Michael Hardner Posted January 4 Report Posted January 4 Summary of her opposition: - everyman Poilievre uses economic statistics. Deceptively in the interview - Peterson makes money from pro-life ads that feature during the interview - Poilievre makes false claims about housing in the interview - The claim that present policy imported racism into Canada is ridiculous ---+++ The one thing I found intriguing is the claim about increasing inequity, I.e the rich getting richer. I feel that that is only going to continue under Poilievre, but if a rising tide lifts all boats, maybe it won't matter? What do you think? 1 1 Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
Politics1990 Posted January 4 Report Posted January 4 (edited) 😆 I can't take anyone serious who wants to be pm and uses the word wokeism for everything the more he speaks the more it has convinced me to just go vote for whichever party has the best chance in my riding vs his at this point. Also thinking company's are gonna pass money down in wages to workers is hilarious that has never worked either they will pocket it for themselves. to be honest i was gonna just sit out the next election but him babbling on about wokeism and just being an annoying turd the past couple month has convinced me to go vote instead of staying home so congrats PP 1 more vote against you cause of your big mouth 🤣 Edited January 4 by Politics1990 2 Quote
NAME REMOVED Posted January 4 Report Posted January 4 Everything PP has done for the last 6 months, convinced me that he would be a big mistake as leader for Canada. The Liberals have not been as bad, as people have made them out to be, and the venom and hatred for Trudeau actually makes me sympathetic for him. Having said that, there needs to be a change, and I can't bring myself to vote Conservative or Liberal. I'm not a big fan of the NDP, but right now it is the lesser of the evils. Quote
Politics1990 Posted January 4 Report Posted January 4 (edited) 3 minutes ago, DUI_Offender said: Everything PP has done for the last 6 months, convinced me that he would be a big mistake as leader for Canada. The Liberals have not been as bad, as people have made them out to be, and the venom and hatred for Trudeau actually makes me sympathetic for him. Having said that, there needs to be a change, and I can't bring myself to vote Conservative or Liberal. I'm not a big fan of the NDP, but right now it is the lesser of the evils. pretty much where i am at voted liberal 2011 2015 2019(wasn't happy about it) 2021 i had enough and voted ndp because the thought of otoole being pm instead of trudeau didn't worry me if it happened but once again fast forward to 2025 and the cons pick another clown just like they did with scheer.. i don't lilke any of the 3 leaders but the cons leader is so bad it's pushing my to just vote for the lesser of the 3 and right now that's trending ndp unless the liberals make a change and gain poll support Edited January 4 by Politics1990 Quote
CdnFox Posted January 4 Report Posted January 4 1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said: Summary of her opposition: - everyman Poilievre uses economic statistics. Deceptively in the interview - Peterson makes money from pro-life ads that feature during the interview - Poilievre makes false claims about housing in the interview - The claim that present policy imported racism into Canada is ridiculous ---+++ The one thing I found intriguing is the claim about increasing inequity, I.e the rich getting richer. I feel that that is only going to continue under Poilievre, but if a rising tide lifts all boats, maybe it won't matter? What do you think? I think in all of the years I've known you this is the first time you've ever started a thread instead of complaining about the threads other people start well done. On to the 'review'... anyone who starts off saying her attention span is less than 2 hours so this was hard for her is probably not going to be intelligent Her first real critism is that polievre talks about women... accurately LOL She agrees with him and then just says she's tired of talking about babies. from there it goes downhill. She's dumber than a stump. She doesn't understand that gdp per capita 'reflects' what people earn and what they can afford and what kind of taxes the gov't collects. She feels it doesn't. SHe is wrong. it does. She then goes on to misquote facts about inflation. She then says the only reason people are struggling is the rich stole your money!!! LOLOL (stupidest comment ever) She doesn't say he makes false claims about housing. she says that if the developers saved money they'd keep it. Which shows a SHOCKING lack of understanding about the market So a little dishonest of you there mike. Bottom line this is a person who's dumber than a stamp hammer, you've misrepresented what she said Mike, and honestly she's SAID HE WAS RIGHT ABOUT EVERYTHNIG HE MENTIONED, but just carries on to say if Polievre fixes the problems the rich will just steal the money anyway so we're all doomed. Mike, if this is an example of what you consider to be "good" commentary, i can see why you don't get a tonne of respect here. Surely to god there's a better critique out there that actually critiques? I could write a better critique and i liked the interview. 1 Quote
Legato Posted January 4 Report Posted January 4 1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said: Summary of her opposition: - everyman Poilievre uses economic statistics. Deceptively in the interview - Peterson makes money from pro-life ads that feature during the interview - Poilievre makes false claims about housing in the interview - The claim that present policy imported racism into Canada is ridiculous ---+++ The one thing I found intriguing is the claim about increasing inequity, I.e the rich getting richer. I feel that that is only going to continue under Poilievre, but if a rising tide lifts all boats, maybe it won't matter? What do you think? Summary of the above post.... I don't like Peterson so I scoured the internet to find something that fits my dislike. Amiright? 1 Quote
Popular Post CdnFox Posted January 4 Popular Post Report Posted January 4 48 minutes ago, Politics1990 said: 😆 I can't take anyone serious who wants to be pm and uses the word wokeism for everything On the other hand you will repetitively vote for someone who has proven to be corrupt, breaks the law regularly, is dishonest, and has lead Canada to ruin. But he didn't say woke! So he's all good right? People like you are one of the best arguments against democracy 3 1 1 Quote
Politics1990 Posted January 4 Report Posted January 4 Just now, CdnFox said: On the other hand you will repetitively vote for someone who has proven to be corrupt, breaks the law regularly, is dishonest, and has lead Canada to ruin. But he didn't say woke! So he's all good right? People like you are one of the best arguments against democracy oh please you don't think the harper government didn't so shady stuff before the trudeau one? every government does shady things cry me a river lol. i already said i won't be voting liberal in the upcoming election if jt is the leader anyway. Quote
Michael Hardner Posted January 4 Author Report Posted January 4 15 minutes ago, Legato said: Summary of the above post.... I don't like Peterson so I scoured the internet to find something that fits my dislike. Amiright? No, this just popped up in my Facebook feed. Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
Army Guy Posted January 4 Report Posted January 4 1 hour ago, Politics1990 said: 😆 I can't take anyone serious who wants to be pm and uses the word wokeism for everything the more he speaks the more it has convinced me to just go vote for whichever party has the best chance in my riding vs his at this point. Also thinking company's are gonna pass money down in wages to workers is hilarious that has never worked either they will pocket it for themselves. to be honest i was gonna just sit out the next election but him babbling on about wokeism and just being an annoying turd the past couple month has convinced me to go vote instead of staying home so congrats PP 1 more vote against you cause of your big mouth 🤣 News flash....PP does not need your approval or vote it is already a sure thing with a super majority, the liberal and NDP parties are going to be devastated....with a great possibility of the bloc party becoming official opposition, ....so for the next 4 years or so get use to his remarks....on a positive note we will not have to listen to many liberals or NDPers whine from the bench.... 2 1 1 Quote We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.
Army Guy Posted January 4 Report Posted January 4 1 hour ago, DUI_Offender said: Everything PP has done for the last 6 months, convinced me that he would be a big mistake as leader for Canada. The Liberals have not been as bad, as people have made them out to be, and the venom and hatred for Trudeau actually makes me sympathetic for him. Having said that, there needs to be a change, and I can't bring myself to vote Conservative or Liberal. I'm not a big fan of the NDP, but right now it is the lesser of the evils. Your a perfect example of a liberal voter, nose blind to all the sh!t they have done in the last 9 years. Thats normal practice for you liberals happens in all governments, your moral values are at the bottom of the scale....supporting a party that has made a practice out of lying to Canadians on a daily basis, deceiving Canadians , stealing from Canadians to benefit their own needs and wants...these are Canadian heros to you....because you are just like them... 3 1 1 Quote We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.
CdnFox Posted January 4 Report Posted January 4 (edited) 5 hours ago, Politics1990 said: oh please you don't think the harper government didn't so shady stuff before the trudeau one? Nope. They absolutely did not. Quote every government does shady things cry me a river lol. i already said i won't be voting liberal in the upcoming election if jt is the leader anyway. No they don't. And when conservative governments do it and the electorate finds out about it conservatives punish the shit out of them. The problem is that those on the left are constantly prepared to reward that behavior. And yet you want to excuse it by pretending somehow it's acceptable to other people. Like your own lack of morals and decency is somehow ok if you can pretend everyone else feels the same way. They don't. We're not talking about a slip up or a misunderstanding or somebody being incompetent and doing something they shouldn't have, we're talking about constant and regular deliberate breaches of ethics and the law that began almost immediately after he took office and has not stopped. Not to mention allowing foreign interference in the form of Chinese money pouring into liberal candidates and taking no action to prevent us because it was beneficial to him. Sorry, you don't get to pass that off as everybody does it. You are supporting a corrupt government because you are a corrupt and moralist individual as are many on the left. Fortunately the ones who are not as a moral and repugnant as yourself have finally realized that they cannot support the scumbag liberals the way they used to and are now turning to Poilievre and are set to give him the largest majority in history. The liberals will have a long walk back from this one and they may even be wiped out, which is what they desperately need. The party has become inherently corrupt and so has its base. They need to be shaken up and think about their actions. Edited January 5 by CdnFox 1 1 Quote
Politics1990 Posted January 4 Report Posted January 4 1 hour ago, CdnFox said: I think in all of the years I've known you this is the first time you've ever started a thread instead of complaining about the threads other people start well done. On to the 'review'... anyone who starts off saying her attention span is less than 2 hours so this was hard for her is probably not going to be intelligent Her first real critism is that polievre talks about women... accurately LOL She agrees with him and then just says she's tired of talking about babies. from there it goes downhill. She's dumber than a stump. She doesn't understand that gdp per capita 'reflects' what people earn and what they can afford and what kind of taxes the gov't collects. She feels it doesn't. SHe is wrong. it does. She then goes on to misquote facts about inflation. She then says the only reason people are struggling is the rich stole your money!!! LOLOL (stupidest comment ever) She doesn't say he makes false claims about housing. she says that if the developers saved money they'd keep it. Which shows a SHOCKING lack of understanding about the market So a little dishonest of you there mike. Bottom line this is a person who's dumber than a stamp hammer, you've misrepresented what she said Mike, and honestly she's SAID HE WAS RIGHT ABOUT EVERYTHNIG HE MENTIONED, but just carries on to say if Polievre fixes the problems the rich will just steal the money anyway so we're all doomed. Mike, if this is an example of what you consider to be "good" commentary, i can see why you don't get a tonne of respect here. Surely to god there's a better critique out there that actually critiques? I could write a better critique and i liked the interview. she is actually quite bright and known for making right wingers look dumb as a rock on social media but sure spin your bs like usual lol Quote
I am Groot Posted January 4 Report Posted January 4 (edited) 4 hours ago, Michael Hardner said: ---++ The one thing I found intriguing is the claim about increasing inequity, I.e the rich getting richer. I feel that that is only going to continue under Poilievre, but if a rising tide lifts all boats, maybe it won't matter? What do you think? According to the parliamentary budget officer income inequality grew under Chretien but subsided under Harper due to tax changes the Tories had made. It has been growing under Trudeau, however. Edited January 4 by I am Groot 2 Quote
Michael Hardner Posted January 4 Author Report Posted January 4 1 hour ago, Politics1990 said: she is actually quite bright and known for making right wingers look dumb as a rock on social media but sure spin your bs like usual lol And actually I didn't say she was right. Dishonest to say that. Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
taxme Posted January 4 Report Posted January 4 4 hours ago, Michael Hardner said: Summary of her opposition: - everyman Poilievre uses economic statistics. Deceptively in the interview - Peterson makes money from pro-life ads that feature during the interview - Poilievre makes false claims about housing in the interview - The claim that present policy imported racism into Canada is ridiculous ---+++ The one thing I found intriguing is the claim about increasing inequity, I.e the rich getting richer. I feel that that is only going to continue under Poilievre, but if a rising tide lifts all boats, maybe it won't matter? What do you think? Give Poilievre a chance to govern and lets see what he can do to help try and make Canada great again for Canada and Canadians. All we ever get from left wing people like you is negative remarks about PP. Do you honestly believe that PP could be an even worse PM for Canada if elected? DEI was only created to leave old whitey out of the picture. The rich will always get richer, no matter what political party is in power and running the country. Your Zionist buddies always do well no matter who is in power. You know that and i and many others know that. Even PP knows as to who he has to bend the knee too. 🤔 Quote
herbie Posted January 4 Report Posted January 4 6 minutes ago, taxme said: DEI was only created to leave old whitey out of the picture. Mr. I.M. Notaracist at it again. Be happy that WalMart is ditching DEI. That means they'll never be forced to hire another white person again. Enjoy. Quote
NAME REMOVED Posted January 4 Report Posted January 4 3 hours ago, CdnFox said: Mike, if this is an example of what you consider to be "good" commentary, i can see why you don't get a tonne of respect here. Surely to god there's a better critique out there that actually critiques? I could write a better critique and i liked the interview. Michael is 1,000 times more valuable to this forum than you will be. Michael has class, something you or your Orange God do not comprehend. In a World of MAGA hyenas, be a leader, and that is precisely what Michael is. 1 Quote
ironstone Posted January 4 Report Posted January 4 5 hours ago, Michael Hardner said: Summary of her opposition: - everyman Poilievre uses economic statistics. Deceptively in the interview - Peterson makes money from pro-life ads that feature during the interview - Poilievre makes false claims about housing in the interview - The claim that present policy imported racism into Canada is ridiculous ---+++ The one thing I found intriguing is the claim about increasing inequity, I.e the rich getting richer. I feel that that is only going to continue under Poilievre, but if a rising tide lifts all boats, maybe it won't matter? What do you think? I had to turn off that clip at 40 seconds because that diva was nauseating. I watched the full interview on Peterson's Daily Wire channel. My main critique is that they are acting as though it's a sure thing that PP is going to win. That could be dangerous and a lot can change from now until the election. What statistics was he using deceptively? So what if Peterson has pro-life ads? The numbers of anti-Semitic incidents are rather high these days so one has to wonder about Canada bringing in lot's of people from a region where there is intense hatred of Israel and Jews in general. Quote "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell
Michael Hardner Posted January 4 Author Report Posted January 4 2 minutes ago, ironstone said: I had to turn off that clip at 40 seconds because that diva was nauseating. I watched the full interview on Peterson's Daily Wire channel. My main critique is that they are acting as though it's a sure thing that PP is going to win. That could be dangerous and a lot can change from now until the election. What statistics was he using deceptively? So what if Peterson has pro-life ads? The numbers of anti-Semitic incidents are rather high these days so one has to wonder about Canada bringing in lot's of people from a region where there is intense hatred of Israel and Jews in general. Well you'd have to watch the critique to find out the substance of it. But fair enough, you are disgusted by the diva just as the liberal Elite are disgusted by Poilievre and his Chihuahua dog style of politics. All fair. I found your criticism interesting, although I don't think you have to worry about the conservatives getting smug with the lead they have. Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
ironstone Posted January 4 Report Posted January 4 9 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said: Well you'd have to watch the critique to find out the substance of it. But fair enough, you are disgusted by the diva just as the liberal Elite are disgusted by Poilievre and his Chihuahua dog style of politics. All fair. I found your criticism interesting, although I don't think you have to worry about the conservatives getting smug with the lead they have. Except for the possible overconfidence, I was impressed with PP in that interview. I have no idea who that woman is, and based on what she said right from the get go I decided to see the interview in it's entirety rather than a 9 minute summary from her. I would urge others to watch the full interview themselves and draw their own conclusions. Quote "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell
Politics1990 Posted January 4 Report Posted January 4 2 hours ago, Michael Hardner said: And actually I didn't say she was right. Dishonest to say that. i never said you said she was right :P? i am saying shes right i am a big fan of her she trolls the right wingers like trump musk and pp perfectly Quote
Michael Hardner Posted January 5 Author Report Posted January 5 30 minutes ago, Politics1990 said: i never said you said she was right :P? i am saying shes right i am a big fan of her she trolls the right wingers like trump musk and pp perfectly The post you quoted said that. Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
User Posted January 5 Report Posted January 5 7 hours ago, Michael Hardner said: The one thing I found intriguing is the claim about increasing inequity, I.e the rich getting richer. I feel that that is only going to continue under Poilievre, but if a rising tide lifts all boats, maybe it won't matter? What do you think? This sums up my thoughts well: Quote
CdnFox Posted January 5 Report Posted January 5 4 hours ago, Politics1990 said: she is actually quite bright and known for making right wingers look dumb as a rock on social media but sure spin your bs like usual lol She's dumb as a stump. She agreed with everything he said and then literally everything else after she agreed was wrong. I have no doubt that other people that have no education in these matters and are equally of low intellect believe that somehow she's making right-wingers look stupid. But to anyone with a brain or a smidgen of knowledge she's a complete adult. Imagine arguing that GDP per capita isn't relevant or is it indicative of quality of life. Or imagine suggesting that if we lower the prices of real estate that it wouldn't matter because the developers will just pocket the money as if there's no such thing as competition or a market. Like that is seriously "I believe in Santa Claus" level stupid. Oh well. There will always be those in society who think that McDonald's is healthy and fine dining. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.