Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Says the guy whining his diapers off :) 

But what we were talking about is lying.  I take it you're conceding that PP isn't a liar and carney is? Well.... nice of you to be honest about it but lets face it, everyone already knew :) 

Whine? Me? Not likely.

I told you before, your opinion mean zero to me

My political views mean nothing to you so...we are even LOL

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
1 minute ago, ExFlyer said:

 

Whine? Me? Not likely.

All the time buddy. And I'm far from the only person to call you out about it :) 

 

Quote

I told you before, your opinion mean zero to me

It is obvious to everyone that my opinion matters a great deal to you.

 

Quote

My political views mean nothing to you so...we are even LOL

That's not true, I don't agree with your political views but that doesn't mean I'm not interested in what you believe.  It's always fascinating to me to see how the minds of those on the left will twist and turn the facts to try and prop up their position. It's like studying cancer or any sort of bacterial growth, the knowledge is valuable. 

Plus it was always mildly amusing when you had your big meltdowns and would post pages and pages of you being a child :)   Glad you managed to grow as a person beyond that but it was always good for a laugh :) 

 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

All the time buddy. And I'm far from the only person to call you out about it :) 

 

It is obvious to everyone that my opinion matters a great deal to you.

 

That's not true, I don't agree with your political views but that doesn't mean I'm not interested in what you believe.  It's always fascinating to me to see how the minds of those on the left will twist and turn the facts to try and prop up their position. It's like studying cancer or any sort of bacterial growth, the knowledge is valuable. 

Plus it was always mildly amusing when you had your big meltdowns and would post pages and pages of you being a child :)   Glad you managed to grow as a person beyond that but it was always good for a laugh :) 

 

Poilievre promises to make microplastics even bigger

 

https://www.thebeaverton.com/2025/04/poilievre-promises-to-make-microplastics-even-bigger/

  • Haha 1

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
1 hour ago, herbie said:

And being completely unable to present a sensible argument for the resumption of single use plastics, again resorts to the standard you/your candidate is a liar ad hominem.

Having been completely unable to present a sensible argument for keeping the single-use Plastics ban, you resort to the very thing you accuse others of. 

  • Sad 2

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
17 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

Perhaps. :)

Oh yes it does. He said he will cancel C380 and 82

Those bills don't deal with recycling.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted

It's not just Polly or Carney, it's the entire world of legislators, regulators and enforcement that have no idea about the severe and mostly irreversible damage to the most fundamental of species (phytoplankton) that are the top of the food chain of the entire planet - and the primary use of carbon.  Most of this damage done by plastic waste - and of course the microplastic issue is now a problem for ALL life forms on the planet.  Our collective ignorance is merely reflected by half-wit politicians.

The sad part is there are plastic-like resins that can easily replace many uses of plastics with materials that are not only fully bio-degradable but are actually soil nutrients.  Meanwhile the plastics industry that is the forefront of making life on this planet unsustainable continues to convince politicians they can "recycle" and make the problem go away.  Pure 100% BS.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
24 minutes ago, cannuck said:

It's not just Polly or Carney, it's the entire world of legislators, regulators and enforcement that have no idea about the severe and mostly irreversible damage to the most fundamental of species (phytoplankton) that are the top of the food chain of the entire planet - and the primary use of carbon.  Most of this damage done by plastic waste - and of course the microplastic issue is now a problem for ALL life forms on the planet.  Our collective ignorance is merely reflected by half-wit politicians.

The sad part is there are plastic-like resins that can easily replace many uses of plastics with materials that are not only fully bio-degradable but are actually soil nutrients.  Meanwhile the plastics industry that is the forefront of making life on this planet unsustainable continues to convince politicians they can "recycle" and make the problem go away.  Pure 100% BS.

Why not just stop throwing plastic into waterways and nature?  Why not put it all in recycle bins and recycle it?  We need to be cleaning up the oceans and waterways and removing any plastic.

It would be pretty hard to ban all plastics.  We have countless things we need it for.  What about all the plastic bottles we use for water, pop, juices, and countless things?  What about the plastic bags we use for food and many things?  It would make more sense to just recycle it all instead of trying to ban things that we need.

The Liberals and left's idea of banning plastic straws will accomplish nothing.  What about the tons of other plastic things used for countless purposes?  They didn't ban them.

It was all show to garner votes much like their fake war on climate change.

Edited by blackbird
Posted
15 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Couldn't refute the fact that your candidate lies more huh? :) Gee that's too bad for you

Phuck man...it is a satire piece and that can wind you up too???

You are so gullible LOL

Canadian-Satire-Patreon-plug.jpg

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
3 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Those bills don't deal with recycling.

Bill C 380 This enactment amends the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 to delete plastic manufactured items from the list of toxic substances in Schedule 1 to that Act.

https://www.parl.ca/DocumentViewer/en/44-1/bill/C-380/first-reading

 

Bill 82. Single-Use Plastics Ban Act, 2019

The Bill amends the Resource Recovery and Circular Economy Act, 2016 by requiring the Minister to amend the Strategy described in section 3 of the Act to include a plan that identifies measurable targets and sets out timelines for the immediate reduction and eventual elimination of the distribution and supply of single-use plastics

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
28 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

Bill C 380 This enactment amends the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 to delete plastic manufactured items from the list of toxic substances in Schedule 1 to that Act.

https://www.parl.ca/DocumentViewer/en/44-1/bill/C-380/first-reading

 

Bill 82. Single-Use Plastics Ban Act, 2019

The Bill amends the Resource Recovery and Circular Economy Act, 2016 by requiring the Minister to amend the Strategy described in section 3 of the Act to include a plan that identifies measurable targets and sets out timelines for the immediate reduction and eventual elimination of the distribution and supply of single-use plastics

And why...would anyone do that when we know how to recycle the materials? Why give up on plastic...a silly idea in today's world to begin with...when we know we can continue to re-use the material over and over again?

You answer is to what? Increase costs and reduce effectiveness.

That's rather shallow...

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
15 minutes ago, blackbird said:

Funny how the loons think government can save the planet by banning a few things.  Would make more sense to teach people to recycle plastic.

Wouldn’t it be better not to use something that pollutes and instead use something that pollutes less?  

Posted
32 minutes ago, TreeBeard said:

Wouldn’t it be better not to use something that pollutes and instead use something that pollutes less?  

No it wouldn't.  There are no good alternatives to plastic for a lot of things.  What would replace plastic pop or juice bottles and many other plastic bottles?

Posted
1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

And why...would anyone do that when we know how to recycle the materials? Why give up on plastic...a silly idea in today's world to begin with...when we know we can continue to re-use the material over and over again?

You answer is to what? Increase costs and reduce effectiveness.

That's rather shallow...

PP does not. He wants to kill the bill. It must be obvious to you that PP is not listening to you LOL

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
2 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

Phuck man...it is a satire piece and that can wind you up too???

 

I never commented on the piece at all. I didn't say anything about it. All I said was you can't refute my argument apparently  :) 

Awww muffin... looks like the truth is what winds YOU up isn't it :) 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
35 minutes ago, blackbird said:

No it wouldn't.  There are no good alternatives to plastic for a lot of things.  What would replace plastic pop or juice bottles and many other plastic bottles?

Why did you switch to bottles?  Can’t you defend plastic straws?

Posted
13 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

I never commented on the piece at all. I didn't say anything about it. All I said was you can't refute my argument apparently  :) 

Awww muffin... looks like the truth is what winds YOU up isn't it :) 

Ohhh poor baby...gonna fly off the deep end again :(

Satire is beyond you comprehension LOL

I see a meltdown coming LOL

 

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
29 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

Ohhh poor baby...gonna fly off the deep end again :(

Satire is beyond you comprehension LOL

I see a meltdown coming LOL

 

LOL i think we all see a meltdown coming ;)  It's already started, and it's what we expect from you. 

So here come the constant repetative posts with you crying like a baby and demanding others are losers because you can't cope with the fact that you are :)   

Please no ass porn tho. 

  image.png.3d66a62ec321ef32586f202683a7d90f.png image.png.f45a7c6773de438c01388d738ee1ba42.pngimage.png.543bec340d2e9618fdcc08d565763051.png

🍿🍿🍿 [munch munch] 🍿🍿🍿

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
1 hour ago, ExFlyer said:

PP does not. He wants to kill the bill. It must be obvious to you that PP is not listening to you LOL

He wants to kill the bill because its a stupid waste of funds.

How don't you get that?

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

He wants to kill the bill because its a stupid waste of funds.

How don't you get that?

Yup, you are right LOL

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
5 hours ago, cannuck said:

Our collective ignorance

You mean a certain subset of "us" who promote ignorance as common sense and personal convenience as the ultimate goal of humanity.

BTW you're going to be attacked by those who think even using the word "collective" = communist conspiracy and "social good" = socialism.

Posted
1 minute ago, Aristides said:

You can't reason with these fools, they obviously think we need more plastic crap going into the environment.

You can lie to yourself if you like but that's clearly not what the issue was

The issue was solutions that don't actually solve anything aren't solutions and we're not really interested in supporting them. You demand that people accept that plastic going into the environment is bad but completely ignore and refute a scientific report showing that the paper straws are putting as much forever chemicals in the environment which is just as bad. And they create more carbon emissions to make.

But sure, lie to yourself and pretend that the issue is that some people think we need more plastic or whatever childishness lets you sleep through the night 🙄

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,898
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Flora smith
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • CDN1 went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Politics1990 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Akalupenn earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...