Trump's Epstein note is Real

[BeaverFever]

6 hours ago, Nationalist said:

As it turns out...the girl was the daughter of a Mar-a-lago club member who's daddy got her a job.

Yea everybody already knows that. What does that have to do with anything 

4 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Biden's election fraud?

There’s some debunked Batshit

[BeaverFever]

Let’s just recap that Trump said the birthday letter was a lie and fake news when it fact it was real and TRUMP was ONCE AGAIN not proven to be the liar but caught attacking the truth teller.  The fact that his cult followers refuse to acknowledge this is proof that they’re a cult. 

[robosmith]

6 hours ago, Nationalist said:

This is the great Libbie line of attack now eh? A Hail Marry to paint Trump as a pedophile?

As it turns out...the girl was the daughter of a Mar-a-lago club member who's daddy got her a job.

Gee...you losers are really desperate. 

I suppose when your polling is in the toilet, ya gotta try something...anything. 

And you're DESPERATELY trying to DEFLECT from Trump's clear statement that HE "shares" "wonderful secrets" with Epstein.

BTW, Trump's polls are ALSO "in the toilet," cause no one is buying your deflection, except the hardest CORE of the MAGA CULT, which means YOU ARE ONE OF THOSE.

Do you understand how many times they had to redact Trump's name from the Epstein Files and HOW DESPERATE Trump is to keep them secret? Any lDIOT can see that desperation SPELLS GUILT. 

I just hope he doesn't drop his suit against WSJ, but he's not FOOL ENOUGH to proceed with DISCOVERY UNDER OATH.

[SpankyMcFarland]

After such a damning revelation, it’s hard to believe Trump will pursue his defamation lawsuit against the WSJ through discovery to the bitter end but given the speed at which he is destroying norms down there and bending the rules to his will, never say never with this shyster. The problem for Republicans is that there will a steady drip of revelations about the friendship between Trump and Epstein and others too.  It’s going to sap their energy. DeSantis or Haley would have saved them from all this - if they could have won the election of course, 

Edited September 10, 2025 by SpankyMcFarland

[SpankyMcFarland]

8 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

Let’s just recap that Trump said the birthday letter was a lie and fake news when it fact it was real and TRUMP was ONCE AGAIN not proven to be the liar but caught attacking the truth teller.  The fact that his cult followers refuse to acknowledge this is proof that they’re a cult. 

He’s going to make anybody defending him look like a fool in the end. 

[Nationalist]

8 hours ago, robosmith said:

And you're DESPERATELY trying to DEFLECT from Trump's clear statement that HE "shares" "wonderful secrets" with Epstein.

BTW, Trump's polls are ALSO "in the toilet," cause no one is buying your deflection, except the hardest CORE of the MAGA CULT, which means YOU ARE ONE OF THOSE.

Do you understand how many times they had to redact Trump's name from the Epstein Files and HOW DESPERATE Trump is to keep them secret? Any lDIOT can see that desperation SPELLS GUILT. 

I just hope he doesn't drop his suit against WSJ, but he's not FOOL ENOUGH to proceed with DISCOVERY UNDER OATH.

Ur insane.

[SpankyMcFarland]

Rule two with Trump is never defend him. Rule one? You need to ask? Just talk to the good people at Deutsche Bank. 

Edited September 10, 2025 by SpankyMcFarland

[robosmith]

5 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Ur insane.

No, it's you who is completely detached from reality.

Not only can you not connect the dots, you can't even acknowledge the dots exist. LMAO

[Nationalist]

5 hours ago, robosmith said:

No, it's you who is completely detached from reality.

Not only can you not connect the dots, you can't even acknowledge the dots exist. LMAO

Connect the dots?

You play 'show me the man and I'll find the crime' way too much.

[SpankyMcFarland]

Here’s another politician struggling to survive the Epstein scandal, Peter Mandelson, the UK’s ambassador to the US. On this occasion it’s probably helpful to him that he’s gay and presumably wasn’t involved in Epstein’s core activities. 

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/sep/10/mandelson-more-very-embarrassing-details-of-epstein-friendship-to-come

 

[SpankyMcFarland]

For the most part, Trump‘s political career has been characterized by capitalizing on enormous good luck late in life. Thus The Apprentice transformed a washed-up bankrupt into America’s favourite big shot who moved with his audience to the Republican Party. One thing he couldn’t change was his previous lifestyle as a louche, amoral womanizer which fit poorly with the values of the Christian MAGA crowd. This is where the luck ran out. Back in the Nineties, people tolerated age-inappropriate heterosexual relationships and borderline criminality in that regard better than they do now. What the birthday book illustrates yet again is that those around Epstein, including Trump, had a clear idea of what he was up to and were OK with it. At this stage the best case scenario for him is that the evidence confirming this is going to accumulate, nothing more damning emerges and Republican voters move on to the next story. 

 

Edited September 10, 2025 by SpankyMcFarland

[robosmith]

5 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Connect the dots?

You play 'show me the man and I'll find the crime' way too much.

Nope. It's the EVIDENCE which has been shown and it says YOU'RE IN DENIAL cause you give CREDIBILITY where NONE IS DUE.

You can't even see Trump's OBVIOUS DESPERATION to COVER IT UP.

[Nationalist]

10 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Nope. It's the EVIDENCE which has been shown and it says YOU'RE IN DENIAL cause you give CREDIBILITY where NONE IS DUE.

You can't even see Trump's OBVIOUS DESPERATION to COVER IT UP.

I give credibility WHEN it's due. There is no evidence that Trump was playing with underage girls. There is evidence that Trump was once a rich "playboy". So fcking what!

You...on the other hand...have zero credibility because you are mentally unstable. 

[CdnFox]

On 9/8/2025 at 1:40 PM, Boges said:

https://x.com/MattBinder/status/1965146521772720139

He's drawn the outline of a child. Effin Pedophile! 

That is very clearly the outline of a woman with breasts. The idea that that's a child is somewhat farcical. And let's be clear, neither Epstein nor Trump wherever actually accused of sleeping with prepubescent kids, just underaged teens.  so 'child' is probably wrong. this is more of a case of Ephebophilia than pedophilia.  

Not that that makes it better, that's still morally wrong and legally wrong,  but you appear to be exaggerating for 'shock' purposes. 

As to whether the letter is authored by trump or someone else on his behalf or something, i honestly don't know. But it's certainly not evidence of pedophilia. 

[WestCanMan]

On 9/8/2025 at 1:40 PM, Boges said:

He's drawn the outline of a child. Effin Pedophile! 

OMG, he's turning into a democrat!

[SpankyMcFarland]

I saw a Republican politician call the authorship of the letter into question. He was then asked whether he would request an investigation into his own allegation and declined to do so which says quite a bit. The letter looks authentic. It’s hard to see how or why somebody would have forged such a document back then when they could easily have been detected. It’s also highly unlikely the estate would have allowed the book to be tampered with more recently. That’s the last thing the lawyers would want. 

Edited September 10, 2025 by SpankyMcFarland

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

That is very clearly the outline of a woman with breasts.

He sees what he wants to see. Don't ruin it for him, with what leftists refer to as "post-pubescent icky stuff". 

[robosmith]

2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

I give credibility WHEN it's due. There is no evidence that Trump was playing with underage girls. There is evidence that Trump was once a rich "playboy". So fcking what!

You...on the other hand...have zero credibility because you are mentally unstable. 

There is EVIDENCE and it's been POSTED HERE. YOUR IGNORANCE won't make it go away.

[robosmith]

21 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

He sees what he wants to see. Don't ruin it for him, with what leftists refer to as "post-pubescent icky stuff". 

Are your HIPS wider than YOUR SHOULDERS and do you have boobs? LMAO

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, SpankyMcFarland said:

I saw a Republican politician call the authorship of the letter into question. He was then asked whether he would request an investigation into his own allegation and declined to do so which says quite a bit. The letter looks authentic. It’s hard to see how or why somebody would have forged such a document back then when they could easily have been detected. It’s also highly unlikely the estate would have allowed the book to be tampered with more recently. That’s the last thing the lawyers would want. 

In what way does it "look authentic'?  How would it look different if it wasn't?

 

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Are your HIPS wider than YOUR SHOULDERS and do you have boobs? LMAO

The picture does  LOL so .....   

I understand this is confusing for you Robo.  IF you ever get a chance to date a woman you'll understand what we're talking about.  

[SpankyMcFarland]

3 hours ago, CdnFox said:

In what way does it "look authentic'?  How would it look different if it wasn't?

 

The picture does  LOL so .....   

I understand this is confusing for you Robo.  IF you ever get a chance to date a woman you'll understand what we're talking about.  

The signature looks authentic for a start. The language is consistent with Trump too. 

I’m happy to wait and see how this plays out. Time will reveal more than any amount of speculation at the moment. 
 

Edited September 10, 2025 by SpankyMcFarland

[robosmith]

8 hours ago, CdnFox said:

The picture does  LOL so .....   

I understand this is confusing for you Robo.  IF you ever get a chance to date a woman you'll understand what we're talking about.  

I've LONG understood YOU ARE CdnLIAR and you've proved that ONCE AGAIN ^here. LMAO

[CdnFox]

6 hours ago, SpankyMcFarland said:

The signature looks authentic for a start.

It would whether it was fake or not. Electric sigs were a thing back then same as today.  I've got a pretty funny story about an angry old lady who stole my sig and put it on a paper saying cristmas decorations were banned and then stole everyone's christmas wreaths   LOLOL

 

Quote

The language is consistent with Trump too. 

That is 100 percent false. If anything it's very untrump. Which isn't proof it's not him but it's certainly doesn't sound like him

But maybe i'm wrong. Name one other thing he wrote that sounded like that.

Quote

I’m happy to wait and see how this plays out. Time will reveal more than any amount of speculation at the moment. 

Sounds like you're not   Sounds like you've allowed your bias to reach an unsupported conclusion. 

Personally i don't really care because there's nothing in there that actually points to inappropriate behavior. It could literally be talking about any element of their sex lives INCLUDING the fact they both have strong ties to victoria secret which is how they met.  Victoria... SECRET?  A secret they share? Hmmmm. 

So this is of no interest to me. IF there's real evidence out there they should find it and present it, and the fact biden didn't says about all i need to know.

[SpankyMcFarland]

And no sooner do I mention Mandy than he is gone:

 

Quote

Keir Starmer has sacked Peter Mandelson as ambassador to the US over his association with Jeffrey Epstein.

The Foreign Office minister Stephen Doughty told MPs that Lord Mandelson had not disclosed the extent and depth of his friendship with Epstein, a convicted child sex offender, when he was appointed as the ambassador.

He said No 10 had not known about emails from Mandelson to Epstein suggesting his 2008 conviction for soliciting a child for prostitution was wrongful and should be challenged.

A Foreign Office spokesperson said: “In light of the additional information in emails written by Peter Mandelson, the prime minister has asked the foreign secretary to withdraw him as ambassador.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/sep/11/keir-starmer-sacks-peter-mandelson-over-jeffrey-epstein-revelations

 

[SpankyMcFarland]

Mr. Trump knows how to sue people if nothing else. Why doesn't he sue the Epstein estate for claiming the infamous document is his? Kash Patel claimed he would open an investigation into how such a forgery got in there. Let’s see how far that goes.

Edited September 17, 2025 by SpankyMcFarland