Trump's Epstein note is Real

[CdnFox]

7 minutes ago, Legato said:

Since you posted Groks answer to all release questions, why are you continuing with the I hate Trump rhetoric.

Wonder why.

Exactly.  Groks answer is that "There are very good reasons biden didn't and they're the same reasons that impact trump."

Yet here he is again, pushing the same dishoenst agenda and asking the same questions

 

[Legato]

Just now, LinkSoul60 said:

It's a strong dislike rhetoric.  

Wonder why that bothers you?

Seems like the word hate has somehow eluded your vocabulary.

[CdnFox]

1 minute ago, LinkSoul60 said:

It's a strong dislike rhetoric.  

Wonder why that bothers you?

Why your hatred rhetoric would bother people you mean?

Well i don't think it bothers people as much as it speaks to your mental health, and why would people pander to the questions of someone who's clearly in a bit of a mental health crisis? Feels like it would just be feeding the fire?

1 minute ago, Legato said:

Seems like the word hate has somehow eluded your vocabulary.

they don't like the word "hate".   They prefer the term "Intense dislike so deep and profound that i just want to shoot the guy in the neck, you know?".   Pls try to use that moving forward, it's like their preferred pronoun  

[Shady]

35 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Since you're tapping out and can't answer...  

According to Grok (for what he's worth) ;

Biden’s failure to release the Epstein files is relevant to the Bondi-Patel memo because both reflect the same legal barriers (grand jury secrecy, victim privacy, and judicial oversight) that prevent unilateral disclosure. The memo’s decision to halt further releases continues the secrecy maintained under Biden, though it may also signal a strategic choice by the new administration to avoid political fallout. Unsigned memos are common in public-facing DOJ-FBI communications, and the use of agency seals in the July 2025 memo aligns with standard practice, though it does little to quell public skepticism about transparency in the Epstein case.

https://x.com/i/grok/share/U8xoYOwGckcOdveZgASvCCYW3

 

So back to the question...  why do you think he's not releasing it?  It was part of his campaign schtick of getting to released, now it's a hoax.  Wonder why...

Why do you think democrats never pushed for Biden to release anything?

[LinkSoul60]

26 minutes ago, Shady said:

Why do you think democrats never pushed for Biden to release anything?

I'm not a Biden apologist. I don't think he was a strong president.  Why do you think Trump doesn't want the files released?

[Shady]

1 minute ago, LinkSoul60 said:

I'm not a Biden apologist. I don't think he was a strong president.  Why do you think Trump doesn't want the files released?

I didn’t ask you about Biden, I asked you why democrats didn’t voice any interest in anything being released when Biden was president.

[LinkSoul60]

51 minutes ago, Legato said:

Seems like the word hate has somehow eluded your vocabulary.

I think we've already been through this...  you tap out and change the narrative because you got nothing.  Told you before, believe what you want. I'm okay if you want to think that. 

[LinkSoul60]

5 minutes ago, Shady said:

I didn’t ask you about Biden, I asked you why democrats didn’t voice any interest in anything being released when Biden was president.

Personally, I don't remember hearing or thinking much about it at all.  I'm also Canadian and can't speak for US democrats.

Why do you think Trump doesn't want the files released?

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Personally, I don't remember hearing or thinking much about it at all.  I'm also Canadian and can't speak for US democrats.

Why do you think Trump doesn't want the files released?

You answered your own question earlier. Now you're just being dishonest.

These are police files, they're not files that were owned by Epstein. They contain information that would affect other people that would be inappropriate. And that's pretty much always the case with police files which is why they are generally not released to the public.

Trump was told that he shouldn't release these by the law inforcement agencies involved and why and he is following their advice and that is the correct move. 

Trump's biggest problem is that he told people that there was some sort of incriminating evidence in the files and that he would release the files in their Entirety and justice would be served. Now he's discovered there was no such thing in the files and that people would be hurt so he's changed his tune and he is very used to his followers just accepting that and moving on when he changes his mind on something but in this case they're not going for it

[Venandi]

13 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

I wouldn't... at all.

I'm guessing you know Bill Clinton was on the "friends list" as well... does your automatic finding of guilty by association apply there? In the absence of compelling evidence to the contrary It certainly doesn't for me. 

 

7 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Why do you think Trump doesn't want the files released?

 

7 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Why do you think Trump doesn't want the files released?

- How many times do you need to hear the answer?

- How many times do you need to hear the answer?

I see this entire thing as a case of patented "Trump bluster" biting him on his own buttocks. It looks like he now sees the potential harm any release would have on innocent people and victims alike and probably regrets saying what he did.

Had the circumstance been different and it was your guy doing the same thing for the same reason, you'd be claiming the moral high gound right now. Frankly, given the expectations of his base and their strong reaction to him not publishing the names, I think it rises to a level of political courage I might have hoped for but didn't actually expect to see. 

Edited October 6, 2025 by Venandi

[LinkSoul60]

4 hours ago, Venandi said:

I'm guessing you know Bill Clinton was on the "friends list" as well... does your automatic finding of guilty by association apply there? In the absence of compelling evidence to the contrary It certainly doesn't for me. 

 

 

- How many times do you need to hear the answer?

- How many times do you need to hear the answer?

I see this entire thing as a case of patented "Trump bluster" biting him on his own buttocks. It looks like he now sees the potential harm any release would have on innocent people and victims alike and probably regrets saying what he did.

Had the circumstance been different and it was your guy doing the same thing for the same reason, you'd be claiming the moral high gound right now. Frankly, given the expectations of his base and their strong reaction to him not publishing the names, I think it rises to a level of political courage I might have hoped for but didn't actually expect to see. 

You assume I have a dog in this fight when you mention Clinton.  Knowing his background, I wouldn't be surprised at all his name is there.  And I'm not sure who 'my guy' is?  If you're referring to Biden you obviously haven't noticed any of my comments of him. He's not 'my guy'.

I'm interested to hear the answer from Trump who as you say 'blustered' about this to expose the 'deep state' yet now says it's a hoax. Why is that....?  That's even after his AG said they had the 'list' sitting on her desk, only to say she misspoke, it was the files on her desk... Sure.

Yours and others defence of a guy who 'blustered' this during his campaign and now say 'let's move on' is admirable. Ill guided in my opinion, but admirable nonetheless. If people are innocent they're innocent, if they're guilty they're guilty, regardless of their political or social status.

Edited October 6, 2025 by LinkSoul60

[Legato]

11 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Why do you think Trump doesn't want the files released?

Here you go again, wearing the hatred on your sleeve. Many times given many explanatory reasons by many people. 

Eyes wide shut.

 

[LinkSoul60]

3 minutes ago, Legato said:

Here you go again, wearing the hatred on your sleeve. Many times given many explanatory reasons by many people. 

Eyes wide shut.

 

Why do you think he doesn't want the files released?

 

Edited October 6, 2025 by LinkSoul60

[Legato]

4 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Why do you think he doesn't want the files released?

 

Same reason as the Biden cartel and a waste of paper. Can't upset the greenies.

[LinkSoul60]

Just now, Legato said:

Same reason as the Biden cartel and a waste of paper. Can't upset the greenies.

You're a waste of time.  Can never answer a question that goes against your loving devotion to a world class narcissist and as always, the need to throw in nonsensical words.  Carry on spoonman....

[Venandi]

1 hour ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Yours and others defence of a guy who 'blustered' this during his campaign and now say 'let's move on' is admirable.

It's not a matter of moving on... let's get after the bad guys in a systematic manner.

But while doing that, let's not throw innocent people and even victims under the bus or label associates / acquaintances as willing participants in the Epstein horror show. 

You may trust the left wing lunatics to apply a level of discretion that says: 

1 hour ago, LinkSoul60 said:

If people are innocent they're innocent,

But I sure don't.

[SpankyMcFarland]

24 minutes ago, Venandi said:

It's not a matter of moving on... let's get after the bad guys in a systematic manner.

But while doing that, let's not throw innocent people and even victims under the bus or label associates / acquaintances as willing participants in the Epstein horror show. 

You may trust the left wing lunatics to apply a level of discretion that says: 

But I sure don't.

We’ll just to wait and see what the files do show. A lot more are going to be released because this is not a simple partisan issue. The Congressman leading the fight for more transparency is a Republican:

Quote

Kentucky Republican U.S. Rep. Thomas Massie says he will soon have the 218 signatures needed to force a U.S. House vote on releasing federal investigation files on convicted sex offender and financier Jeffery Epstein.

Massie, who has led the crusade to release the files much to the ire of Republican President Donald Trump, spoke about his discharge petition during a community forum in rural northeastern Kentucky. He said the results of the special House election in Arizona Tuesday night ensure the petition will receive support from the required number of U.S. House members.

“Both of the candidates on the ballot promised to sign my discharge petition,” Massie said. “And one of them won, obviously, and so now we’re going to have 218 signatures, and we’re going to force a vote on releasing those files.”

The winner of the special election was Democratic candidate Adelita Grijalva.

Earlier this month, Massie appeared with victims of Epstein who supported the release of the files. 

House Republican leaders oppose Massie’s efforts and are backing an investigation by the House Oversight Committee, which is chaired by another Kentucky Republican, U.S. Rep. James Comer.

Massie told reporters after the forum that Republican leaders in D.C. are “in full panic” following the election. He also added that they politically “threatened” Republican co-signers of the petition. 

https://kentuckylantern.com/2025/09/24/massie-says-he-has-the-votes-needed-to-force-u-s-house-vote-on-releasing-epstein-files/

 

Edited October 6, 2025 by SpankyMcFarland

[Chrissy1979]

15 hours ago, Shady said:

I didn’t ask you about Biden, I asked you why democrats didn’t voice any interest in anything being released when Biden was president.

How come you didn’t say anything when Maxwell was moved to a cushy white collar prison? 

[robosmith]

On 10/5/2025 at 12:11 PM, Legato said:

One could hazard a guess that maybe in the past you were given advice from a pedophile. Do you know for sure?

Only if she's Catholic do the odds become high.

[robosmith]

On 10/5/2025 at 12:25 PM, gatomontes99 said:

No one said that. They said he couldn't possibly know. 

If it is always Republicans, why did Democrats block a Republican bill that would have increased penalties for pedophiles?

Democrats Block Hawley Bill to Get Tough on Child Sex Offenders

Why are YOU LYING BY OMISSION with YOUR naked link?

Quote

Senator Durbin, with support from Senators Feinstein (D-Calif.) and Schumer (D-N.Y.), passed similar legislation in 2003. The PROTECT Act worked. But the Supreme Court gutted it in 2005, in a controversial 5-4 decision

 

[robosmith]

23 hours ago, Venandi said:

I'm guessing that it's because people who had nothing to do with Epstein's illegal activities would be irreparably hurt by the release... including some of the victims who never made the spotlight. 

Look how quickly Criissy jumped to conclusions about Trump recruiting 16 year old girls for his "massage parlour."

Personally, I think total release is a bad idea for that reason (the Chrissy effect).  

I'd say "indict the bad guys and leave innocent people alone." Wonder why you don't want the same thing?

You're LYING. "Chrissy" didn't say that.

23 hours ago, Legato said:

So why didn't the Biden crowd of misfits release the documents? We all know they scraped every barrel bottom to find something against Trump.

You KNOW CRAP.

[Legato]

1 minute ago, robosmith said:

You're LYING. "Chrissy" didn't say that.

You KNOW CRAP.

Yes, very well he was a superb inventor.

[robosmith]

23 hours ago, Legato said:

Why didn't the Biden crowd release them?

The files were held by SDNY. What makes YOU BELIEVE "the Biden crowd" knew anything about them?

[robosmith]

23 hours ago, Venandi said:

Given that Biden as his cronies went over that document with a fine tooth comb I'd actually be shocked. 

PROVE ^THIS. There are thousands of documents, and it was Blondi's FBI which "over that document[s] with a fine tooth comb."

19 hours ago, Shady said:

People like you don’t really care about the issue and the victims, you only care because it’s a way to criticize Trump.  People like you didn’t care at all a few months ago and didn’t press the Biden administration to lift a finger.

"People like ^you" reflexively defend EVERY OFFENSE committed by Trump

[Legato]

1 minute ago, robosmith said:

The files were held by SDNY. What makes YOU BELIEVE "the Biden crowd" knew anything about them?

Why do facts always avoid you like the plague.