NDP to vote against throne speech, forcing Liberals to find support elsewhere

[CdnFox]

NDP to vote against throne speech, forcing Liberals to find support elsewhere | CBC News

wow, the NDP grew a spine pretty quick after they got rid of jaggers!  

Interesting. The CPC probably won't back it without concessions, like 'budget before fall" or the like. So the bloc will have to suck it up.  

Or the gov't falls, and then most likely the CPC will be given a chance to run the show.  By tradition if the gov't falls within 6 months of an election the gg won't want to go back to the polls because it's unlikely people's opinions would have substantially changed, so they try to find if there's any other group or coalition that would be willing to try to move forward. If absolutely no one will take the job then it's election time again. 

They'll probably talk one of the others into propping them up, nobody wants an election again this quickly, But it's got to be a pretty serious shot across carney's bow that he's got to think about this so soon. 

[Army Guy]

Way to soon for an election, Let's wait until we see what deal we get on the tariffs and how things work out in the next 6 months...They are not starting off on the right foot, internals problems within his cabinet, first bill is a failure, as much as i'd like to see carney and the liberals fail...lets wait until we get on somewhat stable ground tariff wise first....

We need the NDP to find a much better leader, that will suck liberal votes away, we really need liberal voters to start regretting their choices...If there is a election we need a conservative majority....so PP can start fixing problems...

[CdnFox]

10 minutes ago, Army Guy said:

Way to soon for an election, Let's wait until we see what deal we get on the tariffs and how things work out in the next 6 months...They are not starting off on the right foot, internals problems within his cabinet, first bill is a failure, as much as i'd like to see carney and the liberals fail...lets wait until we get on somewhat stable ground tariff wise first....

We need the NDP to find a much better leader, that will suck liberal votes away, we really need liberal voters to start regretting their choices...If there is a election we need a conservative majority....so PP can start fixing problems...

agreed. I don't think we're in any danger of going to an election either way, i don't think any party could afford it just yet except maybe the cpc, but it's nice that he's already got to be thinking of it. 

[Shady]

I say topple the government if they won’t produce a budget or fiscal update after proposing a half a trillion dollar spending plan with few details.

[Moonlight Graham]

Brilliant tactical decision by the NDP.  They're forcing the Liberals to have to side with the separatists.  

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Moonlight Graham said:

Brilliant tactical decision by the NDP.  They're forcing the Liberals to have to side with the separatists.  

And vice versa, which will make the separatists leery about doing so again in the future that's for sure, he can't be seen to be in bed with his number one political opponent unless he wants to get Jaggerized in the next election 

[ExFlyer]

Ha Ha Ha...and you were wrong again....No Vote needed LOL

[Aristides]

All talk. From the article.

Quote

When debating legislation in the House, the Speaker will ask if MPs request a "recorded division," or a standing vote. If no MP asks for one, the motion is deemed adopted.

No MP asked for recorded division on the throne speech when the time to vote came, meaning it was passed without MPs standing to vote.

 

[herbie]

Oh gee just as the wackos were getting excited to run Milhouse the Meaningless again!

[CdnFox]

7 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

Ha Ha Ha...and you were wrong again....No Vote needed LOL

Well not exactly, there is no recorded vote but there is a vote and the opposition let them off the hook with that, Sends a pretty serious message,  Carney is already losing control, The opposition had to throw him a pity bone.  They probably won't next time   

[ExFlyer]

23 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Well not exactly, there is no recorded vote but there is a vote and the opposition let them off the hook with that, Sends a pretty serious message,  Carney is already losing control, The opposition had to throw him a pity bone.  They probably won't next time   

 

"there is no recorded vote but there is a vote "WTF??? Typical confux reasoning Ha a Ha

Hey dipshit...no recorded vote  = NO VOTE LOL LOL

But hey, I'll bet PP is pissed he didn't get to vote and really pissed at his MP's for not wanting to vote LOL

Edited Thursday at 11:20 PM by ExFlyer

[CdnFox]

Just now, ExFlyer said:

"there is no recorded vote but there is a vote "WTF??? Typical confux reasoning Ha a Ha

Hey dipshit...no recorded vote  = NO VOTE LOL LOL

 

No, it's an old way of having an unofficial vote so the opposition can send a message to the gov't without it being a binding vote. Rarely used but still valid. It allowed the opposition to register their non acceptance of the speech without having to bring the gov't down. Nobody wants an election right now, but nobody wanted to vote for the speech and abstaining is kind of chickensnit. 

That's ok little guy, you'll learn about this stuff in high school  LOLOL 

[ExFlyer]

14 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

No, it's an old way of having an unofficial vote so the opposition can send a message to the gov't without it being a binding vote. Rarely used but still valid. It allowed the opposition to register their non acceptance of the speech without having to bring the gov't down. Nobody wants an election right now, but nobody wanted to vote for the speech and abstaining is kind of chickensnit. 

That's ok little guy, you'll learn about this stuff in high school  LOLOL 

 

"When debating legislation in the House, the Speaker will ask if MPs request a "recorded division," or a standing vote. If no MP asks for one, the motion is deemed adopted.

No MP asked for recorded division on the throne speech when the time to vote came, meaning it was passed without MPs standing to vote."

 

Hey dipshit...no recorded vote  = NO VOTE LOL LOL

But hey, I'll bet PP while sitting in the cheap seats, is pi$$ed his MP's did not vote LOL

Typical BS attempt from the LOSER conmanfux  and as usual...you LOSE.  LOSER  LOL LOL

 

 

Edited Thursday at 11:22 PM by ExFlyer

[CdnFox]

11 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

 

"When debating legislation in the House, the Speaker will ask if MPs request a "recorded division," or a standing vote. If no MP asks for one, the motion is deemed adopted.

No MP asked for recorded division on the throne speech when the time to vote came, meaning it was passed without MPs standing to vote."

 

 

 

Literally what I said. They don't take an official vote which is what standing for a vote and recorded division means.

Only you would be so stupid as to write back what I literally said As if you were telling me something   LOL

no official vote. The opposition let them skate because nobody wanted an election and nobody wanted to vote for it. They literally voted to not have a vote when asked if they wanted an official vote  

But i'm glad you figured it out finally   

[ExFlyer]

12 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Literally ....

BSing your way out of your way out of your stupidity again LOL

 

Edited yesterday at 12:14 PM by ExFlyer

[Nationalist]

13 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Literally what I said. They don't take an official vote which is what standing for a vote and recorded division means.

Only you would be so stupid as to write back what I literally said As if you were telling me something   LOL

no official vote. The opposition let them skate because nobody wanted an election and nobody wanted to vote for it. They literally voted to not have a vote when asked if they wanted an official vote  

But i'm glad you figured it out finally   

I think you hurt flyers feelings...

[ExFlyer]

3 hours ago, Nationalist said:

I think you hurt flyers feelings...

Not at all.

Seeing through confux BS seems to be difficult for you

[CdnFox]

5 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

BSing your way out of your way out of your stupidity again LOL

 

ROFMAO!!!! You repeat back to me what i said to you and when i call you on it you're mad  and want it to be my fault   You go to school on the short bus dont you?   

1 hour ago, ExFlyer said:

Not at all.

LOL, KId... everyone can hear you crying   Go get a cookie. 

[ExFlyer]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

ROFMAO!!!!.

LOL, .

[CdnFox]

52 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

LOL your emotional melt down is on repeat    How does your brain think this works, like maybe i'm sitting here thinking "Wow, i didn't think much of it the first 37 times he posted it but now that he's gone to 38 i really do feel bad'   ROFLMAO!!!

Just give it another 2 or 3 hundred tries, i'm sure i'll start to feel terrible then  

Dude you're a scummy little nobody who very clearly lies his ass off and has nothing intelligent to add.  Nobody, and i do mean nobody, cares what you're crying about now. 

[ExFlyer]

18 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

LOL y...

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, ExFlyer said:

🍿🍿🍿 [munch munch] 🍿🍿🍿

[ExFlyer]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

🍿🍿🍿 

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, ExFlyer said:

ROFLMAO!!!  Tell us again how you're ACTUALLY an adult and not living in your mommies basement, and how you're not trying as you type that   

🍿🍿🍿 [munch munch] 🍿🍿🍿

[ExFlyer]

13 hours ago, CdnFox said:

ROFLMAO!!!  ...

 

Your constant posting is perfect example of Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.