Leaderboard

Remember how "RACIST!!!!" it was to consider the Wuhan lab as a possible source of the coronavirus outbreak? Why did our media pimp that awkwardly stupid narrative? Is it because Trudeau's ties to that lab, despite warnings from CSIS, are so obvious? How much of a role did Trudeau play in the origin of covid? Even if the coronavirus that leaked out of the Wuhan BSL4 lab wasn't one of the many viruses stolen by the Chinese from the Wpg lab, did Chinese virologists learn some tricks of the gain-of-function trade here in Wpg and then take that knowledge back to China? Why doesn't our media talk about the role that Trudeau's idiocy played in China's rising biological warfare threat?

In the Netherlands where they have a PR electoral system they elected 17 parties to their parliament. That's a bit overdoing PR. In other countries with PR they have thresholds between 3-5% to stop splinter-parties from entering parliament. However, nobody can deny that the Netherlands is one of the best places to live in the world. Therefore the claims that changing the electoral system to be fairer would somehow lead to turmoil are rubbish.

Guess i should have read that mess over. Lol

Here's the most important point. There was never any problem in shortage of supply until Biden took control of the supply to decide who gets what. But yes MCAs were an authorized medication about the same time as vaccines or about the time the Biden regime was setting up to take power. In the meantime federal health decided to finance the medication it had authorized. If you look back at Trump's comments about the time monoclonal antibodies had cured him he was talking about making the treatment available to all Americans.

I don't know if you're lying or it's more a case of you being desperate to believe, BS. The Arizona Audit is a tricky one. Both sides are pointing at the other and calling liar. The corporate and state media only wants to tell us about the hand count and how that shows Biden won. The other side tells us it was never about the hand count. The hand count had to be done again as part of an extensive audit but that was never what was really in question. What was in question was whether or not those counted ballots represented actual citizens of Arizona or even actual people. " The Real Question is Legitimate Votes True, the hand recount of ballots show what the official count shows: Joe Biden with little over 10,000 votes more than Donald Trump. Slight differences in the numbers. But are those ballots legitimate? According to the audit, you have 44,000 votes minimum with issues that are “critical” and need further investigation. These involve issues like people voting twice or voting in Maricopa despite moving out of the county. So you can find excuses for three out of every four of those ballots and still have enough to throw the election the other way." Trump, as usual, is right, and you, as usual, are wrong, Beave. The Arizona election was rigged. https://stream.org/forget-the-spin-on-the-arizona-audit-it-proves-the-election-was-corrupt/

What does being “elected” mean to you, if not more seats in parliament? The Libs won more seats, but weren’t elected? So who was elected???

How much do you pay for your home insurance? What do you have to show for it? The military is a complete waste of time, except for when you need it. Then it's priceless. What other large organization do we have to call upon for any kind of emergency? We don't have a National Guard, like they do down south, and are one of the lowest policed countries in the western world. We have no way of coping with civil disorder if it were to start. We have no organization we can use to evacuate people in an emergency, as in an earthquake or flood. None to call in on even a health emergency, as we did recently. Oh, and there's that sovereignty thing. If you want to claim sovereignty over a large and valuable piece of land you had better be able to enforce that claim or someone else will come and take it away from you. Does Australia have a 70% income tax rate? Does the Australian government devote so much money to its military it can't afford robust social services? Nope. Two thirds of our size with a better, more modern military. And yet somehow they can manage that and we can't?

1. I actually support this based on community morality, which means I'm in a different arena 2. No, read my posts again. 3. The 'free speech' claim is always context-dependent and claiming it's an absolute only works on rubes who are only familiar with the term and not its application. 4. I don't have to prove anything. I am with the status-quo which is already in practice. And I'm not making an evidentiary argument, just a moral one.

In case anyone reads this thread, the transfer of Canada from France to England was the result of the Seven Years War (1756-1763) which in fact had two treaties. Many people in Canada view the Plains of Abraham as a significant battle place, Montcalm vs Wolfe, French vs English. This is false. In the late 1750s, there were far more significant battles, involving far more men between Prussia (weirdly allied with England) and Austria (allied with France) . I've walked around many of these battlefields. ==== BTW, Napoleon refought the battles.

Interesting that none of the organizers of this group are practicing nurses yet supposedly they are on their lunch breaks. These alleged nurses would picket their fellow workers and prevent immunocompromised cancer patient from getting to their appointments.

Thousands of medical workers are protesting hospitals that they work at? I’ll need to see some evidence that there are thousands in the protest that are on their lunch break, as you claim.

force is not only a term used to describe particularly forceful force it describes lesser forms of force as well

Since 2021 began there has been approx. a million illegals, mostly from Haiti, from all over the world crossing the border from Mexico into states like Texas and Arizona where most of these illegals are no doubt bringing in brand new diseases with them. They are no doubt also bringing in the covid virus with them also. They then get to be distributed around America where most of them are sent to mostly red states where the BiDumb dumbocrats can use them as an excuse to jack up the covid stats in states like Florida and Texas and make it appear as though there is a pandemic going on in those red states. It's probably because of the illegals that those covid stats are on the rise. Cuomo is just one of the gang of untouchable dumbocrats that will never face criminal charges for his handling and involvement in the deaths of over 15,000 elderly people dying from his what he had done. Most of those elderly people were all fine until they were given those covid vaccine shots. Then they all started to die like flies on sticky paper. It is really sad, and the use of these experimental covid vaccines on innocent gullible people are crimes against humanity as to what our pro globalist politicians are doing to their citizen's. They all pretty much appear to be members of big pharma "Murder Inc" now. These covid vaccines appear to be bio-weapon like vaccines or so the rumor goes. ?

And the fourth is Texas. Texas is unique in the way the Biden regime is flooding infected illegals through the border without testing. Children are better monitored so we know what's happening there and 20% of the kids in Texas facilities are infected. I browse the American death rates pretty regular and my impression is the southern border states, in general, are in the top five for daily deaths. Texas is by far the worse but it's also the worse for illegals. Alabama is a head-scratcher. Hospitalizations are steadily decreasing but daily deaths are steadily increasing. https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/hospitalizations-plummet-in-alabama-while-covid-deaths-continue-to-mount-week-in-review/ar-AAOO5Zf We know the Biden boys (and girls) have been putting illegals on buses and shipping them to red states to help change elections. I suspect Alabama is a big recipient of those gifts.

Freedom of speech means that if you criticize government, they don't fine you or imprison you. It also means the Government can't penalize you for anything you say or post, unless it is incitement to violence or hate speech. Private companies, like Global, have no obligation to accept what you, or anyone else, posts on their site. They have the right to reject what you say, just as you have to say it.

Yeah well it’s already been clearly established that you live in a right wing false reality where you can’t tell truth from fiction and believe all kinds of insane conspiracies about population control etc. So honestly your assessment of me or anything else while entertaining is pretty irrelevant

1. I agree, sending them back is nonsense, but I have heard it proposed by extremists. 2. Looks like we agree here, too, more or less. While most of us are born with either male or female characteristics, I don't think people are simply male or female. I think our gender is on a continuum, with hormones determining how male or female we look, think and behave. Hormones are pretty powerful so it doesn't really surprise me that sometimes the hormones we produce do not match the sexual characteristics we were born with. 3. Yeah, extremists on both sides are a problem. Amazing, a leftie and a rightie agreeing.

To me, the best thing is not to be in the group with pre-existing conditions. If you happen to be in this group, vaccination may be a good strategy.

Intentional totally false accusation without a shred of evidence carefully planned to discredit Trudeau by dirty campaign style linking Trudeau to Wuhan lab 2 days before election date. I won't be surprised if tomorrow they link him to Taliban or ISIS. It is not going to work. Justin Trudeau will be the elected Prime Minister of Canada for at least another 2 years. This campaign style backfired as Canadians witnessed how vicious anti-Trudeau crowd behaved.

1. supporting what is popular with the mob is not a moral argument supporting individual rights against majoritarian mob tyranny is individual rights > democracy two wolves and a sheep voting on what is for dinner is not a moral position 3) never claimed free speech was an absolute I claimed that the level of evidence needed to restrict it is a very high bar indeed 4) if you want adequate justification for the status quo you support then you do need proof if you don't need that and want to infringe on people's rights anyway then that is very far from a solid moral argument you don't restrict something as important as free speech with literally not a single good reason to do so and plenty of good reasons not to that is a supremely immoral position to take