talking about the first hospital strike then it was a stray rocket. So it sounds like your story is made up. Nor is it plausible that a police officer would suggest that they would send the police in to investigate deep inside enemy territory. I need a blood sample before I would be willing to believe you aren't a bot
    1 point
  25. Sure, except for the fact that it's the textbook definition of whataboutism. And now you propose that the "context" of racial either epithets and other hate speech might redeem the usage. Because there's got to be some kind of reasonable pro-Hitler, pro-slavery context. 🙄 Look, it's no surprise that these people are exactly who we think they are when they think no one is watching. Sometimes the hood slips. What's always a little surprising--and entertaining--is how eager some of you are to unmask yourselves and jump right into the hot water with them.
    1 point
  26. Really? Killing a politician and his kids while torturing his wife with their deaths is less offensive than faģgot? Niģga? Rėtard? What about the fact that this guy said he would kill his opponent over Hitler every time? Isn't that a tacit acceptance of killing Jews? This isn't what-about-ism. This is where-are-your-priorities-ism. And your priorities are with your ideology over decorum. I don't know the context of these conversations, and neither do you. Some of the words could be objectionable in most circumstances. But are those words, even in the worse circumstances, really worse than openly stating that you would kill your opponent and his kids and torture his wife with making her watch? Is that what you are hanging your hat on? If it is, that is truly disgusting.
    1 point
  27. Our country is being attacked by him constantly. It’s hard to ignore.
    1 point
  28. You seem to lack any knowledge of being knowledgeable about the knowledge of others. That's why your short of breath
    1 point
  29. I Being able to control drones over enemy lines seems to be challenging. But i guess land based control or any outside control of a drone wont be needed in the future with AI taking over full control of drones ... With artificial intelligence operated drones or AI fighter jets you simply program target locations and send it off on its own...let its AI take care of the rest, be it fighter intercepting , or bombing, or surveillance... its got AI so it knows what to do, it dont need you telling what to do once its in air,, you just sit back and wait for it to return by itself.. no radio control signals for the enemy to jam, no fiber to tangle up . also stealth, radar jamming,, radar tricking misleading features , will make drones hard to track by the enemy.. i think Pakistan tricked India with some kind of radar trickery not to long ago. controlling a drone by a string attached to a tin can that you talk into just about sums up Canada's Drone military might on the world stage... lol.
    1 point
  30. Why didn't you start a thread about the NC Dem candidate that repeatedly sent text messages that he wanted to put two bullets in his opponents head while expressing just how much he wanted his opponents wife to watch her children die? I guess faģgot, rėtard and nigga are far more offensive than fantasizing about killing children, I your world.
    1 point
  31. Brett would appear to be a bot. I'm the entire post is not only fictional but childish. You were sitting next to a police officer that told you that in the middle of a combat zone you'd send police into the basement of a hospital in hostile territory that you didn't control. That makes a lot of sense. Military hadn't fought it's through yet but obviously the police had LOL And the first hospital bombing turned out to be hamas rockets that were fired and went off course and struck the building. I thought AI was going to fix these bots to be a little bit more believable?
    1 point
  32. The strange fascination that many 'Canadians' here have for Trump won't allow them to comment... until they find a reason why the new tariffs on softwood lumber are Carney's or Trudeau's fault.
    1 point
  33. LOL it's 100 percent true, and i note you can't refute it What happened, you got a new box of depends undergarments today so you're not afraid of your own bullshit? LOLOL Almost constantly. You should really work on that.
    1 point
  34. Is it a prerequisite of the Maga cult to ignorantly deny anything and everything that has to do with clean energy, the climate and vaccines? Get your head out of your ass... Solar panels are tried, tested and proven technology that has been around for decades. There is as much risk with a solar panel as there is with bad or faulty wiring. Hail damage is non-existent unless the hail is bigger than 1' in diameter then most everything else the hail hits like cars is going to get damaged. The maintenance of cleaning a solar panel is not insurmountable... think cleaning your windows. Lithium battery storage adds no more fire hazard than the furnace in your home and whatever you're trying to talk about with silicone carbide is just that...whatever. Here is where you minions always stay on script and go sideways... Anything having to do with clean energy of course has to be because we're all concerned with saving the planet. There is a lot of validity to that but adding solar panels is also a cost benefit to the homeowner with typical break even on the investment in 6 - 10 years then after that, it's 'free' electricity. It add's value to the home for resale and yes, it does help the environment. Is that a bad thing?
    1 point
  35. There’s plenty of ideas and intent. Step aside and let people that can actually fix the problem have a chance.
    1 point
  36. Carney is probably a cia agent, and we know you support Poilievre because he's more cruel toward Palestinians. The NDP wants to keep guns to kill animals, and the Greens are the best option.
    1 point
  37. The original was a .gif, the crossbeam snapped.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...