Jump to content

brett 1

Member
  • Posts

    9
  • Joined

  • Last visited

brett 1's Achievements

Rookie

Rookie (2/14)

  • First Post
  • Conversation Starter
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later
  • One Year In

Recent Badges

0

Reputation

  1. I live in toronto and i too remember alot more snow as a kid in the winters, and colder too,,, i believe climate change is in big part happening due to mans impact on the planet. Astronaut Chris Hatfield said in a documentary he used to have trouble taking pictures of rain forests from space because of the clouds that always covered over the rain forests ... clouds look white from space and reflect alot of suns hot rays back out into space,,, with tremendous amount of deforestation for logging and cattle, those clouds are not there anymore to reflect the sun. So vast open spaces of ground are left open to the suns rays to heat up. If you ever seen vast stretches of farm land in Canada then just imagine reflective cloud cover that vast going away forever as similar sized stretches of rain forest are cut down to make room for cattle and industrial farming. The documentary was called "one strange rock" link below https://onestrangerock.com/ But i also think other things created by man are too causing or adding to climate change, emissions from cars factories, possibly methane from cattle and meat industry. all these together are having a accumulative effect i think. now even tundra per-ma frost is thawing which is giving out lots more methane , so its becoming an exponential growth now, faster and faster things are getting worse. and yes i too think that a natural cyclical rhythm of the earth could also be at play too, meaning that we may have been do naturally for some planet warming . But i do think that what man has contributed to climate change has definitely thrown the planet off any natural cycle that may have been due . extinction of species , mass deforestation,,,, We have wrecked the bloody place well before its time. and its all basically been done during our lifetime a span of about 80 years. wow some legacy we leave. i hate to say it but unlike a hopeful David Attenbough i do not see a light at the end of the tunnel. Jacques-Yves Cousteau warned us about over-fished dying seas back in the early 70's and nobody listened to his warnings then, so why would mankind start listening and changing his ways now when the end is near. greed, corruption, destruction, its all mankind knows best ! yours B.
  2. a response to original post (sorry cougar didnt mean to interrupt your discussion, im reading you too, intreresting) Politicians sending out mixed messages doesn't help things at all. On one hand they permit flights, but then they tell the public not to travel and to stay home.. yes i agree with original poster, if you open up flight, then you cant say don't use it while your the one responsible for having it open. But to beg the public to stay home and not set the example yourself puts you and your political associations integrity on the hook. If a political associations members joined that association to become leaders in the community and nation then they must be held to lead by example. They are bound by the policies they and their party set. And though not a written policy , it was made apparent by pleading and begging to the public on tv that not flying was what the parties was endorsing as proper behaviour by members and the public . And many companies do have policies regarding company conduct and behaviour that can be grounds for termination if not upheld. The average none political person should be able to have flown with no repercussions or fear of job loss. But a political "Leader" or "association member" if they truly desire to lead the people then it starts with the words the say to the public. also this situation is not a mere matter of government asking people not to were blue jeans while their members do...lol... this is very serious times and many lives are at stake now, so when governments go on air and plead and beg people not to fly, and then their own membership slaps the party in the face by taking that sort of thing lightly and sneaking on to a plane, well they should be fired, with the urgency of these times weighing against them(its not just blue jeans were talking about, its lives) yours B.
  3. I Couldn't believe it when i heard Canada's chief public health officer Dr. Theresa Tam response to the rise in Covid cases , she actually said that maybe we need thicker masks than the ones that are being used now....Wow, that statement just shows how out of touch with whats happening in the real world Dr. Theresa Tam and here superiors in government are. We dont need thicker masks , what we need is for people to actually wear the existing mask properly in the first place. that means not below your nose, or below your chin, or not at all like many people were doing last summer. Last summer i went into a department store, i saw a tall man walking around with no mask on at all, he was approaching people in the store and they were visibly concerned and moving away from him... i sought out the store manager and asked her what the store policy is regarding mask wearing. She replied "no mask , no entry" end of story. I then said to her well there is a guy in your store and he has no mask on. she ran to where i told her he was, she spoke with him , and then she came back to me, while he stayed there in the store. She came up to me and said "he says he has a medical condition", she said her head office told us that if someone says they have a medical condition that we are not to confront them and to just leave them alone. She looked at me and said she was not comfortable , nor her staff, nor the other costumers with having people who were not wearing masks in the store, but their was nothing further she could do it was head office policy. I went next door to Walmart just out of curiosity to ask their manager what was the policy for people trying to come in with no mask. The Walmart manager said boldly "No Mask, No Entry",,, I then ask the manager what if they say they have a medical condition ?, the managers shoulders sank down and looking sadly now, said our head office said to let them in and not to argue with them. This manager said too that her staff(associates) weren't happy about that policy at all, they were all scared. i thanked here for here time and left. Now i was even more curious about the government rules regarding mask wearing. So i phoned the city's 311 information line. I explained to the 311 government attendant what had just happened and asked her what exactly are the rules regarding mask wearing in stores ?. The answer i got went like this, She said that each stores can have and set a "no mask no entry" policy during covid if they want to, and they can ask people who are not wearing a mask to leave. BUT she continued to say , if a person says they dont want to wear a mask due to a medical condition and the store asks them to leave then under THE CANADIAN CHARTER OF HUMAN RIGHTS that person might be able to take the store to court for that. The 311 operator told me that some stores cant afford to be taken to court, or other stores would rather spend the money on things other than hiring lawyers in a legal fight that could end up going to the supreme court of Canada. So rather than argue with a person about their claims of having medical conditions the company's were simply telling their store managers to not question the medical claims and let them into the store. So because of fear of being taken to court under the CANADIAN CHARTER OF HUMAN RIGHTS stores were not strictly enforcing mask wearing last summer. and that could be a big part of the reason covid cases began to rise. It also seemed like store employees were also apprehensive about asking people to wear masks properly, . Again probably due to fear of legal reprisals ? So do Masks need to be thicker as Canada's chief public health officer Dr. Theresa Tam said. Or do we need to amend the charter of rights so that store owners are not afraid to ask people to wear a mask ? The Question - - should the THE CANADIAN CHARTER OF HUMAN RIGHTS be amended with a clause or provision to take into account a pandemic situation, a provision that keeps store owners from being sued under the charter if they refuse someone entry into the store for not wearing a mask, a provision that would only apply during a pandemic situation. thank you Brett R.
  4. There are a lot of companies small ones and large ones pitching in to help people hit by covid 19. Many are reducing their prices, I've noticed food stores are having a lot more sales than usual, all in an effort to help people survive and get through covert. There are even sites that show seniors where they can shop to get seniors discounts. like the one on the next link below link to businesses offering seniors discounts But i noticed Bell Canada is not on that list of many companies that offer discounts to seniors !!!. I can walk into a Salvation Army thrift store, or a Value Village thrift store and their cashiers will go out of their way to ask me if im a senior and to let me know that their store will gladly give seniors a discount. For god sake these are simply thrift stores and yet they step up and support our nations seniors. Go to the link above and see for your self all the companies some wealthy and some small that are willing to support our seniors with discounts. Or simply type into google "covid discounts" or "covid specials" etc and see for yourself all those businesses who are either trying to help out because of covid or have always given discounts to seniors. This nation is going through a pandemic people are losing jobs across the nation and this nations main controller/operator of the national phone and communications system Bell Canada has not only not ever given discounts to seniors in normal times as far as i can tell , but has not even reduced its prices to pitch in and help people stay in contact with each other during a global pandemic crisis. At a time when the nations peoples have become dreadfully isolated from their loved ones, Bell Canada is carrying on as business as usual. Bell still charges twice the amount for basic services compared to say freedom mobile and chatter which both cost around 25 dollars compared to Bells 50 dollars in Toronto.... Does the Government really View Communications and Bells role in it as a NON-ESSENTIAL SERVICE ...seriously? ... Can you just imagine losing your job because of this covid pandemic , and then having to find money for food, and rent, heat, and then not being able to afford the phone bill, and so you have to cancel your phone / and internet..., And then god forbid you get sick with covid and have no internet to look up the its symptoms, or no phone to call an ambulance with, or even the ability to contact your family so they can hear your last words ... or in a less intense scenario, simply be able to afford internet access so that the family can be connected with loved ones trapped in seniors homes. And what about using the internet as a means of keeping all the children in home schooling, or simply keeping younger kids entertained and occupied while the government orders them to all to stay at home.... Bell Canada basically has a monopoly over the most important "ESSENTIAL SERVICE" in this nation period, the communications services, yet it is running it like a runaway freight train bounding on its way to a stock market gold rush with out a thought or worry towards those who may fall under its tracks. Bell runs it cables , and infrastructure over all our nations land and our backyards in most cases without our individual consent as though it were a government owned social service with entitlement to cross over this nations people's private property. And in return for Bell Canada being handed the ability by our government to run its cables over our property, it thanks us by charging us all twice as much as the new competitors do... Bells Excuse to the CRTC for limiting and prevent outside competition was False .... Bell told the CRTC and the people of Canada years ago at hearings not to let outside competition into this country , because the lower prices that outsider companies would charge would undermine Bell Canada's ability to provide and maintain the infrastructure needed to provide service to remote regions of our vast nation. Meaning that bell needed to maintain its large customer base to pay for the cost of running wires and service to far and remote places in this nation. Bell threatened that if Bell started to lose money because outside companies started charging less and took away Bell's captive costumers, then Bell would no longer be able to afford to provide service to remote areas or maintain the infrastructure(cables/wires) that is already in place now. And that was the summary of Bells argument to the CRTC against letting competition into this country, which i myself fell for at the time...That is till years of seeing with my own eyes what bell is really doing. Everything Bell Canada said to the CRTC years ago is false simply because Bells track record over past years shows Bell hasn't been this self proclaimed great Stuart focused on managing a nations tele/com infrastructure, as it had claimed to the CRTC that its funds were need for . But instead has been using up its funds in past years not so much for infrastructure in the remote or urban regions, but more for the procurement of media outlets, tv stations, radio stations, entertainment centres( the Bell Centre) etc... none of which have anything to do with providing remote regional access or infrastructure maintenance at all. Its all shareholder driven and market devouring monopolistic takeover culture that have been the primary actions taken by Bell that we all have observed over that past years ! , link 1 - list of Bell Canada holdings In fact when it comes to actual infrastructure maintenance, in Toronto our hard wired phone lines give you nothing but crackling noises. I have friends and relatives across Toronto/GTA who all say the same thing, the phone is crackling and the old phone lines over their yards have never been touched or maintained by Bell as long as they can remember. If you call Bell to fix the crackling outside line they try to get into your house so they can charge you a 80 dollar repair fee, even though its cause is Bell's old outside wires(i had this happen to me before! ive worked in tele com so i caught the fast one the guy was trying to pull )... In our Toronto community about two summers ago bell began to install high speed fibre cable over our backyards.. Unfortunately for many neighbours Bell had sold them all a high speed plan about 4 years prior to any fibre cables being installed in the area! So for about 4 years people were paying the extra money thinking they had high speed fibre when the wires(infrastructure) to carry high speed wasn't there at all for yet another 4years or so !... and our community is not the only one that this has happened to , the news ran a piece about people who were paying for expensive fibre plans when fibre cables were not even there in place to carry the high speed to their communities. Bell Canada's actions over the past years, since that CRTC hearing about opening up the tele com market in Canada to outside competition, has been not quite like the bill of goods they sold the CRTC back then ,,,, instead of being good Stuarts of the nations essential communications service, they have become one of the biggest, most expensive monopolies in that industry, and have been festering a culture within itself of suspicious sales practices and acquisitions . Im sure many of you have Bell horror stories too? So why is the prime-minister and the premiers not stepping up during this time of Covid 19 crisis and ordering that bell stop over charging and that it drastically lower its prices, or provide free its "essential" communications services while this nations peoples are struggling just to get by and at their lowest point ? If even Dollar stores can offer seniors discounts through out the year in normal times, then why cant Bell Canada offer discounts to Canadians during a pandemic crisis ? , Bell has been handed a great deal of access and wealth on our Canadian soils, but has Bell Canada been a ethically grateful player in return for all that we have provided Bell with, or has Bell Canada taken advantage of ours and our forefathers Canadian generosity at the end of it all ?...we are treated better by new foreign companies to our country than we are by the one company that uses our own nations name bell "CANADA"... eh ! Some things to think about and respond to 1 - do you think phone service , or internet, or both are essential services 2 - only during a pandemic or national crisis , phone and internet providers should take on a unique role of essential service provider and thus function differently 3 - should government step in and make this type of service (tele/com) accessible to all during crisis like a pandemic 4 - based on Bells weak or false argument put forth to CRTC years ago, and its subsequent transformation into power hungry monopoly that charges more than most people can afford now a days for basic phone service, should the CRTC step in and fully open up the market to outside tele/com companies 5 - Should the CRTC force Bell Canada to sell off all that they acquired since the time of those hearings years ago, as punishment for being a bad and misleading industry player ? 6 - Does the Government of Canada need to intact much stronger anti-monopoly laws in the tele/com industry ? 7 - Should CRTC make providers offer a very basic telephone service for free so that even the poor can have the ability to communicate beyond the confines of "covid lock downs" actually you could post some of these points above as topics unto themselves on these forums. For me they all relate here as a group leading into each other each raising the next concern .. copy past or link this to others around the net, i think this needs to be discussed, by all Canadians . yours Brett R.
  5. hi all Recently here in Toronto there was a small march carried out by a local politician Tony Ruprecht of the Liberal party to bring attention to the passing of a bill that would set $2000 dollar fines for those caught with a hand gun in there possession...an illegally carried hand gun i presume the law was aimed at... Well when i heard of this march and was invited to participate in it to help raise attention to the need for such a bill to be passed I declined and laughed to myself because i thought the whole thing was utter nonsense.. Why did i find marching for this bill to be so laughable, simply because it exemplifies just how distorted and out of touch our our governments priorities really are. In essence the government wants to charge a hardened criminal a $2000 dollar fine for possesion of leathal illegal hand gun , yet already on the books is a law that lets the government charge a $5000 dollar fine to anyone who refuses or cant pay their $15 dollar pet/cat licensing fee... thats right folks , if your a drug dealer in Canada selling thousands of dollars worth of narcotics each week and your caught with an illegal hand gun then the government of Canada will slap you with a measly $2000 dollar ticket which may very well be pocket change to some of the narcotics dealers. But if you a pet owner who has never done any violent or serious crime and you even went so far as to spend $100 to $200 dollars of you own money to get your pet spayed and neutered as all good citizens should do, then if you dont have the cash or refuse to pay that lousy $15 dollar fine then the Canadian government will rush after you with a $5000 dollar fine for committing the dreadful act of not paying your $15 dollar licence fee on your spayed indoor house cat ....geesh It would appear judging by fines set that the government of Canada holds honest Canadian owners of spayed and neutered house pets to be a greater danger and threat to the public and fabric of Canadian society than it does the hard core hand gun carrying bikers , Mafias, drug dealers, gang bangers and various deranged hand gun carrying nutzo's out there .... Yep $5000 dollars for not paying a $15 dollar pet license fee , and only $2000 dollars if your a crook caught carrying a illegal hand gun... Yep it would be truly laughable if it werent so pathetic a reflection of how out of touch and clueless or political leaders really are ..... yep only in canada eh... pitty eh..
  6. hi all I was just reading this post again 3 years after i had originally posted it , just to see if it still made sense to me or if i had changed my thoughts on any of it since then. I was kinda angry with the whole system at the time i had written it, But for the most part after rereading it again 3 years later i think i still feel about the same on the matter of reforming and cleaning up the Canadian Political system... its sad in a way that somethings dont change, even when everyone knows they should be changed oh BTW 3 years ago this was probably my first post ever on a forum , since then i kinda figured out how to use some of the basic forum features that at the time seemed so complicated and strange to me lol.... i went back and used Bold lettering , underlines, and blue colour text to spruce up the original post a bit ,,,,, looks a bit better now.. cheers all
  7. what message is the government sending to honest low income canadians :angry: awhile back i came into a shortage of work. it was a little ruff goin for a while, i went thruogh two winters without being able to afford heat and i caught a cold that allmost did me in durring that winter. im a honest canadian who has never committed a crime in my life, just like many other Canadians who also have lived thier lives on the right side of the law , even dispite the hard ships that come thier way. So how do you think i and many other canadians who have a limited income or are working minimum wage jobs, sometimes two minimum wage jobs with a miserable boss yelling at them day after day , feel when we hear that our taxes are being used to give a university education to a criminal like carla humulka. the reward for being poor and honest Canadians is that you CAN'T afford a university education for your kids, but if you committ a crime our govenment gives you a free education. Even worse is the fact that these murders who killed that inocent girl on boxing day are going to go to prison where they will be given all the things that the honest lower wage earners in this country are denied, such as garanteed 3 warm meals a day, garanteed clean clothes, garanteed a bed to sleep in , and garanteed heat through the winter. thats right prisoners dont have to worry about paying heating bills or any bills for that matteer. in fact convicts probably get colour television ,cable TV, and computers too. while honest Canadians on low income or no income are lining up at food banks ,and thier are many honest canadians who are to proud to go to food banks too so what you see at food banks is only the tip of the ice berg. Oh of course i almost forgot what that convict said at CBC's town hall meeting at the prison system a couple years ago. he told Peter Mansbridge that its "tough on convicts that they have no freedom to do as they want in prison", well im sorry but if thats a convicts biggest hardship in prison thier lack of freedom.then maybe that convict should try working two minimum wage jobs , feeding and clothing his family , puting a roof over thier head and paying the bills. instead of hanging arround bars selling drugs , gettintg high , and shooting guns at inocent boxingday shoppers. If you want to feel a real loss of freedom then try being HONEST and POOR in Canada . or worse yet loosing the freedom to watch your teenage daughter graduate from high school because some gang bangers went gun crazy on boxing day .... one point i must make here too is that the word CRIMINAL and the word POOR do not automatically go together most people poor , middle class, or rich are law biding people. justice in Canada is dredfully unbalanced when murders and criminals live better in prison than honest canadians do outside of prison. the death penalty may not deter the hardend remorseless killer and maybe it might give some bordeline murders good incentive to stay away from guns. but its just that it makes me sick to know that my taxes are being used to feed, cloth, and shelter members of organized crime ,and murders who without hesitation would rob, steal , or kill inocent honest Canadians. we have had a soft justice system in this country for decades and its gotten us to the point where we have become a laughing stock to the criminal culture of today. the 3 strikes law works, thats why all the criminals in the USA are comming to Canada after they've gotten 2 strikes in the USA. Canada has become a safe haven for international crime. and its got to stop...i live in the lansdowne and bloor area in toronto , where crooks that stabed a cop have been released after only two months in jail , its rediculous...yes we need the return of the death sentence for murders and members of organized crime and also for police who are curupt . for police coruption in my view is basically treason against this nation and should be treated as such...life sentences must be given to gangs like the mofias and biker gangs who are resonsible for smuggling and selling these guns to youth throughout toronto. but unfortunately i feel a liberal governt based on their past years association with curption scandles is not likely the party to count on when it comes to making tough laws against organized crime... my vote is ....YES....to the death penalty....and make the guns such a hot potato with exremly long sentences that organized crime would weigh the sentence for gun selling and smuggling far bigger and detrimental to themselves than the profits gained from selling guns to street gangs and thugs of any colour, race or creed... brett from toronto (bloor + lansdowne area)
  8. i know i may be a little over the top in some of my ideas, but you usually never get all of what u ask for. so if we even get some of my ideas passed as laws or constitutional changes then thats a start in the right direction i feel . but certain things i feel should have been in place long ago like a national leader setting an example and maintaining confidence in our financial institutions by not placing his or her money in foreign banks.
  9. In just about every discussion regarding this winters election the word corruption seems to keep coming up. this election may vary well end up being remembered as the corruption election. I am not taking sides here regarding who's corrupt and who's not because i feel that all the parties involved have had their moments regarding corruption . Here is my suggestion, or idea for changes in the law or constitution that may eliminate some of corruption and mismanagement that has plagued or nation. TOTAL FINANCIAL TRANSPARANCY OF GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS , APPOINTEES and their SPOUSES - as well as any government employee that is responsible for the allocation or distribution of public public money ,and or any persons employed by the government in a position of community importance who's actions could negatively affect the community should they be caused to neglect there lawful duties in exchange for financial gains (eg:bribary)....... PART ONE -POLITICIANS - First lets deal with the politicians. All electected officials and thier spouses should have the daily or monthly financial transactions of their bank accounts visible to the public. as well this open scrutiny should continue even if or after they have left public office. this is so that they may not be able to accept financial rewards or payoffs after leaving office, for their actions during their time in office. The SPOUSES or life partners have been included to prevent politicians from secretly hoarding money in their spouses account, money derived as a result of corruption . both the politician to be and their spouses must be bound to public financial scrutiny for life. and anyone that later wishes to become the spouse of an already elected politicians must also become bound to this same financial scrutiny. The Argument against - is that this sort of extreme financial scrutiny would deter potential candidates from entering politics. The Argument for - is that only Canadians who are serious and passionate about serving and making sacrifices for their country would enter politics. if politicians at the signing of a pen can send off troops to sacrifice their lives in foreign lands. Then a small price to pay it would be for a patriotic politician to relinquish his financial privacy. Note as well that in a true democracy political office is not supposed to be something that is restricted to all except the rich and powerful, the public should be allowed to choose their political representative, a person of any social class , race or religion which the public want to represent them in government. PART TWO -MINISTERS AND APPOINTEES- Ministers are in charge of budgets, and therefore require the same scrutiny as that applied to politicians. The exceed the budget game is the primary reason for their inclusion under financial scrutiny. The exceed the budget game is a term applied to ministers and government employees that are given a yearly budget. If that budget is not used up then they fear having their budget cut the next year. To then make it appear to the government that they are under funded they try to EXCEED THE BUDGET by needlessly spending as much money as possible in order to go over budget for the year. Usually this is done by wasting the taxpayer's dollars on needles purchases bogus renovations and construction projects (there's a lot construction workers in canada with stories to tell on this topic). also the potential for kickbacks from construction companies and private contracts is also a good reason to monitor a minister's financial transactions , many businesses would gladly pay a government official thousands of dollars in return for securing multi million dollar government contracts. I am also including in this section under ministers any government appointee or employee who is responsible for authorizing cash flow to the private sector for services rendered. PART THREE - THOSE EMPLOYED IN LAW ENFORCEMENT- Judges, and government employed members of the court should all be subject to financial scrutiny. People employed by the government that are in involved in the prison system ,corrections and parole boards should also be subject to the publics scrutiny of their finances. Police chiefs, division commanders and those in charge of or governing the actions of field officers, must also become financially transparent to the public. But those working officers who are actively involved in undercover work or who go out into the public to patrol should not have there financial information revealed directly to the public in order to protect their identities from criminals. But instead they should frequently have their financial records reviewed by at least two levels of higher ranking police agency members who themselves do fall under the publics financial scrutiny. PART FOUR - IT MUST BE MADE ILLEGAL FOR A POLITICIAN TO HAVE A BANK ACCOUNT ON FORIEGN SHORES - No safe haven must be provided for politicians to hide money that has been wrongfully acquired. Prior to running in an election a would be candidate would have to transfer all their currency abroad back to a Canadian bank. And if after leaving politics for private sector employment or retirement, he could then be allowed to open accounts on foreign shores only if he had signed a form or agreement PRIOR to his entering politics. an agreement that gives the Canadian government permission to have access to his foreign accounts only for the purpose of viewing them on behalf of the Canadian public. A POLITICIAN HAS BY CHOICE BECOME A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE MOST PATRIOTIC POSITION IN A NATION. THEREFORE IT IS A POLITICIANS PATRIOTIC DUTY IN OFFICE ASWELL AS IN THEIR PRIVATE LIFE TO MAINTAIN THE PUBLICS CONFIDENCE IN THE NATIONS FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS. FOR PERSONS OF SUCH HIGH SOCIAL AND POLITICAL STANDING TO PLACE THEIR FUNDS IN FORRIEGN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS , UNDERMINDS IN A MOST UNPATRIOTIC WAY THAT LEADERS CONFIDENCE IN THE FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS OF THE NATION THEY HAD CHOOSEN TO SERVE , AND THEREFORE UNDERMINES THE PUBLICS CONFIDENCE IN THE NATIONS FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ASWELL. HOW TO MONITOR THE FINANCIAL INFORMATION. the internet has provided the public with an exceptional tool, that is capable of easily posting and informing the tax payers and general public of government spending , the reason for the spending and those responsible for authorizing the spending. As well the internet can be used to post the personal financial information of government employees eg: elected or apointed government officials . Laws would make it mandatory for banks in Canada to release financial information to the government regarding politicians and ministers etc. Banks could open special registries or accounts that are for selected government employee use only, thus helping to streamline the flow of information to the internet for transparent public viewing. *this is my idea of how to reform or amend our laws , constitution and political process in Canada, so that we may remove some of the corruption and mismanagement that is eroding the publics trust in the government and costing taxpayers a lot of money. if you like these ideas that i have come up with here, then you have my permission to copy them down and show or send them to others. I feel that if more people see and read this then there may be a chance that some of these ideas or modified parts of them may find there way into law via a grass roots movement or word of mouth. If you don't agree with my ideas all or part of them, please feely pick them apart and explain why you don't agree or what should be added. I want to hear what your opinion and ideas are too, perhaps you have the solution that's needed ..* DO WE ACTUALY NEED THIS OR LAWS BASED ON PARTS OF THIS IN PLACE brett rycombel....toronto.
×
×
  • Create New...