Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 5/3/2026 at 11:12 AM, LinkSoul60 said:

So in other words... To better fit your conservative biased frame of mind we've lost of our sovereignty if another country representative 'tells' us something.  Even in your make believe world that's a stretch...  

Your devotion to Harper is amusing....  "he didn't tolerate any political shenanigans" 😂   No of course not, he just bent his knee to China for the almighty dollar rather than his early tough guy talk of standing up for human rights.  It's always about the dollar, and always will be about the dollar...

What am I supposed to answer about being okay with Carney doing what... China's envoy talking a warning about our relationship with Taiwan?  That's a non-sensical question... even for you.

Why are you always sticking up for Goddess?  I'm actually starting to wonder if you're one in the same... 

 

Chinese ambassador to Canada warned that the “strategic partnership” Ottawa signed with Beijing earlier this year would be damaged if Ottawa sends more military vessels through the Taiwan Strait or if Canadian parliamentarians keep meeting with officials in Taiwan.

So you're okay with China's bully tactics.

Your devotion to the Carney is amusing so keep up with the Mandarin lessons.

 

  • Downvote 1
Posted
3 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

Awww coinfux is having a pedophiloac meltdown .... again LOL LOL LOL

Wow, so the very first thing you did when you woke up this morning was run to your computer to cut and paste one of your little homosexual fantasies about me?

So basically you were up all night thinking about me and I'm the first thing you think about in the morning  :P  That's sweet but pretty creepy

  • Downvote 1

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
9 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Wow, so the very first thing you did when you woke up this morning was run to your computer to cut and paste one of your little homosexual fantasies about me?

So basically you were up all night thinking about me and I'm the first thing you think about in the morning  :P  That's sweet but pretty creepy

Foxy, are you tapdancing in his head?  🤣

  • Haha 1
  • Downvote 1

"There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe."

~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~

Posted
1 hour ago, blackbird said:

Are you ok with the constant catch and release of repeat offenders and the light sentences given to murderers?

Nope.

  • Like 1

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted
18 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Nope.

Why you keep voting for the party that supports it. And why don't you call it out?

I see conservatives here frequently criticizing one conservative policy or another or one conservative leader or another. That includes myself, i've made critical comments on this very bored about every leader the CPC have ever had

But you and most of the liberals here simply can't bring yourself to say even one negative thing about the liberals are their policies. I know those rare occasions when you almost do it's immediately followed by how it's harper's fault or other conservatives fault

Honestly you guys are a cult

Yourfavoritepolitiican.thumb.webp.6bff3e528b1609f278f9d5ef9f25e0f2.webp

  • Downvote 1

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
42 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

But you and most of the liberals here simply can't bring yourself to say even one negative thing about the liberals are their policies.

They killed the carbon tax. If you recall I was the first one around here to point out that Carney's first official lie was the reason he gave for killing it - something you supported wholeheartedly 

AFAIC things have pretty much gone downhill since. And you're certainly no less full of shit.

  • Like 1

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted

Carney's speech at the European Summit sounds like all his other ones.

He doesn't sound like the Prime Minister of a sovereign country.

He sounds like the Davos consultant assigned to the Canadian file.

  • Downvote 1

"There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe."

~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~

Posted
2 hours ago, Goddess said:

Foxy, are you tapdancing in his head?  🤣

I can't help myself, it's just so spacious in here  :) 

  • Downvote 1

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
3 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Why you keep voting for the party that supports it. And why don't you call it out?

I see conservatives here frequently criticizing one conservative policy or another or one conservative leader or another. That includes myself, i've made critical comments on this very bored about every leader the CPC have ever had

But you and most of the liberals here simply can't bring yourself to say even one negative thing about the liberals are their policies. I know those rare occasions when you almost do it's immediately followed by how it's harper's fault or other conservatives fault

Honestly you guys are a cult

Yourfavoritepolitiican.thumb.webp.6bff3e528b1609f278f9d5ef9f25e0f2.webp

Yes, everyone else in a cult...not the forum's most enthusiastic Poilievre-fluffer.  

Your history of criticism against the Conservative Party in Canada is widely recognized.  🤣

Nobody on this forum has less self-awareness than you.  Thanks for the laugh!

  • Like 1

"A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he is for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Wow, so the very first thing you did .

So basically.

Awww coinfux is having another pedophiloac meltdown .... again LOL LOL LOL

Tap Tap Tap while living rent free in your head :)

Edited by ExFlyer
  • Downvote 1

You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.

Posted
4 hours ago, Goddess said:

Foxy, are you tapdancing in his head?  🤣

Clearly it is me tap dancing in his head rent free for a very long time because he cannot stop posting back to me...with really feeble posts

And you, well, you are such a sad sad character, well, you just ain't worth any more than a down arrow LOL

  • Downvote 1

You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.

Posted
1 hour ago, eyeball said:

They killed the carbon tax.

Well they didn't really, they just killed the visible portion of it and then hit the rest but either way they certainly never suggested they were wrong prior to that. So I'm not sure what your point is.

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

If you recall I was the first one around here to point out that Carney's first official lie was the reason he gave for killing it

I don't actually recall that but I don't recall you not saying that either so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. But I have never once heard you suggest that it should be brought back or that this was the wrong decision. It's at least somewhat believable to me that you may have not believed his reasoning but you have Never in my recollection suggested he should keep it

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

AFAIC things have pretty much gone downhill since.

And yet you have stood up in favor of all of their policies

you  defend the liberals on an almost daily basis here so you can't really claim if you defend each one of their actions that you are somehow generally critical of them. .

33 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

Yes, everyone else in a cult...not the forum's most enthusiastic Poilievre-fluffer.  

I have been extremely critical of Poilievre in a number of areas. And for that matter of Erin and Andrew and Steve.

But I understand your need to lie about that. Your entire persona is to desperately try and validate yourself by unreasonably attacking you are better levine hope that this time you won't look like a complete twat.

Better luck next time :)  

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
20 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

I have been extremely critical of Poilievre in a number of areas. 

No, you really haven't🤣

I could perhaps believe you've offered some softball nothingburger critiques somewhere, but I don't think there's a bigger and more blinkered PP fanboy than you on this forum.  

Thanks for the laughs again.  

"A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he is for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous

Posted
5 hours ago, eyeball said:

Nope.

If you are opposed to the catch and release of repeat offenders, why do you support Liberals or NDP?   They are the parties responsible for the soft-on-crime system.

Posted
1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

So I'm not sure what your point is.

That you're full of shit.

 

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

you  defend the liberals on an almost daily basis here so you can't really claim if you defend each one of their actions that you are somehow generally critical of them. .

The ridiculous criticism you level at Liberals on an almost hourly basis provides an ongoing reason for not supporting Poilievre.

I bet you think you're doing him a favour. LMAO!

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted
1 hour ago, blackbird said:

If you are opposed to the catch and release of repeat offenders, why do you support Liberals or NDP?   They are the parties responsible for the soft-on-crime system.

I haven't supported a Liberal in 50 years, for the same reason I don't support Conservatives.

As for the NDP, their approach to preventing crime is building a more fair and equitable economy resulting in a greater number of more opportune choices for people to make and fewer cracks in which to fall.

This is just about the opposite of the Liberals/Conservatives who, as evidenced by an eternally expanding wealth/income gap, work to tilt the economy towards the ultra-rich - including being as soft as possible on white collar crooks in power.

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted
53 minutes ago, eyeball said:

The ridiculous criticism you level at Liberals on an almost hourly basis provides an ongoing reason for not supporting Poilievre.

There's something to be said about that.  Voting for the Liberals in the last election was a repudiation of the race to the intellectual bottom that the CPC has undertaken since MAGA spilled over into their ranks.  

  • Thanks 1

"A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he is for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous

Posted
17 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

There's something to be said about that.  Voting for the Liberals in the last election was a repudiation of the race to the intellectual bottom that the CPC has undertaken since MAGA spilled over into their ranks.  

Exactly. 

 

That's when we got all these fake conservatives popping in here, thinking that insults are the best way to win in an election. 

I can't be conservative now, according to them, because I don't buy into that.

 

Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase !

Michael Hardner

Posted
45 minutes ago, eyeball said:

 

As for the NDP, their approach to preventing crime is building a more fair and equitable economy resulting in a greater number of more opportune choices for people to make and fewer cracks in which to fall.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_income_inequality

If you look at that page, the oecd table... Canada is 11th in terms of income equality after taxes 

Usa is 35th or something. 

That's because Canada throws its money away. Wastes it on social programs and things that address social problems. 

If I worked in the states my my tax rate would be lower and my disposable income would probably double. 

But I sure as hell couldn't walk in any neighborhood in my city without any worry. 

Take a look at videos of Kensington Avenue in Philadelphia.  People have been thrown on the garbage heap...

I don't say it very often, but these are moral choices that force me to stay away from that kind of politics.  

  • Like 1

 

Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase !

Michael Hardner

Posted
2 hours ago, Moonbox said:

No, you really haven't🤣

Sure i have. Losing his riding should never have happened, and i said as much.  I've said clearly that even if the people leaving are being bribed, if he can't get his caucus under control he's got to go. I was very critical of his "sloganeering" even before trudeau stepped down, his 'lets have a carbon tax election" nonsense was lazy and way too easy to deflect (which is precisely what happened). 

2 hours ago, Moonbox said:

I could perhaps believe you've offered some softball nothingburger critiques somewhere, but I don't think there's a bigger and more blinkered PP fanboy than you on this forum.  

Well you think that because you have to lie to yourself to prop up your fake positions and echo chamber logic. 

But it has nothing to do with reality.  

I'm happy to point out the lies you guys say when you claim he "blew a 40 point lead" or whatever it's up to now :)  And point out how stupid it is to say that a guy who got 41.5 percent of the vote is 'unelectable" or something equaliy stupid, but when he makes a mistake i'm happy to call him on it. 

 

that's the biggest difference between you and I. For me the truth works and supports my position so I've got no problem using it. For you the truth is more like Kryptonite and your argument weakens and falls apart around it. So you have to lie

 

  • Downvote 1

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
1 hour ago, eyeball said:

That you're full of shit.

Awww did i make you cry again little guy :)  LOLOL hey your stupidity is NOT my fault. 

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

The ridiculous criticism you level at Liberals on an almost hourly basis provides an ongoing reason for not supporting Poilievre.

Wow, that's one of the least logical things you've said in quite some time and it was up against some pretty stiff competition :) 

Me criticizing liberals for electing liberal governments despite the corruption is no reason not to support a different political leader that I'm not talking about at the time :P  That's just dumb

I get it. You're embarrassed about your support for the left wing and you're angry that you can't defend it and you want that to be my fault as usual.

The very first thing you need to learn is that if you truly don't like corruption you can't be supporting corrupt governments. You need to be punishing them. 

55 minutes ago, eyeball said:

I haven't supported a Liberal in 50 years, for the same reason I don't support Conservatives.

As for the NDP, their approach to preventing crime is building a more fair and equitable economy resulting in a greater number of more opportune choices for people to make and fewer cracks in which to fall.

 

For the last eight years the NDP has been nothing more than support for the liberals. If you vote NDP you're voting for the liberals. And now the NDP is gone. 

 

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
6 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_income_inequality

If you look at that page, the oecd table... Canada is 11th in terms of income equality after taxes 

Usa is 35th or something. 

That's because Canada throws its money away. Wastes it on social programs and things that address social problems. 

If I worked in the states my my tax rate would be lower and my disposable income would probably double. 

But I sure as hell couldn't walk in any neighborhood in my city without any worry. 

Take a look at videos of Kensington Avenue in Philadelphia.  People have been thrown on the garbage heap...

I don't say it very often, but these are moral choices that force me to stay away from that kind of politics.  

We could literally daily post stories of random stabbings and people being killed and all of our major cities in Canada due to the liberal crime policies. Most of which were people that were arrested and then released

We don't have as much gang crime here but when it comes to random violent crime we rival most of the US cities

Your hypocrisy is amazing

  • Downvote 1

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
31 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

There's something to be said about that.  Voting for the Liberals in the last election was a repudiation of the race to the intellectual bottom that the CPC has undertaken since MAGA spilled over into their ranks.  

Bullahit.  You would have voted liberal no matter who the CPC leader was or what he was doing.  There's no 'maga' in the cpc, Carney has been more trump like that PP and has praised him far more as well, not to mention rolling over for him. 

The simple fact is you have a cult like attachment to the liberals and nothing anyone can do or say will shake that. They can commit any crime, destroy the country and it's economy, and you'll still sing their praises even if jesus himself were leading the cpc. 

  • Downvote 1

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
31 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

We could literally daily post stories of random stabbings and people being killed and all of our major cities in Canada due to the liberal crime policies. Most of which were people that were arrested and then released

We don't have as much gang crime here but when it comes to random violent crime we rival most of the US cities

Your hypocrisy is amazing

It wouldn't be hypocrisy, it would be... Being wrong. 

But I appreciate that you didn't didn't actually insult me, just challenged me   Fair enough.

So I went to Google and picked out the first sources that came back for homicide rate.. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_cities_by_crime_rate

 

https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=3510007101&pickMembers[0]=2.2&cubeTimeFrame.startYear=2020&cubeTimeFrame.endYear=2024&referencePeriods=20200101%2C20240101

 

Thunder Bay topped out at 6 murders per 100,000.  Toronto was 1.9.  Thunder Bay would be about the 100th most dangerous city in the USA.

BUT... I did post something without checking first.

 

  • Like 1

 

Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase !

Michael Hardner

Posted
2 hours ago, eyeball said:

I haven't supported a Liberal in 50 years, for the same reason I don't support Conservatives.

As for the NDP, their approach to preventing crime is building a more fair and equitable economy resulting in a greater number of more opportune choices for people to make and fewer cracks in which to fall.

This is just about the opposite of the Liberals/Conservatives who, as evidenced by an eternally expanding wealth/income gap, work to tilt the economy towards the ultra-rich - including being as soft as possible on white collar crooks in power.

So you have just admitted you are responsible for the continuing catch and release of criminals and repeated crime against businesses.  You sound proud to be allowing all the crime to continue.

Your excuse is the wealth distribution has to be changed or some kind of Communist system that gives the repeat offenders a better financial situation or more prosperous life.  That is your excuse for doing nothing to stop all the crime.  That is a really sad, deplorable way of looking at the world and a bizarre way of thinking.  

According to your thinking, criminals can just carry on with their crime and nothing will change unless some miracle happens to make all these repeat offenders financially well off.  That is really a terrible, perverse way of thinking.

You are actually more of a hindrance to building a safe, law abiding society than a help.  An example why Canada is in the mess it is in.   At least you are honest in admitting what your belief is.  I give you credit for that.  

But you do need help.  Perhaps find a good, Bible believing church where you can learn something about the truth about the fallen human nature and the need for repent.  Those who are responsible for evil such as the repeated offenders need to be taken off the streets to protect law-abiding citizens and businesses.   Why don't you care about the well-being of good people and care more for criminals?

  • Downvote 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,015
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    agackibal
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...