All Activity

You have NO EVIDENCE he beat his wife. Did you even see the tattoo they're CLAIMING is ASSOCIATED with Nazis? I've never seen it before, and Platner got it when he was 18 serving in Iraq, because his platoon mates ALL GOT IT. IOW, you're a desperate LIAR as USUAL.

Ya don't say

Yeah, well I've made it quite clear why I think increasing our population is still the wrong thing to do. I also think investing in foreign economic development is a good by idea because the more affluent societies tend to be the fewer babies they have. Meanwhile conservatives still say we need to increase the human population. WTF is wrong with you people?

I'm not obsessed with that at all. I've also made it clear why I'm not interested in growing our population. But you only see what you want to see. Guess what, so am I! How do you explain that? Could you be wrong perhaps? Sure...the left is destroying the world the economy and all your most cherished hopes and dreams. So why hasn't the right simply picked up their weapons and put a stop to it? You need to whine about it for another 50-60 years or something?

Fetterman is a lefty, but he is not a left wing nut job. Just like we tossed the cross dressing, grifter, they should dump Graham. But they won't. They are power hungry. They don't care if they vote for a wife beating NAZI.

WTF? I'm not remotely shocked that Anthony was found guilty. I'm not even shocked at the VAST difference in how you people have aligned to support white killers in similar circumstances and aligned against a Black defendant applying the same defense. But in spite of not being shocked, I am always deeply disappointed in how many of you casually deny the fact of a two-tiered justice system. And the bias is so baked in that you often don't even know you're doing it. In your mind, Anthony was a calculating murderer who miscalculated. You think asking about self defense is damning, because you damned him from day 1, not because it's actually damning. In truth, Anthony was outmatched, and outnumbered--the same disparity of force you acknowledge elsewhere. He stabbed once and fled. When he was arrested he was a sobbing mess and the first thing he said was "I was protecting myself." "The suspect was crying hysterically." "The suspect asked me 'is he going to be ok?'" Yes, after he was arrested he asked about self defense. Which you have spun into evidence of being cold and calculating. But that's clearly not the case. He was highly emotional. He definitely intended to stab Metcalf in the moment, but it's also clear that he didn't try to kill him (one stab) and wasn't even aware that he had killed him. He just knew he'd stabbed somebody. It would have been far more appropriate to convict him of a lesser sentence. But no, I'm not at all surprised that he was convicted. As I said, I'm disappointed by the automatic gravitational alignment by race, particularly when conservatives have been so eager and so vocally in support of equivalent self defense or SYG claims by white defendants.

Independence from whom/what?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Iran_war_fuel_crisis If you think the US is still seen as favourably it was before Trump’s return, I can’t help you. Trump and Co. think they can behave like random Internet loons trolling the world and not face consequences. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jun/15/indian-outrage-over-us-killing-of-sailors-mounts-as-leaders-attend-g7-summit They’ll need India’s help down the line.

It's not impossible that something untoward happened, but those kinds of shifts in distribution aren't any kind of evidence, let alone proof. Those kinds of voting patterns are not even statistically improbably, let alone impossible. It looks like that was about 60-something percent of the vote reported by June 3. You SHOULD NOT expect the vote distribution to hold going forward, particularly when considering differences in voting patterns by area and method. And, don't forget, this is just a primary. Pratt wouldn't have been competitive in a general election anyway. So the idea that there was a conspiracy to cheat to exclude Pratt from an election in which he wouldn't be competitive seems pretty far fetched. Why? To what end are people taking such risks for no reward?

As usual with Trump, there is utter confusion about what has been agreed and with whom. It will take days to weeks to see what has happened here and which parties feel bound by it.

Hodad... You're sitting here trying to pretend that Karmelo should have been found innocent, against all reason, then you posted this: The fact that you were shocked when Karmelo was found guilty is like a death-blow to your credibility on this issue. Karmelo killed someone. 100%, no doubt, there were witnesses and he even confessed. He didn't even know if it was in self-defence, and all of the witnesses thought it was not. He just babbled to the police. Buddy, Karmelo murdered someone and was found guilty of it. I'm not sure what's left to say. It was not self-defence, and he belongs in jail.

Remind me how the US handles votes for independence.

The only one playing a dumb game is you. It's right there for everyone to see, I can see it you can see it goddess can see it everyone looking at this thread can see it you're being a line sack of shit And I'm not interested in playing appease the liberal for you Okay any government did not warn its people substantially about the rest. They should have. They have not stood behind people who have suffered as a result. They should have. Every one of your questions was answered above right after you ask them and everyone can see it. You're being a pathetic little liberal snake No he isn't. And stop calling him Shirley

Nothing to do with Trump, of course. What rubbish.

Nobody is saying you have to be an immunologist or a virologist or an epidemiologist. But surely you are basing your decisions on more than just emotional hysteria.

That was largely my point too. If you want to inspire trust and give people confidence in believing in your recommended course of action you need to be honest. You need to let people know what the real risks are and then why you feel it's worth it. And you need to stand behind them afterward if there are problems, and spreading hatred about people who don't agree with you is not helping If you don't do these things then next time more people question and distrust. it makes things WORSE. Just be honest about the risks, and if there are unexpected consequences stand beside people. That would have been nothing wrong with saying 'This is still in the development phases and we can't say with certainty what risks there might be but we honestly believe that for most people the risks are lower than the risks they will face from covid itself based on the information we have today. You will have to make your own decisions" I think you shamed yourself enough in this thread that you got in any position to criticize any information anyone else brings forward

Copy and paste...2 clicks is to easy to pi$$ you off LOSER HA HA HA All you deserve is an endless loop. Enjoy it LOSER Once again Ahhh yes, back to pedophile and insulting dead people. Typical LOSER response when LOSING with every post you make HA. HA HA So sad you have such reading issues LOSER so, here it is for the third time HA HA HA "Oh...did you miss it the last time LOSER??? LOL Here it is for you again LOSER I am sure you have seen this before but you do not seem to get it so, here it is again LOSER LOL LOL LOL As usual, a zero value post from a ZERO LOSER LOL LOL LOL A LOSER like you does not deserve anything new. I repeat so you won't forget you are a complete ZERO LOSER and need your equally ZERO LOSER buddy veradahbouy to back you up HA HA HA No meltdown...that is what happens to you when I tap dance in your LOSER head LOL LOL LOL Once again, your post only proves confux the LOSER is suffering from blatherskite HA HA HA

Knowledgable… enough. You want to play this dumb game here where you find some tidbit of information someone doesn’t know to impugn them as being too stupid to talk to or that because I’m not a lifelong immunologist I can’t know anything… It is one of the dumbest logical fallacies.

No, I just assumed since you're here pretending to be knowledgeable about every vaccine that you would have an opinion based on more than just.......emotion. My bad.

Listen, once again, this is your little way to get off, playing this dumb game. If you want to keep talking, go back to the lengthy post I made where I responded to you and you ignored it.

The point I'm making is that we need to assess the benefits of vaccination rationally and objectively, not hysterically and instinctively, as User is doing by having emotional meltdowns when presented with facts, yelling that millions of children would die without them. That is categorically false. You can ignore the rate of decline for each childhood disease prior to a vaccine being invented if you want, but let's suspend reality and assume User is right and the majority of decline is due to vaccines. The reality is that the rate of decline for the last 2-10% mortality, either was the same or slower after introduction of a vaccine. Vaccines did not make the rate decline faster. And in some cases, deaths increased after a vaccine was introduced. For some reason, User believes strongly that INCREASED deaths after a vaccine introduction, is evidence of a safe & effective vaccine. I'll let you all work through that one, mentally, on your own. Total deaths are still nowhere near millions. Not hundreds of thousands, not tens of thousands, not even high thousands. Even accounting for population increase, claiming that vaccines save millions of lives every year is an exaggeration and the data does not show that, because these diseases were rapidly declining BEFORE a vaccine. That claim is off. But a very large amount. For some diseases, deaths are so low that they are only estimated, making any claimed reduction for those ones, entirely speculative. This is not diminishing any death. All deaths are tragic. Including deaths from vaccines. User views vaccine deaths as acceptable collateral damage. F*ck THOSE kids, amirite? If Big Pharma is lying to you about this, do you think they might be lying about the number of deaths FROM vaccines? It is in their best financial interests to keep the public hysterical about childhood diseases, which were nearly eliminated without the use of vaccines, and in the dark about the number of vaccine injuries.

Good question. I don't remember anyplace treating Biden for NPD, but his TDS would've been exacerbated had he been treated here:

Of course i did. right after you asked the questions It's there for you to see, for me to see, for everyone to see. So what you're really doing is trying to cover the fact you were a lying asswipe who was wrong from minute one but too much of a coward to admit it. It's RIGHT THERE. EVERYTHING you asked got answered, and right away. Till you started asking the same thing over and over despite the fact it had been answered The gov't did not substantially warn the public of the risk, THey should have, they have not stood behind people who suffered from the shot, they should, you're a twat, you shouldn't be. THat simple and the rest is you being a crybaby coward instead of facing facts you don't like

I've been saying that before the Iran War. Whether you like trump or not or agree with his policies or not he should have been extremely vulnerable politically if the other side was organized or had its crap together in any meaningful fashion And yet somehow they're managing to do worse than Trump. My expectation is they'll still pick up some seats in the midterms because that happens literally with every single president ever. They always lose a little support in the midterms

This is victimization nonsense, and just more of the race-baiting garbage that the Democrats peddle. These kinds of lies have consequences, as they radicalize young men like Karmelo Anthony to illogically hate white people for no reason.