Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 12/16/2019 in all areas

  1. I am a businessman in ONT and you have no fucking clue to what you are saying. It is your ilk that is killing a great country.
    2 points
  2. This parliament has a majority of left wing parties. Left wing parties have no respect for freedom of speech or freedom of expression where it involves blaspheming against their sacred values (which change monthly). The entire NDP caucus, including the women, would get erections at the thought of laws to ban offensive speech. I don't think the SCC cares much for freedom of speech, freedom of association, freedom of religion, or freedom of expression where it involves anything offensive to progressive social values. I would not rely on the SCC to protect any of these things. Lawyers in Canada are indoctrinated with progressive social views in law school, which is why Harper wasn't able to find any conservatives to appoint.
    2 points
  3. 2 points
  4. That's a strawman, we're talking about free speech, not simply any gov decision /law regarding something not protected by Charter rights. It's not the same as banning cigarettes. You've not explained why. They keep dragging Zuckerberg in front of Congress about things like political ads. The heat is on to change things. I think Facebook as a company has an ethical responsibility to choose which ads they show. Whether Congress should make laws forcing him to change things is another matter. Depends why. I don't care if someone wants to express opinions that homosexual acts are immoral. That's their prerogative, and my prerogative to disagree. If you threaten gay people, that should be shut down. Half of twitter hates white people, they're a-holes but i don't want them arrested. if they threaten white people with violence, then i want them arrested. How offensive is too offensive, and who decides that? That's an extremely dangerous responsibility. I don't even believe in "hate speech" crimes. IMO hate speech is when you call for ie: violence or genocide against a group, which is already covered by other laws. If you hate Muslims, like who cares. It only becomes a problem when discriminatory or violent actions (or threats of actions in some cases) are taken against said groups, which is illegal as it should be. Is it the fault of the online hate sites that someone shoots a mosque, or is it the fault of the shooter themselves? You can hate someone without committing violence against them. Should twitter be shut down by government because a lot of users on there spread anti-white propaganda? A lot of people hate Trump too. If there's threats of violence on these anti-Muslim/anti-semite sites then those responsible should be charged with a crime as per the law. Dougie hates Canadians, should he be charged. Arabs can hate on Canada/Canadians all they want, they'll only be arrested when they start planning or threaten terror crimes. These fringe groups IMO simply need to be monitored for violent threats. Mein Kampf isn't banned in Canada. Chapters doesn't carry it, because Heather the CEO is Jewish and has chosen to not sell it as is her legal right. But the government doesn't ban it. Do you want to burn books Michael? Fahrenheit 451.
    2 points
  5. 1. No. Are you one of those people that thinks the government should decide which ideas are good or bad instead of public opinion? Public opinion has been the arbiter since the dawn of free speech rights, things have gone well. When the government is the arbiter, things don't go well. See every communist or fascist regime or absolute monarchy ever in history. See Fahrenheit 451, Animal Farm, and uhhh the Hunger Games. 2. Antisemitic propaganda ads, if allowed on Facebook or Youtube etc, would probably create a massive backlash from users and Facebook would suffer financially and then ban those ads. Antisemitic propaganda by chanters on the street would illicit boos and then be ignored. If antisemtic propaganda is physically threatening in any way the creators should be charged for violent threats. What exactly do you want banned online and on which websites? What's the specific problem you want addressed? 3. Ok.
    2 points
  6. Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays to all! And most importantly, a Joyful Solstice as the days will start getting longer soon! Yay! https://m.imgur.com/t/awesome/1KytDTQ
    1 point
  7. The hadith is weak and even as that it doesn't mean a man has the right to beat his wife it means he should not be made to say anything bad about his wife.
    1 point
  8. 1 point
  9. Trump made most of his money off daddy, then lost it it all until he was put into a reality TV show, then began to license his name on other people's buildings. This is a quote from his daughter in a documentary. "I remember once my father and I were walking down Fifth Avenue and there was a homeless person sitting right outside of Trump Tower and I remember my father pointing to him and saying, ‘You know, that guy has $8 billion more than me,’ because he was in such extreme debt at that point, you know?” Trump said on camera, seen at 4:15 below."
    1 point
  10. You mean you've made up and assigned some to me, using the typical far left mantra that anyone who is even mildly opposed to immigration or to any group coming in must be inspired by racism. That is simply due to your own fanaticism. Ideologues invent things about their ideological enemies. The far left cannot stand being contradicted on its sacred 'truths'. Everything I say is fact. If you question anything then ask and unlike you I'll provide the source. There's nothing I've said above I haven't said before, with sources and cites included. A cursory check. That's it. That's all. There isn't even an interview. Just a very quick scan of documents, most of them produced by private parties in third world countries, often by bribery, often forged. Not sure why you included a cite about elderly immigrants. There's nothing in it which contradicts what I said.
    1 point
  11. Why not? The Liberals sure did it during the last election. So did the Tories, for that matter.
    1 point
  12. Dougie stop pretending. You’re a Laurentian Elite. So am I. You can’t cash in your Toronto chips to live high on the hog in pastoral Wellington unless you drank that Kool Aid a long time ago. It’s okay. God forgives.
    1 point
  13. Michael, even though I may believe that that false story of refugees slaughtering goats in a hotel bathroom was intended to "promote hatred" ... NO, I can't imagine the courts concluding that "beyond a reasonable doubt". First, because the original publication of that claim online was by a possibly anonymous or fake 'customer' posting a fake review of the hotel on Trip Advisor. So that's the real perpetrator, but the hotel can't remove reviews. Did Trip Advisor remove that review? I don't know ... perhaps. Did police search out that poster to charge them with 'promoting hatred'? Very unlikely ... because repeating a rumour that you "believe" to be true absolves you under the law anyway. It became a much more public issue when Sue-Ann Levy opined about it in her usual nauseating manner, including repeating that fake 'review' ... in her column. She cited her source without verifying it's veracity, a journalistic fault but likely not a legal one: The courts could never prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Levy was intending to promote hatred against refugees. In fact, in responding to complaints, Levy determinedly maintained that her purpose was to bring attention to the plight of these refugees, brought to Canada, and then "abandoned" by the Liberal government. It is, as Moonlight Graham said, a very high bar to even lay charges under Section 319, and even moreso for obtaining a conviction in court that will stick through appeal and Supreme Court challenge.
    1 point
  14. People shouldn't be allowed to spread misinformation designed to provoke hate against their neighbours. Naturally, the worst offenders among us in this regard would immediately try to play the victim card and blame the big bad minority Liberals.
    1 point
  15. No...I am making the exact opposite case....Donald Trump isn't a saint...just like many previous American presidents. The FBI was used by many presidents under Hoover's reign for all kinds of harassment and dirty tricks. Why does Trump have to be squeaky clean ? So what ? FDR was leading America into a World War with the help of foreign actors ! Nothing special about the Bidens either...."opposition research" and "fake news" is perfectly legal. President Lincoln not only arrested his enemies and thousands of others, he also suspended freedom of the press and habeas corpus. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2001/11/lincoln-s-suspension-of-habeas-corpus.html https://quod.lib.umich.edu/j/jala/2629860.0005.103/--lincoln-administration-and-arbitrary-arrests?rgn=main;view=fulltext
    1 point
  16. Yes. There is much to dislike, disapprove, and distrust about Islam and its followers. The religion is violently chauvinistic and preaches distrust and hatred towards all unbelievers. It is also highly political in its ambitions to conquer the world and unite every state under Islam. Why would anyone who isn't a Muslim not disapprove of that or distrust its adherents? It's enforced social values are barbaric and backward and harken back centuries to the savagery of the middle east a thousand years ago. Why would we want to welcome it into Canada or expand the number of its followers here? That doesn't mean that we 'hate' Muslims. It just means that we have rendered an informed judgement as to the wisdom of having them come here.
    1 point
  17. Personally I don't hate anyone, but the deniers like to frame any disagreement as hate.
    1 point
  18. I have ALWAYS said that our minerals and bitumen will never be happy as long as we pay so much attention to human health and we'll being !
    1 point
  19. I think someone just got offended Here you go... MAY THE DIVINE GLORY OF OUR SAVIOUR FILL YOUR HUNGRY SOUL THIS SEASON. Christ, I even need that on Boxing Day...
    1 point
  20. Imagine their heads if Trump can extends his term by 3 years... no election in 2020 https://dailyworldupdate.us/supreme-court-can-extend-trumps-term-by-up-to-3-years-if-hes-acquitted-in-the-senate/
    1 point
  21. Stage 1 is done for content and distribution method only because of Stage 2. Russian rap music and hip-hop in blue jeans is still an artifact of that era. Canadian influence has been there going back to Fay Wray in King Kong (1933), but again largely dependent on the American media machine. There may have been a time when Montreal (not Toronto) had major print media impact on eastern North America. The CRTC exists because of backlash against early American radio and television dominance....there is no modern equivalent information age defense. So what we usually see is focus and energy expended to recognize successful Canadians in American media. There are some notable exceptions like Cirque du Soleil that rise to the top based on niche excellence and international appeal. Blocking ISPs is tantamount to admitting defeat, driving access underground. You have pointed out many times that Canadians want access to American media...and I would add access to American media platforms. It's not like America is purposely bombarding a jammed Canada with Voice of America or Radio Free Europe propaganda...Canadians freely spend their money or pirate the content willingly. Very difficult for government to stop that.
    1 point
  22. The Americans aren't the only ones. It seems to a substantial portion of the Left, doing something to piss of traditionalists, patriots, conservatives, etc. is by far the best use of their time. Thus you have the nonsense in Brazil of that 'movie' depicting Jesus as gay, or the painting in Mexico which is drawing furious mobs which shows national hero Zapata naked wearing a pink hat. It's all aimed at sticking it to the traditionalists and showing how little respect they, the left, have for traditions and cultural values of their countries. Ironically, these are the same people who are almost fanatical about everyone showing utter respect if not open reverence for the cultural and religious traditions of minorities. I read a piece today in Quillette which talked about the Conservative win in the British election and the shifting bases of support between them and Labour. it suggested the working class voter is abandoning Labour because Labour has abandoned them in favor of urban elites and immigrants. And that all they get from Labourites is denigrated and treated with contempt because of their 'traditional' views and attitudes about love of God and Queen and country. Sounds very similar to what we see in the US and Canada.
    1 point
  23. Certainly not....President Trump used the power of his office...same as previous American presidents. Why does Trump have to be the Boy Scout ?
    1 point
  24. China's present retrenchment into Stalinism is not a sign of strength, Beijing is panicking because they know they are losing control. Beijing foolishly lashing out at Canada is another sign of panic.
    1 point
  25. This is why you know nothing of history, you're only capable of seeing what you want to see.
    1 point
  26. Trump has gotten into Trudeau's head....and Macron's too.
    1 point
  27. If I own a business, and I have ten employees working for me, who are paid the minimum wage, and I am now being told that I have to raise everyone's salaries, I would seriously have to think as to whether I should take a drop in my own income or lay two people off. I think that two people will be laid off. Now what? They now either go on unemployment, or they must try to look for another minimum wage paying salary with another business owner. What is killing all businesses in Canada today is just plain too much government, too much bureaucracy, too many rules and regulations, and too many taxes. It is the government that causes inflation and unemployment. The government is here to promote, not stifle, the growth of jobs, and not try to build up a bureaucracy, as they seem to be always trying to do all the time, which then creates more new taxes to run that bureaucracy for the taxpayer to have to pay for. There can be no doubt about it that the "government "IS" the problem". Downsize politicians and bureaucrats, now. Works for me.
    1 point
  28. 1 point
  29. 1 point
×
×
  • Create New...