CdnFox Posted 17 hours ago Report Posted 17 hours ago Poilievre rejects severance offered to defeated MPs after losing Ontario riding - The Globe and Mail If a sitting MP is defeated they have a right to Severance. And there is no requirement to pay it back if they seek re-election elsewhere Pierre is entitled to receive $154,850 in Severance because he lost his riding. He is perfectly eligible for that and MPS get that all the time. There's no requirement to repay it if he runs somewhere else. But instead of demanding that he's entitled to his entitlements he's refusing to take it knowing that he doesn't tend to run again and expects to be back in the house and feels it would be inappropriate to keep the money I rather doubt you'd see a liberal doing that 1 1 Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Aristides Posted 16 hours ago Report Posted 16 hours ago And so he should if he still wants to be PM. 2 Quote
CdnFox Posted 16 hours ago Author Report Posted 16 hours ago 19 minutes ago, Aristides said: And so he should if he still wants to be PM. Agreed, but as I say I'm not sure that would be universal across the other parties. Jag meet for example sold out his party for a pension Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
WestCanMan Posted 16 hours ago Report Posted 16 hours ago 37 minutes ago, Aristides said: And so he should if he still wants to be PM. STFU. You know that Trudeau, Carney, Singh and May would all take it. Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid. Ex-Canadian since April 2025
eyeball Posted 15 hours ago Report Posted 15 hours ago Good on PP. I'm sure he'll make it up one day as an appointed board director or trustee or on the lecture circuit. It's all good. 1 Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
herbie Posted 14 hours ago Report Posted 14 hours ago You don't get severance if you don't get severed. PP intends to run again, so he'd have to give it back if he wins a seat. Trudeau didn't run so he's not eligible. May didn't get defeated, so she's not either. Singh's entitled to it, though for a far less amount, and he'd be a fool not to take it and try to run again.\ Nice grumble attempt from a Tory lapdpg though. 2 Quote
eyeball Posted 14 hours ago Report Posted 14 hours ago 2 minutes ago, herbie said: Nice grumble attempt from a Tory lapdpg though. It did seem a little gimmicky at first blush but I thought he had at least a little benefit of doubt coming. I mean he could still lose again. Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
CdnFox Posted 12 hours ago Author Report Posted 12 hours ago 2 hours ago, eyeball said: Good on PP. I'm sure he'll make it up one day as an appointed board director or trustee or on the lecture circuit. It's all good. For sure. Right after he's prime minister for a few terms 1 Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
myata Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago The man who won't take no for an answer. Man who has the duty to keep his bum firmly glued to that chair. Just couldn't see the door he's clearly pointed to. CPC on the trek from ridiculous to maga. There's still time (not that much though) 1 Quote If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant
myata Posted 11 hours ago Report Posted 11 hours ago .. by the way, how much the unnecessary and uncalled for election will cost Canadians simply because the man just couldn't see the door he was pointed to? That's the man. He did that. 1 Quote If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant
CdnFox Posted 10 hours ago Author Report Posted 10 hours ago 1 hour ago, myata said: The man who won't take no for an answer. Man who has the duty to keep his bum firmly glued to that chair. Just couldn't see the door he's clearly pointed to. CPC on the trek from ridiculous to maga. There's still time (not that much though) Read the instructions on your pills again. I don't think you're taking enough 55 minutes ago, myata said: .. by the way, how much the unnecessary and uncalled for election will cost Canadians simply because the man just couldn't see the door he was pointed to? That's the man. He did that. It's not unnecessary and it's not uncalled for I know you absolutely hate democracy if it doesn't serve your immediate purpose. You would rather silence anybody rather than give them a chance to vote for somebody you don't like. In your heart you're a tyrant, you're just another Putin want to be who believes that nobody should have their voice if it disagrees with you. The party has decided to keep him on as leader. Cope with it Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
ExFlyer Posted 6 hours ago Report Posted 6 hours ago 4 hours ago, CdnFox said: Read the instructions on your pills again. I don't think you're taking enough It's not unnecessary and it's not uncalled for I know you absolutely hate democracy if it doesn't serve your immediate purpose. You would rather silence anybody rather than give them a chance to vote for somebody you don't like. In your heart you're a tyrant, you're just another Putin want to be who believes that nobody should have their voice if it disagrees with you. The party has decided to keep him on as leader. Cope with it You mean to those that lost the election as a leader of his party and then even lost his own seat? So, democracy is to kick out a loyal member so the loser can take his spot ? I would think in doing so serves his personal immediate purpose?? Hopefully the residents of the riding he is stealing see what he is, a loser, and will not let him get away with it. Quote Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.
myata Posted 6 hours ago Report Posted 6 hours ago The unnecessary and bogus election will cost us, Canadian taxpayers over $1 million "Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre’s bid to regain a seat in Parliament through a byelection could cost taxpayers more than $1 million, according to data from recent races." Put it into perspective, preferably with own brain. So much for "honorable" but it's only a word who cared, right? In fact, we are talking here about a gross disrespect to Canadian taxpayers and democracy itself. Party over the country, but we knew that already small surprise. 1 Quote If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant
ExFlyer Posted 6 hours ago Report Posted 6 hours ago Sorry, but I cannot feel sorry for him not cheer his stance. He has made $299,900 per year as leader of opposition and. Lived in government housing (19-room mansion with eight bedrooms, five bathrooms, living room, sitting room (2nd floor), and dining room, and sits on extensive grounds. Besides the residents in the home, Stornoway is served by a staff of three: a chef, chauffeur, and household administrator. and is maintained with $70,000 a year in government funds" Quote Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.
Aristides Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago 11 hours ago, WestCanMan said: STFU. You know that Trudeau, Carney, Singh and May would all take it. I don't know that and neither do you. The optics would be really bad for someone who still has aspirations for the big job. I'm not judging his integrity, just saying it is also an astute political move. If Carney is as good as his word about expediting a bye election, it won't be long before he is back in the house. We have seen a side of PP since the election was lost that we hadn't seen before. If he had shown it before, perhaps the conservatives wouldn't have lost. If he keeps it up, I wouldn't be surprised if he eventually does become PM. 1 Quote
Moonbox Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago (edited) 39 minutes ago, Aristides said: I'm not judging his integrity, just saying it is also an astute political move. Astute is a bit of a stretch, I think. Taking this payment would have made (even more) a laughingstock and hypocrite out of him. This is like praising your child for not scoring on his own net again. Edited 4 hours ago by Moonbox 1 Quote "A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he is for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous
WestCanMan Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, Aristides said: I don't know that and neither do you. The optics would be really bad for someone who still has aspirations for the big job. I'm not judging his integrity, just saying it is also an astute political move. If Carney is as good as his word about expediting a bye election, it won't be long before he is back in the house. We have seen a side of PP since the election was lost that we hadn't seen before. If he had shown it before, perhaps the conservatives wouldn't have lost. If he keeps it up, I wouldn't be surprised if he eventually does become PM. You know that about Singh for sure, because he extended our failed Trudeau gov't just to get pensions for him MP's. You know that about Trudeau for sure because he funnelled gov't money to WE as if it was their birthright. He even took money from WE to speak at charity events after he was an MP. E. May is a grimy loser who needs vodka money. She'd personally go out and shake down homeless people for their unpaid taxes to get her $184k. Leftists are trash. Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid. Ex-Canadian since April 2025
WestCanMan Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 12 hours ago, eyeball said: A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding. I see that in your signature there... Where is gov't oversight supposed to come from, pray tell? The media is supposed to play a big role in that, but our media in Canada is openly supporting one party and has been for decades now. You fully support the lack of media in this country. What type of oversight are you hoping for? The media tells Canadians that scandals and ethics breaches don't matter, and you support that, so what would be the point of "oversight" if the media can just ignore it or convince Canadians to look away? Our old ethic commissioner got PTSD, and the RCMP weren't allowed to question anyone about Trudeau's scandals, and you were happy about that, so again, why even pretend that you actually want oversight? Do you think that there should be more oversight on the opposition? Is that it? I think that if you were being honest, you'd say that you want the opposition under heavy scrutiny, and mostly muzzled. 1 Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid. Ex-Canadian since April 2025
Gaétan Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago Do you think a rich person would lower themselves to pick up 5 cents? He is there for the glory and to be talked about on television. Quote
WestCanMan Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 4 minutes ago, Gaétan said: Do you think a rich person would lower themselves to pick up 5 cents? He is there for the glory and to be talked about on television. ^^That^^ right there just came from a guy who thinks that the leader of Hamas is a swell guy with good intentions. I think we're done here. Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid. Ex-Canadian since April 2025
Barquentine Posted 44 minutes ago Report Posted 44 minutes ago 17 hours ago, CdnFox said: I rather doubt you'd see a liberal doing that Your extreme bias constantly clouds your judgment. 1 Quote
myata Posted 38 minutes ago Report Posted 38 minutes ago 4 hours ago, Aristides said: just saying it is also an astute political move. Keeping the objective numbers in mind I can't quite agree and neither should anyone who can count. 1.2 to 1.5 million $ for unnecessary election spent versus ~ 10% "saved"? Ohoh. It surely works out of someone's pocket just not his. 1 Quote If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant
Moonbox Posted 34 minutes ago Report Posted 34 minutes ago 2 minutes ago, myata said: Keeping the objective numbers in mind I can't quite agree and neither should anyone who can count. 1.2 to 1.5 million $ for unnecessary election spent versus ~ 10% "saved"? Ohoh. It surely works out of someone's pocket just not his. I don't know why you would say the election was unnecessary. Trudeau didn't have a mandate anymore. Carney wasn't elected, until he was. Quote "A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he is for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous
herbie Posted 28 minutes ago Report Posted 28 minutes ago He must get re-elected. He has zero employment experience in the real world. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.