Donalds cognitive decline quickening

[Deluge]

On 1/24/2026 at 10:32 AM, CrakHoBarbie said:

Yet, when we realized just how far Joe had declined, we refused to nominate him for another term.

Y'all just love little donny sooooo much, that Y'all will keep supporting him, even as the eggplant he is now becoming.

Isn't that a hoot?

No, you defended the hair sniffer until there was no place to go except acknowledge what we already knew on day one of his fraudulent presidency. 

The second Trump starts babbling like Biden, I'll be among the first to call for his resignation. 

YOU, would've had Biden forever if you could, as that would've meant at least 50 million more illegals, regular shakedowns by the IRS, and pride month every month until the US caved under the weight of its own social decay. 

Edited January 26 by Deluge

[ironstone]

17 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Trump didn't campaign on a $75B goon squad terrorizing blue cities.

But he did say he planned to do that AFTER he was elected.

Your usual gross mischaracterization, but whether you like it or not, illegal immigration was a  huge issue in the presidential election. Trump made it very clear he was going to secure the border and start deporting the illegals.

Americans were fully aware of his intentions during the entire campaign. He won the Electoral College AND the popular vote.

It is only the radicals that fight tooth and nail to protect the criminals from arrests and deportations.

Even when protesters are explicitly informed that ICE is trying to apprehend a child sex offender...they don't care.

When a Democrat eventually returns to the White House, all of your hatred for ICE will dissipate in an instant.

[User]

13 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

1. Well God bless you.  Then YES I push trans "ideology", which you define as supporting trans rights.
2. Yeah, but your reply to #1 has opened my eyes to the possibility that you may be in favour of objective reality.  That's quite something.
3. That is TBD.  I don't accept all of them... there are myriad that are proposed, I'm sure.  But I am ok with the 'principle'.  They have it for protections based on colour, creed etc.  Things like housing protection, employment protection, etc.  Bathrooms... and sports... I don't care about but in practical terms I favour tolerane and community peace-making.  So I generally support bathroom access based on how you look, and would rather not have bathroom laws but maybe folks want that locally.  Who knows...
4.  What % would have to have voted in favour for you to accept that conservatives can be in favour of trans rights ?  This is an honest question.  We have #2 conservative under Harper and now the #2 under Poilievre who's a wifed-up Lesbian... these are keystones in the CPC.  So can we just move past that then ?

What if we said SOME conservatives support trans rights.

5. You want to make the argument about specific issues that it's much easier to debate on.  I don't have a strong opinion on sports.  Should a 20 year old muscled up male-gendered man who calls themselves a WOMAN be able to box against a genetic woman ?  Seems like a dumb question to me but we should let the smaller jurisdictions decide these things first to see if it's a problem.

1. I already know that. Except, this is not just a quibble about what "push" means as you also disavow being a culture warrior while you accuse others of the same. You use these tactics to avoid having to defend yourself or the laws/ideology you support when you push them on here. 

2. LOL, sure. You are the one pushing trans ideology and that men can be women just because they say so, but I am the one with issues with objective reality. 

3. Except, it is the bathrooms and sports that is one of the largest issues, and still you play coy now, trying to have it both ways, where you can not directly engage, but also indirectly support the outcome and argue against those who oppose it. You oppose laws preventing it... but the issue is also that people in power are passing laws and policy to force it. You don't have much to say there, just when people oppose that. 

4. What is the point that you are making then. if it was merly that someone somewhere that identifies as a Conservative supports something... then yeah, OK. So what?

5. LOL, "if" its a problem? See, you play these games because you know you can't defend this stupidity, but you will passively support it all the same and play these games to do so. 

 

 

[herbie]

Goon squad is too polite a term to describe ICE.

Gestapo, Stasi, Red Guard, Tonton Macoute....

Edited January 27 by herbie

[CrakHoBarbie]

23 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

 

Those are christians AFAIC

Some im sure.

But, most i talk to ( anecdotally, of course) are redhats, desperate to legislate certain tenets of their mythology, to force compliance 

That, "believe or else" mentality has no place in any secular society. 

 

 

Edited January 26 by CrakHoBarbie

[User]

1 minute ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

Some im sure.

But, most i talk to ( anecdotally, of course) are redhats, desperate to legislate certain tenets of their mythology, to force compliance 

That, "believe or else" mentality has no place in any secular society. 

 

 

This is not a secular society.

[Legato]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Seems like you flunked out of CLOWN SCHOOL.

Bupkis

 

[robosmith]

58 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Ya know what I understand?

Yeah, NOTHING.

58 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

That spoiled, ignorant, little sh1ts like you, should try improving America instead of destroying it.

You know NOTHING about what I do to improve America. Duh

Exposing LIARS like you and Trump is just the beginning.

[Legato]

1 minute ago, robosmith said:

Yeah, NOTHING.

You know NOTHING about what I do to improve America. Duh

Exposing LIARS like you and Trump is just the beginning.

Bupkis/0

[robosmith]

34 minutes ago, ironstone said:

Your usual gross mischaracterization, but whether you like it or not, illegal immigration was a  huge issue in the presidential election. Trump made it very clear he was going to secure the border and start deporting the illegals.

Americans were fully aware of his intentions during the entire campaign. He won the Electoral College AND the popular vote.

It is only the radicals that fight tooth and nail to protect the criminals from arrests and deportations.

Even when protesters are explicitly informed that ICE is trying to apprehend a child sex offender...they don't care.

When a Democrat eventually returns to the White House, all of your hatred for ICE will dissipate in an instant.

Trump didn't campaign on a $75B goon squad terrorizing blue cities.

But he did say he planned to do that AFTER he was elected.

Show us where he said he would use a $75B goon squad to terrorize blue cities before he was elected.

7 minutes ago, Legato said:

Bupkis

 

You post BUPKIS and you get BUPKIS back

Edited January 26 by robosmith

[Legato]

Just now, robosmith said:

 

You post BUPKIS and you get BUPKIS back

Ditto.

[robosmith]

5 hours ago, Legato said:

Seems like there's a lack of oxygen on the high chair you're sitting on.

 

4 minutes ago, Legato said:

Ditto.

Next time think before starting the BUPKIS circle.

[ironstone]

14 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Trump didn't campaign on a $75B goon squad terrorizing blue cities.

Could you express yourself in clearer terms? $75B goon squad refers to....? If you mean ICE, why not just say it?

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said:

He's the king of the Chuds, to my mind.  Is he actually a Chud ?  I don't think he stands for anything.

You're a "conservative" who constantly uses derogatory terms for conservatives but never for leftists... 🤔

Quote

Lots of conservatives on here have spoken against Trump - Groot, Argus, and quiet disagreement on his methods from Bush_Cheney but you have to look for it.

That's because conservatives are not like left4rds: we don't all goose-step behind our glorious leader 24/7/365 like a bunch of lemmings... An integral part of being a conservative is exercising free will/independent thought. 

It's quite common for conservative MP's/congressmen/senators to vote with their own conscience, or on behalf of their constituents, instead of blindly following their party leader. That kind of insolence is not tolerated in the LPOC or DNC. 

Quote

2. Like I say, there are women with penises now. 

No, there are not "women with penises", you're a loony toon.

People with penises are men, but they can dress up like women and act like women if they want to. 

Quote

But people who don't accept transgender people 

Now you're exaggerating to the extent that it qualifies as a blatant lie, which is no big deal for you, as we've all come to see.

The vast majority of conservatives "accept transgender people", including everyone here AFAIK, what we don't accept is "dudes wearing a dress so that they can go into the girls' bathroom". 

FYI, conservatives identify as"people who put protecting women and children above all else, at any cost". At any cost, Michael. If that means that adults get their feelings hurt, because they can't go into the wrong bathrooms, then so be it. I don't give a shit about "the feelings of an adult" when that puts women children at risk. 

Run your f'ing weaselly mouth until you're blue in the face, I really don't GAF about your opinion. The safety of women and children is a red line for me. Men don't go into the girls' bathroom, period. 

If you want to fight for something, fight for a 3rd bathroom. It's normal for women to use the "family" bathrooms. 

If women dressed up as men wanna use the men's bathroom, I'm personally ok with that. Men don't generally get r4ped by women. But I don't speak for all conservatives in that regard, just for me. I've never asked around.

Quote

I guess the meaning of the word may have changed when I wasn't looking. 

The words never changed their meaning, leftists just pretended that they did.

Men are still men, women are still women, and transgenders are still transgenders. 

Quote

Just like Christian now seems to mean someone who hates foreigners in some quarters.

No, that just another id10tic left4rd talking point coming out of your pseudo-conservative yap. 

Honestly, Michael, stop telling people that you're a conservative. It's embarrassing for us. We don't like liars and weasels, and you're making us look bad. 

You're seriously voted off the conservative island, Mike. We don't want you. We don't even want your smelly vote. Go lie down with your fellow weasels in the LPOC camp. They adore shameless liars like you. 

Edited January 26 by WestCanMan

[Legato]

19 minutes ago, robosmith said:

 

Next time think before starting the BUPKIS circle.

Bupkis.

[WestCanMan]

53 minutes ago, herbie said:

Goon squad is too polite a term to describe ICE.

Gestapo, Stasi, Trd Guard, Tonton Macoute....

You cheered:

• when children and young adults were forced to take a dangerous injection that they didn't want or need

Now you're protecting:

• woman-beaters
• rapists
• murderers
• drug dealers
• human traffickers
• pedophiles
• child-sodomizers. 

That's why we hate each other so much: the people that I would die to protect are the prey for the criminals that you adore. 

[gatomontes99]

Why are we arguing about this? We know what reality is. Don't engage them when even they know they are lying. 

Make fun of them...sure. But don't give the Crack ho trannies the legitimacy of argument. They don't deserve it.

[Michael Hardner]

1 hour ago, User said:

1. Before I respond to the rest... I was not talking to you. You are so excited to look for any excuse to avoid having to directly respond on here, but do try to read more closely next time before you run. 

1. Mea Culpa.  Good chat ***

[Michael Hardner]

1 hour ago, User said:

1. I already know that. Except, this is not just a quibble about what "push" means as you also disavow being a culture warrior while you accuse others of the same.

2. You use these tactics to avoid having to defend yourself or the laws/ideology you support when you push them on here. 

3. LOL, sure. You are the one pushing trans ideology and that men can be women just because they say so, but I am the one with issues with objective reality. 

4. Except, it is the bathrooms and sports that is one of the largest issues, and still you play coy now, trying to have it both ways, where you can not directly engage, but also indirectly support the outcome and argue against those who oppose it. You oppose laws preventing it... but the issue is also that people in power are passing laws and policy to force it. You don't have much to say there, just when people oppose that. 

5. What is the point that you are making then. if it was merly that someone somewhere that identifies as a Conservative supports something... then yeah, OK. So what?

6. LOL, "if" its a problem? See, you play these games because you know you can't defend this stupidity, but you will passively support it all the same and play these games to do so. 

 

1.  I don't think everyone who supports trans rights is a culture warrior, though.  Do you ?  
2. It seems you want to talk about details of implementations.  That may mean that we generally agree on the larger framework and don't have much to discuss.  Maybe you don't have issues with objective reality after all.
3. Yes I am pushing that.
4. Is it ?  I would think the overall definition is a bigger problem.  I'm not playing coy.  I don't think I have come out strong on the details of how such things are implemented.    If you don't think the overall framework or definition is a problem we may agree after all.
5. Well a lot of people seem to think that I can't be conservative because I support trans rights (overall).  I guess you're not one of them.
6. Not games.  I'm answering all your questions here aren't I ?  We're learning some stuff too.

36 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

 uses derogatory terms for conservatives but never for leftists... 🤔 

Why do you think Leftists can't be Chuds ?

You don't know my friends....

An Outfit called Natural News (as lefty and hippy as it reads, for sure) used to be all about the anti-vax, WiFi causing cancer, etc. etc.  

They were Leftist Chuds AFAIC.

I'll get to your note later, it's rather long.

[Nationalist]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Yeah, NOTHING.

You know NOTHING about what I do to improve America. Duh

Exposing LIARS like you and Trump is just the beginning.

I know you're ANTIFA. A terrorist organization. 

[User]

24 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

1.  I don't think everyone who supports trans rights is a culture warrior, though.  Do you ?  
2. It seems you want to talk about details of implementations.  That may mean that we generally agree on the larger framework and don't have much to discuss.  Maybe you don't have issues with objective reality after all.
3. Yes I am pushing that.
4. Is it ?  I would think the overall definition is a bigger problem.  I'm not playing coy.  I don't think I have come out strong on the details of how such things are implemented.    If you don't think the overall framework or definition is a problem we may agree after all.
5. Well a lot of people seem to think that I can't be conservative because I support trans rights (overall).  I guess you're not one of them.
6. Not games.  I'm answering all your questions here aren't I ?  We're learning some stuff too.

1. I tend not to make absolute statements like this, but the point is that you have no qualms throwing that terminology around here, but fail to see you are just as much a culture warrior in the end as you accuse others of being. 

2. I never had any issues with objective reality. Can you name the last time you thought I did, since you are now acting shocked to think I don't? As you still say "maybe"

3. Then you are the one with a problem with objective reality, not me. 

4. Yes, it is. But regardless of getting into some quibbling with you on the subjective nature of how much of a problem something is... it is in fact a contentious issue playing out here in the states and even in Canada as you linked to an article on just that. You are playing coy, because you clearly have a position here, but you know it is indefensible when you are really challenged, so you balk and play these games about local laws and only say thing opposed to laws going one way, and then end with "who knows"

You know. You just don't want to say, because you are a sympathetic culture warrior pushing trans ideology.

5. No, we have determined your use of "conservative" here has nothing to do with the common political use of the term at all. 

6. The standards of your gamesmanship are not based solely on responding to questions, which it took me asking you the same thing 3 times before now to get you to respond... it is you saying things like "if" it is a problem. It is in fact a problem. But you play these games to obfuscate. 

[CrakHoBarbie]

2 hours ago, Legato said:

Bupkis/0

And now, representing /0, another dazzling, masterpiece of a retort from the Jethro Bodine clan.

Well done, gomer.

[User]

55 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

And now, representing /0, another dazzling, masterpiece of a retort from the Jethro Bodine clan.

Well done, gomer.

As opposed to how you hide like a coward?

 

[Hodad]

6 hours ago, ironstone said:

Absolutely, the press should hold the president to account. But the fact is, all presidents are not getting the same treatment from the press.

For the most part, the press loved Obama as much as they hate Trump.

The main issue during the election was illegal immigration. Trump is doing what he said he would do.

Obama deports illegals...NO PROBLEM. Trump deports illegals....RACIST, BIGOT, HITLER...

As I stated before, when they start to shield Trump from engaging with the press, that's a sign that something is wrong.

Unequal behavior--particularly bad behavior--begets unequal coverage. That's normal. 

And you know full well that hardly anyone is fussy about deportations. If Trump were doing it in a normal fashion like past presidents, he'd get the same reaction. But instead he's got masked thugs deployed en masse abducting people, beating people, killing people, harassing and arresting brown citizens simply for being brown in the wrong place and time, and engaging in other senseless actually of cruelty. Why? For th stated purpose of terrorizing those populations. It's explicit and deliberate. And it's completely disingenuous for you to pretend this is an apples-to-apples comparison, let alone unfair coverage. Unbelievable.

Edited January 27 by Hodad

[ironstone]

6 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Unequal behavior--particularly bad behavior--begets unequal coverage. That's normal. 

And you know full well that hardly anyone is fussy about deportations. If Trump were doing it in a normal fashion like past presidents, he'd get the same reaction. But instead he's got masked thugs deployed en masse abducting people, beating people, killing people, harassing and arresting brown citizens simply for being brown in the wrong place and time, and engaging in other senseless actually of cruelty. Why? For th stated purpose of terrorizing those populations. It's explicit and deliberate. And it's completely disingenuous for you to pretend this is an apples-to-apples comparison, let alone unfair coverage. Unbelievable.

So how did ICE deport criminal illegal aliens from Minneapolis during Obama's two terms? Undoubtably Obama got a lot more cooperation from all states than Trump is getting, including much less coverage by the media.

What precisely was different back then from a procedural perspective?