Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Dad Arrested After Man Accused of Raping His Teen Daughter Was Killed

This is a nuanced case and not as clear cut as the title. However, the daughter was groomed, lured and raped. The dad found them and a car chased ensued. The dad killed the rapist claiming self defense.

I have to say, if I was the judge, I'd have a hard time letting this go to trial.

  • Like 2

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
3 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Dad Arrested After Man Accused of Raping His Teen Daughter Was Killed

This is a nuanced case and not as clear cut as the title. However, the daughter was groomed, lured and raped. The dad found them and a car chased ensued. The dad killed the rapist claiming self defense.

I have to say, if I was the judge, I'd have a hard time letting this go to trial.

Maybe see the evidence first?

  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Maybe see the evidence first?

Rapist is dead.

Evidence complete.

Just now, robosmith said:

Why wait for evidence when you can get good exercise jumping to conclusions?

You think irony is something that is very much like iron, don't you?

 

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
4 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Rapist is dead.

Evidence complete.

You think irony is something that is very much like iron, don't you?

 

I don't know about your country but in mine, 1st degree murder requires proof that it was pre meditated and planned. That's why I find this charge interesting. Maybe there is more to it than you think.

  • Like 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, Aristides said:

I don't know about your country but in mine, 1st degree murder requires proof that it was pre meditated and planned. That's why I find this charge interesting. Maybe there is more to it than you think.

In this country, a dead rapist is a good thing.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
21 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

In this country, a dead rapist is a good thing.

Ya well, maybe you should find out what actually happened. Maybe ask why the charge is first degree and not second or manslaughter for starters. Or why there are any charges at all.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Aristides said:

I don't know about your country but in mine, 1st degree murder requires proof that it was pre meditated and planned. That's why I find this charge interesting. Maybe there is more to it than you think.

It doesn't seem to be a charge yet.  He was arrested and released on bail but they didn't actually charge him, just questioned him so far. 

Way too early to say much I think. If the facts are exactly as they are presented in the paper only, and I guarantee that that is not true, it sounds like legitimate self-defense. But there's a lot of room there for other facts to still come to light.

Anyway. Crappy situation no matter how it turns out. At least the daughter is alive

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
3 minutes ago, Moonlight Graham said:

Sounds like the dad should be off.  Community service time served already LOL

The article only tells the family's side. I hope it checks out and the charges disappear.

Posted
8 hours ago, Aristides said:

The article only tells the family's side. I hope it checks out and the charges disappear.

Why are you on the rapists side?

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
10 hours ago, Aristides said:

 Or why there are any charges at all.

That's my question. 

If it's a good thing, why are the police involved?

10 hours ago, DUI_Offender said:

Why is this topic in the Federal US politics section?

Because the implicit directive here is that vigilante justice is the only Justice. 

We don't need police. 

Ask Elon to defund, dismiss, deny. 

If some CEO denies Healthcare, it's open season Ergo facto.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Aristides said:

I’m on the side of the truth, whatever it turns out to be.

Some how, the left is always on the side of the child rapist.

  • Sad 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
Quote

https://katv.com/news/local/father-charged-with-second-degree-murder-after-finding-14-year-old-daughter-with-man

FOX News reported that Spencer's family had a no-contact order in place for Fosler because he had stalked and raped the 14-year-old over the summer.

“Took report of an inappropriate relationship, sexual misconduct. We realized it was Cabot jurisdiction. We forwarded it to Cabot detectives, and Cabot worked that case," Sheriff Staley told Channel 7 News. "He was subsequently arrested back in July and placed in the Lonoke County Detention Center. The initial charges were rape and internet stalking. I believe other charges were added such as child pornography."

So the guy already raped the girl once, months before. He was charged for that and for child porn.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
11 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Dad Arrested After Man Accused of Raping His Teen Daughter Was Killed

This is a nuanced case and not as clear cut as the title. However, the daughter was groomed, lured and raped. The dad found them and a car chased ensued. The dad killed the rapist claiming self defense.

I have to say, if I was the judge, I'd have a hard time letting this go to trial.

The guy has a chance it happened in Arkansas and it doesn't seem he killed a black guy.

If he had been black and in New York the article would be very different, they would be talking about how WONDERFUL he was and he just the loved the child and this evil racist white man killed him and he was unarmed. BLM would be calling for riots and there would be protests. Alvin Bragg would look to throw the book at him.

Posted
12 hours ago, robosmith said:

Why wait for evidence when you can get good exercise jumping to conclusions?

There are a lot of people that refused to give a certain Donald Trump the presumption of innocence when Democrat prosecutors starting piling charges on him.

  • Like 2

"Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell

Posted (edited)

Nothing will make a dad see red, more than finding out who raped his little girl.

Edited by Nationalist

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
45 minutes ago, ironstone said:

There are a lot of people that refused to give a certain Donald Trump the presumption of innocence when Democrat prosecutors starting piling charges on him.

That's why we have courts and trials.

Posted
2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Some how, the left is always on the side of the child rapist.

 

As usual, you have to politicize everything.

From what this article says, the guy seems like a real PoS and will not be missed. I am certainly not defending him.

However I will play devil's advocate in pointing out.

!: When someone is shot and killed, we just can't ignore it based on what we feel.

2: Charges do not equal convictions

3: Messy as it can be, we have due process and rule of law to determine what actually happened and act accordingly.

4: We don't convict and execute people on the basis of what we read in the paper or see on a cable news clip.

I've always considered myself to be someone to the right of centre but if the right no longer believes in this, it is the right that has changed, not me.

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Aristides said:

 

As usual, you have to politicize everything.

From what this article says, the guy seems like a real PoS and will not be missed. I am certainly not defending him.

However I will play devil's advocate in pointing out.

!: When someone is shot and killed, we just can't ignore it based on what we feel.

2: Charges do not equal convictions

3: Messy as it can be, we have due process and rule of law to determine what actually happened and act accordingly.

4: We don't convict and execute people on the basis of what we read in the paper or see on a cable news clip.

I've always considered myself to be someone to the right of centre but if the right no longer believes in this, it is the right that has changed, not me.

Of course you support rapists, typical.

 

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Of course you support rapists, typical.

 

I support rule of law and due process and you are full of shit.

I hope this guy's story checks out and any charges are dropped.

Edited by Aristides
Posted
7 minutes ago, Aristides said:

I support rule of law and due process and you are full of shit.

I hope this guy's story checks out and any charges are dropped.

How does it feel?

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,900
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Ana Silva
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dave L earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Ana Silva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • CDN1 went up a rank
      Enthusiast
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...