CrakHoBarbie Posted February 2 Report Posted February 2 In the recent Epstein file release, (obtained by the House Oversight Committee via subpoena to Epstein's estate), in an email exchange between Epstein and someone identified only as "SP", where they were discussing plans for an NYC visit. The most notable part of the email chain is when Epstein stated, "trump will be there. doesnt like black girls,, calls them 'boogers', wont go w in 10 feet". Keep in mind, this is an email from 2013. Three years before donald became president. Just a reminder to "SP", to let him know donald likes his jail bait "White". And, surprisingly, he doesn't eat "Boogers" Quote
User Posted February 2 Report Posted February 2 I mean... sure, if you are in the habit of believing people like Epstein. Quote
Deluge Posted February 2 Report Posted February 2 13 hours ago, CrakHoBarbie said: In the recent Epstein file release, (obtained by the House Oversight Committee via subpoena to Epstein's estate), in an email exchange between Epstein and someone identified only as "SP", where they were discussing plans for an NYC visit. The most notable part of the email chain is when Epstein stated, "trump will be there. doesnt like black girls,, calls them 'boogers', wont go w in 10 feet". Keep in mind, this is an email from 2013. Three years before donald became president. Just a reminder to "SP", to let him know donald likes his jail bait "White". And, surprisingly, he doesn't eat "Boogers" I'm sure black girls call Trump a lot worse names than "Booger". This is a nothing burger. 1 Quote
Nationalist Posted February 2 Report Posted February 2 13 hours ago, CrakHoBarbie said: In the recent Epstein file release, (obtained by the House Oversight Committee via subpoena to Epstein's estate), in an email exchange between Epstein and someone identified only as "SP", where they were discussing plans for an NYC visit. The most notable part of the email chain is when Epstein stated, "trump will be there. doesnt like black girls,, calls them 'boogers', wont go w in 10 feet". Keep in mind, this is an email from 2013. Three years before donald became president. Just a reminder to "SP", to let him know donald likes his jail bait "White". And, surprisingly, he doesn't eat "Boogers" And? Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
WestCanMan Posted February 2 Report Posted February 2 (edited) 13 hours ago, CrakHoBarbie said: In the recent Epstein file release, (obtained by the House Oversight Committee via subpoena to Epstein's estate), in an email exchange between Epstein and someone identified only as "SP", where they were discussing plans for an NYC visit. The most notable part of the email chain is when Epstein stated, "trump will be there. doesnt like black girls,, calls them 'boogers', wont go w in 10 feet". Keep in mind, this is an email from 2013. Three years before donald became president. Just a reminder to "SP", to let him know donald likes his jail bait "White". And, surprisingly, he doesn't eat "Boogers" I can write an email to anyone and say that CrakHo hates anything. I can even say that CrakHo is planning to kill someone. If I send that email to someone, does that become proof that you are plotting a murder? The only thing we have learned from that email is: Nothing. It's not proof that Trump was going to meet Epstein, it's not proof that Trump shared info about that preference. It's a conversation that Trump wasn't a party to, period. Also, we already know that the FBI was found guilty of altering one email and presenting it as evidence to the FISA court, so the whole notion of "emails from 13 years ago as evidence of anything" is really dead. Edited February 2 by WestCanMan Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. "I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul "It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot
Hodad Posted February 2 Report Posted February 2 40 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: I can write an email to anyone and say that CrakHo hates anything. I can even say that CrakHo is planning to kill someone. If I send that email to someone, does that become proof that you are plotting a murder? The only thing we have learned from that email is: Nothing. It's not proof that Trump was going to meet Epstein, it's not proof that Trump shared info about that preference. It's a conversation that Trump wasn't a party to, period. Also, we already know that the FBI was found guilty of altering one email and presenting it as evidence to the FISA court, so the whole notion of "emails from 13 years ago as evidence of anything" is really dead. Well, ^^this is fascinating. You've completely reinvented your standards of evidence in service to Dear Leader. And you're not even a little embarrassed about becoming a poster child for parasocial relationships. It's not like we're "discovering" that Trump is a virulent racist. That's very old news. Whether it's truth or fiction (let's be real, very likely true) you don't mind either way. So why are you even pretending to care if he was dismissive and disrespectful Black girls? 2 Quote
User Posted February 2 Report Posted February 2 4 minutes ago, Hodad said: Well, ^^this is fascinating. You've completely reinvented your standards of evidence in service to Dear Leader. And you're not even a little embarrassed about becoming a poster child for parasocial relationships. It's not like we're "discovering" that Trump is a virulent racist. That's very old news. Whether it's truth or fiction (let's be real, very likely true) you don't mind either way. So why are you even pretending to care if he was dismissive and disrespectful Black girls? There is no standard of evidence in an absurd baseless assertion that makes no sense. Quote
CrakHoBarbie Posted February 2 Author Report Posted February 2 2 hours ago, Hodad said: Well, ^^this is fascinating. You've completely reinvented your standards of evidence in service to Dear Leader. And you're not even a little embarrassed about becoming a poster child for parasocial relationships. It's not like we're "discovering" that Trump is a virulent racist. That's very old news. Whether it's truth or fiction (let's be real, very likely true) you don't mind either way. So why are you even pretending to care if he was dismissive and disrespectful Black girls? Its amazing watching all donnies sycophants come here and make any and every excuse under the sun in support of their Jesus. For them, it doesn't matter what is revealed in the files. It doesn't matter how damning the proof nor how compelling the evidence. In their tiny minds, any evidence against Jesus must be fraudulent. Because Jesus says so. 1 Quote
Nationalist Posted February 2 Report Posted February 2 4 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said: Its amazing watching all donnies sycophants come here and make any and every excuse under the sun in support of their Jesus. For them, it doesn't matter what is revealed in the files. It doesn't matter how damning the proof nor how compelling the evidence. In their tiny minds, any evidence against Jesus must be fraudulent. Because Jesus says so. Barb...Brandon eulegized a KKK guy... I think you've hit the pipe enough today dear... Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Deluge Posted February 2 Report Posted February 2 5 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said: Its amazing watching all donnies sycophants come here and make any and every excuse under the sun in support of their Jesus. For them, it doesn't matter what is revealed in the files. It doesn't matter how damning the proof nor how compelling the evidence. In their tiny minds, any evidence against Jesus must be fraudulent. Because Jesus says so. Jesus will come to burn the wicked. Will he vaporize crime cultists (leftists), or will he vaporize American patriots (us)? It's obvious that he will vaporize the crime cultists. Quote
User Posted February 2 Report Posted February 2 7 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said: Its amazing watching all donnies sycophants come here and make any and every excuse under the sun in support of their Jesus. For them, it doesn't matter what is revealed in the files. It doesn't matter how damning the proof nor how compelling the evidence. In their tiny minds, any evidence against Jesus must be fraudulent. Because Jesus says so. Fraudulent? It's a baseless assertion made by a third party with no evidence. That is not evidence. As was already pointed out here, if I email someone the forum and tell them you are a pedophile. Are you a pedophile? Is that evidence you are one? Quote
BeaverFever Posted February 2 Report Posted February 2 3 hours ago, WestCanMan said: I can write an email to anyone and say that CrakHo hates anything. I can even say that CrakHo is planning to kill someone. If I send that email to someone, does that become proof that you are plotting a murder? The only thing we have learned from that email is: Nothing. It's not proof that Trump was going to meet Epstein, it's not proof that Trump shared info about that preference. It's a conversation that Trump wasn't a party to, period. Also, we already know that the FBI was found guilty of altering one email and presenting it as evidence to the FISA court, so the whole notion of "emails from 13 years ago as evidence of anything" is really dead. Great now do all the emails mentioning Hunter Biden or “the big guy” 1 1 Quote
User Posted February 2 Report Posted February 2 1 minute ago, BeaverFever said: Great now do all the emails mentioning Hunter Biden or “the big guy” Those were emails literally to Hunter Biden regarding a business deal he was literally a part of. It was not some third party emailing someone else. Quote
BeaverFever Posted February 2 Report Posted February 2 30 minutes ago, User said: Those were emails literally to Hunter Biden regarding a business deal he was literally a part of. It was not some third party emailing someone else. A lot of the conspiracies are third party claims including confirmation of who “the big guy” is. Quote
WestCanMan Posted February 2 Report Posted February 2 25 minutes ago, BeaverFever said: Great now do all the emails mentioning Hunter Biden or “the big guy” OK. All the emails mentioning "Hunter" and "the big guy" are corroborated by the story of a man who was willing to show his face on TV, and who was a know business associate of Hunter who has provided relevant documents that he signed with Hunter, and whose story is further corroborated by the laptop that the FBI verified to be Hunter's. Furthermore, Hunter and Joe both vowed several times that Joe had nothing to do with any of Hunter's overseas businesses, including Burisma, and they were proven to have been lying about that, which 1) destroys the Biden's credibility in this matter and 2) tells us that they were hiding something. Joe Biden was caught on video bragging about taking a drastic action against the Ukrainian gov't which directly helped Hunter's boss at Burisma, without achieving much else. Are we done here? I think you should just go see a dominatrix or something, to work your shit out, instead of coming to me for your spankings. Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. "I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul "It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot
User Posted February 2 Report Posted February 2 10 minutes ago, BeaverFever said: A lot of the conspiracies are third party claims including confirmation of who “the big guy” is. We are not talking about a lot of conspiracies. The discussion was on your absurd comparison of Epstein emailing someone else, making an unfounded, baseless assertion about Trump in that email to an email TO Hunter Biden from someone Hunter Biden was actively engaged in business with on a business plan Hunter was involved in about "the big guy" That is not a conspiracy. That is a fact. We also have the IRS Whistle Blowers talking about who "the big guy" was as well as the person who used the phrase in the email. No conspiracy. Quote
CDN1 Posted February 2 Report Posted February 2 (edited) Well, Black women do make up the bottom rungs of the dating market. Pretty standard, according to all the studies that have been done on it. Not even Black men prefer them these days. So, Trump's no Lockjaw.... Edited February 2 by CDN1 Quote
CrakHoBarbie Posted February 2 Author Report Posted February 2 50 minutes ago, CDN1 said: Well, Black women do make up the bottom rungs of the dating market. Pretty standard, according to all the studies that have been done on it. Not even Black men prefer them these days. So, Trump's no Lockjaw.... You poor delusional fool. Some of the most attractive women in the World, have been women of color. You must have bumped your head. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted February 3 Report Posted February 3 This is such a booger of a thread. 2 1 Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
herbie Posted February 3 Report Posted February 3 Knowing what a P.O.S. the man is, does that surprise anyone? 1 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted February 3 Report Posted February 3 6 hours ago, Hodad said: Well, ^^this is fascinating. You've completely reinvented your standards of evidence in service to Dear Leader. And you're not even a little embarrassed about becoming a poster child for parasocial relationships. It's not like we're "discovering" that Trump is a virulent racist. That's very old news. Whether it's truth or fiction (let's be real, very likely true) you don't mind either way. So why are you even pretending to care if he was dismissive and disrespectful Black girls? Yep. That racist dastardly saved this woma instead of letting her die. Doesn't he know how white supremacist that is? Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
CDN1 Posted February 3 Report Posted February 3 3 hours ago, CrakHoBarbie said: You poor delusional fool. Some of the most attractive women in the World, have been women of color. You must have bumped your head. Yeah, there's plenty of attractive women across the spectrum, but Black women (not light-mixed) routinely rank at or near the bottom of the attractiveness scale. Sorry, it's a science. Don't look at me, blame the men who actually participated in those studies. Things change, but the average Black woman today weighs almost 190 pounds and wears a wig. Quote
West Posted February 3 Report Posted February 3 4 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: This is such a booger of a thread. Can't even call someone "boogers" anymore. Yeesh Quote
CrakHoBarbie Posted February 3 Author Report Posted February 3 12 hours ago, CDN1 said: Yeah, there's plenty of attractive women across the spectrum, but Black women (not light-mixed) routinely rank at or near the bottom of the attractiveness scale. Sorry, it's a science. Don't look at me, blame the men who actually participated in those studies. Things change, but the average Black woman today weighs almost 190 pounds and wears a wig. Attractiveness is subjective. Whom finds whom attractive, varies widely across cultures and individuals So, there is no objective measure that proves one race of women is inherently more attractive than another. Now you, a white dude, are obviously heavily influenced by that white cultural standard, your upbringing, your revoltingly racist community. Which has lead to you having your distinct personal preferences. There is no inherent biological differences. Just those in your head. 14 hours ago, herbie said: Knowing what a P.O.S. the man is, does that surprise anyone? Not even a tiny bit. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.