Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 05/25/2017 in all areas
-
By today's standards, yes, they are lackluster but when they were first released those early movies were golden to Bond fans.2 points
-
It could happen in Canada, yes as according to this we shouldn`t be complacent about it. http://cnews.canoe.com/CNEWS/Canada/2017/05/24/22726489.html Asking why it hasn’t happened yet is perhaps more to the point. That’s because we’ve already got jihadists like Salman Abedi, the 22-year-old behind the horrific concert attack, right here on home turf. Dozens of them. Perhaps over a hundred. How do we know this? Because the heads of our security agencies say so. They’ve compiled the lists, they have the names and have some sense of where the radicals are at. The only thing they haven’t done is charge them.2 points
-
Why would he? You make it clear by your question you have already rendered the conclusion there is not one good thing about Islam. You express a conclusion that makes it clear you are not serious in entertaining any position other than your own. Get it clear. He has not defended Muslim extremism, fundamentalism, terrorism or any other thought process in the name of Islam or ANY religion that defends violence. What position he has taken and I stand by him on is that you do not distinguish between Muslims-you label them all as evil. That is clear in your comments, and that renders your comments as extreme, hateful and as potentially violent as the very thought processes engaged in by Muslim and other extremists and terrorists. Your thought processes if I may use that reference, are no different than those who engage in the terrorist attacks in the name of Islam. You no more represent me or anyone like me who detests Muslim violence anymore than Muslim terrorists represent Muslims.2 points
-
You again label all Muslims as savages. Of course your comment is nonsensical You are very well aware there are insufficient numbers to be able to conduct surveillance on such a scale. Furthermore common sense would tell you that it would be insufficient as the vast majority of people you would have under surveillance simply because they are "Muslim" would not be doing anything warranting surveillance. Next and again common sense would tell you, there is no way of knowing who is "Muslim" just by looking at them. Muslims come in every shape, colour and size. They don't wear Muslim badges that say Hi I am Muslim follow me. You clearly do not understand how intelligence and in fact counter-intelligence operations work. You have this simplistic notion you can label an entire group of people as evil and "watch" them. Yah I know. In the good old days with Hitler you could put yellow Stars or Pink Triangles on them and lock them up. Ah the good old days. Do everyone a favour. Hide under your bed. Clearly the sight of anyone with a tan frightens you.2 points
-
Yah terrorism is defensive. Thanks for the analysis. Terrorism is not defensive. That is what we are talking about. You don't speak for all Muslims. Your imaginary projection that all Muslims are on the defensive is a crock. You engage in stereotypes of Muslims no different than the other bigots on this thread. You lump them all under one label and assign them common attributes. Your words are bigoted. Muslims do not need you as their spokesperson labeling them all as victims. You patronize.2 points
-
The first EO was amended and clarified to not include legal resident aliens. If fewer illegals result from the mere threat of Trump's travel ban, then it is a good thing.1 point
-
They have a campy style to them. Best in marathon form...uncut. Plus...one has to remember...in a film like You Only Live Twice...some of the 'high-tech gadgets' are standard fare today if not replaced...the Bell UH-1 Huey Iroquois/Hog for example....which was featured...was still pretty new to everybody. Or Goldfinger...with the affordable, sporty Piper PA-28 Cherokee...futuristic.1 point
-
So what their number is increasing in Canada? Are you going to blame every single muslim in Canada for the actions of one person? I am bemused why no one realises such rhetorics is what groups like ISIS are hoping for to create a rift. and btw how can any sane person call this war on terror whilst Trump just signed a $110bn arms contract with sunni wahabi Saudi Arabia??? There is no limit to hypocrisy....1 point
-
I'm perfectly willing to accept your version of the events but you can't expect me to just accept anonymous internet guy's word for it. I'm still interested in where you got your information. I've managed to get out of you that it's an "alternative" source but you don't seem to want to reveal much more. That's always suspicious to me when anonymous internet guys do that.1 point
-
I'm pretty sure I never saw his earliest Bond movies, but I've got a couple of Connery Bond movies and they kind of suck.1 point
-
In tonight's game 7 of the Eastern Conference final, I urge the Sens to bore the Pens to death in order to steal a win to advance to the Stanley Cup.1 point
-
Freedom of expression is a protected Charter right....not backpack homicide bombs detonated for Allah.1 point
-
Neighbors always say that about the next door neighbor who killed people or kept teenagers locked in bedrooms, boxes or sheds for years. These incidents don't make every man a suspect for murder or holding teenage prisoners.1 point
-
I do...but hey our liberal friends think I am insane. Trudeau is going to turn Canada into another Muslim country at the rate he is surrounding himself with Muslims in his cabinet who happen to be anti semitic....1 point
-
I don't see any jew or christian blowing themselves up in the name of religion. Muslims do...How is that narrow minded?1 point
-
Is there anyone who doesn't believe that once the muslim numbers increase in Canada, we'll start seeing terrorist attacks too and look very much like France, Germany and England? IOW - does anyone not understand that we're inviting terrorism into our lives?1 point
-
1 point
-
All that's being protected, or more to the point neglected, is western complicity in causing terrorism. I'm not for or with ISIS at all, I'm strictly against western right-wing conservatism, the root cause of virtually everything that's so cocked-up in the world.1 point
-
Won't happen. If Notley tries to beat the box office by calling an election in order to hold it ahead of the merger, she knows she'll lose to the Wildrose at the moment. If she waits, she'll lose to the United Conservatives of Alberta. Either way, she's one and done and she and her party know it. I'm pretty sure she'll hold out until the very, very last second to drop the writ - if the NDP have any hope in hell of being reelected, it will be because they collect all the dirt they can on the new merged party and its members. That and she wants to introduce into law every possible "left winged" idea she can so she'll have a legacy of sorts. Notley is likely to be the last NDP premiere for decades and very possibly the last female premiere for a very long time after our string of failed female leaders in this province. First there was Redford who tainted everything she touched and left office in disgrace, then there was Smith (who I actually liked) who toasted her political career in the "deal with the devil", and now there's Notley who is a complete train wreck. Albertans have memories like elephants politically, so future NDP will pay the price for every perceived "mistake" she makes. There will be no election until May 31, 2019.1 point
-
Does ISIS recruit people by quoting the Quran where it forbids murder or conversion by the sword? Or does it use the verses you delight in posting here to persuade believers it is their sacred duty to blow themselves and others up? Does ISIS allow for Muslims to consider Jihad a personal struggle, or does it insist that all Muslims must engage in violent Jihad or be considered apostate, as you do? You spread ISIS' violent message for them. You, along with ISIS, deny that Muslims can follow a peaceful interpretation of Islam and still be true to the Quran's teachings.1 point
-
Nazism found a common denominator in Islam which proved very useful during the final stages of the Holocaust.1 point
-
I would like to ask if anyone thinks Douglas Murray is an Islamophobe for his campaign against Islamism and accommodation in the UK. He is, after all, a gay man, and polls posted here have shown more than half of British Muslims think all homosexuals should be in prison. So is his dislike of Islam 'unreasonable and unfounded'?1 point
-
In other words, when moderate Muslims say that Islam has nothing to do with this, they are the ones, in my humble view, who are seeding the ground, who are handing over the ground of theological interpretation to those who already have malignant intentions. But we have to acknowledge that there are verses that terrorists are using, and that they should not have the last word. You can't do that if you're going to say Islam has nothing to do with this violence. - Irshad Manji1 point
-
Muslims aren't terrorists? I think that would probably be news to the victims in Manchester. Not that you care about THEM, of course.1 point
-
ISIS applauds DoP and Gohs for spreading their message of violence and denying the right of Muslims to choose peace and still call themselves Muslim.1 point
-
It is important to remember that Islam needs protection from any criticism. This fact is far more important than a few dead people at a concert: Islam is a great religion...your children...not nearly as great. And certainly your children are expendable: if they were good Muslims, they are now in paradise as they died in the act of Jihad. If they weren't good Muslims, the proper eternity in Hell-fire awaits. All is well.1 point
-
Omni is exactly where I want him: defending Islam in the the latest Islamic horror show.1 point
-
Ah, well...Manchester is a good thing to you then. Poor Islam getting its licks in.1 point
-
Of course lefties realize people are being killed. Who, what and why is what's at issue between us and the bonehead stupid righties who insist on believing religion is all there is to it.1 point
-
PM Trudeau is slowly running away from ISIS fight...as expected. http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/sajjan-iraq-isis-cp-140-1.41292191 point
-
Some would prefer absolute quiet as near as I can tell. No discussion of Islam at all. They seem to think Islam's aggressiveness is the result of modern Western bigotry. This does not explain why Charles Martel had the same problems with Islam...heh.1 point
-
1 point
-
There was already a "movement" in the U.S. that kept Hillary Clinton out of the White house. The movement was led by Donald Trump.1 point
-
More gruesome details emerging: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/05/24/leaked-pictures-show-bomb-used-manchester-attack/ Appears that the bomb was remote-controlled in the case that the martyr on his mission to meet allah and 72 virgins got cold feet at the crucial moment. Most probably the death-toll could have been much higher.1 point
-
I specifically make the claim against certain groups/people within the US government. Your tactic of criticism equaling hate for all of them is nothing but idiocy.1 point
-
How do you judge someone lazy upon a brief meeting? Why would you say someone who is of average height is short? Why would you describe him as genuine and good but say he'd never beat Trudeau?1 point
-
Now let me deal directly with the above pathetic recruitment attempt. Jewish Voice for Peace is a tactic whereby violent anti Jewish extremists use Jews as a cover to hide their violent anti semitic beliefs. The reasoning goes if a Jew supports BDS or for that matter anti-Semitism then it must be o.k. Once again this tactic is called: "Good Jews and bad Jews" is a common argumentative dichotomy, whereby "good Jews" are those who happen to agree with a person's positive stereotypes regarding how those who happen to practice Judaism or are of Jewish ancestry should behave (and, hence, ought to be protected from criticism) and "bad Jews" are those who fulfill negative stereotypes about how those same individuals should not behave. Either straw-man "group" can be a majority or minority, but both usually fulfill the lowest expectations (by non-Jews, usually those in historically-Christian- or Muslim-dominated territories) of how a Jewish person should be perceived. source:http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Good_Jews_and_Bad_Jew One of the most pathetic tactics by terrorists and violent anti semites is to try use Jews as a cover to try make their hatred of Jews acceptable. You won't ever see people who use the above tactic ever acknowledge that Muslims support Israel's right to exist.. Using their logic if a Jew hates a Jew and joins anti-Semitic violent haters then it can't be anti semitic. The tactic is as basic an anti-Semitic canard as it comes. In the Muslim world of sharia law where a Jew is defined as a khafir or dhimmi, an inferior infidel unable to own land or have the same rights to a nation or land or anything else a Muslim has, the concept believes a god Jew is one who knows their place, i.e., stateless and of inferior rights. The only way a Jew ceases being an infidel is to convert to Islam but if they insist on remaining a Jew, then they must remain in t heir place. In the Christian world it meant the same thing only if you were a Jew, you were like in the Muslim world cursed to going to hell until you accepted Jesus as your saviour. If not that, then you could not own land and must assume your place as a descendent of cursed, lying, wicked people-in otherwords the same belief as Muslim religion had of Jews only with Muslims, the only salvation was through Muhammed. So today when addressing the Jewish collective the tactic of stereotyping a good Jew as one who does not believe they have a collective identity and knows their place is trotted out each and every time there is a pretense to start a thread questioning the right of Jews to be a national collective. A good Jew would never do that. Only a bad Jew would be a Zionist. The problem is BDS does not and has never differentiated between Zionist and non Zionist Jews. In fact the Jews duped and recruited into BDS have mostly fled when the riots began and enlightened progressive leftists in BDS begin spitting and throwing things at Jews, demand Jews be fired from any professorships or positions at universities and engage in words that ridicule Judaism and all Jews and deny the holocaust which BDS has done and continues to do. BDS was never about just boycotting Israeli settlements and its why no BDS supporter has the integrity to come on this site, admit they support Hamas and the other terrorist groups who use BDS as a front. They won't admit their Muslim extremist beliefs. They won't reveal their true names and agendas. Therein lies the difference. I do not hide I am a Jew and support the right to any Jew to have the same rights as Muslims. Hindus, Christians, Buddhists. I don't hide my religious beliefs and I have not been taught a Jew is an infidel and the only good Jew is one who will not deman equality to a Muslim, i.e., the same right to a nation or own land. Here see for yourself what a farse Jews For Peace is https://www.adl.org/blog/convicted-terrorist-to-address-jewish-voice-for-peace-conference-in-chicago I also ask this forum, when did anyone come on this site and say they were Palestinian? Who has come on this site other than Altai and say they are Muslim? When has anyone come on this site and said they agree with Hamas and Hezbollah and Al Quaeda? Hell no. The coded word for that though I contend, is BDS. You want to piss on a Jew, replace the word Jew with Israel. You want to support terrorism but make it sound like you are just a leftist boycotter, call it BDS. Why do you think that is? Why do you think people use this forum to recruit members for "Jewish Voice For Peace" but you've never seen anyone come on this forum recruiting you to the Jewish world conspiracy or the illuminati or the shapeshifter dracos, or the Yankee imperialist empire, etc. Why? Would Hot Enough admit he quotes Jewish Voice For Peace precisely because they advocate a terrorist violently overthrow of Israel? When was the last time anyone read or saw a poster say they were Palestinian or Muslim and advocate the violent overthrow of Israel on this forum? You think it will ever happen? Hell no but the Jew card, the good Jew bad Jew card, it never fails to make its way on to such threads or the use of Palestinian babies to depict all Israelis as baby killers. This thread is a lame pretext for supporting terrorism couched by three letters BDS. It only needs 2 letters B and S.1 point
-
1 point
