Leaderboard

What we need

But the fraud has been completely visible, no faith involved. It actually takes more “faith” to look at the various videos and claim you see no fraud.

Anyone who: a. was born in Canada b. passes the criteria for citizenship according to law, and swears to bear true allegiance to Her Majesty the Queen of Canada and her Heirs and successors. c. there are other circumstances regarding parents being Canadian but you should consult with a legal professional for details. I'm just a simple potter.

In fact, I'll go further. Anyone(and more specifically every single person on this forum) who believed the Trump/Russia collusion story was exercising far more faith than those of us who believe this voter fraud situation. You're like faith healers. And that is because there was no supporting evidence of the Russian nonsense. Not. One. Witness. No. Video. Nothing at all that could be used to support the Steele Dossier. But you believed it for YEARS. And some of you probably still do believe it! With no evidence. Just CNN and MSNBC repeating it in their echo chambers. You've all become useful idiots. The voter fraud crime, on the other hand, has 100's of eye witness accounts. These people bear witness on affidavits(legal document with severe penalties) of many different techniques and ways that voter fraud occurred. Across all of the States that stopped counting overnight. Seeing ballots being rescanned into the machines multiple times, for example, to pump up Biden's numbers. Then there is the reams of video documenting the crimes. People with phones, security cameras capturing bags of fraudulent ballots being toted around, mysteriously showing up in cars, trucks, wagons, you name it. Watchers being forced out of buildings. Or forced to observe from 40 or 50 feet. Then there is the ballots themselves. The fake ones with no creases, proving they never saw an envelope. The ones with no signatures. The ones from thousands of dead people. The ones from out of state. The list goes on. Then there are the numbers, the simple data. impossible vote spikes, overnight. More ballots than voters. Voting behaviour that defies reality. The list goes on and on. But only in the swing states, the ones that stopped counting. And I won't even go into the Dominion stuff. But Russia collusion really happened, right? Why? Because Trump's a (use your favourite insult here). Well, that's all the proof I need that you're incapable of discussing this, any of you Russian hoaxers. It's kind of sad.

Of course governments should be able to limit business activity. Else the meth dealer would be free to deal meth, cause it's his "business". I guess what the OP really means "In the choice between public health and public commerce, should public commerce prevail?". In 1918-1921, businesses were also shut down, people stayed home in droves and mask wars played out in the media and on the street. Amazingly, once the pandemic ended, the economy improved, people got back to work, busineses thrived - there's a reason the decade after was called the "roaring 20s". Its true, during the pandemic and the preceeding war years, people suffered - dying, losing loved ones, losing businesses and income. But as a society, we survived. And we will this time, too. So in my view, money and jobs and the economy are all "fixable"; death is not. So if temporarily closing down businesses helps save lives, I'm ok with that - because death is permanent in a way job loss is not. We've been dealing with this pandemic for less than a year and already have a solution on the horizon. We really are such snowflakes when compared to what our grandparents went through.

It's estimated that 20 percent of retailers will go out of business in Canada due to public health restrictions. Workers and business owners are being forced onto government subsistence handouts for the sake of preventing viral spread. Rather than letting people decide whether they want to risk shopping or patronizing businesses, government is deciding for them and destroying some livelihoods. Is it fair?

It’s getting ridiculous now doing google searches. If you google something obvious like “police killed during 2020 riots” you get a virtual goose-egg regarding the requested subject matter. You do get all sorts of info about police killing people, and GF, and the riots. Google is in the business of editorializing history now. It’s fascism, just like when Antifa attacks people for reporting on their crimes.

Five months since I stated that the evidence wouldn't be posted

Bahahahaha I have a Canadian passport but would never, ever, bear allegiance to the Queen and the British Crown. Canadians are just subjects being the property of the Canadian government. Most Quebecers do not care at all about the Queen, but are Canadians on paper.

Yes it did,,,

LMAO. Literally THE MOST FARCICAL ACCUSATION THAT I EVER HEARD IN MY LIFE was Lisa Swetnick's hysterical story about attending numerous Kavanaugh gang-rape parties. I thought that it was the dumbest thing that I ever heard, but that didn't stop Demmies from falling for it. Her dirtbag lawyer was actually a leading contender for leadership of the Demmies for a while in 2018, according to CNN talking heads. Dems are the lowest of the low. They make our Liberals look almost human.

Bill Barr never said there was no election fraud or he was no longer investigating. That's more something Progs and Never-Trumpers choose to believe they read or heard. Go ahead though and do that prog/TDSer thing where you quote a selective clip of what he said and leave out important context. Then guess what I'm going to do. In the meantime I find this interesting. You know how real conservatives are rejecting Fox now because they've flipped to Prog. Trump doesn't appear to be using them anymore. Apparently OAN, Newsmax and Rightside Broadcasting are the new media channels of choice. I subscribe to Trump's YouTube channel they sent me this one from OAN:

This post is 3/4 nonsense. Unless a person is willing to acknowledge the fraud, there really is no point discussing anything. That you can't acknowledge what's clearly fraud being committed on the various videos shows you to be untrustworthy. And that is kind of sad.

Yes, it should be illegal, unless the government wants to reimburse them for every penny they lose.

The biggest advocates of illogical lockdowns are people that get paid either way. Funny how that is? They ask others to sacrifice while sacrifice nothing themselves.