Potential for the Liberal government to fall in a matter of weeks.

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

OH NO!!!! The LOSER tries to speak.... HA HA HA

Speak?  This is an online forum, there's no voice chat. 

Are you hearing voices speaking to you again?  How many times have we told you to take your meds!!!

[ExFlyer]

14 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Speak?  This is an online forum, there's no voice chat. 

Are you hearing voices speaking to you again?  How many times have we told you to take your meds!!!

WOW...confux loses it....LOSER LOL

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, ExFlyer said:

WOW...confux loses it....LOSER LOL

Awww, best you could do during your meltdown?  C'mon, it's almost the weekend, you must be drinking by now, surely you can be more entertaining than THAT!

So you're still mad that i'm right?  you'd think you'd be used to it by now  

 

[taxme]

1 hour ago, ExFlyer said:

WOW...confux loses it....LOSER LOL

And this coming from one of the biggest antifa troll losers around. Phkn loser. 🤮

[bush_cheney2004]

5 hours ago, SpankyMcFarland said:

We don’t have the type of king that No Kings refers to, something closer to this guy:

...We have a constitutional monarchy in which the King has a ceremonial role. Also note that we didn’t make the elementary and potentially dangerous mistake of combining head of state with head of government. 

 

No Kings has a very American, historical context, neither ceremonial or sub-Saharan African.  The irony in all this is that any modern American president has far more applied and potential power via the Executive Branch than any king.

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, bush_cheney2004 said:

 

No Kings has a very American, historical context, neither ceremonial or sub-Saharan African.  The irony in all this is that any modern American president has far more applied and potential power via the Executive Branch than any king.

I don't think that it was necessarily the power of a king that Americans rebelled against. What they were angry about as far as I can tell from the documents is that the power was something they had no say in and did not represent their interests. They were upset about the idea of taxation without representation. Not the idea of taxation.

Well I guess they're largely fine with an American king that's been elected or someone that has equivalent or greater power provided their elected

[bush_cheney2004]

4 hours ago, CdnFox said:

I don't think that it was necessarily the power of a king that Americans rebelled against. What they were angry about as far as I can tell from the documents is that the power was something they had no say in and did not represent their interests. They were upset about the idea of taxation without representation. Not the idea of taxation.

Well I guess they're largely fine with an American king that's been elected or someone that has equivalent or greater power provided their elected

 

Agreed...this is the historical context.   Since the Revolution, American presidents have slowly gained more and more unchecked power (Executive Branch), if only because of the huge scope of the job and the reluctance of Congress to reign things in.   Congress tends to be more reactive while real world domestic and foreign policy events require power immediacy in many instances.

[Barquentine]

12 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Well I guess they're largely fine with an American king

Wrong! They are not fine with it. It's their constitution that prohibits kings. Kings can't be voted out. (So kings are as un-American as you can get) It's the fact that Trump and his supporters are talking about subverting the constitution that engendered the 'No Kings' protests.

[ExFlyer]

15 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Awww, best you could do 

 

Nope, far from it, but I realized doing my best against a fool like you is a worthless endeavour. LOL

15 hours ago, taxme said:

And this coming from one of the biggest antifa troll losers around. Phkn loser. 🤮

AHA!!! another name calling posts and swearing from the taxi LOL

You have so little to offer is an embarrassment to all conservatives LOL

[ExFlyer]

15 hours ago, taxme said:

And this coming from one of the biggest antifa troll losers around. Phkn loser. 🤮

OH My...taxi is insulting people again...what a surprise....NOT !!!!   LOL

You are such a lowly mind walling in such shallow waters

[CdnFox]

23 minutes ago, Barquentine said:

Wrong! They are not fine with it.

The majority seems fine with it. 

Quote

It's their constitution that prohibits kings.

It doesn't really. I'm not sure you know what 'kings' were like. To be honest, for the most part in history kings had less control over their land than a leader in the democratic systems we see or even the socialist ones. 

It does however solidify some of the rights of the individual and requires a democratic process in appointing the leader. 

That is a major step up but it doesn't actually eliminate the idea of a head leader. The founding fathers DID actually consider that and almost went with a council of three presidents instead of one for that very reason but in the end decided to go with what they've got now. 

OUR system tends to move us further away from a king like figure being in power, which is hilarious considering we actually have a king  

Quote

Kings can't be voted out. (So kings are as un-American as you can get) It's the fact that Trump and his supporters are talking about subverting the constitution that engendered the 'No Kings' protests.

Sure they can. Kings were voted out, overthrow, ursurped etc all the time. 

There are very few periods in history where a king's power was absolute. 

The democratic process built into the system solidifies and formalizes the ability of the people to choose their leader and extends that power to all the people instead of just the nobility and land owners, which is great, but it doesn't change the fact there's still a leader. ANd over the years more and more presidents have stolen more and more power away from the  congress and put it in the oval office and they did so legally.  

Edited November 8, 2025 by CdnFox

[CdnFox]

 

13 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

Nope, far from it, 

 

So yes then  LOLOL 

It must be so embarrassing for you    Everyone looks down on you. 

I'm sure it'll get better for you once you get through puberty  ]

 

6 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

OH My...taxi is insulting people again...what a surprise....NOT !!!! 

LOL  'what a surprise, not'.  My littlest nephew still talks like that sometimes.  

[ExFlyer]

Just now, CdnFox said:

 

 

So yes then  LOLOL 

It must be so embarrassing for you    Everyone looks down on you. 

I'm sure it'll get better for you once you get through puberty  ]

 

LOL  'what a surprise, not'.  My littlest nephew still talks like that sometimes.  

U Huh...keep trying.

Wasting time with you has become boring. I retort only because it is fun watching you battle with me in you head. 

As I said once before, you or your ilk's opinion of me is absolutely immaterial. I could not, in any way , care what you think of me....and I keep trolling you fools to prove it as you keep coming back for more and more.

It seems to me that puberty is a age you have yet to achieve as you keep up your childlike tantrums over and over .... and will again because little me in your head makes you do it LOL

[CdnFox]

Just now, ExFlyer said:

U Huh...keep trying.

 

Honest to god making you look childish requires no effort whatsoever  He pretty much do it yourself. That's why everybody makes fun of you

[ExFlyer]

29 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Honest to god making you look childish requires no effort whatsoever  He pretty much do it yourself. That's why everybody makes fun of you

Oh, you're back LOL

Still in your head I see LOL

As I said once before, you or your ilk's opinion of me is absolutely immaterial. I could not, in any way , care what you think of me....and I keep trolling you fools to prove it as you keep coming back for more and more.

[CdnFox]

9 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

Oh, you're back LOL

 

Oh you're doing the whole "I'm totally shocked to see a reply on a discussion forum" thing  

Yes, you replied to one of my posts, i'm replying back to you.  That's how these boards work   I'm sure in the real world you're quite used to having the people around you just ignore you so maybe you thought it would be the same here?

Do you have something useful to add to the conversation or are you just going back to your usual childish behavior? 

[ExFlyer]

16 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Oh you're doing the whole ....

HA HA HA still in your head and continuing to make you retort... HA HA HA

[CdnFox]

2 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

HA HA HA still in your head and continuing to make you retort... HA HA HA

You're the one who keeps replying I'm begging for my attention kiddo.

You sound distressed. Go tell your mom I said you could have a cookie and a nap

[ExFlyer]

3 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

You're the one who keeps replying I'm begging for my attention kiddo.

You sound distressed. Go tell your mom I said you could have a cookie and a nap

Nope, but thanks for giving yorr attention to me LOL

Disrespect to those that passed away is a clear indication of what kind of person you are....a sad sad little man

[CdnFox]

16 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

Nope, but thanks for giving yorr attention to me LOL

 

Well you were begging for it so hard I thought I'd throw you a bone.

 

[ExFlyer]

11 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Well you were begging for it so hard I thought I'd throw you a bone.

 

HA HA HA.  

Look in the mirror to see who keeps coming back for more.... Oh yeah...it's always you LOL

[CdnFox]

1 minute ago, ExFlyer said:

HA HA HA.  

 

Hi yes, your usual admission of defeat  

Don't let it bug you too much, I'm sure someone somewhere Will pay attention to you if you pay them enough

[ExFlyer]

8 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Hi yes, your usual admission of defeat  

Don't let it bug you too much, I'm sure someone somewhere Will pay attention to you if you pay them enough

What a LOSER you are ...  LOL

[Legato]

15 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Hi yes, your usual admission of defeat  

Don't let it bug you too much, I'm sure someone somewhere Will pay attention to you if you pay them enough

People stopped paying attention, he just declared bankruptcy.

[CdnFox]

8 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

What a LOSER you are ...  LOL

Awww... made you cry again huh?  Go see if mommy will change your diapers for you again  

1 minute ago, Legato said:

People stopped paying attention, he just declared bankruptcy.

Moral or financial?   

Either way, the people have a point