Harris Gave Sharpton $500k Right Before Her Interview

[gatomontes99]

FoxNews: MSNBC admitted it was "unaware" that Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign paid $500,000 to Rev. Al Sharpton’s National Action Network nonprofit ahead of a friendly interview with the Democratic nominee ahead of Election Day.

First off, i call bullshit on PPMSLSD being "unaware" that Sharpton and Harris were crooked. But, beside that point, how often does this happen? I really think we need to look at those books and see where these billions are going. If she did it with Sharpton, you know she did it multiple times. It sure would explain the treatment she got on 60 Minutes. 

Edited November 3, 2025 by gatomontes99

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

FoxNews: MSNBC admitted it was "unaware" that Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign paid $500,000 to Rev. Al Sharpton’s National Action Network nonprofit ahead of a friendly interview with the Democratic nominee ahead of Election Day.

First off, i call bullshit on PPMSLSD being "unaware" that Sharpton and Harris were crooked. But, beside that point, how often does this happen? I really think we need to look at those books and see where these billions are going. If she did it with Sharpton, you know she did it multiple times. It sure would explain the treatment she got on 60 Minutes. 

IF you're suggesting that the Harris contribution to NAN bought her favorable treatment in an interview, that completely IGNORES the FACT that Sharpton was ALL IN on the Harris campaign over Trump. AKA she would have ALWAYS gotten favorable treatment from Sharpton in an interview. Duh.

[User]

1 minute ago, robosmith said:

IF you're suggesting that the Harris contribution to NAN bought her favorable treatment in an interview, that completely IGNORES the FACT that Sharpton was ALL IN on the Harris campaign over Trump. AKA she would have ALWAYS gotten favorable treatment from Sharpton in an interview. Duh.

Then why not disclose it then to be above board?

 

[gatomontes99]

7 hours ago, robosmith said:

IF you're suggesting that the Harris contribution to NAN bought her favorable treatment in an interview, that completely IGNORES the FACT that Sharpton was ALL IN on the Harris campaign over Trump. AKA she would have ALWAYS gotten favorable treatment from Sharpton in an interview. Duh.

Im suggesting that the left is fully corrupt and used her campaign to funnel donor dollars to pundits rather than trying to win. You don't think she spent $1B on 30 second spots, do you? 

[Nationalist]

Just another case of Libbie abuse and corruption. 

[robosmith]

4 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Just another case of Libbie abuse and corruption. 

^Just another LIE with NO EVIDENCE. You can't even point out ONE instance where Sharpton publicly opposed Harris or her policies.

[WestCanMan]

13 hours ago, robosmith said:

IF you're suggesting that the Harris contribution to NAN bought her favorable treatment in an interview, that completely IGNORES the FACT that Sharpton was ALL IN on the Harris campaign over Trump. AKA she would have ALWAYS gotten favorable treatment from Sharpton in an interview. Duh.

The old "She just bribed him out of the goodness of her heart" defence. 

Solid 😎

 

 

🤣😂😭🤣

[User]

22 minutes ago, robosmith said:

^Just another LIE with NO EVIDENCE. You can't even point out ONE instance where Sharpton publicly opposed Harris or her policies.

Why would we need to do this?

The point is the same regardless. 

[gatomontes99]

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

^Just another LIE with NO EVIDENCE. You can't even point out ONE instance where Sharpton publicly opposed Harris or her policies.

Literally paying a man to interview her is evidence dumb asş

[herbie]

So f*cking what?

[CdnFox]

On 11/2/2025 at 6:30 PM, gatomontes99 said:

FoxNews: MSNBC admitted it was "unaware" that Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign paid $500,000 to Rev. Al Sharpton’s National Action Network nonprofit ahead of a friendly interview with the Democratic nominee ahead of Election Day.

First off, i call bullshit on PPMSLSD being "unaware" that Sharpton and Harris were crooked. But, beside that point, how often does this happen? I really think we need to look at those books and see where these billions are going. If she did it with Sharpton, you know she did it multiple times. It sure would explain the treatment she got on 60 Minutes. 

All the time. She gave almost everybody money, all the people that supported her were paid massive dollars. That's how she managed to go so over budget, she paid literally everybody to be her friend and say nice things about her

I mean there's no law against it, but I do think there should be a law that says if you're a media source and you're presenting something as an interview you should have to disclose up front whether or not you directly or indirectly received a benefit from somebody in relation to the interview. You want to take 500k for doing the interview fine, but tell the viewers