Leaderboard

He wasn't sent there. He demanded to go fight with his father because he didn't want to be left behind with the women. His 2 older brothers had already graduated from Al Quaeda training and he wanted to be like the rest of his family - terrorists. He has never renounced his terrorist beliefs.

Your argument is yes but.... All that stuff is horrible. But it's irrelevant to Khadr the murderer.

15 year olds know what's right and wrong. 15 year olds know that murder is wrong. Give me a break with the brainwashing bullshit. It's just an excuse.

To summarize you have in your responses presumed OP to lecture me and Jews and others that: 1- we must assume the worst in all of a people if many or some of that people engage in evil; 2-engage in process 1 to assume all Muslims have negative attributes undesireable in Canadian society and so we should ban Muslims from Canada; 3-that we Jews and our leaders who disagree with you as to 1 and 2 are afraid to be called Islamaphobic and are dupes of Islamic extremists. You have also evidenced in your responses to me: 4-you have no basis of extrapolation for any assumptions you have made to assume the negative generalizations you have made and you continue to be unable to understand your conclusion that we should hate all Muslims because many of them hate us is not based on denying many hate us (that was never challenged) but that it makes no logical sense because it simply generates the same hatred back in response, i.e., negative generalizations to rationalize discrimination against an entire category of people. Further and ironically you claim your Muslim adversaries hate in disprorportionate amounts, but you do the exact same thing by assuming an entire Muslim population is undesireable. In addition, you started off claiming Muslims should be banned for being more likely to be terrorists and then when provided counter arguments to show you had no statistics for that justify such assumptions you deflected and switched the focus to having us believe your true concern about Muslims and why they shoudl be banned is because they hate Jews so you now present numbers showing Muslims hate Jews when that was never the issue of this thread or contested. Interestingly you have never come on this forum once and started a thread saying lets said ban anti-semites from coming to Canada It is only when challenged about your negative generalizations about Muslims, you then raise dit, and then only in relation to Muslims, no other peoples. So Argus. You would have us believe what...that you are so concerned about Jews in Canada this justifies your negative stereotypes of Muslims but no other anti semites? I call that out and challenge you for using anti-semitism as a shield, a pretense an object of exploitation to justify your own hatred of Muslims. You don`t speak for any Jew about anti-semitism and your presumption you can dictate to me or any Jew why we are hated let alone why we must hate Muslims or anyone is the kind of presumptuous and patronizing tone that gives birth to hatred and negative generalizations and so policies that led to residential schools or the holocaust and so many other acts of legislated discrimination. Further your previous denial of anti-semitism and its role in enabling Nazism and then trying to back track saying oh you didn`t deny it, just caled it secondary shows your ignore of Jewish history and anti-semitism you presume to lecture about. Secondary..you called it secondary...bull shit, you only called it secondary after being called out and when you did that you showed you continue to trivialize anti semitism and what it is capable of doing and how the thought process is no different from the one you are engaging in now. Most ironic is you quote Pew Polls to justify hatred. Long before the Pew Polls kept track of anti semitism in geographic locations the ADL has been doing that. You presume to tell me and Jews we do not know what the ADL is or the statistics it keeps and what they mean? You claim to tell me or any Jew how we must use those statistics ... The ADL was created in 2011 by a lawyer to combat thought processes that led to the discrimination and hateful attacks against Jews. Its mission was to expose this behaviour these thought processes as negative generalizations made to define Jews as less worthy, human, equal, than non Jews. That mission of the ADL was never limited to just understanding how it impacts on Jews BUT all peoples targeted with hatred. The ADL has been a strong ally assisting Christian, Muslim and all kinds of religious and social groups defend ourselves against hatred. Because it does, because the B`Nai B`Rith does as well, because Jewish leaders reach out to Christians and Muslims and others to combat hatred, this makes us dupes of Islamic extremists...why because you say so...you would prefer we build walls and define entire peoples as undesireable. In your world, you try place yourself in an anti-septic bubble where everyone believes like you do and that makes you more educated than I. In conclusion, your words simply repeat your bigotry against Muslims Argus and Jews and anyone else who disagrees with your beliefs. You want to come on and piss on Muslims, that is your right. Its my right and the right of others to challenge your negative generalizations as being illogical and unhelpful in understanding what criteria would be needed to properly enunciate immigration policies. Yes we know you are quick to be able to say what is not Canadian but never once have you come on here and say what it IS to be Canadian. Your silence in that regard I would contend shows you can`t create concepts or beliefs you only know how to tear down or piss on beliefs.

One regime's whistleblower is another regime's rat, just go ask Julian Assange - if it wasn't for him.... Never mind.

Trudeau settled out of court because, as always, he sided with the terrorist (or 'fighter', as Trudeau calls them).

Khadr is human garbage.

He should have been left to the Americans. His crime was against an American. Trudeau is the real criminal here.

Now you're just trolling because you know how stupid of a comment that is.

Misanthropy is so boring. The audacity of those who would build moralistic systems, on the other hand, is exciting.

Faith in humanity? No thanks. We might as well all go straight to hell.

Yeah, I agree. I'm already tired of this story, please we can move on.

Does Prince Harry count as an "entitled refugee"? Sorry, he was the one that came to mind. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/prince-harry-canada-jobs-1.5429202

Your first comment is an attempt again to be insulting showing your insecurity. Then you respond by making the ridiculous unsubstantiated accusation that Jews assisted the decision making process of placing aboriginals in Christian reform schools. Provide the proof for such an absurd accusation. More to the point even if it was true you contend what exactly...that Christian's can not question their past behaviour and neither can Jews? You clearly knee jerk respond at this point trying to deflect from the point made to you that you have no way to defend. Negative generalizations put aboriginals in these schools using a cognitive process no different then the ones you now use against Muslims. Your attempt to suggest Jews are no better than Christians not only does not address the issue but shows how insecure you are and so how absurd your responses have become. No one and not me suggested Christians were or are worse than Jews.

In regards to 1 your attempt to spin the purpose of the residential school system in Canada is noted. Some of us would state instead that the residential schools were in fact government sponsored Christian religious schools created to focrefully remove aboriginal children from their families, existing school systems and culture because it was felt their aboriginal values were undesireable for a Canadian to have based on the assumption that dominant Christian values were superior and the proper Canadian values to have. The fact you white-wash it should be no surprise to anyone. 2. Your second comment makes no mention of the fact that Canada only made it a crime to rape one's marital spouse 26 years ago and it still is not a crime to rape someone in North Carolina or Oklahoma and to put someone in jail for raping their wife in the following US states it must be linked to another crime, its not a stand alone crime..Arizona, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wyoming? Do you want to discuss how few convictions there are in Canada because of how problematic it would be for a spouse to accuse their other spouse of rape and so you have no clue as to the actual rate of marital rapes in Canada or any other non Muslim country as compared to any Muslim country? In fact you have no objective basis to extrapolate anything about marital rape rate sin any country. You can't even provide a reference to where you concluded there are no marital rape laws in any Muslim country. Not that it matters but in Indonesia (most populous Muslim country) , Benin, Bhutan, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, Mauritius, Kazakhstan, Mauritania, Turkey, Niger, Sudan,Qatar, it is illegal to rape your wife. Since you brought it up here are countries that are not Muslim that have no laws against marital rape-are you concerned about getting immigrants and refugees from these countries as well?..the Bahammas, Botswana,Cameroon, Cambodia, China (which by itself has more people than all Muslims in all countries combined), Democratic Republic of the Congo, Republic of Congo, El Salvador, Ethiopia, Haiti, India (it has almost as many people as the entire population of world Muslims), Mynammar, North Korea, saint Lucia, Sri Lanka, Tuvalu, Uganda. Provide the reference for the 3rd sentence and claim. The 4th sentence is yet another unsubstantiated claim that is false. All the countries I listed for example under the above reference to marital rape, also have references to battery that do not exclude husbands. In regards to the fifth sentence...gays are being beaten and discriminated against in many non Muslim countries, starting with for example, Russia, Uganda and Jamaica? What is your point? In regards to your references that Christianity has allowed progress and Muslim has not are you now saying there are no progressive or moderate Muslims? In fact you again clearly demonstrate above you throw out subjective negative stereotypes to negate all Muslim people. Your accusations are not even substantiated. Then you accuse others of drivel. You just engage in bigoted rants at this point. You can't even be bothered before you spew off at the mouth to research a damn thing such as: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marital_rape_laws_by_country In regards to actual Islamic religious laws on marital intercourse I provide people this reference: https://www.dar-alifta.org/Foreign/ViewFatwa.aspx?ID=6033. Again no one on this board is arguing Islam is being practiced in a sexist manner or manner many of us would find questionable. What I am challenging is the exercise of unsubstantiated negative accusations thrown out that necessarily ask you to stereotype all Muslims as thinking in the same way and behaving the same way.

He has never denied that he killed that man. Is that because he wants the notoriety? Can't have sympathy for him being considered guilty if he won't deny it. And he is a terrorist. Yay! We finally agree on one thing. FWIW I also think it's a joke that the first person to testify, and rat out his accomplices, always gets the smallest sentence, even if they're the guiltiest. I call that "winning the rat race". I do it because he is a terrorist. He was raised to be a terrorist, the evidence that he was a terrorist is there in his bomb-making videos, and he has never publicly denounced that which made him a terrorist. Guilty is guilty, period. I'm no easier on any other criminals than I am on Khadr. You'll find the same thing about conservatives across the board.

Christianity is for the uneducated masses from the times of pre-science, pre-enlightenment to explain how the universe works. Don't bother your mind with such rabble Jesus' morality works just as well without the metaphysical ghost-story nonsense.

I see that model as Europe during the middle ages when the church had lots of power that interfered with the day to day lives of people. This came to the head when King Henry VIII wanted to re-marry and the church did not allow him. Of course he married again and told the church to pi@& off. He instigated the separation of church from the state. The rest is history following the industrial revolution and modernisation in Europe. Bottom line there’s no place for religion in politics or in Henry’s case personal life... England got this right but somehow their interference in other countries’ politics always seems to be a stumbling block. It evolve around exploiting the various religious factions and create endless wars.....

“If these writings of the Greeks agree with the book of Allah, they are redundant, useless and need not be preserved; if they disagree, they are pernicious, and ought to be destroyed.” ---Caliph Omar upon learning that a vast number of books from the Library of Alexandria still existed. The books were then burnt to warm the saunas of Alexandria. A six month supply, apparently.