gatomontes99 Posted September 18, 2025 Report Posted September 18, 2025 11 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said: Charlie Kirk believed in free speech. He would be sickened you are destroying it in his name. Speech that incited violence is not free. Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
User Posted September 18, 2025 Report Posted September 18, 2025 1 hour ago, Chrissy1979 said: So you’re a chickenshit, a hypocrite, and a liar. Anything else? Projection. Quote
Chrissy1979 Posted September 18, 2025 Report Posted September 18, 2025 4 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Speech that incited violence is not free. You're making things up because you know you're wrong, and you're spitting on Kirk's grave by feeding on his death to get rid of the free speech he fought for. In contrast to your ghoulish exploitation, this is Kimmel's reaction to the shooting. 2 minutes ago, User said: Projection. I have another unanswerable "loaded" question: how was the question loaded? 😂 Quote
User Posted September 18, 2025 Report Posted September 18, 2025 10 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said: I have another unanswerable "loaded" question: how was the question loaded? You are too willfully ignorant and dishonest. 1 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted September 19, 2025 Report Posted September 19, 2025 (edited) 15 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said: You're making things up because you know you're wrong, and you're spitting on Kirk's grave by feeding on his death to get rid of the free speech he fought for. In contrast to your ghoulish exploitation, this is Kimmel's reaction to the shooting. And then he said? He also wore black face and dropped some N bombs. But I guess you are ok with Megan Kelly getting cancelled flr just discussing black face as a Halloween costume, right? Edited September 19, 2025 by gatomontes99 Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
Venandi Posted September 19, 2025 Report Posted September 19, 2025 4 hours ago, Chrissy1979 said: Fuentes and Kirk were fighting because Fuentes thought Kirk wasn’t conservative enough. So you logically assumed that Fuentes shot Kirk then? If an abusive husband with multiple battery convictions is shot, do you assume that it was another abusive husband that did it because he wasn't abusive enough? I can't follow your logic here... Quote
Chrissy1979 Posted September 19, 2025 Report Posted September 19, 2025 1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said: And then he said? He also wore black face and dropped some N bombs. But I guess you are ok with Megan Kelly getting cancelled flr just discussing black face as a Halloween costume, right? The idea of free speech, which Charlie Kirk believed in strongly, is based on the idea that government must not restrict speech. The FCC made it clear they threatened ABC. Ttump made it clear he told them to. Using Kirk’s death to destroy something he deeply believed in is even more shamelessly disrespectful than those people who mocked his death. At least they were being honest that they didn’t care. You’re being just as disrespectful and lying about it. 1 Quote
CdnFox Posted September 19, 2025 Report Posted September 19, 2025 7 hours ago, Chrissy1979 said: I assumed nothing. I just pointed out how you guys were making assumptions based on nothing. No, you februently hope that but of course as we know they were basing it on real things and now we have confirmation 1 hour ago, Chrissy1979 said: The idea of free speech, which Charlie Kirk believed in strongly, is based on the idea that government must not restrict speech. The FCC made it clear they threatened ABC. Ttump made it clear he told them to. Using Kirk’s death to destroy something he deeply believed in is even more shamelessly disrespectful than those people who mocked his death. At least they were being honest that they didn’t care. You’re being just as disrespectful and lying about it. But you don't believe in free speech and you're glad Charlie is dead. Which makes you even more hypocrisful Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
Chrissy1979 Posted September 19, 2025 Report Posted September 19, 2025 10 hours ago, CdnFox said: No, you februently hope that but of course as we know they were basing it on real things and now we have confirmation But you don't believe in free speech and you're glad Charlie is dead. Which makes you even more hypocrisful I believe in free speech and consider his murder to be a horrible thing. You are fighting against free speech and are gleefully exploiting his death to do it. I think that makes you the real "hypocrisful" one. Quote
LinkSoul60 Posted September 19, 2025 Report Posted September 19, 2025 14 hours ago, CouchPotato said: 😂... seriously. Very touching.... Quote
Deluge Posted September 19, 2025 Report Posted September 19, 2025 (edited) 1 hour ago, LinkSoul60 said: 😂... seriously. Very touching.... LinkMissing60 takes as much pleasure in killing as any middle eastern terrorist. Edited September 19, 2025 by Deluge 1 Quote
Nationalist Posted September 19, 2025 Report Posted September 19, 2025 Interestingly enough... This assassination has forfeited not only the political war...but now also the culture war. Good work Libbies! 1 1 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
CdnFox Posted September 19, 2025 Report Posted September 19, 2025 7 hours ago, Chrissy1979 said: I believe in free speech and consider his murder to be a horrible thing. You have always hated free speech and I'm sure you're happy he's dead. You lie of the drop of a hat and every windows it. That's why no one takes you seriously. Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
Chrissy1979 Posted September 19, 2025 Report Posted September 19, 2025 9 minutes ago, CdnFox said: You have always hated free speech and I'm sure you're happy he's dead. You lie of the drop of a hat and every windows it. That's why no one takes you seriously. I know you guys are happy he is dead because you were exploiting him before his body was cold. I know that, unlike Kirk, you despise free speech (which I have always supported). I also know that you lie to make excuses for paedophiles. Quote
Nationalist Posted September 19, 2025 Report Posted September 19, 2025 1 hour ago, Chrissy1979 said: I know you guys are happy he is dead because you were exploiting him before his body was cold. I know that, unlike Kirk, you despise free speech (which I have always supported). I also know that you lie to make excuses for paedophiles. Babe...you got issues. 1 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
CdnFox Posted September 19, 2025 Report Posted September 19, 2025 1 hour ago, Chrissy1979 said: I know you guys are happy he is dead because you were exploiting him before his body was cold. I know that, unlike Kirk, you despise free speech (which I have always supported). I also know that you lie to make excuses for paedophiles. Says the girl who was the first one to Try to make it political by insisting he was a republican LOLOL No exploitation kiddo, we called it like it was and you're pissy because we were honest and you were lying. And you got caught by several people for that. 26 minutes ago, Nationalist said: Babe...you got issues. She has an echo chamber and cult. The echo chamber and cult have issues. 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
User Posted September 20, 2025 Report Posted September 20, 2025 1 minute ago, robosmith said: Floyd was not a hero. He was a scum bag; he didn't deserve to be celebrated. Trying to compare Kirk to Floyd now? You people are unhinged lunatics. 1 Quote
CdnFox Posted September 20, 2025 Report Posted September 20, 2025 1 hour ago, robosmith said: But that's the difference isn't it, he wasn't an innocent man. He was a career criminal and died because he was also a drug user. He was legitimately being arrested by police. He was not engaged in lawful activity Trying to compare a criminal drug user who died while being arrested with a free speech activist who never committed a crime in his life and was killed illegally while exercising his right to free speech is monstrous The fact that you had to include a little lie about him being innocent proves that even you know there's no comparison Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
Chrissy1979 Posted September 20, 2025 Report Posted September 20, 2025 5 minutes ago, CdnFox said: But that's the difference isn't it, he wasn't an innocent man. He was a career criminal and died because he was also a drug user. He was legitimately being arrested by police. He was not engaged in lawful activity Trying to compare a criminal drug user who died while being arrested with a free speech activist who never committed a crime in his life and was killed illegally while exercising his right to free speech is monstrous The fact that you had to include a little lie about him being innocent proves that even you know there's no comparison Is it more or less monstrous to use the death of a free speech advocate to get rid of free speech? 1 hour ago, User said: Floyd was not a hero. He was a scum bag; he didn't deserve to be celebrated. Trying to compare Kirk to Floyd now? You people are unhinged lunatics. Not as much as a scumbag as someone who would like to protect paedos though. Quote
User Posted September 20, 2025 Report Posted September 20, 2025 3 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said: Not as much as a scumbag as someone who would like to protect paedos though. Its about time you slunk away for another decade. You are offering nothing to this forum right now. Quote
Chrissy1979 Posted September 20, 2025 Report Posted September 20, 2025 30 minutes ago, User said: Its about time you slunk away for another decade. You are offering nothing to this forum right now. Can't stand people exposing you for what you are? Quote
CdnFox Posted September 20, 2025 Report Posted September 20, 2025 (edited) 1 hour ago, Chrissy1979 said: Is it more or less monstrous to use the death of a free speech advocate to get rid of free speech? Not really, not when it's Using the very rules that the left set in place against it. If anything there's a good chance that maybe the left will finally realize that their efforts and censorship were terrible it will be used against them in the future. With luck they'll change their course moving forward and step up when their own side is doing the censoring. 1 hour ago, Chrissy1979 said: Not as much as a scumbag as someone who would like to protect paedos though. You mean like you did with Biden? I'm not sure I'd be pointing out your own faults again like that Edited September 20, 2025 by CdnFox Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
Chrissy1979 Posted September 20, 2025 Report Posted September 20, 2025 56 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Not really, not when it's Using the very rules that the left set in place against it. If anything there's a good chance that maybe the left will finally realize that their efforts and censorship were terrible it will be used against them in the future. With luck they'll change their course moving forward and step up when their own side is doing the censoring. You mean like you did with Biden? I'm not sure I'd be pointing out your own faults again like that You invented cancel culture, but that has nothing to do with the first amendment. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.