Charlie Kirk was a propagandist, NOT a master debater

[robosmith]

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1127212979501787

Don't post until you've watched the whole video like I did.

[Shady]

11 minutes ago, robosmith said:

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1127212979501787

Don't post until you've watched the whole video like I did.

I don’t need to watch the whole video, because everything you said is subjective, and has no bearing on his murder.  Stop trying to justify political violence you piece of sh!t.

[User]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Don't post until you've watched the whole video like I did.

How about you don't start a thread if you are going to be too lazy to actually offer any of your own commentary to discuss

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, Shady said:

I don’t need to watch the whole video, because everything you said is subjective, and has no bearing on his murder.  Stop trying to justify political violence you piece of sh!t.

I never said it had anything to do with his murder you POS.

[gatomontes99]

14 minutes ago, robosmith said:

I never said it had anything to do with his murder you POS.

You are clearly trying to justify his murder by creating a narrative that his debate tactics were invalid. 

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1127212979501787

Don't post until you've watched the whole video like I did.

As for the video, I'm not buying what the tranny is saying. He is taking elements of the speech and redefining them with the clear goal of distorting the argument. 

The argument was that a typical passenger will question whether a pilot is qualified because of their minority status. They would do that because the airline expressly stated they would use minority status as a qualification rather than actual qualifications. 

The use of an example (like Harvard) solidifies that there are situations in which minority hiring replaced qualified hiring with disastrous consequences. Also, the tranny claimed hiring isn't a zero sum game, but it literally is. They don't hire an infinite number of employees. Hiring based on discriminatory practices is widely considered inappropriate.

In addition, the tranny claimed Charlie made up a scenario. Since Charlie was speculating about whether the pilot was fully qualified and discussing what a hypothetical passenger might think, an example with extreme incompetence is not an unfair or inaccurate assumption. 

As for the claim that an instructor would lose his/her license for passing a poor pilot is 1000% false. First, instructors don't test pilots. The FAA and their designees check pilots. Designees don't have a "license"threy can lose. They have a Letter of Authorization to test on behalf of the FAA. Unless their actions are grotesquely inappropriate, the worst that can happen is that they will lose their LOA. 

As for their checkrides, they use a set of criteria that are published by the FAA, but are somewhat subjective. Meaning, some designees (aka check airmen) can be harder on their pilots and some can be far more foregiving.

Further, every airline has their own training program and grading system with subjective standards. Their scenarios are created by the airline's training department, using FAA guidelines that score activities. Each scenario must reach a minimal level. However, the scenarios are well known by the pilots, so they can over perform by knowing what is coming. 

In short, the video is full of fallacies disguised as informed criticism. 

As someone that is intensely familiar with airline training and the varying levels of competence among pilots, I don't have major issue with what Charlie Kirk said. The true problem is not whether or not the pilots are qualified. The true problem, as highlighted by Kirk, is that the populous will view minorities through a hyper critical lense. DEI is a disservice to minorities that have earned their positions. They are good. They are qualified. Yet, people speculate because they don't know if DEI gave them an advantage. 

[Deluge]

3 hours ago, robosmith said:

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1127212979501787

Don't post until you've watched the whole video like I did.

Looks like that pronoun slut is going through an identity crisis.

He also must really hate Charlie Kirk, as he keeps kicking the deceased - what a f*cking loser. 

 

[herbie]

All those expected rally to the defence of a fellow MAGA shill.

[User]

11 hours ago, herbie said:

All those expected rally to the defence of a fellow MAGA shill.

Defense of what?

No one from your loony side has even tried to make a point here yet. 

[CdnFox]

15 hours ago, robosmith said:

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1127212979501787

Don't post until you've watched the whole video like I did.

In other words, you're spreading propaganda lying about Charlie Kirk.  

Charlie kirk was very clearly a debater. Anyone could make counter points and provide facts and fact checks and were able to prepare ahead of time. 

He engaged people in debate. That is what a 'debater' is.

 Your hatred and lies are inappropriate. 

[CdnFox]

11 hours ago, herbie said:

All those expected rally to the defence of a fellow MAGA shill.

At least one expected spouts vitriolic hatred when confronted with the truth

[WestCanMan]

20 hours ago, robosmith said:

Don't post until you've watched the whole video like I did.

 

LMAO. The Queen of Confirmation Bias is telling other people to "look at all the evidence before reaching a final conclusion". 🤣

[robosmith]

31 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

LMAO. The Queen of Confirmation Bias is telling other people to "look at all the evidence before reaching a final conclusion". 🤣

The ^Queen of NO EVIDENCE complaining about being called on NOT considering EVIDENCE. LMAO

Because you have NOTHING with which to rebut it.

[User]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Because you have NOTHING with which to rebut it.

Rebut what? Yet again, you offered nothing here to consider. You are not only inept, a liar, but lazy too. 

[eyeball]

Charlie Kirk was a propagandist, NOT a master debater

What ever else he was moral entrepreneurs will always be a dime a dozen.

There'll be another along shortly enough.

[Deluge]

6 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Charlie Kirk was a propagandist, NOT a master debater

What ever else he was moral entrepreneurs will always be a dime a dozen.

There'll be another along shortly enough.

Hopefully 1,000 more, running all over the US educating woke cultists. 

[eyeball]

7 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Hopefully 1,000 more, running all over the US educating woke cultists. 

They'll need to resort to this.

[Legato]

7 minutes ago, eyeball said:

They'll need to resort to this.

Self portraits  don't always have the desired effect.

[eyeball]

2 minutes ago, Legato said:

Self portraits don't always have the desired effect.

That's Malcolm McDowell not me.

A Clockwork Orange ring a bell?

[Legato]

1 minute ago, eyeball said:

That's Malcolm McDowell not me.

A Clockwork Orange ring a bell?

Hi Malcolm, how yer doin?

[robosmith]

16 hours ago, Legato said:

Self portraits  don't always have the desired effect.

Your TROLLS NEVER have your desired effect.