Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The US never owned the oil in Venezuela. US oil companies HAD a license to pump an sell Venezuelan oil for a SHARE of the profits.

Now Trump has ordered the illegal invasion and capture of Maduro, and LIES that we are taking back OUR OIL.

Today an illegal coup in Venezuela, but where next? ...

3 hours ago  The world will be anxious, and rightly so. For a man so bent on a peace prize, Trump appears to revel in conflict, writes Simon Tisdall.
  • Like 1
Posted
Quote

 

Trump blames Nicolás Maduro for the arrival of hundreds of thousands of Venezuelan migrants in the US.

They are among close to eight million Venezuelans estimated to have fled the country's economic crisis and repression since 2013.

Without providing evidence, Trump has accused Maduro of "emptying his prisons and insane asylums" and "forcing" its inmates to migrate to the US.

Trump has also focused on fighting the influx of drugs - especially fentanyl and cocaine - into the US.

He has designated two Venezuelan criminal groups - Tren de Aragua and Cartel de los Soles - as Foreign Terrorist Organisations (FTOs) and has alleged that the latter is led by Maduro himself.

Analysts have pointed out that Cartel de los Soles is not a hierarchical group but a term used to describe corrupt officials who have allowed cocaine to transit through Venezuela.

Trump had also doubled the reward for information leading to Maduro's capture and has announced that he would designate the Maduro government as an FTO.

Maduro has vehemently denied being a cartel leader and has accused the US of using its "war on drugs" as an excuse to try to depose him and get its hands on Venezuela's vast oil reserves.

 

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, West said:

The Biden administration did not recognize Maduro and hes been wanted for NARCO TERRORISM for five years. 

Its telling who's likely apart of Maduros crime ring, some in the US government, by those who are crying about his arrest

^Based solely on Trump's LIES.

Trump invented "NARCO TERRORISM" and it doesn't exist outside of his EO.

Posted
53 minutes ago, robosmith said:

The US never owned the oil in Venezuela. US oil companies HAD a license to pump an sell Venezuelan oil for a SHARE of the profits.

Now Trump has ordered the illegal invasion and capture of Maduro, and LIES that we are taking back OUR OIL.

Sematics. If we have the rights to the oil, saying it is our oil is the same as saying it is our oil. 

On that note, just to make sure your claims about this being illegal are not just partisan ramblings, you do also agree that Biden and Obama both engaged in the illegal use of the military too?

3 minutes ago, robosmith said:

^Based solely on Trump's LIES.

Trump invented "NARCO TERRORISM" and it doesn't exist outside of his EO.

This term has been around since the 80's you clown. 

 

 

Posted
7 minutes ago, robosmith said:

^Based solely on Trump's LIES.

Trump invented "NARCO TERRORISM" and it doesn't exist outside of his EO.

The official position of the US government is that Tren de Aragua is a terrorist organization. 

Maduro was not viewed as legitimate by most western countries. 

Venezuela was run by a terrorist state who were funding terrorism in the US. 

Therefore Trump lawfully acted. 

Duh

  • Like 3
Posted
1 hour ago, West said:

The official position of the US government is that Tren de Aragua is a terrorist organization. 

Maduro was not viewed as legitimate by most western countries. 

Venezuela was run by a terrorist state who were funding terrorism in the US. 

Therefore Trump lawfully acted. 

Duh

Im not a big fan of what the US did. I understand the reasoning geopolitically, but im not a fan of this.

I wonder who's next? Maybe Trump traded Ukraine for Venezuela?

  • Like 1

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Im not a big fan of what the US did. I understand the reasoning geopolitically, but im not a fan of this.

I wonder who's next? Maybe Trump traded Ukraine for Venezuela?

IMO? Maduro is being used as bait in the Southern District of New York.

Posted
1 hour ago, West said:

The official position of the US government is that Tren de Aragua is a terrorist organization. 

Maduro was not viewed as legitimate by most western countries. 

Venezuela was run by a terrorist state who were funding terrorism in the US. 

Therefore Trump lawfully acted. 

Duh

You have ZERO EVIDENCE that Venezuela funded terrorism in the US.

None of those boats from Venezuela were headed for the US.

Unfortunately all that evidence was DESTROYED.

17 minutes ago, West said:

IMO? Maduro is being used as bait in the Southern District of New York.

Too bad your amateur legal opinions mean NOTHING, Canuck.

Posted
6 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You have ZERO EVIDENCE that Venezuela funded terrorism in the US.

None of those boats from Venezuela were headed for the US.

Unfortunately all that evidence was DESTROYED.

Too bad your amateur legal opinions mean NOTHING, Canuck.

Its in the indictment. Duh

Posted
51 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You have ZERO EVIDENCE that Venezuela funded terrorism in the US.

Sure we do:

https://www.justice.gov/opa/media/1422326/dl

52 minutes ago, robosmith said:

None of those boats from Venezuela were headed for the US.

OK... but when you stop being dishonestly obtuse, where were those drugs going to end up and what was the money funding?

52 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Unfortunately all that evidence was DESTROYED.

No, just the boats. This is not a criminal trial, it is a military action. 

53 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Too bad your amateur legal opinions mean NOTHING, Canuck.

Which is still more than you have. 

 

 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

Im not a big fan of what the US did. I understand the reasoning geopolitically, but im not a fan of this.

I wonder who's next? Maybe Trump traded Ukraine for Venezuela?

Hopefully the terrorist Islamic Republic of Iran is next. This would free the entire Middle East from terrorism, save Israel from possible mass destruction and does a lot of good for world economy by bringing an mineral/oil rich nation of Iran into civilized markets.

Edited by CITIZEN_2015
  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Prove it, with EVIDENCE. Duh

Ding Dong Bell, the ****'s in the Well.

What more evidence do you need.

Posted
1 hour ago, CITIZEN_2015 said:

Hopefully the terrorist Islamic Republic of Iran is next. This would free the entire Middle East from terrorism, save Israel from possible mass destruction and does a lot of good for world economy by bringing an mineral/oil rich nation of Iran into civilized markets.

Doubtful...but...ya never know...

3 hours ago, West said:

IMO? Maduro is being used as bait in the Southern District of New York.

Ok...ya got me...bait?

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
4 hours ago, User said:

This term has been around since the 80's you clown. 

The US has always come up with excuses for blaming other countries and people for it's demand for drugs and projected it's war against them instead of looking in the mirror.

  • Thanks 1

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted

This is a copy of something I posted in the Maduro thread, that might provide some insight in this thread.

Trump’s support of Putin and Russia is starting to make sense.

Trump would give Ukraine to Putin, and in return Putin would give Venezuela to Trump.

Venezuela is Russia's most important trading and military ally in Latin America. Russia recognized Nicolás Maduro as the president of Venezuela, instead of Juan Guaidó

This was a case of “You keep out of my face, I’ll keep out of yours.”

Putin gets his prize in Europe, and Trump gets trillions of dollars in oil.

You think it is a coincidence that Trump sent warships into the Caribbean one day after his meeting with Putin in Anchorage?

According to the Congressional testimony in 2019 of Fiona Hill, this kind of deal was on the table during the first Trump Administration

image.thumb.jpeg.22fb02abcdd99dc4f0d7db907dc38dbb.jpeg

 

Posted (edited)

Expropriations/Nationalizations of U.S. Company Assets

During Chávez’s presidency, Venezuela pursued a broad policy of nationalizing key sectors of the economy (especially oil, electricity, steel and other industries) and expropriating private foreign-owned assets:

Oil Projects – In the Orinoco Belt starting in 2007, Venezuela required foreign oil companies to hand over majority control of operations to the state oil company PDVSA. U.S. majors like ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips ended up losing control of their Venezuelan oil assets after failing to agree on new contract terms. Their assets were taken and nationalized. 
CiberCuba

Cargill – A major U.S. agricultural company saw its rice processing assets seized during a wave of nationalizations. 
archive.ph

Williams Companies – Another U.S. energy firm had a gas plant taken over by the state. 
archive.ph

Helmerich & Payne (oil rigs) – Eleven oil drilling rigs owned by this U.S. company were seized under Chávez.

This might be a bad move by Trump or a prudent move. Only time will tell. There were over 50 countries that did not recognize the Maduro government as legitimate.

Edited by ironstone
  • Like 1

Beware the Brookfield industrial complex...

Posted
47 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Doubtful...but...ya never know...

Ok...ya got me...bait?

It'll make the Libbies commit who run that court system. Thats the same area where they keep overturning the planes returning the drug smugglers and who tried to imprison him over looking at voter fraud 

Posted
29 minutes ago, West said:

It'll make the Libbies commit who run that court system. Thats the same area where they keep overturning the planes returning the drug smugglers and who tried to imprison him over looking at voter fraud 

Ah...ok got it.

Ya this should be interesting. 

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
1 hour ago, eyeball said:

The US has always come up with excuses for blaming other countries and people for it's demand for drugs and projected it's war against them instead of looking in the mirror.

Same old ignorant comments that have already been responded to many times on here. Drugs cause an addiction, people buying them are not in their right minds. Part of combating this is, in fact, looking to those pushing the drugs.

These narco terrorists are also involved in more criminal actions in our country than merely smuggling drugs in, dealing with this is also dealing with that threat too.  

 

 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,025
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    Jameslive
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • maro ay earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • maro ay earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Longley earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • ashtonfennescey earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • ashtonfennescey earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...